CPT
CPT descriptor
APC
93880
Duplex extracranial arteries, complete bilateral
0267
93882
Duplex extracranial arteries, unilateral or limited
0267
93886
Transcranial Doppler intracranial arteries; complete
0267
93888
Transcranial Doppler intracranial arteries; limited
0265
93890
Transcranial Doppler; vasoreactivity study
0266
93892
Transcranial Doppler; emboli detection, no bubble injection
0266
93893
Transcranial Doppler; emboli detection with bubble injection
0266
93922
Limited bilateral extremity artery physiologic study 1–2 levels
0097
93923
Complete bilateral extremity arterial physiologic study ≥3 levels
0096
93924
Treadmill lower extremity physiologic exam
0096
93925
Duplex lower extremity arteries or bypass grafts; complete bilateral
0267
93926
Duplex lower extremity arteries or bypass grafts; unilateral or limited
0266
93930
Duplex upper extremity arteries or bypass grafts; complete bilateral
0267
93931
Duplex upper extremity arteries or bypass grafts; unilateral or limited
0266
93965
Physiologic study of extremity veins, complete bilateral
0096
93970
Duplex extremity veins including compression; complete bilateral
0267
93971
Duplex extremity veins including compression; unilateral or limited
0266
93975
Duplex arterial inflow and venous outflow of abdominal, pelvic, scrotal or retroperitoneal organs, complete study
0267
93976
Duplex arterial inflow and venous outflow of abdominal, pelvic, scrotal or retroperitoneal organs, limited study
0267
93978
Duplex aorta, IVC, iliac vasculature, or bypass grafts; complete
0267
93979
Duplex aorta, IVC, iliac vasculature, or bypass grafts; unilateral or limited
0266
93980
Duplex arterial inflow and venous outflow, penile vessels; complete
0267
93981
Duplex arterial inflow and venous outflow, penile vessels; follow-up or limited
0267
93982
Physiologic study implanted wireless pressure sensor aneurysm sac
0097
93990
Duplex hemodialysis access including arterial inflow, body of access and venous outflow
0266
It should be remembered that this APC discussion relates only to the technical portion of vascular lab studies performed in hospitals on outpatients. The professional interpretation of these exams is reported by traditional CPT codes with addition of the −26 modifier to identify the studies as being professional component only. A coding example reflecting this segment would be performance of a complete bilateral lower extremity venous duplex exam on an outpatient Medicare beneficiary for the indication of sudden onset lower extremity swelling. The hospital-based vascular lab would report APC 0267, and the interpreting physician would submit 93970-26.
Finally, if a vascular lab study is performed on a hospital inpatient, it would be most common for the technical component to be bundled in the prospective payment for the hospitalization. Medicare uses “Diagnosis Related Groups” or “DRGs” for this purpose, and many private carriers also utilize the DRG approach. The vascular lab would identify performance of the exam, typically by CPT code or APC, but this would be used exclusively for internal hospital accounting purposes. The overall hospital payment would be based on the DRG, and frequently the DRG will not be impacted by the vascular lab results. In this setting, the interpreting physician would report a −26 modified CPT code. A typical example is the hospital ICU inpatient requiring a bilateral lower extremity venous duplex exam. Technical billing rolls into the DRG, and the interpreting physician reports 93970-26.
Vascular Lab Coverage Requirements and Advanced Beneficiary Notice
In order to meet Medicare coverage requirements, all vascular laboratory studies must (1) have a valid, recorded medical indication; (2) be ordered by a licensed independent provider; (3) have archived retrievable test data; and (4) include a physician’s professional interpretation. Each of these will be examined in more detail.
What constitutes a valid medical indication can be a frustrating issue for vascular lab managers because the clinical indications as listed on the requisition or physician’s order determine whether or not a service is covered, meaning paid, by the insurance carrier. A clinical indication that the ordering provider believes is totally appropriate, may not be considered valid by the carrier. For instance, a 60-year-old-lifelong smoker and his primary care provider may believe that a first-time carotid duplex exam is entirely appropriate especially if two of the patient’s brothers and three of his sisters have all suffered strokes. However, the patient’s insurance carrier may consider this a noncovered “screening” exam if the patient has no lateralizing neurologic symptoms. The lab manager is then faced with a dilemma. Refusing to do the exam antagonizes the patient and the ordering provider. On the other hand, performing the exam with no expectation of payment can only be done a limited number of times if the lab is to remain fiscally viable.