Author and year (reference)
Number
Age range (years)
Race/ethnicity
Reference values (ppb)
Analyzer
See 2013 [45]
17,249 (2,519 at 6–11 years of age)
6–80
Hispanic, White, Black, and other
5th–95th percentile 3.5–39 (3.5–36.5 for 6–11 year of age)
NIOX MINO (Aerocrine AB, Sweden)
657
9–12
White, Asian, African
Mean 12.7 for White (22.8 for Asian)
Echo Physics CDL 88sp (Eco Medics AG, Switzerland)
Malmberg 2006 [46]
114
7–15
Caucasian
Range 7–14
NIOX (Aerocrine AB, Sweden)
Burchvald 2005 [19]
405 (332a)
4–17
Caucasian, Black, Asian, Hispanic
Mean 9.7 (8.8a)
NIOX (Aerocrine AB, Sweden)
Wong 2005 [50]
291
11–18
Chinese, Caucasian
Median 17 male, 10.8 female for Chinese (11.6 male, 9.1 female for Caucasian)
NIOX (Aerocrine AB, Sweden)
Saito 2004 [49]
176
10–12
Japanese
Mean 15.3
Model 280i (Sievers, USA)
While approximately 10 % or up to 4 ppb has been considered as the within-subject variation in healthy subjects [51, 52], higher variation to more than 20 % was noted in subjects with asthma [20, 51]. Therefore, at least a 20 % change is considered a significant rise or fall in FENO over time or following an intervention [5].
Factors Affecting FENO Values
ATS/ERS guidelines should be followed carefully to obtain accurate and reproducible measurements [2].
Age, Anthropometric Factors, Sex, Race
In children, FENO is age dependent [19, 45, 48] with an increase of about 5 % or 1 ppb/year [19, 48]. Besides age, height, body mass index (BMI), gender, and race can affect FENO. FENO has been shown to have a positive correlation with height [45, 46, 48], and a negative relationship with BMI [45]. However, no significant correlation with height, weight, BMI, or body surface area is noted after adjusting for gender [50] and another study using BMI z score, which is age-independent and sex-independent, also shows no correlation between BMI and FENO [53]. Males tend to have higher FENO than females [8, 45, 50]. Non-white population, particularly Asians, have higher FENO [45, 48, 50].
Diet
FENO can be increased by ingestion of nitrate-rich l-arginine containing foods, such as lettuce, spinach, ham, cucumber, potato, and tomato [54, 55]. FENO increases steadily after nitrate or nitrate-rich food ingestion with a maximum at 120 min, and then decline. However, FENO at 3 h after ingestion still remains higher than the baseline prior to ingestion [54, 55]. Therefore, nitrate-rich diet should be avoided in 3 h before the measurement. Dietary intake of fats such as butter has a positive correlation with FENO, while consumption of salad, one of the major sources of antioxidants, is found to be negatively associated with FENO level [56]. FENO decreases with drinking water 5–20 s before exhalation maneuver, and water temperature does not affect this effect [57]. FENO decreases significantly in the first hour after coffee or caffeine consumption, and this drop remains consistently for 4 h after consumption compared to the placebo [58]. Alcohol also decreases FENO in asthmatic subjects but not in normal individuals [59]. Previously refraining from eating and drinking for 1 h before FENO measurement is recommended by ATS/ERS [2], but longer hours of refraining might be needed to avoid the dietary effect.
Medications
Many medications can affect FENO level. Oral or intravenous l-arginine has been shown to increase FENO in healthy adults [60, 61], but a recent study did not show a significant increase in FENO after oral arginine administration regardless of history of allergy [62], at the same dose studied in the previous study [60]. The nitrite-reducing conditions in the oral cavity by using antibacterial mouthwash such as chlorhexidine acetate or sodium bicarbonate reduce FENO [55, 63]. Inhaled and oral corticosteroid reduce FENO in asthma [32, 64–66] and leukotriene receptor antagonist such as montelukast also decreases FENO [67]. However, nedocromil does not reduce FENO in asthmatic children [66]. Omalizumab decreases FENO and the degree of inhibition of FENO is similar to that seen for inhaled steroid alone [68]. Bronchodilators like beta-agonists have been shown to increase FENO in asthmatics [67, 69–71] while low-dose theophylline does not affect FENO in mild asthma despite reducing eosinophilic inflammation [72]. Bronchoconstriction by methacholine decreases FENO in healthy volunteers [70]. However, no significant fall in FENO is observed after allergen or isocapnic cold air challenge in atopic asthma [73]. The reason for these changes is not clear but is believed to be due to neural mechanisms leading to increase in NO release from lower airways or mechanical effect on airway caliber.
Smoking
Cigarette smoking has been shown to reduce FENO both acutely and on long-term basis [74, 75]. FENO is also reduced with passive smoke exposure both in adults [45, 76] and in early infancy [34, 77, 78] and school age children [45]. Infants exposed pre- and postnatally to smoke show lower FENO than infants exposed only after birth and never-exposed infants [77]. However, this is not the case in infants of mother with atopy or asthma, and FENO increase [78]. Another study done in young children with mean age 51.3 weeks [79] has a different result, showing higher FENO with exposure to parental smoking. A dose–response relationship between FENO and the number of smoking parents is also noted [79]. This discrepancy in result could be related to differences in age of subjects, duration of passive smoking exposure, and prenatal environmental factors such as maternal smoking and atopy.
Respiratory Maneuvers and Exercise
Spirometric maneuvers have been shown to transiently reduce FENO [69, 71, 73, 80, 81], as early as 1 min after spirometry and FENO returned to baseline over 1 h. It is important to obtain FENO consistently prior to spirometry. However, FENO maneuver itself and body plethysmography do not appear to affect plateau FENO level [69, 81]. Reduction in FENO with spirometry is blunted by bronchoprovocation with isocapnic cold air hyperventilation or allergen [73]. FENO is reduced after sputum induction [82, 83]. However, this change occurs with sputum induction by hypertonic saline, not by isotonic saline, and the decreased FENO is observed over 4 h and returns to baseline after 24 h [83]. A change in FENO occurs with exercise, and the largest drop in FENO is noted at 5 min after exercise [80]. Therefore, ATS/ERS recommends avoiding strenuous exercise for 1 h before the measurement [2].
Circadian Rhythm and Seasonal Variation
The effect of circadian rhythm on FENO is not conclusive. No variation is shown in healthy and asthmatic adults and children as well as infants [52, 84–86] while other studies report the morning levels higher than the evening levels in asthmatic and healthy children [20, 87]. The opposite finding in circadian variation is also noted with FENO at 4 pm higher than FENO at 4 am in nocturnal asthma [86]. If possible, it is ideal to perform serial measurements of FENO in the same period of the day to avoid the effects of circadian rhythm. Seasonal variation in FENO is reported due to natural pollen exposure in children with seasonal asthma and pollen allergy [88].
Other Factors
FENO does not alter significantly with gestation during pregnancy although amniotic nitrite concentration decreases after 37 weeks of gestation [89]. Menstrual cycle may affect FENO results. FENO is higher before menstruation than after, in women with complaint of premenstrual asthma [90], but no effect of the menstrual cycle on FENO is noted in other studies [91, 92].
The amount of NO in ambient air can affect FENO [73, 93]. Ambient NO at the time of each test recorded, and breathing NO free or scrubbed air during the study is recommended. Underlying disease condition has shown to affect FENO. FENO levels in adults with hypertension, particularly male, and in patients undergoing major surgery are significantly lower than healthy volunteers [75]. Renal failure and dialysis do not appear to have a significant impact on FENO [75]. The application of positive end-expiratory pressure has been shown to increase FENO in animals [94–96]. High FENO is also detected in mechanically ventilated patients with septic syndrome [75]. Hypoxia causes a dose-dependent decrease in FENO in both animal research [94] and human studies [97, 98] while carbon dioxide also causes a dose-dependent reduction in FENO [94, 95]. Change in pulmonary blood flow did not affect FENO in humans but the effect of hemodynamic change on FENO is noted in animal study [94]. Many studies report elevated FENO in atopy and allergy [30, 31, 33, 99]. Other conditions affecting FENO are discussed in the clinical practice section.
Exhaled NO in Clinical Practice
Asthma
Many studies have assessed the roles of FENO in asthma. FENO can be used to support the diagnosis of asthma, evaluate eosinophilic airway inflammation, assess potential response to anti-inflammatory agents, guide dose titration of anti-inflammatory medications, predict asthma exacerbation, predict asthma relapse, and evaluate adherence to anti-inflammatory medications [1, 4–6].
The official ATS Clinical Practice Guidelines [5] reported a strong recommendation for using FENO to assess eosinophilic airway inflammation and steroid responsiveness. Other strong recommendations supported by ATS are age as a factor affecting FENO in children <12 years of age; measures of low FENO of <20 ppb in children (<25 ppb in adults) indicating less likelihood of eosinophilic inflammation and responsiveness to corticosteroids; cautious interpretation of FENO values between 20 and 35 ppb in children (25–50 ppb in adults); persistent and/or high allergen exposure as a factor associated with higher levels of FENO; and the use of FENO to monitor airway inflammation in asthma. On the other hand, ATS Guidelines provided only weak recommendations for the use of FENO as supporting the diagnosis of asthma. Recommendations are also weak for identifying proper cut points in interpretation and in quantitating a significant increase or decrease in values between visits.
FENO is considered as an indirect marker of airway eosinophilic inflammation, and many studies describe the correlation between FENO and eosinophils measured in sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage, bronchial biopsy, and blood. This relationship was also studied in children [8–14]. In summary, eosinophilic inflammation is unlikely present when FENO is low.
Airway inflammation in asthma is heterogeneous and is not always associated with eosinophilic inflammation. The use of FENO for diagnostic purpose has been evaluated. In epidemiologic studies, FENO can be used as an indicator for allergic airway inflammation in children [14, 49, 99, 100], and performs better than respiratory function measured and bronchodilator responsiveness in identifying preschool children with probable asthma [101], and in predicting subsequent wheezing treated with systemic steroid in infants and toddlers [29]. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values as diagnostic of asthma are high [101, 102]. However, a cross-sectional survey in adolescent children shows high negative predictive values of FENO for asthma but positive predictive value is low for the diagnosis of asthma [14]. High FENO can be also noted in atopic children without asthma [47, 100]. The combination of FENO and methacholine provocation test may have more diagnostic power in epidemiological studies than FENO alone for allergic asthma [103].
In children with respiratory symptoms, FENO in the diagnosis of asthma can be a predictor of asthma [101, 102, 104]. Significant association between FENO and reported asthma symptoms is also shown [14, 99, 101, 105], while the correlations between symptoms and spirometry are poor [105]. In nonallergic patients, normal FENO does not exclude the diagnosis of asthma, and in patients who have already been treated with inhaled steroids, is significantly reduced from previously elevated FENO in inflammatory airway diseases. Overall, the results of studies examining the use of FENO in the diagnosis of asthma have also been inconsistent in the adult literature. Therefore, FENO reflects only one aspect of the asthma phenotype, and should be used as a supportive method to other diagnostic tests.
It is well known that not all patients with asthma respond to corticosteroids. High FENO (>35 ppb) in adults has been shown as a positive indicator that the patient would likely respond to inhaled corticosteroids (likelihood ratio of a positive response, 4.9; 95 % confidence interval, 2.2–10.9) [106]. In children, the response to anti-inflammatory treatment was also found to be correlated with the FENO [107–109]. High FENO (median 17.4 ppb) is associated with a good FEV1 response (>15 % increase) while lower FENO (median 11.1 ppb) is associated with a poor response (<5 % increase) [107]. FENO is predictive of steroid responsiveness more consistently than spirometry, bronchodilator response, peak flow variation, or airway hyperreactivity to methacholine [107, 110–112], even when no sputum eosinophilia is demonstrated [113]. The reduction response of FENO to corticosteroid treatment is both rapid (within 1 week, potentially as early as 48 h) and dose dependent [112, 114, 115]. Anti-leukotrienes also reduce FENO in asthma, but to a lesser extent [109]. FENO is also helpful in predicting asthma relapse after clinical remission [116] and in anticipating eligibility for inhaled corticosteroid dose reduction [117, 118]. However, tailoring anti-asthma therapy according to FENO in comparison to usual care treatment strategies shows no added value of FENO for clinical symptoms, asthma exacerbations, pulmonary function, β-agonist use, and overall daily dose of inhaled corticosteroid [119–123]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis [124] also conclude no significant benefit of adding FENO to traditional treatment algorithms with respect to asthma exacerbations, asthma symptom scores, or forced expiratory flow in 1 s (FEV1). In children, FENO-based treatment group received significantly higher dose of inhaled corticosteroid [123], and this finding is opposite to that adult studies [124]. However, pregnant women with asthma [125] may benefit the most from FENO monitoring, resulting in significant reduction in asthma exacerbation during pregnancy.
A strong positive correlation between the reduction of FENO and the adherence to anti-inflammatory treatment is noted [126]. Therefore, besides reviewing adequate doses of anti-inflammatory treatment, checking adherence and inhaler technique is needed for children with high exhaled NO who are already being treated with anti-inflammatory treatment.
FENO may be able to predict long-term outcome. In adults with difficult-to-treat asthma, FENO predicts accelerated decline in lung function [127]. In infants and toddlers with recurrent wheeze, high FENO also predicts deterioration in z-scores of forced expiratory volumes and flows, as measured 6 months later [29].
It is important to choose the appropriate cut point in relation to the clinical setting (Table 14.2). Clinical practice strategies for use of FENO in patients with asthma have been explained in detail in the text and tables of the ATS Clinical Practice Guidelines [5].
Table 14.2
General guideline for interpretation of fraction of exhaled (FENO) at 50 ml/s flow rate
FENO (ppb) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Children (<12 years) | <20 | 20–35 | >35 |
Adult | <25 | 25–50 | >50 |
Eosinophilic inflammation | Unlikely | Mild if present | Likely |
No previous diagnosis of asthma and no anti-inflammatory treatment | |||
Symptomatic | • Neutrophilic asthma • Alternative diagnosesa | • Eosinophilic asthma | |
Response to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) | Unlikely | Possible | Likely |
Previous diagnosis of asthma and on anti-inflammatory treatment | |||
Symptomatic | • Alternative diagnosesa | • High allergen exposure • Infection • Poor adherence or inhaler technique • Inadequate ICS | • High allergen exposure • Poor adherence or inhaler technique • Inadequate ICS dose • Risk of relapse or exacerbation • Steroid resistance |
Previous diagnosis of asthma and on anti-inflammatory treatment | |||
Asymptomatic | • Adequate ICS dose • Good adherence | • Adequate ICS dose • Good adherence | • Poor adherence or inhaler technique |
ICS dose | Reduction or withdraw | No change | No change |
Viral Infection
Since NO functions in host defense against viral infections, elevation of FENO is likely beneficial to the host by inhibiting viral replication. In both healthy and asthmatic adults, higher FENO was noted during viral respiratory tract infections [128–130]. In contrast, infants with rhinorrhea [131] or acute virus-associated wheezy bronchitis [85] have significantly lower FENO than healthy infants. With resolution of symptoms, a significant increase in FENO is noted in some of the infants with rhinorrhea [131]. These findings suggest possible downregulation of NO production, impaired NO diffusion into the airway due to epithelial damage and increased airway secretions, and an inflammatory reaction mostly related to neutrophils. However, a more recent study in children with respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis shows FENO higher (but without statistical significance) than healthy control during the acute phase of illness, and a positive correlation between FENO and the clinical score (Downes) of bronchiolitis is noted with higher FENO in children with more distress [132]. The inconsistency of the effect of viral infection on FENO level is not fully explained but the differences in method, sample size, gender, atopy, allergy, asthma of study subjects, maternal smoking as well as possible virus-specific disease process can be speculated. The infants with future wheezing episodes in 2 years [132], and young children <4 years of age with clinical index for predicting asthma at school age [133] already present elevated level of FENO. FENO in young children with history of recurrent wheezing is also higher than healthy control and children with other pulmonary diseases [134], and atopic wheezers show higher FENO than nonatopic wheezers [134].
Chronic Lung Disease (CLD) of Prematurity
Data on FENO values for children with CLD of prematurity are inconsistent possibly due to the differences in the age of study subjects, gestational age, definitions and severity of CLD, or measurement techniques. Compared to controls, equal [134–136] or higher [137–139] FENO was noted in infants and younger children with CLD. FENO is particularly elevated in infants with moderate or severe CLD [138]. Although FENO is not elevated in infants with CLD, calculated NO output VNO (nl/min), by multiplying online flow rate (L/min) and FENO (ppb), is reduced in infants with lower gestational age, higher clinical risk index for babies score, longer duration of oxygen therapy, postnatal treatment with corticosteroids, and more severe CLD [135]. Even at school age, no significant differences are observed in FENO among children with CLD of prematurity, healthy control, and preterm-born children without CLD, unless atopy is not present [140]. FENO in prematurely born atopic children is significantly higher than nonatopic children without prematurity [140]. On the other hand, Baraldi et al. [141] reports lower FENO in school-age children with CLD of prematurity than healthy matched term-born control and preterm-born children without CLD. FENO in children with CLD is four times lower than children with asthma despite a comparable airflow limitation in FEV1 in both CLD and asthma groups [141]. The low FENO in children with CLD is not due to effects of medications such as corticosteroid or leukotriene receptor antagonist, based on study protocol. However, other factors affecting FENO such as atopy, allergy, smoking exposure, and severity of CLD are not described for the study subjects.
Pulmonary Hypertension (PHN)
NO in airway gases obtained by bronchoscopy, NO reaction products in exhaled breath condensate or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, FENO, and VNO are low in adults with PHN, and are negatively correlated with pulmonary artery (PA) pressures and with years since diagnosis of PHN [142–144]. Therapeutic interventions for PHN are associated with increased levels of FENO [144, 145]. Therefore, FENO may have a role in monitoring disease severity and response to therapy in children with PHN but further investigation is required.
Cystic Fibrosis (CF)
FENO is low in both children [40, 63, 146, 147] and infants [134, 148] with CF despite chronic airway inflammation, although FENO levels similar to or higher than control subjects are also reported in children and infants with CF [93, 139, 149]. FENO is negatively correlated with lung clearance index in CF [40] and FENO is lower in patients with severe CF lung disease than in those with mild disease [147, 150]. However, this association has not been shown in other trial [93]. FENO also has an inverse relationship with age, regardless of CF genotypes, and gradually decline throughout young childhood [149]. Several mechanisms for reduced FENO in CF [151] have been proposed including reduced iNOS or iNOS expression in CF [152–155], presence of NO reductase in Pseudomonas aeruginosa [156], trapping of NO metabolites in thick secretions [157], deficiency of l-arginine by increased sputum or systemic arginase activities [150, 158], and metabolism and consumptions of NO by reactive oxygen species present in the inflamed environment resulting in elevated nitrate and nitrotyrosine [159, 160].
After therapeutic interventions, the relationship between FENO and pulmonary function is not consistent. A significant increase in FENO following intravenous antibiotic treatment is noted in children with CF, but does not correlate with lung function [161]. On the other hand, inhaled l-arginine improves both FENO and pulmonary function [162]. FENO is also not associated with any marker of airway inflammation measured in bronchoalveolar lavage in infants with CF [149].
Decreased iNOS in bronchial epithelium and consequently decreased NO are associated with reduced bactericidal activity in the lung [152, 155], and with increased susceptibility of airway colonization with P. aeruginosa [163]. Interestingly, children with chronic P. aeruginosa infection demonstrated no significant increase in FENO after intravenous antibiotics [161, 164].
A study including both children and adult shows lower nasal NO concentration in CF than in controls and asthmatics [93]. However, no relationship between nasal NO and pulmonary function is noted in patients with CF.
C alv and J NO have been evaluated in children with CF [40, 43, 44]. J NO can be similar to or lower than healthy children without CF but variable results were noted for C alv. C alv correlates negatively with other systemic inflammatory markers in CF [40]. Children with chronic P. aeruginosa colonization have higher levels of systemic inflammatory markers than those not colonized and also lower levels of C alv [40].
Although FENO may have some utility as a biomarker of CF severity in children, roles of FENO in CF-related lung disease need further study and the use of FENO is currently very limited in CF.
Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD)
Children with PCD have lower FENO than healthy children. However, some overlap in FENO has been shown [165]; thereby, FENO cannot be used to differentiate patients with PCD from healthy controls. On the other hand, extremely low levels of nasal NO occur in children with PCD, and can effectively discriminate those with PCD from children with other causes of bronchiectasis, CF, asthma, and healthy controls [104, 166–169]. A detailed description of the utility of nasal NO as a screening tool in PCD is explained further in Chap. 4.
Transplantation
Increased FENO has been noted with acute rejection [170], pulmonary infection [171], and development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) [172, 173] in adult lung transplant recipients. However, no elevated FENO is also reported in pulmonary infection or BOS in human lung transplantation [170]. The data on pediatric lung and cardiac transplant recipients demonstrated that C alv was significantly elevated in cardiac transplant recipients when compared to controls; lung transplant recipients had higher levels of C alv than controls; however this difference did not reach statistical significance [174]. Nasal NO is significantly lower in pediatric lung transplant recipients when compared to other solid-organ recipients or healthy controls, and was negatively correlated with tacrolimus levels [175]. Higher FENO was also observed in children with pulmonary complications after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [176].
Conclusion
NO is a molecule generated from various resident and inflammatory cells in the airway, and can be measured in exhaled air as FENO by a stationary chemiluminescence analyzer or a portable handheld device. ATS/ERS published recommendations to standardize the procedures to measure FENO, and official ATS clinical practice guidelines has also been published for interpretation of FENO. In the clinical setting, FENO can provide information on airway inflammation, and help the management of airway diseases, particularly asthma. In pediatric asthma, FENO can be complementary to lung function tests to guide asthma diagnosis, assessment of current asthma control, adjustment of anti-inflammatory medications, and future risk of exacerbation. In other pediatric respiratory diseases, there has been progress in clinical application of FENO, but further research is needed.
References
1.
Barnes PJ, Dweik RA, Gelb AF, Gibson PG, George SC, Grasemann H, et al. Exhaled nitric oxide in pulmonary diseases: a comprehensive review. Chest. 2010;138(3):682–92. PubMed PMID: 20822990.PubMed
2.
American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society. ATS/ERS recommendations for standardized procedures for the online and offline measurement of exhaled lower respiratory nitric oxide and nasal nitric oxide, 2005. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171(8):912–30. PubMed PMID: 15817806.
3.
Recommendations for standardized procedures for the on-line and off-line measurement of exhaled lower respiratory nitric oxide and nasal nitric oxide in adults and children-1999. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. Am J Res Crit Care Med. 1999;160(6):2104–17. PubMed PMID: 10588636.
4.
Silkoff PE, Erzurum SC, Lundberg JO, George SC, Marczin N, Hunt JF, et al. ATS workshop proceedings: exhaled nitric oxide and nitric oxide oxidative metabolism in exhaled breath condensate. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2006;3(2):131–45. PubMed PMID: 16565422.PubMed
5.
Dweik RA, Boggs PB, Erzurum SC, Irvin CG, Leigh MW, Lundberg JO, et al. An official ATS clinical practice guideline: interpretation of exhaled nitric oxide levels (FENO) for clinical applications. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(5):602–15. PubMed PMID: 21885636.PubMed
6.
Baraldi E, de Jongste JC. European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society Task F. Measurement of exhaled nitric oxide in children, 2001. Eur Respir J. 2002;20(1):223–37.PubMed
7.
Lane C, Knight D, Burgess S, Franklin P, Horak F, Legg J, et al. Epithelial inducible nitric oxide synthase activity is the major determinant of nitric oxide concentration in exhaled breath. Thorax. 2004;59(9):757–60. PubMed PMID: 15333851. Pubmed Central PMCID: 1747143.PubMedCentralPubMed
8.
Barreto M, Villa MP, Monti F, Bohmerova Z, Martella S, Montesano M, et al. Additive effect of eosinophilia and atopy on exhaled nitric oxide levels in children with or without a history of respiratory symptoms. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2005;16(1):52–8. PubMed PMID: 15693912.PubMed