Endovascular Therapy of Vascular Malformations

Chapter 72


Endovascular Therapy of Vascular Malformations


Carlos J. Guevara, Ahmad Alomari



Management of vascular malformations has evolved over time to encompass three distinct approaches: the conservative, the minimally invasive, and the operative. Percutaneous interventional management has become widely accepted as the principal minimally invasive therapy for vascular mal­formations, replacing surgery for many traditional indications. Nevertheless, many challenging vascular malformations necessitate therapeutic strategies that combine some or all of these approaches. Management of vascular anomalies can be challenging and lengthy; these disorders are extremely heterogenous, affect any body organ or system at any age, and have frequently overlapping presentations. Although teamwork is not a substitute for individual innovation, these disorders are best managed with an interdisciplinary approach managed by relevant medical specialists at specialized centers.1


Essential steps in the treatment algorithm for vascular malformations include accurate diagnosis and characterization of the particular malformation and proper expectations for the treatment approach.


In this chapter we review the different percutaneous treatment options for both the low-flow (venous and lymphatic) and the high-flow (arteriovenous) vascular malformations.



Venous Malformations


Venous malformations (VMs), the most common vascular malformations, manifest typically as solitary lesions with preference for the cervicofacial area, extremities, and trunk.2,3 Multiple lesions may have a genetic predisposition (such as TIE2 mutation in cutaneomucosal venous malformation and glomulin mutation in glomuvenous malformation).4 Blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome is a sporadic multifocal venous malformation involving the soft tissue and gastrointestinal tract.


It is of paramount importance to differentiate between two main morphologic types of VMs: the spongiform mass type and congenital ectasia of veins (phlebectasia). The latter carries a significantly higher risk of thromboembolism, which can be largely prevented with early therapeutic measures. Phlebectasia can be sporadic but is commonly encountered in complex overgrowth syndromes (e.g., Klippel-Trenaunay and CLOVES [congenital, lipomatous, overgrowth, vascular malformations, epidermal nevi and spinal/skeletal anomalies and/or scoliosis] syndromes) or other extremity anomalies (e.g., fibroadipose vascular anomaly [FAVA]).


Pain in VMs is multifactorial, with acute episodes principally predisposed by clot formation. Symptoms may worsen with menarche and pregnancy. Swelling and engagement of venous spaces and involvement of joints, muscles, and tendons are also contributing factors. Particular anatomic locations bear additional specific morbidities. For example, articular synovial involvement, particularly around the knee joint, predisposes to hemarthrosis and premature degenerative chondropathy. Airway lesions can cause obstruction, and gastrointestinal lesions can manifest as bleeding. Extensive osseous and chondral involvement may even­tually lead to bone deformity, pathologic fracture, and joint failure.



Sclerotherapy for Venous Malformations



Indications


The prime indication for treatment of VMs is pain, which eventually develops in the vast majority of lesions. Lesions in particular locations (e.g., synovial-articular), symptomatic gastrointestinal VMs, and disfiguring (e.g., facial, genital) VMs are treated even in the absence of pain. Treatment of such lesions should be initiated early in life, before they enlarge, because smaller lesions may require fewer procedures and smaller volumes of sclerosants and because early treatment may prevent some long-term complications. Painless small, nondisfiguring VMs can be managed conservatively, as can painless very diffuse or extensive VMs.



Preoperative Evaluation


Localized intravascular coagulation (LIC) is common with large VMs, causing elevation of D-dimer, hypofibrinogenemia, and, to a lesser extent, borderline low or slightly decreased platelet count.5 Basic coagulation parameters (complete blood count, prothrombin time/international normalized ratio, partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen and D-dimer measurements) are usually obtained prior to interventions for large VMs. Correcting minor hematologic abnormalities is not necessary before percutaneous interventions.


Characterization of the size and extension of a lesion can be performed with ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Ultrasonographically, VMs appear as hypoechoic or anechoic compressible spaces containing stagnant blood within thin anomalus venous walls. Other than the hyperechoic clots or phleboliths, VMs have no substantial solid components (Fig. 72-1A). Blood flow in spongiform VMs is not usually seen on color-flow Doppler ultrasonography. MRI sequences should be obtained with fat saturation and should include T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and post-contrast T1-weighted sequences. As on US, VMs are depicted on MRI as blood-containing spaces with phleboliths (Fig. 72-1B). Fluid-fluid levels are very common. Post-contrast enhancement is patchy and heterogenous. MR angiography (MRA) and MR venography (MRV) are not usually helpful for spongiform VMs. Intralesional or ascending venography and CT scans are of limited diagnostic use (Figs. 72-1C, 72-2).




Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 30, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIAC SURGERY | Comments Off on Endovascular Therapy of Vascular Malformations

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access