Meta-Analysis of Anticoagulation Use, Stroke, Thromboembolism, Bleeding, and Mortality in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation on Dialysis




Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients on dialysis. Although randomized trials of anticoagulation for AF have demonstrated striking reductions in stroke, these trials did not recruit patients on dialysis. We thus undertook this systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies including patients with AF on dialysis that reported associations of anticoagulation use. Twenty studies involving 529,741 subjects and 31,321 patients with AF on dialysis were identified. Anticoagulation was associated with a 45% (95% CI 13% to 88%) increased risk of any stroke, reflecting a nonsignificant 13% (95% CI −4% to 34%) increased ischemic stroke risk and 38% (95% CI 3% to 85%) increased hemorrhagic stroke risk. There was also a 44% (95% CI 38% to 56%) lower risk of any thromboembolism, and a 31% (95% CI 12% to 53%) increased risk of any bleeding but no clear association with cardiovascular death (relative risk 0.99, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.15) or all-cause mortality (relative risk 0.97, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.04). Incident event rates were similar or worse in patients on anticoagulation. In conclusion, these observational analyses provide little supporting evidence of benefit, and instead suggest harm, from anticoagulation in patients on dialysis with AF. These results raise the possibility that the effects of anticoagulation in patients with AF on dialysis may not be similar to the clear benefit of anticoagulation seen in patients with AF without end-stage renal disease. Randomized trials are required to definitively evaluate the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation for AF in the dialysis setting.


Atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasingly common in patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis, which is concerning as AF confers significant additional morbidity and mortality. Randomized trials in general populations with AF have demonstrated that anticoagulation decreases ischemic stroke to a larger extent than any increase in hemorrhagic stroke, resulting in a two-thirds reduction in any stroke. Given these large effects of treatment, the significant benefit of anticoagulation can also be demonstrated in observational data from general populations with AF, despite the potential for moderate biases in such nonrandomized data. However, the aforementioned randomized trials largely excluded patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis, and some observational studies have suggested excess bleeding and even ischemic hazards from anticoagulation for AF in the dialysis setting. In an attempt to provide further insight in this area, we undertook this meta-analysis to assess whether the available observational evidence supports a benefit from anticoagulation for patients with AF on dialysis, commensurate with that seen from both randomized and observational evidence in general populations with AF.


Methods


Full details of the methods are presented in the Appendix . In brief, we performed a systematic search of observational studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases up to June 2015. Eligible studies included patients with AF on dialysis reporting outcome data according to vitamin K antagonist use (either measures of relative risk [RR] for the association between anticoagulation use and outcomes) or incident event rates according to anticoagulation use. We sought to include patients on either hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis although we permitted studies reporting data on combined renal replacement therapy cohorts that included a minimal proportion of kidney transplants (<10%). Outcomes of interest included any thromboembolism (ischemic stroke or peripheral embolism), any stroke, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, major bleeding, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality. Studies with prospective cohort, retrospective cohort, or nested case-control study designs were eligible for inclusion.


Data from included studies were extracted in duplicate using a standard protocol. Data were extracted on study characteristics (study period, country, cohort source, design, follow-up, and risk of bias), participant characteristics (number, age, and gender), treatment use (dialysis type, anticoagulation use, and antiplatelet use), and covariates adjusted for in multivariate models.


Risk estimates and CIs on the associations between anticoagulation and study outcomes were extracted from each study where available and log-transformed. We preferentially extracted maximally adjusted RRs from each study. Event numbers, person-time and incident rates per 100 person-years were also abstracted or calculated where available. Exact methods based on the Poisson distribution were used to calculate CIs for rates if necessary. Summary estimates for associations and event rates were subsequently calculated using meta-analytic techniques. The main meta-analytic approach used in our analyses was to take the simple inverse-variance–weighted average of the like-with-like comparisons within each study; sensitivity analyses were also undertaken using a random-effects approach. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 statistics. Factors potentially contributing to heterogeneity were explored through sensitivity analyses, subgroup analyses, and meta-regression techniques; these included study characteristics (study period, country, cohort source, design, follow-up, and quality/risk of bias), participant characteristics (number, age, and gender), treatment use (dialysis type, anticoagulation use, and antiplatelet use), and covariate adjustment. We screened for small-study effects that might be attributable to publication bias using funnel plots of effect size plotted against standard error, Egger’s test, Begg’s test; where present, the effect of these was characterized using trim and fill procedures. Only, overall RRs have 95% CI; all other RRs have 99% CIs. A 2-tailed value of p <0.05 was considered statistically significant, and all analyses were performed using Stata, version 13.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas) and R version 3.2.1 (R Project for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).




Results


The systematic search of electronic databases identified 1,884 studies, and an additional 6 studies were identified by manual searching of reference lists ( Figure 1 ). From these, we identified 144 potentially relevant studies for full-text review. A total of 20 studies were subsequently included, involving 529,741 subjects and 31,321 patients with AF on dialysis ( Table 1 and Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 ). Of the these studies, 17 reported or provided data on associations of anticoagulation treatment with study outcomes, and 13 reported or provided data on absolute incident event rates according to anticoagulation treatment status. Three were prospective cohort studies, and 17 were retrospective cohort studies. The vast majority of patients were on hemodialysis; 4 studies included a minority of patients on peritoneal dialysis, and 2 studies included a minimal proportion of kidney transplants.




Figure 1


Study selection. Results of electronic database search leading to study selection.


Table 1

Characteristics of included studies
































































































































































































































































Reference Study period Country Cohort source No. of patients Dialysis type, % Follow up, y Mean age, y Men, % VKA use, % AP use, %
Abbott (2003) 1996-2000 United States USRDS DMMS Wave II 123 100 HD 2.92 58.9 53.4 5.9 18.6
Bonde (2014) 1997-2011 Denmark Nationwide analysis 1,728 72.0 HD, 25.2 PD 1.65 66.8 35.0 22.8 32.7
Chan (2009) 2003-2004 United States FMCA ESRD database 1,671 100 HD 1.60 72.3 57.0 44.7 48.7
Chao (2014) 1996-2011 Taiwan NHIRD database 10,999 100 HD 1.08 71.0 46.2 0 0
Chen C (2014) 2001-2007 Taiwan NHIRD database 3,695 100 HD 3.81 NA NA 15.4 NA
Chen J (2014) 1997-2008 Taiwan NHIRD database 4,899 100 HD 4.12 NA 46.5 6.0 33.1
Das (2011) 2005-2009 United Kingdom Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading 48 100 HD 4.00 70.9 NA 41.7 54.2
Garg (2015) 2009-2012 United States Beaumont Health System, Michigan 302 100 HD 3.00 NA NA 39.4 NA
Genovesi (2015) 2010-2012 Italy Multiple dialysis centers 290 100 HD 2.00 NA 60.0 46.2 47.9
Khalid (2013) 2005-2010 United States Henry Ford Health Systems 96 100 HD 1.00 77.2 68.8 35.4 25.0
Knoll (2012) 2000-2007 Austria INVOR Study 52 86.5 HD, 13.5 PD 2.84 69.1 67.3 57.7 53.8
Lai (2009) NA United States Winchester Medical Centre, New York 93 100 HD 2.30 74.7 67.9 54.8 41.4
Olesen (2012) 1997-2008 Denmark Nationwide analysis 901 78.0 HD, 15.4 PD 12.00 66.8 66.4 24.8 22.00
Phelan (2011) 2000-2008 Ireland Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 70 100 HD 2.02 69.9 52.9 100 NA
Shah (2014) 1998-2007 Canada Multiple hospitals, Quebec &Ontario 1,626 NA 9.00 75.2 61.0 46.5 28.1
Vazquez (2000) NA Spain Hospital General de Especialidades, Ciudad de Jaen 26 100 HD 1.00 59.9 54.7 7.7 NA
Wakasugi (2014) 2008-2011 Japan Multiple centers in Japan 60 100 HD 1.83 68.1 65.0 46.7 53.3
Wang (2014) 2000-2008 New Zealand Middelmore Hospital, Auckland 141 NA 3.40 NA NA 41.8 NA
Winkelmayer (2011) 1994-2006 United States Medicare beneficiaries database 2,313 95.6 HD, 4.4 PD 1.93 69.9 42.5 10.8 NA
Wizemann (2010) 1996-2004 International DOPPS Study 2,188 100 HD 8.00 NA NA 16.0 31.0

AP = antiplatelet; DOPPS = Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study; FMCA ESRD = Fresenius Medical Care North America End-stage Renal Disease database; HD = hemodialysis; INVOR = Study of Incident Dialysis Patients in Vorarlberg; NA = not available; NHIRD = national health insurance research database; PD = peritoneal dialysis; USRDS DMMS = United States Renal Data System Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Study; VKA = vitamin K antagonist; y = years.


Thirteen studies providing data on incident event rates according to anticoagulation treatment included 24,335 dialysis patients with AF followed up for 72,777 person-years ( Table 2 ). Substantial event rates were noted for most outcomes; for example, we observed total stroke rates of 7.65 per 100 person-years, major bleeding rates of 11.35 per 100 person-years, and all-cause mortality rates of 17.27 per 100 person-years in those on anticoagulation. Of note, incident event rates were generally similar or greater in patients treated with anticoagulation. Few studies provided event data for the outcomes of any thromboembolism or cardiovascular death.



Table 2

Pooled estimates of incident event rates










































































































































Outcome No. of
studies
No. of
person-years
Incidence rate (per
100 person-years)
95%
Confidence
Interval
I 2 Heterogeneity P Value for
Heterogeneity
Any thromboembolism
With anticoagulation 2 270 3.70 2.45-4.95 0.0% 0.94
Without anticoagulation 2 336 3.77 2.53-5.02 83.3% 0.014
Any stroke
With anticoagulation 3 1,761 7.65 6.52-8.78 92.3% <0.001
Without anticoagulation 3 20,165 4.01 3.24-4.78 92.4% <0.001
Ischemic stroke
With anticoagulation 8 10,081 3.11 2.82-3.40 92.4% <0.001
Without anticoagulation 8 44,438 2.15 1.97-2.33 94.2% <0.001
Hemorrhagic stroke
With anticoagulation 3 1,944 1.46 0.93-1.98 77.9% 0.011
Without anticoagulation 4 17,690 0.83 0.46-1.20 23.4% 0.27
Major bleeding
With anticoagulation 5 7,684 11.35 10.74-11.95 87.9% <0.001
Without anticoagulation 6 24,212 7.62 7.14-8.10 97.2% <0.001
Cardiovascular death
With anticoagulation 1 80 1.25 0.03-6.96 NA NA
Without anticoagulation 1 112 0.96 0.02-5.36 NA NA
All-cause mortality
With anticoagulation 4 880 17.28 15.06-19.49 98.5% <0.001
Without anticoagulation 4 4,466 13.65 11.66-15.63 98.6% <0.001


Significant between-study heterogeneity was present for some of these pooled estimates ( Table 2 ), which we attempted to explore through subgroup, sensitivity and meta-regression analyses. Subgroup analyses suggested that ischemic stroke and bleeding rates may vary by region ( Supplementary Table 3 ), but no other consistent differences were observed in subgroup analyses, nor did sensitivity analyses or meta-regression suggest any other factors contributed to heterogeneity. Moderately higher incident event rates for ischemic stroke were also noted in sensitivity analyses using random-effects meta-analysis ( Supplementary Table 4 ), but otherwise no material differences were noted. Although there was some evidence of possible publication bias for the outcome of ischemic stroke rates ( Supplementary Figure 1 ), trim and fill procedures accounting for these had no material effect on the summary estimate.


Seventeen studies providing data on associations of anticoagulation treatment with study outcomes included 20,490 patients with AF on dialysis followed up for 90,746 person-years. Anticoagulation treatment was associated with a 45% (RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.88) greater risk of any stroke and nonsignificant 13% (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.34) greater risk of ischemic stroke, and 38% (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.85) greater risk of hemorrhagic stroke ( Figures 2 and 3 ). There was a 40% (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.79; Figure 3 ) lower risk of any thromboembolism and 31% (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.53; Figure 4 ) increased risk of any bleeding. No clear association of anticoagulation treatment was observed with cardiovascular death (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.15) or all-cause mortality (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.04; Figure 5 ).




Figure 2


Associations of anticoagulation with any stroke and any thromboembolism. Forest plots showing the associations of anticoagulation use with any stroke (top) and any thromboembolism (bottom) . The point estimates (center of each square), weight of study (proportional area of square) and 99% CIs for individual study estimates (horizontal line) are shown. The overall summary estimate is also shown (diamond) with 95% CIs.



Figure 3


Associations of anticoagulation with ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke. Forest plots showing the associations of anticoagulation use with ischemic stroke (top) and hemorrhagic stroke (bottom) . The point estimates (center of each square), weight of study (proportional area of square) and 99% CIs for individual study estimates (horizontal line) are shown. The overall summary estimate is also shown (diamond) with 95% CIs.



Figure 4


Associations of anticoagulation with bleeding. Forest plot showing the association of anticoagulation use with bleeding. The point estimates (center of each square), weight of study (proportional area of square) and 99% CIs for individual study estimates (horizontal line) are shown. The overall summary estimate is also shown (diamond) with 95% CIs.



Figure 5


Associations of anticoagulation with cardiovascular death and all-cause mortality. Forest plots showing the associations of anticoagulation use with cardiovascular death (top) and all-cause mortality (bottom) . The point estimates (center of each square), weight of study (proportional area of square) and 99% CIs for individual study estimates (horizontal line) are shown. The overall summary estimate is also shown (diamond) with 95% CIs.


Between-study heterogeneity was observed for summary estimates of the associations of anticoagulation treatment with ischemic stroke (I 2 statistic = 55.6%, p = 0.021), hemorrhagic stroke (I 2 statistic = 71.1%, p = 0.008), (I 2 statistic = 76.3%, p <0.001) but not for the other outcomes of any stroke, any thromboembolism, and bleeding and cardiovascular death (p >0.05 for all). Although excluding some individual studies in sensitivity analyses reduced some of this heterogeneity, no material change in overall summary estimates resulted ( Supplementary Table 5 ). In sensitivity analyses using random-effects meta-analysis, moderately stronger summary estimates resulted for the associations of anticoagulation treatment with hemorrhagic stroke and all-cause mortality; otherwise, no material differences were seen ( Table 3 ). Other sensitivity, subgroup and meta-regression analyses did not suggest other identifiable study or population characteristics significantly contributed to heterogeneity. There was no evidence of publication bias for any of these associations (p >0.1 for all).


Nov 26, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Meta-Analysis of Anticoagulation Use, Stroke, Thromboembolism, Bleeding, and Mortality in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation on Dialysis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access