13 Cardiomyopathies
Cardiomyopathy: Required Parameters to Obtain from Scanning
Left ventricle (LV)–focused ventricular function views
Right ventricle (RV)–focused ventricular function views
Cardiac output, cardiac index, right ventricular systolic pressure, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF%)
Diastolic dysfunction evaluation
2006 American Heart Association Definitions and Classification of Cardiomyopathies2
Dilated (Congestive) Cardiomyopathy
Goals of Echocardiography in Dilated Cardiomyopathy
To establish high probability of the diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy
To exclude significant valvular, congenital, and pericardial disease
To identify complications such as intracavitary thrombi
To calculate right ventricular systolic pressure and cardiac output
Echocardiographic Features of Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Two-Dimensional
Tendency to spheroid chamber shapes
Distortion of the tricuspid and mitral apparati by ventricular and annular dilation occurs, resulting in mild/moderate (seldom severe) insufficiency.
Cardiac output is reduced, initially on exertion, but later in the resting state. Severely reduced stroke volume is evident on two-dimensional imaging as a flicker of valve opening, rather than sustained opening. The “low-output” appearance of the aortic valve is most easily seen on M-mode.
Increased end-point to septal separation is classically seen and reflects the combination of cavitary dilation and systolic dysfunction.
The presence of a “restrictive pattern” of ventricular inflow is seen in more advanced cases, typically with the onset of clinical heart failure, and independently predicts a worse prognosis. Lack of improvement of the restrictive pattern with medical therapy establishes an index of refractoriness to therapy, and an even worse prognosis.
RV systolic pressure represents the sum total of the combined forces of hydrostatic back pressure, reactive pulmonary hypertension, and failing contractile function of the right heart due to myopathy of the right ventricle itself.
“Mildly dilated cardiomyopathy” is a variant syndrome characterized by severe congestive heart failure (CHF) with low ejection fraction, but only minimal chamber dilation.3 It carries a poor prognosis, similar to that of dilated cardiomyopathy.
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Noninvasive imaging has a central role in the recognition of and evaluation of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.4
Goals of Echocardiography in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
To establish morphologic and functional characteristics consistent with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (the “phenotype”)
To map the distribution of the hypertrophy within the ventricles
To establish that the level of obstruction, if present, is at the muscular and not at the aortic valve level
To identify obstruction at the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) level if present
To identify complications of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, such as
Echocardiographic Features of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Two-Dimensional and Real-Time Imaging
Left ventricular hypertrophy with increased wall thickness also may be seen:
Increased LV wall thickness, typically >15 mm.
Note the maximal thickness; it is a marker of clinical risk.
Note the pattern of hypertrophy.
LVOT or right ventricular outflow tract systolic narrowing
Systolic anterior motion (SAM) of the mitral leaflets
A “contact plaque” in the LVOT is seen in many patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM), although this is poorly proven as a sign of HOCM.
Evidence of flow acceleration at the base of the LVOT usually is abundantly clear from color Doppler flow mapping; pulsed-wave Doppler is only confirmatory. Continuous wave Doppler is required to establish maximal velocity and gradient. Doppler estimated peak dynamic gradients correlate well with peak catheter gradients: r = 0.96, SEE 3.9 mm7 and r = 0.93–0.89,8 respectively.
The spectral profile typically is late-peaking (“dagger-shaped”) and often provokable by maneuvers that reduce LV size.
Intracavitary obstruction may occur at the
Mitral morphologic abnormalities such as the following may occur:
Thickening of the anterior mitral leaflet (in 75%)
Elongation of the anterior mitral leaflet
Papillary muscle abnormalities
MR is common, especially if there is outflow obstruction, because the anterior traction on the leaflets may compromise coaptation and result in (typically) posteriorly directed MR. (However, outflow obstruction does not have to be present.) In HOCM, MR is actually holosystolic, although the bulk of it occurs in later systole.11 Mitral insufficiency occurs as the anterior mitral leaflet or posterior mitral leaflet is pulled out of coaptation alignment, but may also occur secondarily to traumatic chordal rupture12 or to infective endocarditis of the mitral valve producing infective chordal rupture.
Mild aortic insufficiency is common, and results from either
Dyssynchronous LV relaxation (apex relaxing before the rest of the LV does) may produce an apically directed isovolumic relaxation time jet of about 2 m/sec.
Systolic Anterior Motion
SAM correlates with gradient, but cause versus effect remains unclear, and somewhat moot.
SAM is not (at all) specific for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. In states other than hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, SAM often is chordal, and less often involves the leaflets—and, therefore, less often is associated with mitral insufficiency.
Grading SAM is less important than measuring the associated gradient.
Echocardiographic and Surgical and Catheter Options for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy
Optimal definition of the LVOT anatomy
Exclusion of membranes or tunnels
Confirmation of adequate thickness of the septum to withstand myotomy/myectomy (to avoid iatrogenic ventriculoseptal defect)
The mechanism of MR in a case of HOCM is most likely to be unraveled by echocardiography, assisting with the consideration of the merit of mitral valve replacement in HOCM.
Role of Treansesophageal Echocardiography in the Surgical Management of Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy
TEE plays a role in the surgical management of HOCM:
Aid in the decision of feasibility/appropriateness of myocardial myotomy/myectomy—specifically, is the basal interventricular septum too thin to withstand the myocardial myotomy/myectomy without excessive risk of ventricular septal defect formation?
Is mitral valve replacement more appropriate?
Have there been complications with the procedure?
Apical Ballooning Syndrome
The apical ballooning syndrome (also known as transient apical ballooning, tako-tsubo [“octopus pot”], or stress cardiomyopathy) is a syndrome of relatively recent recognition that has several notable features. There is a large predominance of female patients, and often a preceding major physiologically or psychologically stressful circumstance (e.g., bereavement). Although the electrocardiographic changes are striking, biomarker elevations are discordantly only mildly abnormal, consistent with myocardial stunning. Despite the fact that some patients present with heart failure or even cardiogenic shock, more than 90% of them will survive, and the ventricle usually normalizes within 3 months, also consistent with stunning. High-grade arrhythmias may occur, and about 10% of patients will experience a recurrence of the syndrome. The cause is debated, but unknown. Initially described in Japanese, it is now recognized to occur across races.13
The numerous names for the same syndrome are unfortunate: apical ballooning syndrome and transient apical ballooning are clear, descriptive, and without implication of cause; tako-tsubo, the authentic name of the Japanese octopus pot trap, is exotic and descriptive; stress cardiomyopathy, a term preferred by some, implies causality, which is not well understood to date.14,15
Restrictive and Infiltrative Cardiomyopathy
Echocardiographic Findings
Myocardial or endocardial thickening
Normal or small ventricular cavity sizes, until late in the course
Biatrial enlargement (may be massive)
Normal systolic function, at least early
Diastolic inflow abnormalities
Diastolic mitral insufficiency would indicate very elevated LV end-diastolic pressure.
Cardiac Amyloidosis
Echocardiographic Findings of Cardiac Amyloidosis
Wall thickening generally tracks the chronologic and clinical course of the disease.
Cavitary dimensions usually are normal or small until late in disease when dilation may occur.
Only half of cases (47%) exhibit “characteristically” bright, refractile, and granular myocardial appearance. This perceived appearance is not specific for amyloidosis, and is notoriously inter-physician variable.
Systolic function is well preserved through the early part of the disease, and there may even be hypercontractility from anemia and low intravascular volume.
Mitral insufficiency: 90%, usually mild to moderate
Tricuspid insufficiency: 70% to 80%, usually mild to moderate
Aortic insufficiency: 43%, usually mild to moderate
Pulmonary insufficiency: 23%, usually mild to moderate
Thickened interatrial septum (infiltration with amyloid)
Severe hypertrophy (infiltration) of the base of the septum may occasionally result in LVOT obstruction, with the usual findings of SAM and unstable gradients.
The association of ventricular inflow diastolic flow patterns with disease severity was first mapped out in amyloidosis. Early in the course of disease, an “abnormal relaxation” pattern of right ventricular and left ventricular inflow is evident. With clinical worsening of cardiac function, this may transiently (pseudo) normalize and then latterly and terminally evolve into a restrictive pattern. Progression to death is then usually rapid, in 1 to 2 years. Doppler filling patterns may thus predict the time course.17–19
Restrictive cardiomyopathy/diastolic heart failure
Restrictive cardiomyopathy with LVOT obstruction, SAM, mitral insufficiency20–22
Restrictive cardiomyopathy with right ventricular outflow tract obstruction
Dilated cardiomyopathy-like (predominant systolic dysfunction) terminal phase
Orthostatic hypotension in 10% from dysautonomia, with or without intravascular hypovolemia from nephrosis
Pseudo-infarction pattern on electrocardiography; abnormal electrical impulse formation and conduction
The combination of low voltages on the electrocardiogram and increased septal thickness (>19 mm) has the following predictive value:23
Cardiac Hemochromatosis
The characteristic patient is male, with the other usual systemic features of the disorder, and suffers from CHF with or without arrhythmias and conduction problems. Cardiac causes of death are still the most common. Phlebotomy may improve indices of systolic function,24 as may desferrioxamine.
Chagas Disease
Dilated nonsegmental and nondilated segmental forms occur. Half or more of patients have an apical aneurysm that is indistinguishable from that produced by CAD. Approximately one third have a typical dilated cardiomyopathy picture that is indistinguishable from that due to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.25 Both the left and right ventricular apices may be aneurysmal and have thrombi (>50%). CHF, conduction disturbances, arrhythmias, and systemic and pulmonary emboli are common.
Myocarditis
In early fulminant myocarditis, myocardial walls may be thickened with inflammation and edema; this observation is more often true in children than in adults. Global loss of systolic function is characteristic, and dilation may occur. Some regional variation of involvement or systolic dysfunction may occur.
Transthoracic Echocardiography
ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography26
Heart Failure (HF) with TTE
HF with TTE initial evaluation of known or suspected HF (systolic or diastolic) based on symptoms, signs, or abnormal test results
Re-evaluation of known HF (systolic or diastolic) with a change in clinical status or cardiac examination without a clear precipitating change in medication or diet
Re-evaluation of known HF (systolic or diastolic) with a change in clinical status or cardiac examination with a clear precipitating change in medication or diet
Re-evaluation of known HF (systolic or diastolic) to guide therapy
Routine surveillance (<1 yr) of HF (systolic or diastolic) when there is no change in clinical status or cardiac examination
Routine surveillance (≥1 yr) of HF (systolic or diastolic) when there is no change in clinical status or cardiac examination
Device Evaluation (Including Pacemaker, ICD, or CRT) with TTE
Initial evaluation or re-evaluation after revascularization and/or optimal medical therapy to determine candidacy for device therapy and/or to determine optimal choice of deviceAppropriateness criteria: A; median score: 9
Initial evaluation for CRT device optimization after implantation
Known implanted pacing device with symptoms possibly due to device complication or suboptimal pacing device settings
Routine surveillance (<1 yr) of implanted device without a change in clinical status or cardiac examination
Routine surveillance (≥1 yr) of implanted device without a change in clinical status or cardiac examination
Cardiomyopathies with TTE
Initial evaluation of known or suspected cardiomyopathy (e.g., restrictive, infiltrative, dilated, hypertrophic, or genetic cardiomyopathy)
Re-evaluation of known cardiomyopathy with a change in clinical status or cardiac examination or to guide therapy
Routine surveillance (<1 yr) of known cardiomyopathy without a change in clinical status or cardiac examination
Routine surveillance (≥1 yr) of known cardiomyopathy without a change in clinical status or cardiac examination
Screening evaluation for structure and function in first-degree relatives of a patient with an inherited cardiomyopathy
Baseline and serial re-evaluations in a patient undergoing therapy with cardiotoxic agents
ACC/AHA 2003 Guideline Update for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography27
ACC/AHA 1997 Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography28
Indications for Echocardiography in Patients with Dyspnea, Edema, or Cardiomyopathy
For assessment of LV size and function in patients with suspected cardiomyopathy or clinical diagnosis of heart failure*
For edema with clinical signs of elevated central venous pressure when a potential cardiac etiology is suspected or when central venous pressure cannot be estimated with confidence and clinical suspicion of heart disease is high*
For dyspnea with clinical signs of heart disease
For patients with unexplained hypotension, especially in the intensive care unit*
For patients exposed to cardiotoxic agents, to determine the advisability of additional or increased dosages
For re-evaluation of LV function in patients with established cardiomyopathy when there has been a documented change in clinical status or to guide medical therapy
For re-evaluation of patients with established cardiomyopathy when there is no change in clinical status
For re-evaluation of patients with edema when a potential cardiac cause has already been demonstrated
For evaluation of LV ejection fraction in patients with recent (contrast or radionuclide) angiographic determination of ejection fraction