Erratum for Sachdeva et al. “Determining the Significance of Side Branch Lesion During Bifurcation Stenting” Am J Cardiol 2011;107:1794–1795




On page 1794 in the last paragraph on line 8, the sentence should read “They concluded that preintervention intravascular ultrasound minimal luminal area (MLA) of the side branch ostium, MLA of the main branch distal to the carina, the amount of plaque burden at the side branch ostium, and the maximal balloon pressure as independent predictors of ischemia in the side branch after main branch stenting.”


Also, on page 1795 in the 2nd paragraph on line 4, the sentence should read “Were the more rigorous FFR cutoff of 0.75 utilized, the incidence of ischemia was even less frequent (9%) in their study 8.”

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 16, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Erratum for Sachdeva et al. “Determining the Significance of Side Branch Lesion During Bifurcation Stenting” Am J Cardiol 2011;107:1794–1795

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access