Usefulness of the Integrated Scoring Model of Treadmill Tests to Predict Myocardial Ischemia and Silent Myocardial Ischemia in Community-Dwelling Adults (from the Rancho Bernardo Study)




To investigate the association between analyses of submaximal treadmill exercise test (TMT) and long-term myocardial ischemia (Mis) and silent Mis in community-dwelling older adults, 898 Rancho Bernardo Study participants (mean age 55 years) without coronary heart disease underwent TMT and were followed up to 27 years. The main outcome measures are incidence of Mis and silent Mis. During follow-up, 97 Mis and 103 silent Mis events occurred. We measured ST change, inability to achieve target heart rate, abnormal heart rate recovery (HRR), and chronotropic incompetence (ChI). Each parameter was a significant predictor for Mis and silent Mis. An integrated scoring model was based on these 4 parameters and defined as sum of numbers of abnormal parameters. After multiple adjustments, an integrated scoring model independently predicted Mis and silent Mis. The incidence rates of abnormalities of parameters are 36.5% for 1 abnormality, 9.1% for 2 abnormalities, and 2.0% for 3 or 4 abnormalities. Compared with those with normal results, participants with 1 or 2 abnormalities had significantly increased risk for Mis (hazard ratio [HR] 1.79 or 2.34, respectively) and silent Mis (HR 1.80 or 2.64, respectively). Participants with 3 or more positive findings showed an even greater risk for Mis (HR 7.96 [3.02 to 21.00]) and silent Mis (HR 3.22 [0.76 to 13.60]). In conclusion, ST change, ChI, abnormal HRR, inability to achieve target heart rate, and integrated scoring model of TMT were independent predictors of long-term Mis and silent Mis in an asymptomatic middle-aged population. Management of ChI or abnormal HRR in an asymptomatic population may prevent future ischemic heart disease and thus improve the quality of life.


It is well known that chronotropic incompetence (ChI) and abnormal heart rate recovery (HRR) are independent predictors of major adverse cardiovascular events and overall mortality. However, the independent value of the treadmill exercise test (TMT) used as a screening tool in asymptomatic adults to predict future coronary artery disease, and especially to predict silent ischemia, is not yet known. The present study was designed to assess ST change, ChI, inability to achieve target heart rate (iTHR), abnormal HRR, and integrated analysis of these parameters as predictors of myocardial ischemia (Mis) and silent Mis in community-dwelling asymptomatic older adults followed up to 27 years.


Methods


The Rancho Bernardo Study is a prospective population-based study of older adults residing in a suburban southern California community. The cohort of residents enrolled was quite homogeneous—they were almost entirely Caucasian and most were white-collar workers. From 1972 to 1974, a total of 1,789 community-dwelling adults participated in a heart disease risk factor survey, which served as the baseline visit for the present study. Participants with a history of coronary heart disease (CHD: myocardial infarction, angina, or coronary artery bypass surgery) were excluded from the TMT. The data of 898 participants who underwent TMT at baseline are used for this analysis ( Figure 1 ). The study protocol was approved by the Human Research Protection Program at the University of California, San Diego; all participants gave written informed consent before participation. Participants were followed by annual mailed questionnaires, and they returned for research clinic visits approximately every 4 years through 1999, up to 27 years.




Figure 1


Summary of study population.


A submaximal TMT was administered to participants ; exclusions included aortic stenosis, congestive heart failure, severe hypertension, R-on-T–type premature ventricular contractions, ventricular tachycardia, parasystolic focus, atrial flutter, congenital heart disease, and second reschedule required. The exercise test was terminated for any of the following reasons: (1) subjective response: the subject was unwilling or unable to continue exercise; (2) development of potential hazards to the subject; and (3) attainment of near-maximal exercise—exercise was stopped if the subject attained age-predicted target heart rate (THR) and maintained it for 1 minute, if the subject maintained THR until the end of the ongoing exercise stage, or if subject’s heart rate exceeded target heart rate by 8 beats/min, whichever occurred first. A test result was considered to be positive if (1) ST depression or elevation of ≥1 mm was recorded by the visual coders, (2) the ST integral decreased by at least 10 diV-seconds from its resting value to a value of 10 gV-seconds or less, or (3) the ST integral rose by at least 10 gV-sec from its resting value.


Three nonelectrocardiographic measurements were defined as (1) an abnormal HRR—a decrease of <22 beats/min after 2 minutes of recovery ; (2) ChI—the inability to achieve 80% of heart rate reserve, using a standard equation to define the percentage heart rate reserve [(maximal heart rate − resting heart rate)/(174 − 0.54 × age) − (resting heart rate) × 100] ; (3) THR was considered achieved when 90% of maximal heart rate predicted for subject’s age was attained.


The primary outcomes were Mis and silent Mis. Mis, determined using standard epidemiologic methods (such as annual mailed questionnaires and interviews at regular clinic visits), consisted of a history of myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, coronary revascularization, or coronary artery bypass graft history.


Silent Mis was defined as ≥1 ischemic resting electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities, newly revealed at a follow-up visit with no history of myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, or chest pain not meeting the Rose algorithm.



  • (1)

    “ECG coronary probable”—major Q or QS wave [Minnesota Code 1.1, 1.2]; complete left bundle branch block [Minnesota Code 7.1.1].


  • (2)

    “ECG coronary possible”—small Q or QS wave [Minnesota Code 1.3]; ST depression [Minnesota Code 4.1 – 4.3]; T wave items [Minnesota Code 5.1 to 5.3].



No Evidence of Cardiovascular Disease was defined as no ECG changes and no history of myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, or chest pain (≥30 minutes).


Data on vital status were collected on all participants. More than 99% of this cohort was followed for vital status by annual mailer through 1999.


Death certificates were obtained for all decedents and coded for cause of death by a certified nosologist using the ninth revision of the “International Classification of Diseases, Adapted.” Deaths due to CHD included coronary death, myocardial infarction, coronary insufficiency, and angina (ICD-9 codes 410.00 to 414.00). We classified deaths due to CHD as apparent myocardial ischemia.


Categorical variables are reported as numbers (percentages), and continuous variables are presented as means (standard deviation). Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to obtain multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of Mis and silent Mis of those who had abnormal test results during the TMT versus those with normal test results. HRs were adjusted for age by decade, gender, cholesterol level, history of diabetes, and smoking. We performed the supremum test for proportional hazards assumption with 1,000 replications in Cox regression model. Although TMT had a marginal significance in the test of proportionality, we used the time-dependent Cox regression model because the other exposure variables fit the proportionality assumption. We restricted study subjects who had performed TMT in our analyses, and there was no missing in exposure variables such as TMT and target HR. There was 1 missing in the variables of HRR and ChI. Also, our main exposure variables such as ST change, THR, HRR, and ChI were binomial scales (achievement vs no achievement, positive vs negative, etc.), not continuous scales, and so there were no outliers. There was no interaction effect between the main exposure variable and the other confounders in our multivariate models. A 2-tailed p <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data were analyzed using the SAS statistical package (SAS institute, Chicago, IL).




Results


The baseline characteristics of participants are provided in Table 1 ; 898 Rancho Bernardo Study participants underwent TMT and were followed for up to 27 years (mean age at baseline 55.04 ± 14.85 years, 481 were women); 218 participants (24.3%) were current smokers, 366 (40.8%) were daily drinkers, 180 (20.0%) had metabolic syndrome, and 38 (4.2%) had diabetes mellitus.



Table 1

Baseline characteristics of study population




















































































































Variable Total cohort (n=898) Myocardial Ischemia
Apparent (n=97) Silent (n=103)
Age (years) 55.04 ± 14.85 65.65 ± 10.46 59.5 ± 98.33
BMI (Kg/m 2 ) 24.96 ± 3.46 24.77 ± 3.37 24.97 ± 3.54
Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) 228.54 ± 43.58 238.05 ± 40.58 230.53 ± 43.14
Triglycerides (mg/dL) 141.87 ± 101.92 127.05 ± 71.18 141.00 ± 87.49
HDL (mg/dL) 58.20 ± 18.76 58.71 ± 18.41 60.32 ± 18.65
LDL (mg/dL) 152.51 ± 40.53 164.46 ± 37.89 153.72 ± 42.66
SBP (mmHg) 147.57 ± 18.78 158.02 ± 20.89 151.42 ± 17.08
DBP (mmHg) 99.23 ± 9.47 100.20 ± 10.03 100.00 ± 9.31
HR (beats/min) 84.24 ± 13.14 81.53 ± 11.64 81.69 ± 13.43
Fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL) 99.30 ± 18.23 103.71 ± 27.62 98.58 ± 13.36
Current Smoker 218(24.3%) 25(26.3%) 19(18.4%)
Daily Alcohol Drinker 366(40.8%) 46(48.4%) 43(41.7%)
Regular Exercise (3+ times per week) 109(88.6%) 9(90.0%) 10(90.9%)
Family History of CVD 147(16.6%) 18(19.4%) 25(24.3%)
Diabetes mellitus 38(4.2%) 8(8.4%) 3(2.9%)
Metabolic Syndrome (Modified WHO) 180(20.0%) 20(21.1%) 22(21.4%)
Lipid-modifying agent 68(7.6%) 25(26.3%) 14(13.6%)
Anti-Diabetes mellitus agent 15(1.7%) 4(4.2%) 1(1.0%)
Anti-Hypertension 99(11.0%) 18(18.9%) 13(12.6%)
Diuretics 44(5.1%) 6(6.4%) 7(6.8%)
Anti-Arrhythmia 6(0.7%) 0 1(1.0%)

Categorical variables are reported as number (percentages) and continuous variables as mean (standard deviation). CVD—cardiovascular disease.


Fifty-three participants (5.9%) showed positive TMT result (ST change). Overall, 418 participants (46.5%) were unable to achieve their THR. Twenty-two participants (2.5%) had abnormal HRR, and ChI was detected in 56 participants (6.2%). In Cox proportional hazards models, after adjusting for age, gender, cholesterol level, diabetes, and smoking history, positive TMT result was independently associated with Mis (HR 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83 to 3.59) and silent Mis (HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.16 to 4.19); iTHR was associated with Mis (adjusted HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.57) and silent Mis (HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.33 to 3.50) regardless of causes for stopping TMT ( Table 2 , Figures 2 and 3 ). Abnormal HRR was also independently associated with Mis (adjusted HR 5.30, 95% CI 2.14 to 13.15) and silent Mis (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.18 to 9.37). And, ChI was associated with Mis (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.65) but not silent Mis (adjusted HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.40 to 2.47; Table 2 , Figures 2 and 3 ).



Table 2

Risk for myocardial ischemia (Mis) and silent myocardial ischemia by result of each test.




































































































































Test Result N of total cohort N of Mis events HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) N of total cohort N of Silent Mis events HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI)
Treadmill Exercise Test
Negative 845 89 1.00 1.00 845 93 1.00 1.00
Positive 53 8 1.72(0.83-3.55) 1.72(0.83-3.59) 53 10 2.26(1.17-4.36) 2.16(1.16-4.19)
Target Heart Rate
Achieved 480 26 1.00 1.00 480 40 1.00 1.00
Not achieved 418 71 2.24(1.32-3.81) 2.11(1.25-3.57) 418 63 2.10(1.30-3.39) 2.16(1.33-3.50)
Due to heart-related symptoms 273 46 2.06(1.17-3.61) 1.94(1.11-3.37) 273 50 2.53(1.53-4.17) 2.60(1.57-4.31)
Due to leg pain and weakness 90 14 2.52(1.25-5.05) 2.41(1.20-4.84) 90 9 1.55(0.72-3.32) 1.56(0.73-3.36)
Miscellaneous 55 11 2.86(1.32-6.18) 2.69(1.28-5.79) 55 4 1.00(0.34-2.89) 1.06(0.36-3.07)
Heart rate recovery
Normal 875 91 1.00 1.00 875 102 1.00 1.00
Abnormal 22 6 5.67(2.34-13.75) 5.30(2.14-13.15) 22 1 1.17(0.16-8.47) 1.29(1.18-9.37)
Chronotropic Incompetence §
Negative 841 85 1.00 1.00 841 98 1.00 1.00
Positive 56 12 1.91(1.01-3.61) 1.92(1.01-3.65) 56 5 0.97(0.39-2.42) 0.99(0.40-2.47)

Adjusted for age and sex.


Adjusted for age, sex, cholesterol level, diabetes history, and smoking history.


Abnormal heart rate recovery was defined as a decrease of <22bpm after 2 min of recovery.


§ Chronotropic incompetence was defined as the inability to achieve 80% of heart rate reserve, using the regression equation [(maximal heart rate – resting heart rate)/(174-0.54 x age)-(resting heart rate) x100].




Figure 2


Myocardial ischemia event-free survival probability per (A) ST change, (B) inability to achieve target heart rate, (C) abnormal heart rate recovery, and (D) chronotropic incompetence.



Figure 3


Silent myocardial ischemia event-free survival probability per (A) ST change, (B) inability to achieve target heart rate, (C) abnormal heart rate recovery, and (D) chronotropic incompetence.


Even in the subanalysis excluding ST-segment abnormalities, iTHR was persistently associated with greater Mis (adjusted HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.22 to 3.61) and silent Mis (adjusted HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.90), and abnormal HRR remained a predictor of Mis (adjusted HR 3.94, 95% CI 1.34 to 11.63; Table 3 ).



Table 3

Risk for myocardial ischemia (Mis) and silent myocardial ischemia by result of each test in subjects with negative treadmill exercise test.














































































































Test Result N of total cohort N of Mis events HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) N of total cohort N of Silent Mis events HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI)
Target Heart Rate
Achieved 470 26 1.00 1.00 470 40 1.00 1.00
Not achieved 375 63 2.16(1.24-3.75) 2.10(1.22-3.61) 375 53 1.71(1.03-2.83) 1.74(1.05-2.90)
Due to heart related symptoms 241 43 2.11(1.18-3.78) 2.01(1.13-3.56) 241 41 2.00(1.18-3.40) 2.06(1.21-3.52)
Due to leg pain and weakness 81 10 2.02(0.92-4.40) 2.09(0.95-4.58) 81 8 1.39(0.62-3.12) 1.38(0.61-3.09)
Miscellaneous 53 10 2.64(1.19-5.87) 2.59(1.17-5.72) 53 4 0.91(0.31-2.65) 0.94(0.32-2.73)
Heart Rate Recovery
Normal 824 85 1.00 1.00 824 92 1.00 1.00
Abnormal 20 4 4.48(1.55-12.92) 3.94(1.34-11.63) 20 1 1.29(0.17-8.97) 1.34(0.18-9.76)
Chronotropic Incompetence §
Negative 792 79 1.00 1.00 792 89 1.00 1.00
Positive 52 10 1.86(0.92-3.73) 1.77(0.87-3.59) 52 4 0.86(0.31-2.38) 0.89(0.32-2.49)

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 30, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Usefulness of the Integrated Scoring Model of Treadmill Tests to Predict Myocardial Ischemia and Silent Myocardial Ischemia in Community-Dwelling Adults (from the Rancho Bernardo Study)

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access