Exercise training has been shown to be effective in improving exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with heart failure and left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. Real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (RTMCE) is a new technique that allows quantitative analysis of myocardial blood flow (MBF). The aim of this study was to determine the effects of exercise training on MBF in patients with LV dysfunction. We studied 23 patients with LV dysfunction who underwent RTMCE and cardiopulmonary exercise testing at baseline and 4 months after medical treatment (control group, n = 10) or medical treatment plus exercise training (trained group, n = 13). Replenishment velocity (β) and MBF reserves were derived from quantitative RTMCE. The 4-month exercise training consisted of 3 60-minute exercise sessions/week at an intensity corresponding to anaerobic threshold, 10% below the respiratory compensation point. Aerobic exercise training did not change LV diameters, volumes, or ejection fraction. At baseline, no difference was observed in MBF reserve between the control and trained groups (1.89, 1.67 to 1.98, vs 1.81, 1.28 to 2.38, p = 0.38). Four-month exercise training resulted in a significant increase in β reserve from 1.72 (1.45 to 1.48) to 2.20 (1.69 to 2.77, p <0.001) and an MBF reserve from 1.81 (1.28 to 2.38) to 3.05 (2.07 to 3.93, p <0.001). In the control group, β reserve decreased from 1.51 (1.10 to 1.85) to 1.46 (1.14 to 2.33, p = 0.03) and MBF reserve from 1.89 (1.67 to 1.98) to 1.55 (1.11 to 2.27, p <0.001). Peak oxygen consumption increased by 13.8% after 4 months of exercise training and decreased by 1.9% in the control group. In conclusion, exercise training resulted in significant improvement of MBF reserve in patients with heart failure and LV dysfunction.
Real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (RTMCE) has been demonstrated to be an accurate technique for myocardial blood flow (MBF) measurement. This technique has advantages over other methods to study alterations in coronary microvasculature because it can provide information regarding 2 components of tissue perfusion: MBF velocity and volume. In this study, we sought to determine the effects of exercise training on MBF reserve as measured by RTMCE in patients with heart failure and left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction.
Methods
From June 2005 to November 2007, we prospectively enrolled 31 consecutive patients with stable primary heart failure and LV dysfunction who underwent stress RTMCE before and after 4-month exercise-based rehabilitation with medical treatment or medical treatment alone. Inclusion criteria were symptoms of heart failure for ≥1 year, optimized medical treatment, and LV ejection fraction <45%. Exclusion criteria were inability to exercise, malignant arrhythmias, ischemic cardiomyopathy, second- or third-degree atrioventricular block, severe obstructive pulmonary disease, severe valvar disease, decompensated heart failure within 2 weeks of stress RTMCE, and severe hypertension (blood pressure >180/110 mm Hg). Patients who did not complete ≥85% of exercise program were also excluded. The study was approved by the ethical committee and all patients gave written informed consent.
Enrolled patients were randomized to receive medical treatment (control group) or medical treatment plus a 4-month exercise training program in a supervised hospital-based setting according to the same protocol (trained group). They underwent dipyridamole stress RTMCE and cardiopulmonary exercise testing at baseline, when they were enrolled in the study, and after 4 months. Before stress testing, patients were requested to abstain from xanthine-containing food and drinks for ≥24 hours. All medications in use were obtained from patient information and chart registers.
RTMCE was performed using a commercially available ultrasound scanner (Sonos 7500, Philips Medical Systems, Andover, Massachusetts) equipped with an S3 transducer (1.8 to 3.6 MHz). A complete 2-dimensional echocardiogram was obtained at rest. Cardiac chamber diameters were determined according to recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography. End-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and LV ejection fraction were calculated using a modified Simpson biplane method. Diastolic dysfunction was classified as I for patients with abnormal relaxation, II for a pseudo-normal pattern, and III for a restrictive pattern. The left ventricle was divided in 17 segments. Basal segments were not considered for quantitative analysis because of attenuation.
The contrast agent used was the commercially available lipid encapsulated microbubble Definity (Bristol-Myers Squibb Medical Imaging, Inc., North Billerica, Massachusetts). Color-coded power-modulation images were adjusted to achieve optimal nonlinear signals at a mechanical index of 0.2 and frame rate ≥25 Hz. Time-gain compensation and 2-dimensional gain settings were adjusted to suppress any nonlinear signals from tissue before contrast injection. After optimization, contrast was started intravenously at a continuous infusion rate. At this time, equipment settings were readjusted and then kept unchanged throughout the study. To assess the replenishment kinetics, microbubble destruction in the myocardium was induced by manually deflagrated flash containing 5 consecutive high-mechanical index (1.4) impulses. Sequences of low-power myocardial perfusion images containing ≥15 cardiac cycles after the flash were acquired. Contrast-enhanced images were obtained in the apical 4-, 2-, and 3-chamber views at baseline and after dipyridamole (0.84 mg/kg).
MBF was quantified using Q-Lab 4.0 (Philips Medical Systems, Bothell, Washington). Real-time myocardial contrast echocardiographic sequences were analyzed in end-systolic frames starting in the frame immediately after the flash and including 15 subsequent cardiac cycles. Regions of interest were placed and tracked manually within the myocardium of each segment with careful exclusion of epicardial and endocardial borders. Regions of interest of similar size and shape were drawn in baseline and peak dipyridamole stress images. To determine the ratio between plateau acoustic intensity in the myocardium and left ventricle, a region of interest of the same size was also set in the adjacent LV cavity, just near the myocardial sample (blood pool acoustic intensity). The software package automatically calculated the mean acoustic intensity of each region of interest and generated time-intensity curves that were subsequently fitted to a mono-exponential function: y = A (1 − e −βt ), where y is the acoustic intensity at sequence of images in time, A is the plateau acoustic intensity, and β is the replenishment velocity, the rate constant of acoustic intensity increase, and represents mean microbubble velocity. When curves did not fit to the mono-exponential function, or when we could not obtain adequate goodness of fitness, the segment was considered not analyzable. When a segment was considered not analyzable at rest or at peak stress in the 2 studies, it was disposed at all stages and studies (rest and peak). A was then normalized for the blood pool acoustic-intensity using equation: normalized A = 10 ([A − blood pool]/10) × 100.
An index of MBF was calculated as the product of normalized A × β. The average of all analyzable segments was considered for each patient. Intraobserver variabilities for measurements of β and MBF reserves in our laboratory have been previously described and were 2.1% (r = 0.99) and 7.4% (r = 0.95), respectively. Interobserver variabilities for the same parameters were 6.8% (r = 0.98) and 5.5% (r = 0.97), respectively.
Patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a cycle ergometer using an increment protocol (5.0, 7.5, or 10 W/min). The 12-lead electrocardiogram was continuously monitored for ST segment, arrhythmias, and heart rate records at rest and during exercise and recovery period. Blood pressure was recorded at rest and every 2 minutes during exercise and recovery period. Peak oxygen consumption per unit time (V o 2 ) was obtained on a breath-by-breath analysis of expired gas. Peak V o 2 was defined as the greatest mean value during exercise when the subject could no longer maintain the pedaling at 60 rpm. Anaerobic threshold was determined to occur at the break point between carbon dioxide production and V o 2 or the point at which ventilatory equivalent for oxygen and end-tidal oxygen partial pressure curves reached their respective lowest levels before beginning to increase. The respiratory compensation point was determined to occur at the point at which the ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide was lowest before systematic increase and when end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure reached a maximum and began to decrease.
The 4-month exercise training consisted of 3 60-minute exercise sessions/week; each session consisted of 5-minute stretching exercises, 25-minute cycling on an ergometer bicycle in the first month up to 40 minutes in the final 3 months, 10 minutes of local strengthening exercises, and 5 minutes of cool down stretching exercises.
Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD and categorical variables as proportions. Two-tailed unpaired and paired Student’s t tests were used for comparisons of dependent and independent samples. Chi-square test and analysis of variance were used for comparisons of proportions. All data analysis was performed with SPSS 17.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Illinois). Statistical significance was set at a p value <0.05.
Results
Of the 31 enrolled patients, 16 were randomized to the trained group and 15 to the control group. Of the 16 patients in the trained group, 1 had intense dyspnea during dipyridamole resulting in stress interruption and 2 did not complete the training program due to noncardiac reasons. Of the 15 patients in the control group, 5 did not agree to repeat RTMCE and cardiopulmonary exercise testing after 4 months and were excluded. The final population was constituted by 23 patients. Their clinical and echocardiographic characteristics are listed in Table 1 .
Age (years)/Gender | BMI (kg/m 2 ) | Digitalis | ACEI | β Blocker | Diuretics | Baseline | 4 Months | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDV (ml) | ESV (ml) | EF (%) | DD | EDV (ml) | ESV (ml) | EF (%) | DD | |||||||
Control 1 | 43/M | 26 | no | yes | yes | no | 216 | 167 | 23 | II | 216 | 167 | 23 | II |
Control 2 | 46/M | 26 | no | yes | yes | yes | 167 | 83 | 50 | I | 180 | 88 | 51 | I |
Control 3 | 48/F | 26 | no | yes | yes | no | 167 | 118 | 29 | I | 167 | 113 | 32 | I |
Control 4 | 53/F | 26 | no | yes | yes | no | 224 | 173 | 23 | I | 231 | 180 | 22 | II |
Control 5 | 54/F | 24 | no | yes | yes | yes | 180 | 135 | 25 | II | 167 | 118 | 29 | III |
Control 6 | 60/F | 25 | no | no | yes | yes | 180 | 118 | 34 | I | 187 | 118 | 37 | I |
Control 7 | 70/M | 23 | no | yes | yes | yes | 247 | 173 | 30 | II | 247 | 180 | 27 | II |
Control 8 | 72/F | 30 | no | yes | yes | no | 239 | 167 | 30 | I | 239 | 160 | 33 | I |
Control 9 | 74/F | 28 | no | no | yes | no | 194 | 141 | 27 | II | 194 | 124 | 36 | II |
Control 10 | 74/M | 25 | no | no | yes | no | 272 | 201 | 26 | I | 281 | 209 | 26 | I |
Trained 1 | 27/M | 28 | yes | yes | yes | yes | 426 | 335 | 21 | I | 415 | 307 | 26 | I |
Trained 2 | 41/M | 30 | no | yes | yes | no | 216 | 118 | 45 | I | 224 | 118 | 47 | I |
Trained 3 | 45/F | 28 | no | yes | yes | yes | 180 | 102 | 43 | I | 173 | 97 | 44 | I |
Trained 4 | 46/M | 28 | yes | yes | yes | yes | 194 | 108 | 45 | II | 194 | 97 | 50 | I |
Trained 5 | 49/M | 24 | no | yes | yes | yes | 231 | 167 | 28 | I | 224 | 154 | 31 | I |
Trained 6 | 50/M | 25 | no | yes | yes | yes | 180 | 130 | 28 | III | 180 | 124 | 31 | II |
Trained 7 | 54/F | 30 | yes | yes | yes | yes | 255 | 173 | 32 | I | 247 | 160 | 35 | I |
Trained 8 | 55/M | 30 | no | yes | yes | yes | 154 | 92 | 40 | I | 167 | 83 | 50 | I |
Trained 9 | 56/M | 27 | no | yes | yes | no | 149 | 118 | 34 | I | 180 | 113 | 37 | I |
Trained 10 | 59/M | 26 | yes | yes | yes | yes | 141 | 74 | 47 | I | 147 | 88 | 41 | I |
Trained 11 | 62/F | 25 | yes | yes | yes | yes | 180 | 113 | 37 | II | 180 | 108 | 40 | I |
Trained 12 | 71/F | 24 | no | yes | yes | yes | 147 | 88 | 41 | I | 147 | 83 | 44 | I |
Trained 13 | 76/M | 26 | no | yes | yes | yes | 160 | 83 | 48 | I | 160 | 83 | 48 | I |