Methods to Improve Ventilation in Patient-Ventilator Management


Methods to Improve Ventilation in Patient-Ventilator Management


Learning Objectives


On completion of this chapter, the reader will be able to do the following:



Recommend ventilator adjustments to reduce work of breathing and improve ventilation based on patient diagnosis, arterial blood gas results, and ventilator parameters.


Calculate the appropriate suction catheter size, length, and amount of suction pressure needed for a specific size endotracheal tube and patient.


Compare the benefits of closed-suction catheters to the open-suction technique.


Discuss the pros and cons of instilling normal saline to loosen secretions before suctioning.


List the clinical findings that are used to establish the presence of a respiratory infection.


Describe the procedure for prone positioning in ventilated patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome.


List potential problems associated with placing the patient in a prone position during mechanical ventilation.


Discuss several theories that describe how prone positioning improves ventilation-perfusion in adult respiratory distress syndrome.


Compare the protocols for using metered dose inhalers and small volume nebulizers during mechanical ventilation.


10 Describe complications associated with using small volume nebulizers powered by external flowmeters during mechanical ventilation.


11 Describe patient-centered mechanical ventilation and how it might be assessed by the respiratory therapist.


12 Discuss complications associated with the in-house transport of a mechanically ventilated patient.


Key Terms


• Asynchrony


• Hyperosmolar


• Hyperthyroidism


• Iatrogenic


• Ischemia


• Ketoacidosis


• Permissive hypercapnia


• Transpyloric


Clinicians generally use the first 30 to 60 minutes following initiation of mechanical ventilation to gather information that can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of ventilatory support. As discussed in Chapter 8, these data typically involve vital signs, breath sounds, and assessment of respiratory mechanics (i.e., lung compliance [CL] and airway resistance [Raw]. Ventilator graphics can also be a valuable resource when evaluating the patient-ventilator interaction (see Chapter 9).


This chapter provides an overview of ventilatory strategies that can be used to manage patients with various acid-base disturbances. It also includes a discussion of airway clearance techniques, aerosol administration, flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy during ventilation, patient positioning, and techniques used to assess fluid balance. The importance of ensuring patient comfort and safety, as well as in-house transport of the ventilated patient, are also discussed.


Correcting Ventilation Abnormalities


Once an initial physical assessment is performed, an arterial blood gas (ABG) sample should be obtained to evaluate the patient’s respiratory and acid-base status. Evaluation of ABG results can be divided into three parts: acid-base status, ventilation, and oxygenation status—pH (alkalinity and acidity), and bicarbonate; PaCO2 (partial pressure of carbon dioxide); and oxygenation status—PaO2 (partial pressure of oxygen), SaO2 (arterial oxygen saturation), CaO2 (arterial content of oxygen), and oxygen delivery (DO2). The following discussion focuses on those factors that can alter PaCO2 during mechanical ventilation, including total ventilation, physiological dead space, and CO2 production (Fig. 12-1). Methods to improve oxygenation are reviewed in Chapter 13.



Common Methods of Changing Ventilation Based on PaCO2 and pH


A change in minute ventilation (image) is often required after a patient is placed on mechanical ventilation. It is not uncommon to use full ventilatory support initially and then make adjustments after an initial assessment is performed. The examples provided here represent full support of an apneic patient.


During mechanical ventilation, adjusting the set tidal volume (VT) or rate (f) can be used to correct respiratory alkalosis or acidosis. These changes are based on the following equation*:


Known PaCO2×KnownV˙E=Desired PaCO2×DesiredV˙E


image

With this equation, it is assumed that physiological dead space and CO2 production (resulting from metabolism) do not change significantly during a short period. The equation can therefore be modified to read:


Known PaCO2×Known alveolar ventilation per minute (V˙A)=Desired PaCO2×Desired V˙A


image

If it is appropriate to keep rate (f) constant and change VT, then the equation becomes:


DesiredVT=KnownPaCO2×KnownVTDesiredPaCO2


image

If it is appropriate to keep VT constant and change f, then the equation is written:


Desiredf=KnownPaCO2×KnownfDesiredPaCO2


image

Respiratory Acidosis: Volume and Pressure Ventilation Changes


When PaCO2 is elevated (>45 mm Hg) and pH is decreased (<7.35), respiratory acidosis is present and image is inadequate. Acute respiratory acidosis is associated with the following:



See Chapter 4 for additional information.


In patients receiving mechanical ventilation, respiratory acidosis generally can be corrected by altering the set VT or f. Regardless of whether the patient is receiving volume-controlled or pressure-controlled ventilation, increasing image will decrease the PaCO2.


Recommended guidelines are to target the VT of 5 to 8 mL/kg ideal body weight (IBW) while assuring that the plateau pressure (Pplateau) is maintained less than 30 cm H2O. As discussed in Chapter 6, tidal volume and breathing frequency adjustments should be based on the patient’s pulmonary pathology. It is important to understand that the 5 to 8 mL/kg range is an average. If the VT is at the upper limit of this range and/or Pplateau is greater than 30 cm H2O, then f should be increased.


With PC-CMV, the set pressure is generally increased to obtain the targeted VT. PC-CMV is time-cycled. If inspiratory time (TI) is short, increasing it may also increase volume delivery, without requiring an increase in pressure (P) (Fig. 12-2).



image Clinical Scenario


Adjusting PC-CMV in a Patient with Respiratory Acidosis


A 75-kg (165-lb) patient is placed on PC-CMV with a rate of 10 breaths/min, a set pressure of 25 cm H2O, and a measured VT of 425 mL. The flow-time curve for this patient is shown in Curve A below. TI is 0.7 seconds. The ABGs are as follows: pH = 7.30; PaCO2 = 50 mm Hg; image = 23 mEq/L.


image

To improve ventilation, two things can be adjusted. The TI can be increased so that the set pressure reaches the alveolar level. This would be apparent when the flow curve shows a time of zero flow during inspiration (Curve B). This strategy may be tried first. If this does not improve volume delivery sufficiently, the set pressure can be increased.


image


image Clinical Scenario


Respiratory Acidosis: Increasing Tidal Volume


A 50-year-old man with respiratory acidosis is receiving mechanical ventilatory support. He is 6 ft 2 in. tall and weighs 190 lb (81 kg, IBW) (anatomic dead space [VDanat] = 190 mL). Exhaled VT measured at the endotracheal tube (ET) is 400 mL. His respiratory rate is 16 breaths/min. The patient is receiving VC-CMV. ABGs show a PaCO2 of 55 mm Hg and a pH of 7.33. The patient has no pulmonary disease. His desired PaCO2 is 40 mm Hg. What ventilator change must be made to decrease the PaCO2?


Because the VT setting is less than 8 mL/kg and the patient has no pulmonary disease, it is appropriate to hold rate constant and change VT:


DesiredVT=KnownPaCO2×KnownVTDesiredPaCO2


image

Desired VT=55×40040=550mL


image

The new VT is set at 550 mL (about 7 mL/kg IBW) to achieve a desired PaCO2 of 40 mm Hg. The alveolar ventilation has been increased appropriately to correct the respiratory acidos is.



image Clinical Scenario


Respiratory Acidosis: Increasing Rate


A 48-year-old woman who is 5 ft 2 in. tall is receiving VC-CMV with no spontaneous breaths. She has a PaCO2 of 58 mm Hg; pH is 7.28; VT at the ET is 425 mL. IBW is 115 lb (52 kg); VDanat is 115 mL. Respiratory rate is 15 breaths/min. How can the ventilator settings be adjusted to achieve a desired Pa2 of 40 mm Hg?


In this case, the patient’s VT is set at about 8 mL/kg, so it is appropriate to change f and not increase VT.


Desiredf=Knownf×KnownPaCO2DesiredPaCO2


image

Increasing the breathing frequency to 23 breaths/min should decrease the PaCO2 to 40 mm Hg. It is important to recognize, however, that setting high respiratory rates is associated with air trapping because of a reduced expiratory time.



image Clinical Scenario


Changes During Pressure Ventilation


During PC-CMV, the same types of adjustments for VT and rate are made based on ABGs, except that the set pressure is increased or decreased to achieve a desired VT. Exhaled volume is monitored until the desired VT is obtained. Note that it is important to make sure that TI is long enough to gain the most benefit from the set pressure (see Case Study 12-1).



A 75-kg (IBW) patient with respiratory acidosis is receiving PC-CMV (PaCO2 = 59 mm Hg; pH = 7.31; desired PACO2 = 40 mm Hg). At a set pressure of 10 cm H2O, the exhaled VT is 400 mL (5.3 mL/kg) and the rate is 16 breaths/min. The patient is not spontaneously breathing. TI is set so that the flow returns to zero before the end of inspiration and a Pplateau period can be measured. What ventilator adjustment must be made to decrease his PaCO2? The VT setting is less than 8 mL/kg, so it is appropriate to hold f constant and change VT.


DesiredVT=59×40040=590mlorabout600mL


image

A set pressure (P) of 10 cm H2O results in a VT of 400 mL (0.4 L); what is an estimated pressure that will achieve a VT of 600 mL (0.6 L)? Assume that compliance does not change. Remember static compliance (CS) = VT/(Pplateau − PEEP, CS = 400/10, and CS = 40 mL/cm H2O


DesiredP=DesiredVTCS


image

DesiredP=600mL(40mL/cmH2O)andP=15cm H2O


image

Desired pressure is 15cm H2O.


image

Increasing pressure during PC-CMV will normally increase VT. Conversely, decreasing pressure decreases VT for patients with respiratory alkalosis during PC-CMV.



Respiratory Alkalosis: VC-CMV and PC-CMV Changes


When PaCO2 is decreased (<35 mm Hg) and pH increases (>7.45), then respiratory alkalosis is present and alveolar ventilation is excessive. Common causes of respiratory alkalosis include the following2:



In mechanically ventilated patients, hyperventilation is often the cause of respiratory alkalosis. To correct respiratory alkalosis in this situation, the clinician should decrease minute ventilation during volume-controlled ventilation by decreasing f and, if necessary, by decreasing VT. If pressure-controlled ventilation is used, the clinician should decrease f first and then decrease set pressure, if necessary.



image Clinical Scanario


Respiratory Alkalosis: Decreasing the Rate


A 35-year-old man with respiratory alkalosis (PaCO2 = 20 mm Hg; pH = 7.60) is on CMV with no spontaneous breaths and a delivered VT of 550 mL, a rate of 18 breaths/min, and VDanat at 150 mL. His desired PaCO2 is 40 mm Hg. IBW is 70 kg. VT setting is approximately 8 mL/kg. It is appropriate to decrease f and leave VT constant:


Desiredf=18×2040=9breaths/min


image

A new rate of 9 breaths/min should achieve the desired PACO2 of 40 mm Hg. (NOTE: This case did not state whether this was volume-controlled or pressure-controlled ventilation. It does not matter in this situation, however, because the targeted change was the rate.)




image Clinical Scenario


Respiratory Alkalosis: Decreasing the Volume in Pressure-Controlled Ventilation


A 50-year-old woman on PC-CMV originally had a set pressure of 20 cm H2O, which resulted in a VT of 450 mL (CS = 28 mL/cm H2O). The set rate was 12 breaths/min with no spontaneous efforts. TI is long enough to provide a slight pause (zero flow) at end inspiration. ABGs on this setting showed a pH = 7.41 and a PaCO2 of 44 mm Hg. The patient’s IBW is 60 kg.


After 2 days of ventilation on these settings, the pH = 7.51 and the PaCO2 = 29 mm Hg. The pressure is still at 20 cm H2O and VT is 625 mL (10.4 mL/kg IBW). CS is now 32 mL/cm H2O. This is a substantial improvement. The VT is high, based on IBW. What would be an appropriate target volume for this patient?


Desired VT=453or about 450mL


image

How do you set a pressure to get this VT?


Remember CS=VT/ΔP,soP=VT/CS


image

and


P=450mL/(32mL/cm H2O)=14cm H2O


image

A decrease in pressure to 14 cm H2O should achieve the new targeted VT of 450 mL, which is 7.5 mL/kg IBW for this patient.



image Clinical Scenario


Respiratory Alkalosis During Spontaneous Efforts


A 25-year-old man on VC-CMV has a set rate of 14 breaths/min and a VT of 560 mL. The patient’s IBW is 80 kg (176 lb). The patient is triggering the ventilator an additional 4 breaths/min. Total rate is 18 breaths/min; PaCO2 is 30 mm Hg; pH is 7.50. What can the respiratory therapist do to improve ventilation? The VT is 7 mL/kg IBW, which is appropriate for this patient. Suppose the therapist reduces the set f on the ventilator to 10 breaths/min. What impact would this have on ventilation? As long as the patient continues to trigger additional breaths, reducing the set f will have no effect.


Decreasing VT (or, more specifically, pressure during PC-CMV) may be effective in reducing minute ventilation unless the patient increases his spontaneous rate, thus maintaining high alveolar ventilation. In addition, lowering the VT to less than 7 mL/kg may result in atelectasis from low VT ventilation.


In this situation, several alternatives are available: (1) reduce the tidal volume but ensure that an adequate level of PEEP is being administered to reduce the potential for atelectasis; (2) institute another mode, such as synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) or pressure-supported ventilation (PSV), to allow the patient to breathe without receiving a mandatory breath with every inspiration; or (3) sedate the patient to control breathing better. Sedation may be needed for patients demonstrating extreme agitation, increased work of breathing (WOB), or patient-ventilator asynchrony. It is important to recognize that sedation may not always be the best choice. Whenever possible, the cause of hyperventilation should be investigated and treated. Common causes of hyperventilation include hypoxemia, pain, anxiety, fever, agitation, and asynchrony.


Head injury that results in a high image and hyperventilation is sometimes difficult to control, regardless of the mode selected. Some patients with brain injury have a tendency to breathe with a high VT and f, which is due to a CNS lesion and cannot be corrected.3


Metabolic Acidosis and Alkalosis


Treatment of metabolic acidosis and alkalosis should focus on identifying those metabolic factors that can cause these acid-base disturbances. Although it may not be apparent, a respiratory component may also be involved, and this possibility should also be addressed.


Metabolic Acidosis


Patients in apparent respiratory distress may present with metabolic acidosis. Blood gases indicate pH = 7.00 to 7.34 and a bicarbonate in the range of about 12 to 22 mEq/L. These patients are often struggling to lower their PaCO2 to achieve some degree of hyperventilation to compensate for the metabolic acidosis. As a consequence, these patients are at risk for developing respiratory muscle fatigue. Thus, in this situation, mechanical ventilation is indicated to meet the minimum goal of compensated hypocapnia.4 Whether or not this can be accomplished with noninvasive ventilation depends on whether the patient meets the criteria for this mode of ventilation (see Chapter 19). If invasive ventilation is required, the risks must be balanced against the temporary benefits.


Causes of metabolic acidosis include the following processes:



Treatment for metabolic acidosis includes initiating effective therapy to deal with the cause of the acidosis and then assessing the need to reverse the acidemia with the administration of an alkalizing agent. Treating the cause and making sure vascular volume and cardiac output are normal, as well as ensuring adequate oxygenation, are essential. These actions allow time for the normal metabolism of organic acids (lactic acid and ketoacids) and allow time for the kidneys to generate bicarbonate to replace losses.4


Controversy abounds regarding the benefit of using alkalinizing agents, such as bicarbonate administration in the treatment of metabolic acidosis. Lowering arterial CO2 is also controversial, but if the patient is losing the struggle to maintain high image with spontaneous breathing, assisted ventilation may be necessary to avoid respiratory failure. In this situation, it is appropriate to keep the pH within normal limits (7.35-7.45) (Case Study 12-1).


Metabolic Alkalosis


Metabolic alkalosis is present when pH (7.45-7.70) and bicarbonate (26-48 mEq/L) are elevated above normal. Common causes include the following:



As with metabolic acidosis, treatment involves identifying the underlying cause and reversing those factors leading to the alkalosis. In severe cases, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, acid infusion, and low bicarbonate dialysis may be required.5


Uncomplicated metabolic alkalosis is not usually associated with alveolar hypoventilation as a compensatory mechanism because of the resulting hypoxemia that occurs with severe hypoventilation. For example, PaCO2 will usually not rise higher than 55 mm Hg. Remember that the PaO2 will fall as the CO2 rises. Thus, hypoventilation is accompanied by hypoxemia in a patient who is breathing room air. The hypoxemia will cause stimulation of the peripheral chemoreceptors, resulting in increased minute ventilation. Only in rare circumstances does full compensation of metabolic alkalosis occur.5


Mixed Acid-Base Disturbances


Some patients with acute respiratory failure have mixed respiratory and metabolic disturbances, such as respiratory acidosis combined with metabolic alkalosis. The pH may actually be near normal. The following case can be used to illustrate this point.



image Clinical Scenario


Mixed Respiratory and Metabolic Disturbances


A 65-year-old patient on mechanical ventilation has a nasogastric tube in place with suction. He is also receiving diuretics for congestive heart failure (CHF). The pH is 7.36, PaCO2 is 58 mm Hg, image 31 mEq/L, and PaO2 is 111 mm Hg (FIO2 = 0.30). VT is 400 mL, and the rate is 12 breaths/min. Is it appropriate to increase image so that the PaCO2 can be returned to 40 mm Hg? In this case, it is not appropriate to increase image to decrease the PaCO2. This can rapidly result in alkalosis with accompanying cardiac dysrhythmias, seizures, and other neurologic disturbances. The cause of both problems should be determined and corrected.




image Clinical Scenario


Combined Respiratory Alkalosis and Metabolic Acidosis


A 55-year-old man is transported by helicopter to a large metropolitan hospital. His initial diagnosis is acute myocardial infarction. The paramedics intubate the patient, start an intravenous (IV) drip with normal saline and begin manual ventilation with 100% O2. After admission to the hospital, the patient has a vascular stent placed in one of the coronary vessels to improve its patency. The patient is stabilized, and mechanical ventilation is initiated with the following settings: SIMV 16 breaths/min, VT = 750 mL (≈10 mL/kg, IBW). No spontaneous breaths are present. No changes are made in the ventilator settings, and the VT is maintained at ≈10 mL/kg IBW.


Two days later the respiratory therapist obtains a 6:00 AM ABG for this patient. The ventilator settings are still the same. ABG results are as follows:


PaCO2=25mm Hg;pH=7.42;HCO3=17mEq/L


image

The patient does not have a history of pulmonary or metabolic disease. His normal PaCO2 is about 40 mm Hg. Both the VT and rate are high for this patient. Because the Pplateau is only 20 mm Hg, the therapist decides to reduce the rate initially to begin targeting the patient’s normal PaCO2.


Desiredf=(Actual rate×Actual PaCO2)/Desired PaCO2


image

Desiredf=(16×25)40


image

Desiredf=10breaths/min


image

Attempts to reduce ventilator rate to 10 breaths/min result in an increased spontaneous rate of more than 25 breaths/min. The patient is conscious, appears very anxious, and is laboring to breathe. Why is it difficult to reduce the mandatory rate in this situation?


The patient has a compensated respiratory alkalosis. The initial image was set too high for this patient (set image = 12 L/min; predicted image = 10 L/min). After 2 days on these same settings, the kidneys have compensated for an iatrogenic hyperventilation by excreting excess bicarbonate. To allow the reverse process to take place, the mandatory rate will have to be reduced slowly (1-2 breaths about every 2 to 4 hours) so the normal ventilation can be restored and the kidneys given time to increase the bicarbonate back to a normal level.



image Clinical Scenario


Combined Respiratory Acidosis and Metabolic Alkalosis


A 35-year-old woman is receiving mechanical ventilation. ABG analysis shows a PaCO2 of 60 mm Hg and a pH of 7.41, image = 35 mEq/L. (NOTE: The patient’s normal PaCO2 is 40 mm Hg.) The fact that the high PaCO2 is not reflected in the pH indicates that the patient appears to have a metabolic alkalosis as well as a respiratory acidosis. Before the PaCO2 can be corrected with ventilator adjustment, the metabolic alkalosis must be corrected. If the PaCO2 were decreased to 40 mm Hg, the pH would increase and the patient would develop a severe alkalosis.


Increased Physiological Dead Space


If pure respiratory acidosis persists even after alveolar ventilation has been increased, the patient may have a problem that is the result of increased alveolar dead space. Increased alveolar dead space can be caused by a pulmonary embolism or low cardiac output resulting in low pulmonary perfusion.


Increased alveolar dead space can also occur when ventilatory support reduces pulmonary blood flow to the lungs by causing high alveolar pressures, such as in the application of high PEEP. Reduced pulmonary perfusion can also be associated with air trapping that results from a high image or a low inspiratory gas flow (high inspiratory-to-expiratory [I : E] ratio, such as 3 : 1), or from an uneven distribution of ventilation because of a pathological lung problem.


In the case of air trapping (auto-PEEP), increasing the flow or decreasing the I : E ratio (to 1 : 3 or 1 : 4) may correct the problem. (Increasing inspiratory flow can shorten TI and allow more time for exhalation.) Sometimes repositioning the patient so that the disease-compromised lung receives minimal blood flow (independent position) while the nondiseased lung receives greater blood flow can significantly improve gas exchange and help address the problem. (See section on positioning later in this chapter.)


The normal ratio of dead space to tidal volume (VD/VT) is 0.2 to 0.4. In critically ill patients, this value may be greater than 0.7. Calculation of VD/VT ratio uses the Enghoff modification of the Bohr equation: VD/VT = (PaCO2image)/PaCO2, where image is the partial pressure of CO2 in the mixed expired gases collected from the patient.* A blood gas sample is collected and the average tidal volume measured while the image is being measured. Note that although this method of measuring VD/VT ratio can provide useful information on mechanically ventilated patients, it typically requires additional equipment and is not routinely performed.


It is more common in ventilated patients to monitor the end-tidal CO2 (normal PETCO2 = 35 to 43 mm Hg) and the gradient between arterial and end-tidal CO2 to determine whether dead space is changing (normal PaCO2-to-PETCO2 gradient = 1-5 mm Hg). A decrease in end-tidal CO2 and an increase in the PaCO2-to-PETCO2 gradient suggest increased dead space. Some clinicians use the mean value of the PETCO2 instead of measuring mixed expired gas to calculate the VD : VT ratio.6 Advances in capnography using single-breath volumetric CO2 monitoring offers still another alternative for estimating VD/VT. (See Chapter 10 for more details on PETCO2 and volumetric CO2 monitoring.)


Increased Metabolism and Increased Carbon Dioxide Production


Metabolic rate and image are elevated in patients who have fever, burns, multiple trauma, sepsis, hyperthyroidism, muscle tremors or seizures, agitation, and in those patients who have undergone multiple surgical procedures. Regardless of the cause, it is clear that image is increased and WOB will be elevated. Increasing the machine rate will decrease WOB, but auto-PEEP is likely to occur. It would be beneficial, therefore, to add enough pressure support (PS) for the spontaneous breaths to reduce WOB through the ET and circuit. Other options might include switching to PC-CMV and using sedation to reduce the patient’s work.




image Clinical Scenario


Increased Metabolism and Increased CO2 Production


A 25-year-old burn patient on SIMV has a VT of 1.0 L, rate of 10 breaths/min, PaCO2 of 40 mm Hg, and pH of 7.39. The patient has a spontaneous rate of 15 breaths/min and a spontaneous VT of 800 mL. His PaO2 is 88 mm Hg on 0.5 FIO2. This patient has a very high total image (machine image = 10 L/min + patient image = 12 L/min; total image = 22 L/min). Given this level of image, one would expect the PaCO2 to be lower. The reason that it is not lower may be either an increased image or an increased VD/VT.


Intentional Iatrogenic Hyperventilation


Historically, iatrogenic hyperventilation has been used in patients with acute head injury and increased intracranial pressure (ICP). Hyperventilation reduces CO2 in the blood, which in turn is associated with constriction of cerebral blood vessels and a decrease in blood flow to the brain. Although this approach was believed by many clinicians to help lower increased ICP, therapeutic guidelines for head injuries with increased ICP do not recommend prophylactic hyperventilation (PaCO2 <25 mm Hg) during the first 24 hours. Hyperventilation during the first few days following severe traumatic brain injury may actually increase cerebral ischemia and cause cerebral hypoxemia (see Chapter 7 section on closed head injury).


Hyperventilation may be needed for brief periods when acute neurologic deterioration is present and ICP is elevated. Mild hyperventilation (PaCO2 30-35 mm Hg) may be used for longer periods in situations in which increased ICP is refractory to standard treatment, including sedation and analgesia, neuromuscular blockade, cerebrospinal fluid drainage, and hyperosmolar therapy.7 However, the practice of iatrogenic hyperventilation remains controversial.8 Consider the following example.



image Clinical Scenario


Iatrogenic Hyperventilation


A 42-year-old woman who is 5 ft 4 in. tall (IBW = 125 lb, or 57 kg) is on controlled ventilation for 12 hours following a severe cerebral concussion. Her PaCO2 is 48 mm Hg, her pH is 7.32, and her VT is 400 mL. Respiratory rate is 12 breaths/min. What are your recommendations? Current VT is 7 mL/kg. Is it appropriate to change f? In this case, it would be appropriate to increase the f and maintain the PaCO2 at normal levels for the first 24 hours.


If we change the rate, the following recommendation would apply:


Desiredf=12×4840=14breaths/min


image

Permissive Hypercapnia


Occasionally, it becomes impossible to maintain normal PaCO2 levels in a patient without risking lung damage from high pressures and volumes. Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or status asthmaticus and sometimes patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who require ventilatory support are at risk for ventilator-induced injury. Inappropriate use of mechanical ventilation can result in severe lung injury, activation of inflammatory mediators, and can even potentially lead to multisystem organ failure.9 (See Chapter 17 for additional information on ventilator-induced lung injury.)


A technique referred to as permissive hypercapnia (PHY) has gained popularity as an alternative form of patient management.10 PHY is a deliberate limitation of ventilatory support to avoid lung overdistention and injury of the lung. During PHY, arterial partial pressures of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) values are allowed to rise above normal (e.g., ≥50-150 mm Hg), and pH values are allowed to fall below normal (e.g., ≥7.10-7.30). Patients who do not have renal failure or cardiovascular problems usually tolerate a pH of 7.20 to 7.25. Younger patients may tolerate even lower pH values. Many clinicians who use PHY allow for a gradual rise in PaCO2 because an abrupt increase in PaCO2 is usually not well tolerated.1112


Alterations in PaCO2 and pH can affect multiple organ systems. Researchers often focus on the effects of severe acidosis because of serious consequences associated with it. Although most investigators agree that a pH of 7.25 or greater is acceptable, no one is certain whether a lower pH is acceptable. Survival without complications has been demonstrated in isolated cases in which the pH dropped as low as 6.6 and the PaCO2 rose as high as 375 mm Hg when oxygenation was well maintained.11,13 Similar findings have been shown in studies of patients with ARDS and acute asthma.1417


During hypoventilation, increases in PaCO2 are accompanied by a decrease in PaO2, so O2 administration must be provided and oxygenation status monitored carefully. Increases in PaCO2 and decreases in pH that occur in acute respiratory acidosis also cause a right shift in the oxyhemoglobin dissociation curve. Although this shift in the curve facilitates unloading of O2 at the tissue level, it also reduces O2 loading at the lungs and can further compromise gas exchange.


Increases in carbon dioxide have an additional physiological effect. A higher-than-normal PaCO2 stimulates the drive to breathe. Therefore, it is appropriate to provide sedation to patients with acute lung injury (ALI) in whom permissive hypercapnia is being used. The sedation may improve patient comfort (Key Point 12-1).



image Key Point 12-1


Extremely high levels of PaCO2 (>200 mm Hg) can result in an anesthesia effect also known as CO2 narcosis.


Procedures for Managing Permissive Hypercapnia


Efforts to maintain eucapnic breathing (i.e., near a patient’s normal level of PaCO2) might include removing sources of mechanical dead space and increasing the frequency of mandatory breaths.18 When the decision is made to allow PaCO2 to rise above normal, the following strategy may be used19:



Note that use of these buffering agents remains debatable and not well studied in PHY. A short-term increase in PaCO2 might occur when bicarbonate is administered. This is exhaled over time if the level of ventilation is constant. The use of THAM is not associated with an increased PaCO2. It produces intracellular as well as extracellular buffering of pH. Whether or not buffers have any effect on the tolerance of permissive hypercapnia is not known.20A protocol for the implementation of permissive hypercapnia is provided in Box 12-1.21



Contraindications of Permissive Hypercapnia


Carbon dioxide is a powerful vasodilator of cerebral vessels. Thus, increasing CO2 levels can result in cerebral edema and increased ICP, which can aggravate cerebral disorders, such as cerebral trauma or hemorrhage, and cerebral-occupying lesions.19,21 For this reason, the use of PHY is contraindicated in the presence of disorders such as head trauma and intracranial disease. Indeed, it is absolutely contraindicated for those patients who demonstrate intracranial lesions.22


Permissive hypercapnia is relatively contraindicated in patients with preexisting cardiovascular instability. Circulatory effects of PHY can include decreased myocardial contractility, arrhythmias, vasodilation, and increased sympathetic activity. A common finding in patients receiving PHY is increased cardiac output, a normal systemic blood pressure (BP), and pulmonary hypertension.20,23 If the patient’s sympathetic response is impaired or blocked, or if cardiac function is impaired, then an increase in cardiac output might not occur, allowing the vasodilatation to result in hypotension.19


The exact response of the cardiovascular system to permissive hypercapnia is difficult to predict; therefore PHY should be used with caution. This is particularly true when working with patients with any of the following cardiovascular conditions: cardiac ischemia, left ventricular compromise, pulmonary hypertension, and right heart failure.22


Finally, it is worth mentioning that elevated CO2 or decreased pH may affect regional blood flow; skeletal and smooth muscle function; nervous system activity; and endocrine, digestive, hepatic, and renal system functions. Although these effects have not caused significant concern in the clinical setting, further research in these areas is warranted to improve our understanding of this ventilatory strategy.



image Clinical Scenario


Permissive Hypercapnia


A 30-year-old man with ARDS has been on ventilatory support for a week. Current settings are VT = 500 mL; f = 12 breaths/min; peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) = 37 cm H2O; and Pplateau = 29 cm H2O. The patient is 5 ft 8 in. tall and has an IBW of 70 kg. ABGs show pH = 7.24 and PaCO2 = 64 mm Hg. What change is appropriate to return his PaCO2 to normal? If we tried to increase his VT, pressures would increase. If we increase f, the desired f would be


Desired f=12×6440=19breaths/min


image

This equation assumes that we want to maintain a normal PaCO2 of 40 mm Hg. One might suspect that the increased rate would also lead to air trapping, an increase in mean airway pressure, and an increased risk of lung injury. However, in patients with ARDS, lung units are more likely to empty quickly (short time constants). We might increase rate slightly and allow PaCO2 to remain high (i.e., PHY). To protect the patient from increasing airway pressures, it might be appropriate to use pressure ventilation.


The use of PHY is restricted to situations in which the target airway pressure is at its maximum and the highest possible rates are being used. Although no adverse short-term effects of PHY have been noted for most patients, it is not known whether any long-term effects occur. The risks of hypercapnia are considered by some to be preferable to the high Pplateau required to achieve normal CO2 levels. This represents a significant shift in thinking in regard to ventilator management and ARDS.24


Airway Clearance During Mechanical Ventilation


During mechanical ventilation, several techniques can be used to help clear secretions from the airway. These procedures differ somewhat from those used with nonintubated, spontaneously breathing patients. Included in this section are discussions of the following topics: suctioning, aerosol delivery, postural drainage and percussions, and fiberoptic bronchoscopy.* High-frequency percussive ventilation can also assist with secretion clearance.


Secretion Clearance from an Artificial Airway


Clearing secretions from the ET or tracheostomy tube of mechanically ventilated patients is an important component of bronchial hygiene therapy. Although it is not uncommon to see a physician’s order read “Suction Q 2 hr,” suctioning at fixed intervals is not appropriate and should be performed only when necessary (i.e., based on patient assessment findings).


Suctioning a patient’s artificial airways involves insertion of a suction catheter into the patient’s trachea and the application of negative pressure as the catheter is gradually withdrawn.25 Suctioning a patient with an artificial airway can involve shallow suctioning, in which the catheter is inserted to a depth that approximates the length of the artificial airways, or deep suctioning, where the catheter inserted until a resistance is met. In the latter case, once the resistance is encountered, the catheter is withdrawn approximately 1 cm before applying negative pressure.25


Two methods of suctioning are typically described based on the type of catheter used: the open suctioning technique and the closed suctioning technique. The open-circuit technique requires disconnecting the patient from the ventilator; the closed-circuit technique can be performed without removing the patient from the ventilator. With the closed-circuit technique, a sterile, inline suction catheter is incorporated into the ventilator circuit, thus allowing passage of the catheter into the ET and trachea without disconnecting the patient from the ventilator (Key Point 12-2).



image Key Point 12-2


Two methods of endotracheal suctioning can be performed based on the type of catheter used: the open-circuit technique and the closed-circuit technique.


Suction catheters are generally made of transparent flexible plastic that is rigid enough to allow it to be easily inserted into the artificial airway but flexible enough to negotiate turns and not cause trauma to the airway. Catheters are smooth tipped with two or more side holes near the distal end (Fig. 12-3). (It is thought that these smooth-tipped catheters with side holes may help reduce trauma to the mucosa.)26



The proximal end of the catheter connects to a collecting canister via large-bore plastic tube. A thumb port located at the proximal end of the suction catheter allows the operator to control the suction pressure. When it is covered, suction pressure is applied to the catheter and into the airway. The suction pressure applied should be the lowest possible pressure that is required to effectively clear secretions.25 Box 12-2 provides a list of suggested suction pressure levels. These recommended suction levels are based on current practice. It is important to note that to date no experimental studies are available to support these values.



The catheter length should be long enough to reach a main-stem bronchus. This requires a catheter length of about 22 in. (56 cm).26 Note that in infants and in patients with recent tracheal reconstructive surgery or pneumonectomy, the suction catheter should not be inserted more than 1 cm below the distal tip of the ET.27


Remember that the left main-stem bronchus is narrower and branches at a more acute angle than the right bronchus. Consequently, suction catheters often enter the right rather than the left bronchus. A special-tipped suction catheter is available with a bend at the distal end to help facilitate left bronchial suctioning, particularly if the patient is supine or lying on the left side or if the head is turned to the left. Left bronchus suctioning is easier when the patient has a tracheostomy tube in place rather than an ET.27


The diameter of the suction catheter selected is governed by the internal diameter of the artificial airway. It is generally accepted that the diameter of the suction catheter should not exceed 50% of the internal diameter of the artificial airway for children and adults and 30% of the internal diameters for infants.25 Suction catheter sizes are based on French units. French units refer to the circumference of the tube. (NOTE: Circumference equals diameter multiplied times 3.1416 [π].) Because ETs are sized in centimeters and suction catheters are sized in French units, a conversion is required to estimate the correct size (Box 12-3).



Box 12-3


Estimating Correct Suction Catheter Size Based on Endotracheal Tube (ETT) Size


Multiply ET size by 3. This converts the ETT size to French units (Fr). Then divide this number by 2 to use half or less of the ET diameter.


For example: With a size 8 ET, 3 × 8 = 24; 24/2 = 12.


A size 12 Fr suction catheter would be appropriate.


Suctioning should be preceded by hyperoxygenation with 100% O2 for 30 seconds, followed by hyperoxygenation with 100% O2 for 1 minute after suctioning is complete, especially in patients who are hypoxemic before or during suctioning.28 This can be done manually with a resuscitation bag, although this approach does not guarantee VT or pressure, and it has been shown to be ineffective in delivering an FIO2 of 1.0.25 Hyperoxygenation is therefore best accomplished using a temporary oxygen-enrichment program that is available on many microprocessor ventilators.


The duration of suctioning should be brief and must not exceed 15 seconds.25 Shallow suctioning is recommended over deep suctioning, particularly because deep suctioning has not been shown to be superior and may be associated with significantly greater chance of trauma to the tracheal mucosa. Suction should be applied intermittently rather than continually, and the catheter should be rotated as it is withdrawn.29


Hazards and Complications of Suctioning

Loss of suction pressure may be caused by a leak in the system or because the collection canister is full. All connections should be checked, including ensuring that the suction jar is properly seated and screwed on tightly. In cases where the collection canister is full, a float valve at the top of the canister will close the suction line to prevent the transmission of suction to the wall connection line.


Suctioning is a very irritating experience for the patient and can cause a great deal of discomfort and anxiety. Stimulation of the airway with the catheter commonly induces coughing and can result in bronchospasm in patients with reactive airways. Suctioning can also cause hemorrhage, airway edema, and ulceration of the mucosal wall if it is performed improperly.30


The severity of the complications associated with suctioning generally is related to the duration of the procedure, the amount of suction applied, the size of the catheter, and whether or not oxygenation and hyperventilation are done appropriately. Reductions in lung volume can occur with suctioning and lead to atelectasis and hypoxemia. Note that to avoid atelectasis, the clinician should limit the duration of suctioning and the amount of negative pressure applied to the patient’s airways. Hyperoxygenation and hyperventilation of the patient before and after suctioning can also reduce many of the complications associated with suctioning. It is also important to recognize that there is a temporary loss of applied PEEP when a patient is disconnected from the ventilator, which in turn can increase the severity of hypoxemia.


Cardiac arrhythmias can also occur during aggressive suctioning. Tachycardia is generally attributed to hypoxemia and from the irritation of the procedure; bradycardia can occur when the catheter stimulates vagal receptors in the upper airways.31 Hypotension may occur as a result of cardiac arrhythmias or severe coughing episodes. Hypertension may occur because of hypoxemia or increased sympathetic tone resulting from stress, pain, anxiety, or a change in hemodynamics from hyperinflation32,33 (see Case Study 12-2).



Secretion removal is critical in patients with small airways, particularly children, because of the smaller luminal ETs. Suction catheters can even result in pneumothorax in infants if the suction catheter perforates a bronchus.27 Cross contamination of the airway can occur if suctioning is not performed using sterile conditions.34


As previously mentioned, patients with closed head injuries usually have increased ICP. The simple process of inserting the suction catheter without suction being applied in patients with severe brain injury can raise the increased mean intracranial pressure (MICP), the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and the cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP).32,35 This is particularly worrisome in this group of patients. If ICP is being monitored, pressures should be observed before and during suctioning. Oxygenating and hyperventilating the patient are important in this situation. It may even be appropriate to pretreat the patient with topical anesthetic approximately 15 minutes before the procedure to help reduce the risk of increasing ICP.36,37


Closed-Suction Catheters (In-line Suction Catheters)


The closed-suction procedure is considered equally effective as the standard open-suction procedure.38,39 The closed-suction procedure uses in-line catheters that are encased in clear plastic sheaths. The plastic sheaths are attached to special assemblies that connect to a patient’s ventilator circuit, near the Y-connector (Fig. 12-4).40 Notice that inline catheters may add weight and increase the tension on the ET.



The advantage of using the closed-suction technique is that disconnecting the patient from the ventilator can be avoided. This is especially important in patients receiving high FIO2s and PEEP because disconnection increases the likelihood of hypoxia and alveolar collapse. Another advantage of this technique is that it reduces the risk for contaminating the airway and lungs when patients are disconnected from the ventilator. For example, using a manual resuscitation bag may introduce contamination into the patient’s lower airways when a single-use disposable suction catheter, which is accidentally contaminated by the handler, is used to suction a patient. Additionally, aerosolized particles from the ventilator circuit can be released into the air during disconnection of the ventilator circuit, thus presenting a potential risk of contamination to the caregiver. Using inline suction avoids these problems and has been shown to reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).41 Specific indications for closed-suction catheters are listed in Box 12-4.42


Aug 7, 2016 | Posted by in RESPIRATORY | Comments Off on Methods to Improve Ventilation in Patient-Ventilator Management

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access