Ethnic Differences Among Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators Recipients in Israel




Heart failure is an increasingly common condition arising from a variety of different pathophysiological processes. Little is known about the unique features of Israeli Arabs who present with heart failure and who undergo cardiac device implantation. The study population comprised of 4,671 patients who were enrolled in the national Israeli Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator registry. We compared demographic, clinical, and echocardiographic characteristics; device-related indications; and outcomes between Israeli Arabs (n = 733) and Jews (n = 3,938), who were enrolled in the registry from July 2010 through December 2013. Israeli Arabs constituted 15.7% of the study population. They were younger at presentation compared with Jews (57 ± 15 vs 66 ± 12 years, respectively; p <0.001), with a greater burden of co-morbidities, including diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive lung disease and smoking. In addition, Arab patients had a greater frequency of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (40.2% vs 24.6%, respectively; p <0.001), which was associated with a greater frequency of familial history of sudden cardiac death. During 15 ± 9 month follow-up, the mortality rates and appropriate device therapy were similar in both ethnic groups. In conclusion, Israeli Arab patients implanted with implantable cardioverter defibrillators display unique clinical features with greater prevalence of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy characterized by an early-onset and rapid deterioration.


The prevalence of heart failure (HF) is continuously rising, and studies describing it in the Arab population are scarce. Moreover, the cause of HF in this population is not yet established. Israeli Arabs and Jews are mutually exclusive ethnic groups that together comprise the vast majority of Israel’s population (Arabs 20.7% and Jews 75%). We assumed that Israeli Arab patients with HF have diverse characteristics because of differences in environmental and genetic background. The Israeli National Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Registry is a source that could be used to delineate differences between Israeli Arab and Jewish patients with HF. Therefore, we compared clinical characteristics and associated outcomes of Israeli Arab and Jewish patients with HF who were enrolled in the Israeli National ICD Registry.


Methods


The Israeli ICD Database is a prospective multicenter registry that includes all patients who had implantation or replacement of an ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) for primary and secondary preventions. From July 2010 through December 2013, a total of 6,731 patients underwent ICD or CRT-D implantations or replacements in 21 centers in Israel. Ethics committees of each participating institution approved the registry, and all patients provided written informed consent. For the purpose of the present analysis, we included only patients who underwent de novo device implantation and only Israeli Arabs or Jews (n = 4,671). A total of 56 (1.2%) non-Arabs and non-Jews were excluded.


The registry, initiated in July 2010, comprises a collection of data of baseline clinical and implantation characteristics. From July 2011, prospective follow-up was initiated in all participating centers. Follow-up data for clinical and arrhythmic events were obtained from consecutively enrolled patients at 6-month intervals. To date, a total of 1,752 (37.5%) patients were followed over a mean period of 15 ± 9 months (Jews, n = 1,479; Arabs, n = 273). No significant differences were found in the clinical characteristics between registry patients with follow-up data and those who were enrolled before the initiation of follow-up. Data were prospectively collected from the index hospitalization at the time of initial device implantation (or device upgrade). A local electrophysiologist from the implanting center entered information into a secure, Web-based electronic case report form, firewall and password protected. Variables collected included demographic and clinical characteristics, indication for ICD/CRT-D, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), co-morbidities, hemoglobin concentration, serum creatinine levels, and previous treatments, device manufacturer, device type, and unique device identifier. The Israeli Association for Cardiovascular Trials (IACT) at Sheba Medical Center processed the primary data and performed all statistical analyses.


The following clinical end points were evaluated during follow-up: (1) all-cause mortality; (2) cardiac death; (3) first appropriate and inappropriate device therapies (any therapy, shock or ATP); and (4) all-cause and HF hospitalizations. In the present study, we further assessed the combined end point of hospitalization, death, or device therapies. Device therapies were determined as appropriate or inappropriate by an experienced clinical electrophysiologist, who reviewed the intracardiac electrograms of all events, on a case-by-case basis. Because of the significant heterogeneity of the population, a predefined subgroup analysis by HF cause (i.e., ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy) was warranted.


Baseline patient clinical characteristics and procedural data were compared between the 2 ethnic groups. Data are expressed as mean ± SD or frequency and percentage when appropriate. The chi-square test was used for dichotomous variables, and analysis of variance was used for continuous variables. Cox proportional hazard multivariate models were used to evaluate associations between ethnicity and the various outcomes. Prespecified covariates in the multivariate models included age >75 years, female gender, QRS duration >150 ms, New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes III to IV, presence of complete left bundle branch block (LBBB), non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, implantation of a CRT-D, implantation of defibrillator for secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death, and Arab ethnicity. A p value <0.05 was considered significant. All analyses were performed by the IACT using SAS statistical software version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina).




Results


From July 2010 through December 2013, a total of 4,671 patients underwent ICD or CRT-D implantations in 21 centers in Israel, of whom 733 (15.7%) were Israeli Arabs and 3,938 (84.3%) were Jews. Of note, during the study period, Israeli Arabs constituted 17.2% to 17.4% of the Israeli population. The clinical characteristics of the 2 ethnic groups are presented in Table 1 . As shown, the age at implantation was younger in Arab patients. In addition, rates of smoking and COPD were higher in Arabs, as were rates of diabetes mellitus and family history of heart disease. Notably, the proportion of patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy was significantly higher in Arabs (40.2% vs 24.6%, p <0.001).



Table 1

Baseline characteristics by ethnicity








































































































Clinical Characteristics JEWS (n=3938) ARABS (n=733) P-value
Age at presentation (years) 65.7±12.3 57.5±14.8 <.001
Women 673(17%) 152(21%) 0.017
Cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator 1521(39%) 250(34%) 0.021
Ischemic heart disease 2970(76%) 438(60%) <.001
Prior myocardial infarction 2574(87%) 370(85%) 0.125
Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy 968(24%) 298(40%) <.001
Family history of sudden cardiac death 126(3%) 65(9%) <.001
Atrial fibrillation 866(22%) 121(17%) <.001
Hypertension 2486(64%) 459(63%) 0.698
Diabetes mellitus 1414(36%) 298(41%) 0.015
Smoking 1093(28%) 347(48%) <.001
New York Heart Association class≥3 1415(36%) 270(37%) 0.640
ACE Inhibitors 2890(74%) 551(76%) 0.416
Diuretics 2742(70%) 529(72%) 0.221
Beta blockers 3166(81%) 603(83%) 0.265
Anti-arrhythmic 692(18%) 108(15%) 0.057
Ejection fraction <30% 1964(54%) 413(61%) 0.003
Ejection fraction, Mean± SD 29.5±10.3 28.3±10.6 <.001
Left bundle brunch block 1139(29%) 207(28%) <.001

ACE = angiotensin converting enzyme.


As summarized in Table 2 , Arab patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy had a worse cardiovascular risk profile, with lower LVEF, and higher proportion of LBBB morphology. Of patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, Arabs displayed higher rates of family history of sudden cardiac death (17% vs 7%, p <0.001), implying that inherited diseases may play an important role in the cause of HF in this subgroup ( Table 2 ).



Table 2

Baseline characteristics of ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy























































































































































































































Clinical Characteristics Ischemic cardiomyopathy Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy
JEWS (n=2970%) ARABS (n=438%) P-value JEWS (n=968%) ARABS (n=295%) P-value
Age at presentation (years) 68.0±10.0 62.6±10.5 <.001 58.9±15.8 50.0±16.9 <.001
Women 327(11%) 55(13%) 0.338 346(36%) 97(33%) 0.367
Cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator 1122(38%) 142(32%) 0.030 399(41%) 108(37%) 0.157
Prior myocardial infarction 2574(87%) 370(85%) 0.116 0 0 0
Prior percutaneous coronary intervention 2178(74%) 359(82%) <.001 0 0 0
Heart failure 2451(83%) 384(88%) 0.008 666(69%) 204(69%) 0.964
Non-ischemic dilated 0 0 0 562(58%) 188(64%) 0.078
Hyperthrophic cardiomyopathy 101(3%) 17(4%) 0.596 138(14%) 22(7%) 0.002
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy 12(0%) 1(0%) 1.000 18(2%) 6(2%) 0.848
Congenital heart disease 54(2%) 5(1%) 0.299 31(4%) 21(8%) 0.004
History of ventricular arrhythmia 880(30%) 124(28%) 0.574 310(32%) 101(34%) 0.498
Family history of sudden cardiac death 55(2%) 15(3%) 0.030 71(7%) 50(17%) <.001
Atrial fibrillation 633(21%) 73(17%) 0.027 233(24%) 48(16%) 0.005
Permanent pacemaker 160(5%) 6(1%) <.001 74(8%) 14(5%) 0.087
Diabetes mellitus 1191(40%) 220(50%) <.001 223(23%) 78(27%) 0.232
Smoking 911(31%) 261(60%) <.001 182(19%) 86(30%) <.001
New York Heart Association class≥3 1089(37%) 169(39%) 0.437 326(34%) 101(34%) 0.859
ACE Inhibitors 2305(79%) 359(83%) 0.050 585(61%) 192(65%) 0.177
Diuretics 2177(74%) 350(80%) 0.004 565(59%) 179(61%) 0.552
Beta blockers 2445(83%) 387(89%) 0.002 721(75%) 216(74%) 0.672
Anti-arrhythmic 545(19%) 70(16%) 0.225 147(15%) 38(13%) 0.319
Aspirin 1634(78%) 262(83%) 0.023 325(48%) 104(48%) 0.913
Ejection fraction <30% 1520(54%) 269(65%) 0.001 444(51%) 144(56%) 0.071
Ejection fraction 28.4±8.0 26.9±8.3 <.001 33.0±14.9 30.7±13.2 0.064
Left bundle brunch block 831(71%) 122(76%) 0.003 308(38%) 85(29%) 0.130


A total of 1,752 consecutive patients, of whom 273 (15.5%) were Arabs, were prospectively followed over a mean period of 15 ± 9 months. Rates of unadjusted all-cause mortality at 16 months were similar between the 2 ethnic groups, as were rates of cardiac mortality ( Figures 1 and 2 , respectively). Also, there were no statistically significant differences in the overall rates of device therapies. However, the rate of appropriate shocks during follow-up was higher in Arabs compared with Jews (3% vs 2%, respectively; p = 0.05).


Nov 30, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Ethnic Differences Among Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators Recipients in Israel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access