Impact of glycemic control and hypoglycemic agents on the clinical outcome in diabetic patients with percutaneous coronary intervention: from the FU-registry




Background


It is not yet clear whether glycemic control and hypoglycemic agents used affect the clinical outcome of percutaneous intervention (PCI) in diabetic patients.




Methods and Results


Among 1809 patients who underwent PCI and received stent placement (FU-registry), we selected 774 DM patients, then divided them into 2 groups: a poor-glycemic-control group, who showed greater than 6.9% HbA1c at the time of PCI (Pre-HbA1c) (“≥ 6.9 group”, n = 357) and a good-glycemic-control group, who showed less than < 6.9% at Pre-HbA1c (“< 6.9 group”, n = 417). The patients in the ≥ 6.9 group were further divided into two groups for further comparisons: a “DM control group” and a “Poor control group”. At follow-up (300 days), there was no difference in major adverse cardiac event (MACE) between the < 6.9 group and ≥ 6.9 groups, as well as between the DM control group and Poor control group. In a multivariate analysis, there was no relationship between the incidence of MACE and Pre-HbA1c, Pre- HbA1c ≥ 6.9% or the HbA1c difference (Pre-HbA1c − HbA1c at follow-up), however, patients treated with insulin (OR:2.23, 95% CI: 1.50–3.30) or thiazolidine (OR:1.9, 95% CI: 1.07–3.41) positively related to MACE, while biguanide (OR:0.17, 95% CI: 0.03–0.59) negatively related to MACE. Insulin treated DM patients with HbA1c < 6.5% tended to have increased MACE ( Fig. 1 ).


Nov 16, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Impact of glycemic control and hypoglycemic agents on the clinical outcome in diabetic patients with percutaneous coronary intervention: from the FU-registry

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access