Usefulness of an Implantable Loop Recorder to Detect Clinically Relevant Arrhythmias in Patients With Advanced Fabry Cardiomyopathy




Patients with genetic cardiomyopathy that involves myocardial hypertrophy often develop clinically relevant arrhythmias that increase the risk of sudden death. Consequently, guidelines for medical device therapy were established for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, but not for conditions with only anecdotal evidence of arrhythmias, like Fabry cardiomyopathy. Patients with Fabry cardiomyopathy progressively develop myocardial fibrosis, and sudden cardiac death occurs regularly. Because 24-hour Holter electrocardiograms (ECGs) might not detect clinically important arrhythmias, we tested an implanted loop recorder for continuous heart rhythm surveillance and determined its impact on therapy. This prospective study included 16 patients (12 men) with advanced Fabry cardiomyopathy, relevant hypertrophy, and replacement fibrosis in “loco typico.” No patients previously exhibited clinically relevant arrhythmias on Holter ECGs. Patients received an implantable loop recorder and were prospectively followed with telemedicine for a median of 1.2 years (range 0.3 to 2.0 years). The primary end point was a clinically meaningful event, which required a therapy change, captured with the loop recorder. Patients submitted data regularly (14 ± 11 times per month). During follow-up, 21 events were detected (including 4 asystole, i.e., ECG pauses ≥3 seconds) and 7 bradycardia events; 5 episodes of intermittent atrial fibrillation (>3 minutes) and 5 episodes of ventricular tachycardia (3 sustained and 2 nonsustained). Subsequently, as defined in the primary end point, 15 events leaded to a change of therapy. These patients required therapy with a pacemaker or cardioverter–defibrillator implantation and/or anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation. In conclusion, clinically relevant arrhythmias that require further device and/or medical therapy are often missed with Holter ECGs in patients with advanced stage Fabry cardiomyopathy, but they can be detected by telemonitoring with an implantable loop recorder.


Fabry disease is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder that results from a deficiency in alpha-galactosidase A. The cardiac pathogenetic correlate is the accumulation of globotriaosylceramides in cells, which causes left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and finally leads to myocardial replacement fibrosis. In these fibrotic hearts, life-threatening arrhythmias can develop. Thus, patients at risk should be evaluated regularly for potential arrhythmia treatments. The current recommendations for managing patients with confirmed Fabry disease include an annual Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) assessment to detect different types of advanced arrhythmias that indicate a potential need to switch therapy. The Holter ECG covers only a relatively short period; therefore, it might be beneficial to implement continuous surveillance for potential arrhythmias in patients at high risk for severe arrhythmias. Several implantable devices are available for continuous rhythm surveillance, such as the Reveal XT device (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota). These devices reliably facilitate the detection of cardiac arrhythmias in routine clinical care. However, the role of these devices in improving the detection of relevant cardiac arrhythmias that require a change in clinical management, such as ventricular tachycardia (VT), bradycardia, and atrial fibrillation (AF), remains to be determined in patients with Fabry disease. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate whether an implantable loop recorder with telemonitoring capabilities could reveal events that required a change in clinical management in patients at risk of developing clinically relevant arrhythmias associated with advanced Fabry cardiomyopathy.


Methods


Study recruitment started in June 2012 and ended in September 2014. A total of 120 consecutive patients with Fabry cardiomyopathy were screened in the Fabry centers in Würzburg and Berlin. Criteria for inclusion were (1) genetically proved Fabry disease, (2) signs of severe LV fibrosis (defined in the following section), (3) no previous detectable clinically relevant arrhythmia (defined in the following section) on Holter ECG, (4) stable treatment with enzyme replacement therapy for at least 12 months, and (5) informed consent for examinations and participation in the study. All these criteria had to be met for enrollment in the study. Exclusion criteria were (1) anticoagulation treatment due to AF, (2) an implanted pacemaker or cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD), and (3) signs of AF or VT in the past.


Severe fibrosis was defined as the presence of at least 2 segments of late enhancement (LE) during cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) or wall motion abnormalities combined with wall thinning in at least 2 LV segments after exclusion of coronary artery disease (CAD) with heart catheterization. In all patients with signs or symptoms of CAD (i.e., by a stress test), a heart catheterization was performed to rule out CAD. We defined a clinically relevant arrhythmia as (1) bradycardia with a heart rate ≤40 beats/min during the day, which indicated a need for pacing therapy; (2) an electrical ventricular pause ≥3 seconds during the day, which indicated a need for pacing therapy; (3) sustained (>30 seconds) or symptomatic nonsustained (<30 seconds) VT, which indicated a need for an ICD; or (4) AF that lasted at least 3 minutes, which indicated a need for anticoagulation.


Of the 120 patients screened, 22 fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and 6 refused to participate. Consequently, this prospective study included 16 consecutive patients (4 women) who were considered “at risk” of developing clinically relevant arrhythmias. At baseline, before loop recorder implantation, an echocardiography, cMRI (when not contraindicated), Holter ECG, and clinical assessment were performed in all patients. A yearly follow-up was conducted with the same assessments performed in the baseline visit. All patients were asked to transmit data from the loop recorder by telephone as often as possible. The loop recorder was explanted when a patient required implantation of an ICD or pacemaker. According to the Declaration of Helsinki, we obtained written informed consent for all patients or their guardians. The local institutional ethics board approved the study protocol.


We performed LV parasternal long-axis imaging with M-Mode echocardiography (Vivid 7, GE Vingmed Ultrasound AS, Horten, Norway) to determine the end-diastolic septal (interventricular septal wall thickness at end diastole [IVSd]) and posterior wall thicknesses. In addition, we measured the left atrial (LA) diameter, and we calculated the LV ejection fraction with Simpson’s formula. We used blood pool pulsed Doppler of the mitral valve inflow to quantify the ratio of early-to-late (E/A) diastolic flow velocity and the deceleration time. The transmitral flow was determined by placing the Doppler window between the tips of the mitral valve leaflets; we measured the peak flow velocities in early (E wave) and late (A wave) systole. In addition, tissue Doppler was performed for measuring the ratio between early transmitral flow and peak early tissue Doppler velocity (E/E′). Measurements were averaged over 3 cycles.


We performed 2-dimensional speckle tracking with an EchoPAC (GE Vingmed Ultrasound AS, Horten, Norway) to acquire standard apical views of the LV for off-line quantification of myocardial deformation. After manually selecting the Region of Interest, speckles were applied automatically and then confirmed by the user. We used semiautomatic postprocessing to extract the longitudinal systolic strain of the 17 LV segments.


We performed cMRI to quantify myocardial mass and cardiac volumes with standard, steady state free precession cine imaging sequences on a 1.5 T whole body scanner (Magnetom Avanto, Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany). To detect myocardial fibrosis, we acquired delayed enhancement images after an intravenous injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine (0.2 mmol/kg; Magnevist, Schering AG, Berlin, Germany). We used a T1-weighted inversion recovery sequence with the breath hold technique (field of view 240 × 320 mm 2 , matrix size 165 × 256, slice thickness 8 mm, repetition time 7.5 ms, echo time 3.4 ms, and flip angle 25°). Care was taken to use identical settings in the baseline and follow-up examinations for a given patient. All consecutive, short-axis slices covering the whole heart were used to measure the area with pathological LE. The sum of areas that showed LE was multiplied by the slice thickness, and then expressed as a percentage of the LV myocardium volume.


Twelve-lead surface resting ECGs were recorded at a sweep of 50 mm/s. ECGs were measured manually and analyzed by a reader who was blinded to the disease stage. Standard criteria for ECG findings were applied, as follows: A normal PR interval was defined as 120 to 200 ms. A normal QRS duration was defined as 70 to 110 ms. LV hypertrophy was assessed with the Sokolow–Lyon index, where the S wave in lead V1 or V2 (whichever was larger) was added to the R wave in lead V5 or V6 (whichever was larger), with a minimum cutoff of 3.5 mV. The QT interval (normal 300 to 440 ms) was measured from the beginning of the QRS complex to the end of the T wave, which was defined as the point where the tangent to the downslope of the T wave intersected the isoelectric line. The corrected QT duration (normal <440 ms) was calculated with the Bazett’s formula. For negative or biphasic T waves, the peak was measured from the nadir of the T wave. ST-segment elevation was defined as a J point elevation that was ≥2 mm in the precordial leads and ≥1 mm in the limb leads. ST-segment decrease was defined as a J point decrease that was ≥1.5 mm in the precordial leads and ≥1 mm in the limb leads.


The Holter ECG was started between 8 a.m. and 10 a.m. and continued for a mean of 22.3 hours. The data were analyzed by a reader blinded to the disease stage. Premature ventricular beats (PVBs) were counted automatically, with manual correction. All counts were then corrected to a fictive duration of exactly 24 hours. PVB were classified as ventricular or supraventricular in origin, and they were ranked as a singlet, couplet, triplet, or run. A run was defined as more than 3 PVBs in a row.


All patients received identical loop recorders with telemedicine capabilities (Reveal XT; Medtronic). Immediately before the surgical procedure, patients were screened for an eligible implant position in the body with the vendor-supplied dermal ECG vector measurement tool. All patients showed good signal quality at the parasternal left position. After aseptic preparation and local anesthesia, an incision approximately 3 cm long was made parasternal left. Then, a subfascial pouch 8 to 10 cm long in the caudal direction was prepared with blunt dissection. The Reveal device was inserted and fixed by muscular ligation with Mersilene. The incision was closed with Vicryl subcutan and Prolene intracutan. Then, the device was interrogated and activated with the external programmer. Directly after the implantation procedure, the settings were programmed according to the study specifications (fast ventricular tachycardia: detection: on; ECG recording: on; interval: 290 ms, 30/40 beats; VT: detection: on; ECG recording: on; interval: 370 ms, 16 beats; asystole: detection: on; ECG recording: on; bradycardia: detection: on; ECG recording: on; interval: 1,500 ms, 4 beats; symptoms: detection: on; ECG recording: 3 episodes – 7.5 minutes; atrial tachycardia/AF: detection: on; ECG recording: on – all episodes). All patients received a corresponding transmitter. We requested that they should transfer data daily, whenever possible. Transmitted data were interrogated at the study center daily (on workdays) through an electronic internet platform.


Continuous data are presented as the mean (SD); categorical variables are presented as numbers (percentages). Categorical data were compared across groups with the chi-square test. A 2-tailed probability value <0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS, version 22 for Windows (SPSS, IBM​, Chicago, ​Illinois).




Results


Table 1 lists the genetic and clinical data for every individual patient and information about their typical Fabry organ involvement. Fifteen patients had a classical mutation, and one patient had a late-onset mutation, which typically presents as a cardiac variant. Most patients were men (75%), and all had markedly elevated levels of globotriaosylsphingosine (Lyso-Gb3; mean 36.3 ± 32 ng/ml). The mean age was 52 ± 11 years, and all were on enzyme replacement therapy for at least 2 years. All patients submitted the data regularly, at a rate of 14 ± 11 times per month. After device implantation, patients were prospectively followed with telemedicine for a median of 1.2 years (range 0.3 to 2.0 years), and no patient died during follow-up.



Table 1

Baseline characteristics of all Fabry patients




















































































































































































































































































Patient number Genetics Age (years) Sex Height (cm) Weight (kg) Gal-A activation (nmol/min/mg) lysoGb3 (ng/ml) ERT for (years) Kidney TX Dialysis GFR (MDRD) (ml/min/1.73 m 2 ) TIA/Stroke Dyshidrosis Angiokeratoma
1 Exon7. Mutation E341 K 53 M 185 57 0.03 63.1 10 0 0 83 + + +
2 Exon 7. Del c.1221 delA 58 F 163 56 0.14 18.7 3 0 0 55 0 0 0
3 Exon3. Mutation D136 E 70 F 165 71 0.15 11.2 10 0 0 76 0 0 0
4 Intron 3. IVS3+1 G > A 45 M 184 75 0.04 21.2 12 + 0 47 0 + 0
5 Exon 7. Mutation E341 K 49 M 180 72 0.02 65.7 11 0 0 110 0 + 0
6 Exon7. Mutation c.1208.del 45 M 184 84 0.02 15.0 11 + + 58 0 + +
7 Exon 7. Deletion 354 fs Del 15 bp 54 F 165 64 0.19 10.1 9 0 0 82 0 + +
8 Transition c664A > G;
Mutation N215S
67 M 170 63 0.13 6.0 2 0 0 103 0 + +
9 Exon 1. c.162 del T 54 M 177 78 0.08 30.6 13 + 0 40 + + +
10 Exon 7. Mutation c.1208 del 49 M 178 72 0.03 28.1 12 0 0 85 0 + 0
11 Exon 1. C134T > C [L45P] 36 M 193 83 0 63.4 3 0 0 100 + + 0
12 Exon 3. Mutation D136 E 48 M 182 83 0.02 15.1 11 + 0 74 0 + 0
13 Intron 6 Trans IVS6-10G > A Splice-Site-Mutation
Mut c.1000-10G > A
36 M 187 86 0.04 30.3 2 0 0 80 0 0 +
14 Exon 6. c. 973 G > A
Mutation G325S
73 F 156 52 0.23 7.2 3 0 0 39 0 0 0
15 c.747A > G 56 M 170 60 0.03 74.7 2 0 0 102 0 0 +
16 c.982 G > C 43 M 148 68 0.02 114 4 0 0 116 0 0 +

ERT = enzyme replacement therapy; F = female; GFR = glomerula filtration rate; M = male; TIA = transistoric ischemic attack; TX = transplantation.

All TIA and stroke were not due to documented atrial fibrillation.



In Table 2 , all individual echocardiographic and cMRI data are shown with the average values. All patients showed LV hypertrophy (IVSd ≥11 mm), and all but one had visible papillary muscle thickening. One patient had a reduced ejection fraction. Seven patients had an E/E′ above 15, which suggested elevated diastolic filling pressure. The global systolic strain averaged −13 ± 5%, and systolic strain in the basal lateral wall was markedly reduced to −9±6%, a sign of both reduced regional LV function and replacement fibrosis in loco typico.



Table 2

Organ specific values















































































































































































































































































































































































Patient number Echocardiography Magnetic Resonance Imaging
LVDd (mm) LVDs (mm) IVSd (mm) LVPWd (mm) EF (%) LA (mm) DT (ms) E/E′ AO root (mm) LV hypertrophy Thick papillary muscle Posterior wall thinning LVMI (g/m 2 ) LVED Vol. (ml) LVES Vol. (ml) Stroke Vol. (ml) Cardiac output (l/min) Fibrosis (%)
1 45 27 12 12 59 38 283 15 39 + + 0 146 152 37 115 6.9 1.23
2 39 20 18 16 63 41 160 12 32 + + 0 205 115 34 81 4.6 1.21
3 46 35 11 7 61 37 228 19 35 + + + NA NA NA NA NA NA
4 54 36 12 13 55 36 197 12 43 + + 0 127 179 77 102 5.9 2.14
5 45 29 11 11 73 36 224 13 37 + + 0 77 135 35 100 6.6 0.74
6 60 31 11 10 76 41 187 11 33 + + 0 109 198 36 162 9 1.12
7 47 28 12 10 54 40 195 18 32 + + 0 117 130 39 91 5.6 2.8
8 55 42 13 7 59 42 181 10 42 + + + NA NA NA NA NA NA
9 51 24 13 13 55 36 275 14 35 + + 0 131 117 36 81 6.1 4.27
10 39 24 13 11 68 37 301 14 34 + + + NA NA NA NA NA NA
11 64 50 11 11 51 40 135 12 41 + 0 0 107 263 140 123 6.6 0.65
12 50 32 12 9 71 38 352 20 39 + + + 111 180 58 122 6.3 3.92
13 42 27 12 13 67 28 268 10 32 + + 0 85 156 53 103 7.7 1.03
14 47 23 14 13 70 41 181 16 28 + + 0 133 110 26 84 5.9 1.86
15 37 23 20 15 60 38 208 16 31 + + + NA NA NA NA NA NA
16 39 25 17 18 63 36 256 19 34 + + 0 183 107 33 70 4.8 3.21
Mean 48 ±8 30 ±8 13 ±3 12 ±3 63 ±7 38 ±3 233 ±58 14 ±3 35 ±4 +=16 (100%) +=15 (64%) +=5 (31%) 124 ±36 149 ±44 49 ±30 101 ±24 6.5 ±1.2 1.86 ±1.33

AO = aortic; DT = deceleration time; EF = ejection fraction; LV = left ventricular; LVDd = left ventricular diastolic diameter; LVED = left ventricular end-diastolic; LVES = left ventricular end-systolic; LVMI = left ventricular mass index; LVSd = left ventricular systolic diameter; LVPWd = left ventricular posterior wall thickness at diastole; IVSd = interventricular septal wall thickness at diastole; NA = not available.


Three patients did not receive cMRIs, due to claustrophobia; one was not eligible due to terminal renal insufficiency/dialysis. All patients with cMRIs (n = 12) showed replacement fibrosis in loco typico. All patients who did not receive cMRIs had visible and quantifiable thinning of the posterior wall (defined as LV posterior wall thickness at end diastole ≥2 mm thinner than the IVSd). Figure 1 shows representative examples of echocardiography and cMRI.




Figure 1


Example of a 45-year-old male patient with typical, advanced Fabry cardiomyopathy. In this patient, bradycardia, asystole, intermittent AF, and sustained VT were detected with an implanted loop recorder. Left (A) : representative echocardiography from a parasternal long-axis viewpoint shows eccentric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Right top (B) : representative cardiac magnetic resonance image in the short-axis orientation. The red arrow indicates a large area with positive LE, which indicates replacement fibrosis. Right bottom (C) : 12-lead, resting electrocardiograph with signs of LV hypertrophy in advanced Fabry cardiomyopathy. EF = ejection fraction; hs-TNT = highly sensitive troponin; LV = left ventricle; LVPWd = left ventricular posterior wall thickness at end diastole; NT-proBNP = N-terminal propeptid of the brain natriuretic peptide.


Table 3 lists the results from the ECGs at rest. Only 2 patients had a prolonged QTc interval. Seven patients had a positive LV Sokolov index for LV hypertrophy, and 11 patients had T negativities in V5 and V6. Figure 1 shows a typical ECG at rest.



Table 3

Electrocardiography




























































































































































































































Patient number Heart
rhythm
Heart axis Heart rate
(min −1 )
P- dur.
time (ms)
PQ dur. (ms) QRS dur. (ms) QTc dur. (ms) Sokolow
index (+/0)
T-wave
negativity (+/0)
ST elevation
(+/0)
1 SR Vertical 56 100 120 130 425 + + 0
2 SR Intermediate 54 80 100 100 588 + + 0
3 SR Intermediate 68 80 120 80 383 0 + 0
4 SR Intermediate 64 100 150 100 427 + 0 0
5 SR Intermediate 64 100 120 100 392 0 0 0
6 SR Intermediate 52 100 140 90 400 + 0 0
7 SR Intermediate 50 110 140 120 420 + + 0
8 SR Left 52 80 160 130 437 0 + 0
9 SR Intermediate 91 90 110 100 394 + + 0
10 SR Intermediate 78 80 80 100 388 0 0 0
11 SR Intermediate 52 110 180 120 382 + 0 0
12 SR Left 72 100 110 110 427 0 + 0
13 SR Left 54 100 110 100 379 0 + 0
14 SR Left 58 100 160 160 492 0 + 0
15 SR Intermediate 64 90 150 110 434 0 + 0
16 SR Intermediate 80 80 130 100 439 0 + 0
Mean 63±12 95±11 130±26 109±19 426±53 +=7(44%) +=11(67%) +=0 (0%)

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 25, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Usefulness of an Implantable Loop Recorder to Detect Clinically Relevant Arrhythmias in Patients With Advanced Fabry Cardiomyopathy

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access