Geographic Differences in Patients in a Global Acute Heart Failure Clinical Trial (from the ASCEND-HF Trial)




A growing number of countries and geographical regions are involved in major clinical trials. Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure is the largest trial in acutely decompensated heart failure (HF) with patients from 5 geographical regions: North America (NA), Latin America (LA), Western Europe (WE), Central Europe (CE), and Asia-Pacific (AP). Data from the 5 geographical areas were compared including baseline characteristics, medications, 30-day outcomes (mortality and mortality or HF hospitalization), and 180-day mortality. Of the 7,141 study patients, 3,243 (45.4%) were from NA (average of 15.2 patients/site), 1,762 (24.7%) from AP (28.4 patients/site), 967 (13.5%) from CE (20.2 patients/site), 665 (9.3%) from LA (17.1 patients/site), and 504 (7.1%) from WE (14.4 patients/site). There were marked differences in co-morbidities, clinical profile, medication use, length of stay, 30-day event rates, and 180-day mortality by region. Compared with NA, the adjusted risk for death or HF hospitalization at 30 days was significantly lower in CE (odds ratio [OR] 0.46, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.64), WE (OR 0.52 95% CI 0.35 to 0.75), and AP (OR 0.62 95% CI 0.48 to 0.79) and numerically lower in LA (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.04) with similar results for 180-day mortality. In conclusion, in patients with acutely decompensated HF, major differences in baseline characteristics, treatments, length of the hospital stay, and 30-day HF rehospitalization rates, and 180-day mortality were found in patients enrolled from different geographical areas.


Cardiovascular clinical research, including research of new therapies for heart failure (HF), is undergoing progressive globalization. This is caused in part by the improvement in chronic HF treatment with a decrease in event rates and the need to detect smaller effects for new drugs (i.e., the requirement for large sample sizes), as well as by financial and recruitment challenges in regions such as North America (NA) and the desire to capitalize on emerging world markets. This shift in trial conduct is associated with a decreasing number of patients enrolled in NA and Western Europe (WE) and with increasing recruitment from Central Europe (CE), Latin America (LA), and, more recently, the Asia-Pacific (AP) region. Heterogeneity of geographical areas may, however, have a major impact on the results and interpretation of clinical trials. The Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure (ASCEND-HF) trial is the largest randomized controlled trial in patients with acute decompensated HF (ADHF). It was a global, clinical trial, which included patients from each of the 5 major geographical regions of the world. Importantly, it was the first large-scale acute HF trial to enroll patients from the AP region. Compared with previous analyses of geographical differences in HF trials, the fairly large sample sizes from each of the world regions allowed a robust analysis of the impact of geographical area on the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with acute HF.


Methods


The design and results of the ASCEND-HF trial have been reported previously. Briefly, the trial was an international, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the effectiveness and safety of nesiritide in addition to standard care versus standard care alone in 7,141 patients with ADHF. The trial was conducted from May 2007 to August 2010 at 398 centers in 30 countries throughout the world. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria have been described elsewhere. The 2 primary end points were a composite end point of all-cause mortality or HF readmission up to 30 days after randomization and the change in early dyspnea relief after study drug initiation.


Data on patient characteristics were collected during the baseline hospitalization. Rehospitalization and fatal events within 30 days after randomization were reviewed and categorized by an independent, blinded Clinical Events Committee. HF hospitalization was classified as previously described. In brief, HF hospitalization required typical clinical manifestations of worsening HF and the addition of or increase in treatment specifically for worsening HF. All-cause mortality was assessed through 180 days.


Enrollment took place in 30 countries in NA, LA, Europe, Asia, and Australia. For this analysis, countries were assigned to 1 of 5 geographical regions based on previous work : NA included the USA and Canada; LA included Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Brazil, and Mexico; WE included France, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Italy, Israel, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom; CE included Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, and Ukraine; and AP included Australia, India, China, Malaysia, New Zealand, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and Thailand.


Patients from different geographical areas were compared with respect to demographic, clinical, and laboratory data and clinical outcomes. All data are shown as median (interquartile range) or n (%) unless otherwise specified. Outcomes of interest included length of the initial hospital stay (LOS), and the 30-day postrandomization outcome of all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization, and all-cause mortality. In addition, we assessed 180-day mortality by world region. For mortality and rehospitalization events, odds ratios (30-day events) or hazard ratios (180-day mortality) and 95% CIs of the patients from different geographical areas, compared with those in NA, were calculated using Cox regression analysis with and without adjustment for baseline covariates. Adjustment covariates included clinically relevant variables that have been used in previous ASCEND-HF models . Kaplan–Meier plots were generated by region for clinical outcomes. A p value <0.05 was used to indicate statistical significance. There was no adjustment for multiple comparisons given the exploratory nature of this analysis. All statistical analyses were performed at Duke Clinical Research Institute (Durham, North Carolina) using SAS version 9.22 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina).



Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the patients subdivided by geographical areas















































































































































































































































































































































































































Asia / Pacific
(n=1762)
Central Europe
(n=967)
Latin America
(n=665)
North America
(n=3243)
Western
Europe (n=504)
P value
Demographics
Men 1187 (67.1%) 669 (69.2%) 401 (60.3%) 2109 (65.0%) 336 (66.7%) 0.003
Age (years) 62 (53,71) 69 (59,75) 70 (60,78) 67 (56,78) 74 (65,81) < 0.001 NP
White 46 (2.6%) 966 (99.9%) 390 (58.6%) 2088 (64.4%) 499 (99.0%) < 0.001
Black 0 0 34 (5.1%) 1040 (32.1%) 3 (0.6%)
Asian 1712 (97.2%) 1 (0.1%) 0 52 (1.6%) 2 (0.4%)
Other 3 (0.2%) 0 241 (36.2%) 63 (1.9%) 0
Ethnicity Hispanic/Latino 12 (0.7%) 3 (0.3%) 647 (97.3%) 211 (6.5%) 9 (1.8%) < 0.001
NYHA Class prior to decompensation
I 29 (1.7%) 10 (1.3%) 96 (15.4%) 88 (3.7%) 32 (7.6%) <0.001
II 176 (10.4%) 189 (24.4%) 181 (29.0%) 443 (18.6%) 109 (25.9%)
III 714 (42.1%) 428 (55.2%) 224 (35.9%) 1314 (55.3%) 173 (41.1%)
IV 775 (45.7%) 149 (19.2%) 123 (19.7%) 533 (22.4%) 107 (25.4%)
Coronary artery disease 838 (47.6%) 644 (66.6%) 213 (32.0%) 1940 (59.9%) 269 (53.4%) <0.001
Myocardial Infarction 552 (31.3%) 433 (44.8%) 162 (24.4%) 1142 (35.2%) 201 (39.9%) <0.001
Previous PCI 196 (11.1%) 75 (7.8%) 69 (10.4%) 719 (22.2%) 110 (21.9%) <0.001
Previous CABG 146 (8.3%) 99 (10.2%) 44 (6.6%) 914 (28.2%) 113 (22.4%) <0.001
Atrial fibrillation 301 (17.1%) 552 (57.1%) 214 (32.2%) 1365 (42.1%) 242 (48.0%) <0.001
Hypertension 959 (54.4%) 718 (74.3%) 521 (78.3%) 2625 (80.9%) 327 (64.9%) <0.001
Peripheral arterial disease 43 (2.4%) 94 (9.7%) 37 (5.6%) 493 (15.2%) 73 (14.5%) <0.001
Cerebrovascular disease 98 (5.6%) 121 (12.5%) 38 (5.7%) 512 (15.8%) 73 (14.5%) <0.001
Diabetes mellitus 732 (41.5%) 281 (29.1%) 228 (34.3%) 1585 (48.9%) 220 (43.7%) <0.001
Chronic respiratory disease 105 (6.0%) 110 (11.4%) 62 (9.3%) 802 (24.7%) 99 (19.6%) <0.001
Depression treated with medications 29 (1.6%) 10 (1.0%) 27 (4.1%) 449 (13.8%) 47 (9.3%) <0.001
Cancer in last 5 years 14 (0.8%) 15 (1.6%) 11 (1.7%) 187 (5.8%) 45 (8.9%) <0.001
Symptoms and physical examination
Dyspnea
At rest 1103 (62.6%) 711 (73.5%) 429 (64.5%) 1824 (56.3%) 348 (69.0%) <0.001
With minimal activity 659 (37.4%) 256 (26.5%) 236 (35.5%) 1418 (43.7%) 156 (31.0%)
Nocturnal dyspnea 1117 (63.6%) 625 (64.6%) 473 (71.2%) 1962 (60.6%) 272 (54.2%) <0.001
Orthopnea 1169 (66.6%) 728 (75.3%) 573 (86.2%) 2620 (80.9%) 395 (78.4%) <0.001
Peripheral Edema 971 (55.1%) 783 (81.0%) 540 (81.2%) 2674 (82.5%) 362 (71.8%) <0.001
Weight Gain 804 (45.8%) 642 (66.7%) 455 (68.4%) 2444 (75.5%) 328 (65.6%) <0.001
Pulmonary congestion 1527 (86.7%) 901 (93.2%) 638 (95.9%) 2669/3240 (82.4%) 466 (92.6%) <0.001
Pulmonary rales 1527 901 638 2669 466 <0.001
≥ 1/3 lung fields 516 (33.8%) 404 (44.8%) 233 (36.5%) 1130 (42.3%) 184 (39.5%)
< 1/3 lung fields 1011 (66.2%) 497 (55.2%) 405 (63.5%) 1539 (57.7%) 282 (60.5%)
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 120 (110, 134) 130 (116, 140) 120 (110, 140) 124 (110, 140) 124 (110, 140) < 0.001 NP
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 76 (70, 84) 80 (70, 86) 79 (70, 84) 72 (64, 83) 70 (60, 80) < 0.001 NP
Respiration rate (breaths/min) 24 (22, 26) 24 (22, 26) 24 (22, 26) 22 (20, 24) 23 (20, 26) < 0.001 NP
Heart rate (beats/min) 88 (78, 99) 84 (72, 98) 80 (70, 94) 80 (70, 91) 80 (69, 92) < 0.001 NP
Weight (kg) 62.5 (54.0, 72.0) 83.9 (73.0, 97.3) 73.0 (62.0, 84.0) 87.4 (73.0, 106) 80.0 (68.8, 92.0) < 0.001 NP
BMI (kg/m 2 ) 23.7 (21.0, 26.7) 28.9 (25.6, 33.3) 27.0 (23.9, 31.1) 29.9 (25.5, 35.5) 27.7 (24.2, 31.9) < 0.001 NP
Baseline laboratories and diagnostic evaluations
Sodium (mmol/L) 137 (134, 140) 141 (138, 143) 138 (135, 141) 139 (137, 141) 140 (137, 142) <0.001 NP
Creatinine (mg/dL) 1.2 (1.0, 1.5) 1.2 (1.0, 1.4) 1.2 (1.0, 1.5) 1.3 (1.0, 1.7) 1.3 (1.0, 1.6) <0.001 NP
BUN (mg/dL) 24.8 (18.0, 37.2) 24.1 (18.0, 36.1) 39.1 (23.1, 55.1) 24.1 (17.0, 34.1) 34.1 (21.8, 52.8) <0.001 NP
Hemoglobin (g/dL) 12.6 (11.3, 14.0) 13.6 (12.4, 14.8) 13.2 (11.8, 14.5) 12.4 (11.0, 13.7) 12.7 (11.4, 14.0) <0.001 NP
BNP (pg/mL) 494 (370, 1513) 1130 (737, 2984) 2068 (1144, 3422) 1031 (602, 1892) 889 (507, 1737) <0.001 NP
NT-proBNP (pg/mL) 4658 (2206, 9679) 3861(1879, 7783) 5031 (2200, 11000) 4799 (2413, 9247) 4000 (1487, 9140) <0.001 NP
QRS duration (msec) 100 (84, 120) 100 (80, 122) 100 (80, 120) 112 (94, 148) 120 (95, 149) <0.001 NP
Ejection fraction (%) 28 (20, 35) 32 (25, 38) 30 (24, 37) 27 (20, 40) 30 (23, 45) <0.001 NP
X-Ray indicating pulmonary congestion 1259 (82.9%) 709 (87.1%) 582 (97.3%) 2251 (74.4%) 405 (87.1%) <0.001

All data are shown as n (%) or median (Q1, Q3) unless otherwise specified.

BMI = body mass index; BNP = brain natriuretic peptide; BUN = blood urea nitrogen; CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting; NP = nonparametric test; NT-proBNP = N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide; NYHA = New York Heart Association; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention.


Table 2

Treatments by world region (prerandomization and discharge)
































































































































































































Asia / Pacific
(n=1762)
Central Europe
(n=967)
Latin America
(n=665)
North America
(n=3243)
Western
Europe (n=504)
P value
Pre-randomization medical treatment
Chronic use of loop Diuretics 822 (46.7%) 608 (62.9%) 350 (52.6%) 2426 (74.9%) 333 (66.2) <0.001
Total daily loop diuretic dose, mg 40 (20, 80) 40 (20, 40) 40 (40, 80) 80 (40, 120) 80 (40, 125) <0.001 NP
ACE Inhibitor/ARB 911 (51.7%) 622 (64.3%) 462 (69.5%) 2039 (62.9%) 306 (60.7%) <0.001
Aldosterone antagonist 453 (25.7%) 425 (44.0%) 228 (34.3%) 749 (23.1%) 137 (27.2%) <0.001
Beta blocker 608 (34.5%) 564 (58.3%) 298 (44.8%) 2386 (73.6%) 302 (59.9%) <0.001
Digoxin 571 (32.4%) 288 (29.8%) 192 (28.9%) 763 (23.5%) 81 (16.1%) <0.001
Hydralazine 22 (1.2%) 4 (0.4%) 32 (4.8%) 472 (14.6%) 2 (0.4%) <0.001
Oral/Topical Nitrates 513 (29.1%) 179 (18.5%) 82 (12.3%) 802 (24.7%) 105 (20.8%) <0.001
Anticoagulant 113 (6.4%) 237 (24.5%) 98 (14.7%) 1084 (33.4%) 190 (37.7%) <0.001
Inotropes 181 (10.3%) 27 (2.8%) 27 (4.1%) 56 (1.7%) 22 (4.4%) <0.001
Vasodilators 395 (22.4%) 243 (25.1%) 179 (26.9%) 147 (4.5%) 95 (18.8%) <0.001
Device therapy
Pacemaker 28 (1.6) 48 (5.0) 49 (7.4) 269 (8.3) 46 (9.1) <0.001
ICD 8 (0.5) 35 (3.6) 7 (1.1) 536 (16.5) 26 (5.2) <0.001
CRT (with or without ICD) 10 (0.6) 14 (1.4) 13 (2.0) 547 (16.9) 56 (11.1) <0.001
Discharge Medications 1761 967 665 504
ACE Inhibitor/ARB 1188 (67.5%) 742 (76.7%) 471 (70.8%) 1949/3242 (60.1%) 350 (69.4%) <0.001
Aldosterone antagonists 792 (45.0%) 644 (66.6%) 380 (57.1%) 929/3243 (28.6%) 205 (40.7%) <0.001
Beta blockers 909 (51.6%) 705 (72.9%) 378 (56.8%) 2258/3242 (69.6%) 329 (65.3%) <0.001
Digoxin 787 (44.7%) 347 (35.9%) 210 (31.6%) 744/3242 (22.9%) 97 (19.2%) <0.001
Hydralazine 35 (2.0%) 4 (0.4%) 33 (5.0%) 473/3243 (14.6%) 1 (0.2%) <0.001
Anticoagulant 168 (9.5%) 331 (34.2%) 128 (19.2%) 993/3243 (30.6%) 211 (41.9%) <0.001
Oral/Topical Nitrates 544 (30.9%) 132 (13.7%) 66 (9.9%) 714/3243 (22.0%) 80 (15.9%) <0.001

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 26, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Geographic Differences in Patients in a Global Acute Heart Failure Clinical Trial (from the ASCEND-HF Trial)

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access