Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy



Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy


Boris Sepesi

David Rice



INTRODUCTION

An adequate pathologic assessment of lymph nodes draining the site of the primary tumor is an important oncologic principle in nearly all solid organ malignancies. Complete histologic evaluation of lymph nodes provides significant prognostic information for overall survival and disease-free survival. Additionally, the overall number of resected nodes has become a quality measure of the adequacy of surgical resection. Pathologic lymph node status (pN) is a crucial component of the tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) staging system and influences clinical and therapeutic decisions in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although the survival benefit of lymphadenectomy has not been proven in randomized trials, it is possible that a select group of patients with truly loco regional disease might benefit from a meticulous lymph node dissection beyond the merits such a dissection would have for stage classification. A surgeon’s role in this process is irreplaceable, as the performance of lymphadenectomy requires a thorough anatomic knowledge of lymph node basins draining the primary tumor site as well as a technical skill and judgment for safe accomplishment of this task.


ANATOMY AND CLASSIFICATION OF INTRATHORACIC LYMPH NODES

The prognostic importance of the metastases to regional lymph nodes in patients with lung cancer has been recognized for over 50 years. The first comprehensive classification of the thoracic lymph node stations has been developed by Naruke et al.; this Japanese classification was used worldwide for almost four decades. In the 1990s, the American Thoracic Society (ATS) attempted to refine the anatomical descriptions of thoracic lymph nodes and in 1997, Mountain and Dresler published a modification of the ATS lymph node map, which was later implemented into the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) Lung Cancer Staging System. While this revised form of lymph node stations has been widely adopted in the United States, it was only sporadically used by the European surgeons, and the Japanese continued to favor the original Naruke’s classification. An effort to consolidate worldwide lung cancer staging data began in 1998 by the International Association for the Study of the Lung Cancer (IASLC) with the establishment of the Lung Cancer Staging Project. In this project, data from over 100,000 patients were collected. The discrepancies between Naruke and Mountain-Dresler thoracic lymph node maps became significant during data analysis as some patients with N2 (or stage IIIA) disease according to Mountain-Dresler classification were staged as N1 (or stage II) disease in Naruke classification. Consequently, IASLC published the third detailed anatomic classification of intrathoracic lymph node stations, reconciling the differences between former Japanese and American lymph node maps (Table 30.1). Fourteen discrete lymph node stations have been recognized, which are grouped into the following seven zones: supraclavicular (level 1 nodes), superior mediastinal upper zone (level 2, 3, and 4 nodes), aortic nodes/aortopulmonary zone (level 5 and 6 nodes), inferior mediastinal subcarinal zone (level 7 nodes) and inferior mediastinal lower zone (level 8 and 9 nodes), N1 nodes hilar/interlobar zone (level 10 and 11 nodes), and peripheral zone (level 12, 13, and 14 nodes; Fig. 30.1).


INTRATHORACIC LYMPHATIC FLOW AND METASTATIC SPREAD

The anatomical description of the mediastinal lymphatic flow may be credited to Riquet et al. who, in a meticulous postmortem dissection utilizing dye injection of the lymphatics, identified intrathoracic lymphatic drainage pathways. The in vivo investigation of the thoracic lymphatic flow was later studied by Hata et al., who generated dynamic lymphoscintigrams by injecting 99mTc-labeled colloid into the segmental bronchial submucosa. He identified the following lobar and segmental lymphatic drainage patterns; Right lung: the apical and posterior segments of the right upper lobe drained via the hilar nodes (level 10), tracheobronchial nodes (level 4), and upper paratracheal lymph nodes (level 2) into the ipsilateral scalene nodes. Drainage from the anterior segment of the right upper lobe varied with approximately 50% of flow via subcarinal (level 7) lymph nodes into the right scalene nodes; occasionally, the lymph flow crossed the midline following the course of the innominate vein into the left scalene lymph nodes. The other half of time the flow from the anterior segment resembled the flow the other segments of the upper lobe. Lymphatic drainage from the middle lobe and the superior segment of the lower lobe resemble the upper lobe drainage ultimately ending in the ipsilateral scalene nodes either via lower paratracheal or subcarinal nodes. Again, in a minority of cases the flow from the middle and lower lobes was noted to cross to the left scalene nodes via subcarinal and left lower paratracheal nodes. Left lung: Lymphatic flow from the left lung was variable; however, certain patterns were identified. The apical posterior segment of the left upper lobe drained primarily via the subcarinal lymph nodes along the left vagus nerve to the left scalene nodes or along the recurrent laryngeal to the paratracheal lymph nodes. The anterior and lingular segments drained along the left nerve through the para-aortic nodes (level 5/6) to the ipsilateral scalene lymph nodes. Lymph from the basilar segments flowed via the subcarinal nodes to the pretracheal and contralateral paratracheal lymphatics to the right scalene nodes. Drainage from the superior segment was least constant and occurred via multiple pathways. The study demonstrated mostly consistent ipsilateral lymph drainage along mediastinal lymph node stations with an occasional contralateral drainage.









Table 30.1 IASLC Definition of Intrathoracic Nodal Stations































































Nodal station


Description


Definition


Level 1 (right and left)


Low cervical, supraclavicular, sternal notch


Upper border: lower margin of cricoid cartilage


Lower border: clavicles bilaterally, in the midline the upper border of the manubrium


Level 2 (left/right)


Upper paratracheal nodes


2R: Upper border: apex of the lung and pleural space, midline the upper border of the manubrium


Lower border: intersection of the caudal margin of innominate vein with the trachea


2L: Upper border: apex of the lung and pleural space, midline the upper border of the manubrium


Lower border: superior border of the aortic arch


Level 3


Prevascular and retrotracheal nodes


3a: Prevascular


On the right


Upper border: apex of chest


Lower border: level of carina


Anterior border: posterior sternum


Posterior border: anterior to superior vena cava


On the left


Upper border: apex of chest


Lower border: level of carina


Anterior border: posterior sternum


Posterior border: left carotid artery


3p: Retrotracheal


Upper border: apex of chest


Lower border: level of carina


Level 4


Lower paratracheal nodes


4R: paratracheal and pretracheal nodes extending, to the left lateral border of the trachea


Upper border: intersection of caudal margin of innominate vein with the trachea


Lower border: lower border of azygos vein


4L: left of the left lateral border of the trachea, medial to the ligamentum arteriosum


Upper border: upper margin of the aortic arch


Lower border: upper rim of the left main pulmonary artery


Level 5


Subaortic/aortopulmonary nodes


Subaortic nodes lateral to the ligamentum arteriosum


Upper border: the lower border of the aortic arch


Lower border: upper rim of the left main pulmonary artery


Level 6


Para-aortic nodes (ascending aorta or phrenic)


Nodes anterior and lateral the ascending aorta and aortic arch


Upper border: tangential line to the upper aspect of the aortic arch


Lower border: the lower border of the aortic arch


Level 7


Subcarinal


Upper border: the carina


Lower border:


Left: the upper aspect of the lower lobe bronchus on the left,


Right: the lower border of the bronchus intermedius


Level 8 (left/right)


Paraesophageal nodes (below the carina)


Nodes adjacent to the wall of the esophagus and to the right or left of the midline excluding subcarinal nodes


Upper border:


Left: the upper border of the lower lobe bronchus


Right: lower border of the bronchus intermedius on the right


Lower border: the diaphragm


Level 9 (left/right)


Pulmonary ligament nodes


Nodes within the pulmonary ligament


Upper border: the inferior pulmonary vein


Lower border: the diaphragm


Level 10 (left/right)


Hilar nodes


Nodes immediately adjacent to the mainstem bronchus and hilar vessels including proximal portion of the pulmonary vein and the main pulmonary artery.


Upper border:


Right: the lower aspect of the azygos vein


Left: the upper aspect of the pulmonary artery


Lower border:


Interlobar region bilaterally


Level 11


Interlobar nodes


Between the origin of the lobar bronchi


Level 12


Lobar nodes


Adjacent to the lobar bronchi


Level 13


Segmental nodes


Adjacent to the segmental bronchi


Level 14


Subsegmental nodes


Adjacent to the subsegmental bronchi








Fig. 30.1. IASLC nodal chart with stations and zones. (Reprinted courtesy of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and with permission of Aletta Frazier, MD. Copyright © 2009, 2010 Aletta Ann Frazier, MD.)

A number of authors have studied the pattern of intrathoracic metastatic spread of lung cancer. Borrie initially demonstrated cancer occurrence along the bronchus intermedius on the right side and along the main fissure on the left; these lymphatic sumps are now referred to as the Sumps of Borrie. In a study of 359 patients who underwent mediastinoscopy, scalene node biopsy and thoracotomy, Nohl-Oser identified the pattern of regional metastatic spread. Right upper lobe tumors had a propensity to spread to ipsilateral mediastinal nodes (75%); contralateral mediastinal or scalene node involvement was rare in both right upper and lower lobe tumors (<5% to 7%). Left upper lobe tumors, however, had higher incidence of contralateral involvement in mediastinal and scalene nodes (10% to 13%) as did left lower lobe tumors (14% scalene and 25% mediastinal).

Intrathoracic lymphatic involvement of biopsy-proven N2 disease was characterized by Asamura et al. in a study of 166 patients. Right upper and lower lobe tumors had much higher propensity to spread into the pretracheal and ipsilateral paratracheal nodes, whereas right middle lobe tumors had the highest association with subcarinal lymphadenopathy (88%). On the left side, metastatic disease was most consistently found in the aortopulmonary window and para-aortic nodes (levels 5 and 6). Involvement of subcarinal (level 7) nodes occurred in the fifth of patients, most frequently when a tumor involved the lingular segment. Metastatic disease from lower lobe tumors was found with almost equal frequency in the subcarinal and aortopulmonary nodes. Although these studies demonstrate
frequent orderly ipsilateral cancer spread from the intraparenchymal to hilar to paratracheal lymph node chains, skip metastases may occur in up to one-third of cases. The occasional drainage into the contralateral lymph nodes argues for a vigilant preoperative lymph node evaluation in patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer.


STUDIES CONCERNING LYMPH NODE DISSECTION


Sampling vs. Dissection

As mentioned previously, mediastinal lymphadenectomy is an important component of the surgical treatment of lung cancer. Importance of lymphadenectomy in accurate disease staging is self-evident; however, debate continues whether lymphadenectomy influences survival in lung cancer patients. Additional controversy in the resection and evaluation of mediastinal lymph nodes concerns sampling versus completely dissecting mediastinal lymph node stations. Previously, a randomized trial by Wu et al. demonstrated survival benefit for systematic nodal dissection in patients with resectable NSCLC; however, other randomized trials failed to show significant survival benefit. To further study the effect of mediastinal lymphadenectomy on survival in NSCLC, the American College of Surgery Oncology Group (ACOSOG) performed a multi-institutional prospective randomized trial (ACOSOG Z0030) to study the effect of mediastinal lymph node sampling (MLNS) versus complete lymph node dissection during pulmonary resection in patients with N0 or N1 (less than hilar disease) in NSCLC. The aim of this study was to compare the survival and recurrence pattern between the groups. Over a 5-year period (1999 to 2004), 1,111 patients were accrued into this randomized trial by 102 surgeons in 63 institutions. After excluding 88 patients, final intent-to-treat analysis was performed on 1,023 patients of whom 498 underwent MLNS and 525 who had mediastinallymph node dissection (MLND). There were no significant demographic differences between the groups in tumor histology, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status, type, or completeness of resection. There was no difference in the median number of nodes removed by thoracoscopic technique or thoracotomy (15 vs. 19; P = 0.17). More nodes were removed during lobectomy compared with segmentectomy (18 vs. 14; P = 0.006). At a median follow-up of 6.5 years, there was no significant difference in the overall survival between the groups (P = 0.25). Similarly, the 5-year disease-free survival was no different (68% in MLNS group and 67% in MLND group; P

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 15, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIAC SURGERY | Comments Off on Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access