Left Ventricular Diastolic Function and Exercise Capacity in Community-Dwelling Adults ≥65 Years of Age Without Heart Failure




Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) has been reported to have strong correlation with exercise capacity. However, this relationship has not been studied extensively in community-dwelling older adults. Data on pulse and tissue Doppler echocardiographic estimates of resting early (E) and atrial (A) transmitral peak inflow and early (Em) mitral annular velocities, and six-minute walk test were obtained from 89 community-dwelling older adults (mean age, 74; range, 65-93 years; 54% women), without a history of heart failure. Overall, 47% had cardiovascular morbidity and 60% had normal diastolic function (E/A 0.75-1.5 and E:Em <10). Among the 36 individuals with LVDD, 83%, 14% and 3% had grade I (E/A <0.75, regardless of E/E m ), II (E/A 0.75-1.5 and E/E m ≥10) and III (E/A>1.5 and E/E m ≥10) LVDD, respectively. Those with LVDD were older (77 versus 73 years; p = 0.001) and had a trend for higher prevalence of cardiovascular morbidity (58% versus 40%; p = 0.083). LVDD negatively correlated with six-minute walk distance (1013 versus 1128 feet; R = −0.25; p = 0.017). This association remained significant despite adjustment for cardiovascular morbidity (R = −0.35; p = 0.048), but lost significance when adjusted for age (R = −0.32; p = 0.105), age and cardiovascular morbidity (R = −0.38; p = 0.161), and additional adjustment for sex, race, body mass index, and systolic blood pressure (R = −0.44; p = 0.365). In conclusion, most community-dwelling older adults without heart failure had normal left ventricular diastolic function or grade-I LVDD. Although LVDD was associated with decreased performance on a six-minute walk test, that association was no longer evident after adjustment for age, body mass index and cardiovascular morbidity.


Left ventricular (LV) diastolic function is an independent predictor of exercise capacity in heart failure (HF). LV diastolic function has also been shown to be associated with functional capacity in younger adults referred for exercise testing. Aging is strongly associated with decreases in LV diastolic function and functional capacity. However, the relation between LV diastolic function and functional capacity has not been extensively studied in relatively healthy community-dwelling older adults. Further, the extent to which the age-associated decrease in LV diastolic function contributes to the decrease in functional capacity in community-dwelling older adults remains uncertain. The purpose of the present study was to examine the association between age, LV diastolic function, and physical function in a cohort of community-dwelling ambulatory older volunteers without HF.


Methods


Community-dwelling ambulatory older adults (≥65 years) without a history of HF, valvular heart disease, or atrial fibrillation were eligible for participation. Participants were recruited by community advertisements from 2003 through 2006. After obtaining informed consent participants were interviewed by trained research assistants and then underwent electrocardiography, echocardiography, and a 6-minute walk test. Participants with electrocardiographic or echocardiographic evidence of atrial fibrillation, LV ejection fraction <45%, and severe aortic or mitral insufficiency were excluded. Local institutional review boards approved the study protocol.


All echocardiographic measurements were performed by trained technicians under direct supervision of a trained echocardiographer (G.J.P.) using Philips ATL 5000 HDI ultrasound (Bothell, Washington) equipment. The technician and echocardiographer were blinded to participants’ cardiovascular morbidities. LV mass (indexed to height and weight) and LV ejection fraction were measured according to recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography. Early (E) and atrial (A) transmitral maximal inflow velocities at tips of mitral valve leaflets by pulse Doppler and early (E m ) and atrial mitral annular velocity by pulse tissue Doppler at the base of the lateral wall 5 to 10 mm below the mitral annulus area in the apical 4-chamber view were obtained using standard techniques. Participants were stratified into grades of LV diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) as follows: grade 0 or normal diastolic function (E/A 0.75 to 1.5 and E/E m <10), grade I (E/A <0.75 regardless of E/E m ), grade II (E/A 0.75 to 1.5 and E/E m ≥10), and grade III (E/A >1.5 and E/E m ≥10).


The 6-minute walk test, a validated and reliable measurement of functional exercise capacity, was performed indoors along a flat firm surface by a trained technician according to a written protocol developed according to recommendations made by the American Thoracic Society guideline. Briefly, participants were instructed to walk back and forth for 6 minutes. They could slow down or stop and rest as necessary and then resume walking when they could. They were also gently encouraged to walk as fast as possible throughout the test as required. At the end of the walk, they were asked to report any symptoms such as pain, shortness of breath, or fatigue. Participants were categorized as having a short 6-minute walk test distance if they had walked <1,059 feet (median) in 6 minutes.


We categorized participants into 2 groups based on presence of LVDD. We compared baseline characteristics of participants including findings from echocardiographic and 6-minute walk test data by the presence or absence of LVDD using chi-square and Student’s t tests as appropriate. Linear regression models were used to determine relations between LVDD and 6-minute walk test, adjusting for age alone, cardiovascular morbidities alone, age and cardiovascular morbidities and additional adjustment for gender, race, body mass index, and systolic blood pressure. All tests were 2-tailed, and a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 15 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Illinois).




Results


Participants (n = 89) had a mean age ± SD of 74 ± 6 years, 54% were women, 16% were nonwhite, and 47% had ≥1 cardiovascular morbidity. Overall 53 (60%) participants had normal LV diastolic function and 36 participants had LVDD. Of those with LVDD, 83% (30 of 36) had grade I, 14% (5 of 36) had grade II, and 3% (1 of 36) had grade III LVDD. Except for older age and a higher prevalence of diabetes in those with LVDD, most other baseline characteristics including baseline history of physical function were balanced between groups ( Table 1 ). Participants had a mean LV ejection fraction of 57 ± 3%, mean E/A ratio of 0.86 ± 0.23, peak E m wave of 10 ± 2 cm/s, and E/E m ratio of 7.0 ± 2.3 ( Table 2 ). As expected, E/A ratio and peak E m were lower in those with LVDD. However, E/E m ratio was similar between groups.



Table 1

Baseline characteristics by left ventricular diastolic dysfunction



























































































































































































































All (n = 89) LVDD p Value
No Yes
(n = 53) (n = 36)
Age (years) 74 ± 6 73 ± 5 77 ± 6 0.001
Women 48 (54%) 26 (62%) 22 (45%) 0.263
Nonwhite 14 (16%) 7 (13%) 7 (19%) 0.428
Married 41 (46%) 27 (51%) 14 (39%) 0.263
Education college or higher 69 (78%) 43 (81%) 26 (72%) 0.323
Income ≥$25,000 47 (53%) 26 (49%) 21 (51%) 0.390
Smoker
Current 2 (2%) 1 (2%) 1 (3%) 0.574
Former 29 (33%) 15 (29%) 14 (39%)
Self-reported general health good or fair 51 (57%) 27 (51%) 24 (67%) 0.141
Physical function/symptoms
Dyspnea on exertion in previous 12 months 13 (15%) 8 (15%) 5 (14%) 0.846
Able to climb 1 flight of stairs 86 (97%) 51 (96%) 35 (97%) 0.798
Able to climb >2 flights of stairs daily 39 (44%) 19 (36%) 20 (56%) 0.066
Able to walk about 3 city blocks 87 (98%) 51 (96%) 36 (100%) 0.238
Walked about 3 city blocks in previous week 13 (15%) 8 (15%) 5 (14%) 0.874
Less active than someone of similar age 59 (66%) 34 (64%) 25 (69%) 0.604
Body mass index (kg/m 2 ) 25 ± 4.6 25 ± 4.6 26 ± 4.7 0.294
Pulse (beats/min) 64 ± 10.0 64 ± 10 65 ± 10 0.489
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 136 ± 18.8 134 ± 17 139 ± 21 0.197
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 70 ± 10.4 68 ± 10 72 ± 11 0.163
Cardiovascular morbidities 42 (47%) 21 (40%) 21 (58%) 0.083
Hypertension 33 (37%) 16 (30%) 17 (47%) 0.103
Coronary artery disease 7 (8%) 4 (8%) 3 (8%) 0.892
Diabetes mellitus 6 (6.7%) 1 (2%) 5 (14%) 0.027
Stroke or transient ischemic attack 4 (4.5%) 2 (4%) 2 (6%) 0.705
Peripheral vascular disease 3 (3%) 2 (4%) 1 (3%) 0.786
Medications
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker 9 (10%) 6 (11%) 3 (8%) 0.646
β Blocker 12 (13%) 10 (19%) 2 (6%) 0.071
Diuretic 8 (9%) 5 (9%) 3 (8%) 0.859
Electrocardiogram
Left ventricular hypertrophy 2 (2%) 1 (2%) 1 (3%) 0.781
First-degree heart block 8 (10%) 2 (4%) 6 (18%) 0.035

Values presented as mean ± SD or number of subjects (percentage).

Participants were stratified as having normal left ventricular diastolic function (grade 0, early/atrial transmitral maximal inflow velocity 0.75 to 1.5 and early transmitral maximal inflow velocity/early mitral annular velocity <10) or left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Those with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction were further classified as having grade I (early/atrial transmitral maximal inflow velocity <0.75 regardless of early transmitral maximal inflow velocity/early mitral annular velocity), grade II (early/atrial transmitral maximal inflow velocity 0.75 to 1.5 and early transmitral maximal inflow velocity/early mitral annular velocity ≥10), or grade III (early/atrial transmitral maximal inflow velocity >1.5 and early transmitral maximal inflow velocity/early mitral annular velocity ≥10).



Table 2

Baseline echocardiographic characteristics and six-minute walk test results by left ventricular diastolic dysfunction






































































































All (n = 89) LVDD p Value
No (n = 53) Yes (n = 36)
Echocardiogram
Ejection fraction (%) 57 ± 3 57 ± 3 56 ± 3 0.703
Early/atrial transmitral maximal inflow velocity ratio 0.86 ± 0.23 0.96 ± 0.18 0.71 ± 0.21 <0.001
Peak early transmitral maximal inflow velocity wave (cm/s) 65 ± 16 61 ± 12 68 ± 19 0.033
Peak atrial transmitral maximal inflow velocity wave (cm/s) 78 ± 17 72 ± 14 86 ± 17 <0.001
Peak early mitral annular velocity wave (m/s) 9.8 ± 2.4 10.6 ± 2.1 8.7 ± 2.2 <0.001
Peak early transmitral maximal inflow velocity/peak early mitral annular velocity 6.9 ± 2.3 6.8 ± 1.9 7.1 ± 2.8 0.548
Left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (mm) 45 ± 5 45 ± 5 44 ± 5 0.342
Relative wall thickness 0.43 ± 0.10 0.42 ± 0.08 0.46 ± 0.12 0.062
Left ventricular mass index (g/m 2 ) 34 ± 8 34 ± 7 35 ± 9 0.416
Left atrial dimension (mm) 37 ± 6 37 ± 6 37 ± 5 0.906
6-minute walk test
Distance completed at 3 minutes (feet) 542 ± 113 563 ± 119 512 ± 98 0.035
Total distance completed at 6 minutes (feet) 1,081 ± 226 1,128 ± 234 1,012 ± 198 0.017
Symptoms during walk 10 (11%) 8 (15%) 2 (6%) 0.162

Values presented as mean ± SD or number of subjects (percentage).


Associations of age with parameters of LV diastolic function are displayed in Figure 1 . E m at rest was negatively associated with age (R = −0.41, p <0.001) regardless of cardiovascular morbidities ( Figure 1 ). However, the overall significant association between age and E/A ratio (R = −0.24 p = 0.026) was significant only in those without cardiovascular morbidity (R = 0.44, p = 0.002) and not in those with cardiovascular morbidity (R = 0.04, p = 0.803; Figure 1 ). E/E m at rest was positively associated with increased age in the overall population (R = 0.29, p = 0.007) and in those with cardiovascular morbidity (R = 0.32, p = 0.038) but not in those without (R = 0.13, p = 0.371; Figure 1 ).


Dec 16, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Left Ventricular Diastolic Function and Exercise Capacity in Community-Dwelling Adults ≥65 Years of Age Without Heart Failure

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access