Epidemiology, Management Strategies, and Outcomes of Patients With Chronic Total Coronary Occlusion




Factors influencing the management of patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) are poorly described. We sought to analyze the clinical and angiographic variables influencing the decision-making process of patients with CTO. Consecutive patients with at least 1 coronary artery CTO were included and categorized as managed either by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), or medical therapy (MT). Patients with previous CABG were excluded. The CTO SYNTAX score (CTO-SS) was defined as the ratio between the score attributed to the CTO lesion in the SYNTAX score calculation and the total SYNTAX score. Independent predictors of management strategies were sought. A total of 510 patients were included (CTO incidence: 20%): 9% were treated with PCI, 34% with CABG, and 57% with MT. SYNTAX score was lowest in PCI (14.8 [11.0 to 18.5]) and highest in CABG (31.5 [25.0 to 38.8], p <0.0001). PCI was attempted more often in patients with higher CTO-SS (i.e., those with higher contribution to the overall SYNTAX score from the CTO lesion; 88% had a CTO-SS >0.5). Conversely, CABG was preferred in subjects with lower CTO-SS (61% had a CTO-SS ≤0.5, p <0.0001). Age, ejection fraction, SYNTAX score, and age of the CTO were independent predictors of revascularization. At mid-term follow-up, unsuccessful revascularization or MT was independently associated with death (hazard ratio 7.2, p = 0.0005). In conclusion, CTOs are frequently documented in clinical practice. However, less than a half is revascularized. Management strategies are influenced by angiographic variables such as the SYNTAX score and the newly proposed CTO-SS.


The management of patients with a chronic total occlusion (CTO) has remained consistently heterogeneous over time and across countries and institutions. Indeed, appropriate use criteria guidelines do not provide specific recommendations regarding the optimal revascularization strategy in many frequent clinical scenarios, such as “lone” CTO (1-vessel disease due to a CTO, which is seen in ∼40% of CTO patients ). Our study aims were to describe the epidemiology of CTO in the overall coronary artery disease (CAD) population of a high-volume catheterization laboratory without a dedicated CTO program, to analyze the decisional process of the clinicians facing patients with CTO, to identify clinical and angiographic predictors of revascularization, and to analyze the clinical outcomes of these patients at mid-term follow-up.


Methods


All consecutive patients with a coronary CTO (100% stenosis with anterograde Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 0 flow for >3 months), catheterized at our institution from January to October 2014, were included. The only exclusion criterion was a history of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). As this was a retrospective analysis conducted per institutional guidelines for data security and privacy, a waiver of consent was granted by the local institutional review board.


Preexisting co-morbidities and the indication of coronary angiogram were collected. General angiographic data included the number of narrowed vessels and the SYNTAX score (calculated using the online tool available at http://www.syntaxscore.com/ ). The CTO SYNTAX score (CTO-SS) was defined as the ratio between the score attributed to the CTO lesion and the SYNTAX score. If >1 CTO was present, the numerator of the CTO-SS was calculated as the sum of the scores attributed to each CTO. A CTO-SS ≤0.5 was considered “low” and a value >0.5 was considered “high.” The Japanese chronic total occlusion (J-CTO) score was also calculated for each lesion. In addition, the following variables were analyzed: CTO age, interventional collaterals grade (according to the Werner classification ), and distal vessel filling (Rentrop grade ≥2 ). All angiograms were reviewed by an interventional cardiologist who had received extensive training at the local quantitative coronary analysis core laboratory.


Patient management was classified as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), CABG, or medical therapy (MT). To analyze the decision-making process, the following variables were recorded: the presence of symptoms (angina or dyspnea), indication of heart surgery (SYNTAX score >22 with/without valve disease), viability in the CTO-related territory on noninvasive testing (as assessed by Tomasello et al ), high co-morbidity or high risk for revascularization (as assessed by the Heart Team), and the suitability of the target distal vessel for revascularization (diameter >2.0 mm and nonnegligible distal bed length).


In case of normality, continuous variables are presented as mean ± SD and the Student t test was used for comparisons. Otherwise, they are presented as median (first to third quartiles), and nonparametric tests were used for comparisons. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies (percentages) and compared using the chi-square test.


Stratified analyses of patient management were performed according to SYNTAX score, J-CTO score, and CTO-SS. In addition, management strategies were analyzed in 5 hypothetical scenarios, as previously described. Scenario 1: presence of symptoms and viability; scenario 2: presence of symptoms but viability testing not performed; scenario 3: absence of symptoms with the presence of viability; scenario 4: absence of symptoms and viability testing not performed; and scenario 5: absence of viability.


Predictors of revascularization (PCI, CABG, or both) were sought. Candidate variables included: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, severe angina, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), Q waves concordant with CTO localization, number of CTOs, CTO localization in the left anterior descending (LAD), J-CTO score, SYNTAX score, CTO age, interventional collaterals, distal filling, and viability in the CTO-related artery. The CTO-SS was not included as a candidate predictor because it is a codependent variable with the SYNTAX score. Variables showing a p <0.20 in univariate analysis were used as candidate predictors for stepwise logistic regression analysis (entry and exit criteria set at p <0.10).


Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to ascertain whether successful CTO revascularization (either percutaneous or surgical) was associated with better outcomes on follow-up, as compared with unsuccessful revascularization (failed CTO PCI or CABG with no graft to the CTO-related artery) or MT. Due to low number of events, the analyses were adjusted for a reduced number of variables, chosen based on clinical judgment, as follows. Prediction of death: age and SYNTAX score. Prediction of a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), any revascularization, ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) and readmission for angina: age, gender, diabetes, SYNTAX score, LVEF, chronic kidney disease, and LAD CTO. Prediction of a composite of death, MI, and CTO revascularization: age, SYNTAX score, LVEF. Adjusted Kaplan–Meier curves of event-free survival were plotted and compared with the log-rank test. For all tests, a p <0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina).




Results


A total of 510 patients with 597 CTOs were included. CTO prevalence was 12% in the overall catheterization laboratory population and 20% in patients with CAD excluding post-CABG subjects ( Figure 1 ). Most patients had 1 CTO (n = 430, 84%); 73 patients had 2 CTOs (14%); and 7 patients had 3 CTOs (1%). Patients were managed as follows: 57% of patients were treated medically, 34% underwent CABG; and 9% underwent CTO PCI. As detailed in Table 1 , PCI patients had worse angina class and were younger and more overweight than CABG and MT subjects. Moreover, these patients presented more often with stable CAD and had a lower prevalence of diabetes, peripheral artery disease, and chronic kidney disease.




Figure 1


Flowchart of the study population.


Table 1

Clinical characteristics

































































































































































































Variable Overall
(n=510)
PCI (n=48) CABG (n=172) Medical therapy
(n=290)
p
Age (years) 68.6±10.2 60.2±11.2 68.2±8.5 70.1±10.2 <0.0001
Men 407 (80%) 40 (83%) 145 (84%) 222 (77%) 0.11
Body mass index (kg/m 2 ) 29.2±5.5 30.6±6.2 30.0±5.2 28.5±5.5 0.004
Hypertension 407 (80%) 33 (69%) 141 (82%) 233 (81%) 0.12
Hyperlipidemia 437 (86%) 31 (65%) 154 (90%) 252 (87%) <0.0001
Diabetes mellitus 191 (37%) 5 (10%) 77 (45%) 109 (38%) <0.0001
Current smoker 144 (28%) 11 (23%) 48 (28%) 85 (29%) 0.66
Family history of CAD 204 (41%) 22 (48%) 79 (47%) 103 (36%) 0.047
Prior myocardial infarction 128 (25%) 8 (17%) 37 (22%) 83 (29%) 0.09
Prior PCI 185 (36%) 18 (38%) 49 (28%) 118 (41%) 0.030
Peripheral artery disease 93 (18%) 3 (6%) 29 (17%) 61 (21%) 0.042
Prior stroke/transient ischemic attack 44 (9%) 2 (4%) 11 (6%) 31 (11%) 0.14
Chronic kidney disease 108 (21%) 4 (8%) 31 (18%) 73 (25%) 0.014
Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class I 74 (15%) 9 (19%) 16 (9%) 49 (17%) 0.07
II 224 (44%) 17 (35%) 85 (50%) 122 (42%)
III 175 (34%) 20 (42%) 53 (31%) 102 (35%)
IV 36 (7%) 2 (4%) 17 (10%) 17 (6%)
Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) 49.2±13.2 52.6±11.6 49.9±12.7 48.2±13.7 0.09
Clinical presentation STEMI 34 (7%) 3 (6%) 7 (4%) 24 (8%) 0.039
NSTEACS 208 (41%) 16 (33%) 80 (47%) 112 (39%)
Stable CAD 173 (34%) 22 (46%) 62 (36%) 89 (31%)
VT/VF 15 (3%) 0 2 (1%) 13 (4%)
Heart failure 80 (16%) 7 (15%) 21 (12%) 52 (18%)
Q waves on ECG None 250 (50%) 24 (50%) 80 (47%) 146 (52%) 0.67
Anterior 58 (12%) 4 (8%) 17 (10%) 37 (13%)
Inferior 173 (34%) 18 (38%) 66 (38%) 89 (32%)
Lateral 22 (4%) 2 (4%) 9 (5%) 11 (4%)

CABG = coronary artery bypass graft; CAD = coronary artery disease; NSTEACS = non–ST elevation acute coronary syndrome; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI = ST-elevation myocardial infarction; VT/VF = ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation.


Angiographic data are presented in Table 2 . The SYNTAX score was lowest in patients treated with PCI (14.8 [11.0 to 18.5]) and highest in CABG subjects (31.5 [25.0 to 38.8], p <0.0001). Not all classic angiographic considerations influenced management patterns. Localization of the CTO, presence and degree of interventional collaterals, and distal vessel filling did not favor a treatment strategy over another. Anatomical complexity of CTO lesions was lower in PCI patients, as shown by the J-CTO score (1.18 ± 1.10), compared with the CABG (1.75 ± 1.11) and MT (1.60 ± 1.02) groups (p = 0.002).



Table 2

Angiographic analysis























































































































































































































































Variable Overall PCI CABG Medical therapy p
Per-patient analysis n=510 n=48 n=172 n=290
Number of narrowed coronary arteries 1 77 (15%) 16 (33%) 5 (3%) 56 (19%) <0.0001
2 158 (31%) 22 (46%) 28 (16%) 108 (37%)
3 275 (54%) 10 (21%) 139 (81%) 126 (43%)
Left main narrowed 50 (10%) 0 36 (21%) 14 (5%) <0.0001
SYNTAX score 23.0 (15.0-31.5) 14.8 (11.0-18.5) 31.5 (25.0-38.8) 20.0 (13.0-27.0) <0.0001
CTO SYNTAX score 0.63 (0.39-0.88) 1 (0.69-1) 0.43 (0.31-0.69) 0.67 (0.48-0.96) <0.0001
CTO SYNTAX score >0.5 316 (62%) 42 (88%) 67 (39%) 207 (71%) <0.0001
Number of CTOs 1 430 (84%) 40 (83%) 142 (83%) 248 (86%) 0.29
2 73 (14%) 8 (17%) 25 (15%) 40 (14%)
≥3 7 (1%) 0 5 (3%) 2 (0.7%)
Per-CTO lesion analysis n=597 n=56 n=207 n=334
Localization Left anterior descending 120 (20%) 16 (29%) 41 (20%) 63 (19%) 0.12
Left circumflex 75 (13%) 7 (13%) 34 (16%) 34 (10%)
Right coronary artery 304 (51%) 25 (45%) 106 (51%) 173 (52%)
Branches 98 (16%) 8 (14 %) 26 (13%) 64 (19%)
Blunt stump 267 (45%) 26 (46%) 92 (44%) 149 (45%) 0.96
Calcification None/mild 416 (70%) 52 (93%) 127 (61%) 237 (71%) 0.08
Moderate 79 (13%) 3 (5%) 30 (14%) 46 (14%)
Severe 102 (17%) 1 (2%) 50 (24%) 51 (15%)
Bending >45° 152 (25%) 8 (14%) 60 (29%) 84 (25%) 0.07
Length (mm) ≤10 79 (13%) 12 (21%) 25 (12%) 42 (13%) 0.0002
11-19 169 (28%) 26 (46%) 53 (26%) 90 (27%)
≥20 349 (58%) 18 (32%) 129 (62%) 202 (60%)
Retry 14 (2%) 10 (18%) 2 (1%) 2 (0.6%) <0.0001
J-CTO score 1.61±1.07 1.18±1.10 1.75±1.11 1.60±1.02 0.002
J-CTO score ≥2 312 (52%) 20 (36%) 117 (57%) 175 (52%) 0.04
Age of CTO (years) <1 18 (3%) 2 (4%) 5 (2%) 11 (3%) 0.06
1-5 25 (4%) 4 (7%) 6 (3%) 15 (4%)
>5 96 (16%) 4 (7%) 21 (10%) 71 (21%)
Unknown 458 (77%) 46 (82%) 175 (84%) 237 (71%)
Interventional collaterals CC0 80 (13%) 9 (16%) 24 (12%) 47 (14%) 0.39
CC1 374 (63%) 35 (63%) 128 (62%) 211 (63%)
CC2 143 (24%) 12 (21%) 55 (27%) 76 (23%)
Distal vessel filling (Rentrop 2-3) 532 (89%) 50 (89%) 189 (91%) 293 (88%) 0.49

CABG = coronary artery bypass graft; CC0/CC1/CC2 = collateral channel grade 0/1/2; CTO = chronic total occlusion; J-CTO = Japanese chronic total occlusion; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; SYNTAX = SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery.


As listed in Table 3 , the vast majority of patients in all groups were symptomatic. Most patients treated with CABG (91%) had a formal indication of surgical revascularization. CABG-treated patients had a higher prevalence of viability in the CTO territory. Only 9% of subjects managed with MT had a CTO vessel not amenable to revascularization.



Table 3

Decision-making process



























































Variable Overall (n=510) PCI (n=48) CABG (n=172) Medical therapy (n=290) p
Presence of symptoms 451 (88%) 43 (90%) 164 (95%) 244 (84%) 0.001
Indication of heart surgery 231 (45%) 4 (8%) 157 (91%) 70 (24%) <0.0001
Viability testing Viability 345 (68%) 33 (69%) 134 (78%) 178 (61%) 0.003
No viability 32 (6%) 2 (4%) 4 (2%) 26 (9%)
Test not performed 133 (26%) 13 (27%) 34 (20%) 86 (30%)
High comorbidity / high risk 42 (8%) 2 (4%) 18 (10%) 22 (8%) 0.31
Vessel not amenable to revascularization 32 (6%) 0 7 (4%) 25 (9%) 0.03

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 25, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Epidemiology, Management Strategies, and Outcomes of Patients With Chronic Total Coronary Occlusion

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access