Still today, bifurcation PCI represents a challenge and complex setting for interventionists. Above all, final kissing balloon inflation (KBI) is yet strongly debated. Provisional T-stenting approach with final KBI to dilate side branch (SB) is the most adopted technique worldwide, safer and more efficacies than 2-stent technique with or without final KBI that is afflicted by a higher risk of instent restenosis and stent thrombosis. Even newer drug-eluting stent (DES) has a not negligible rate of failure for SB angioplasty, in this light here we may perform further considerations.
Intravascular imaging guidance for bifurcation PCI may provide helpful information for optimal SB treatment, in fact, preprocedure intravascular ultrasound provides useful information for residual stenosis at SB ostium after KBI. Moreover, according the Japanese Registry Study in Comparison Between Everolimus-Eluting Stent and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent for the Bifurcation Lesion (J-REVERSE) registry, final KBI is associated with increased SB dissection but greater luminal gain in the proximal main vessel (MV) and SB with a little major incidence of major adverse cardiac event rate respect to non-KBT treatment up to 9-month follow-up. Furthermore, high-pressure final KBI, mandatory in case of 2-stent technique, could cause an increase of periprocedural myocardial infarction.
In this setting, some investigators have investigated a novel strategy without KBI at bench test, comprising initial proximal optimizing technique (POT), then side branch inflation and final POT, called “re-POT” that have shown more effectively than KBI to optimize the final result of provisional coronary bifurcation stenting.
In this scenario, drug-coated balloon (DCB) represents an intriguing solution for SB PCI. In fact, according BIOLUX I study (paclitaxel-eluting balloon and everolimus-eluting stent for provisional stenting of coronary bifurcations), bifurcation angioplasty with everolimus-eluting stent deployment on MV and DCB on SB appears to be a novel way of treatment, safe and effective even at 1-year follow-up. Important to underline is the predilatation of both branches, postdilatation of MV stent deployment and final KBI was routinely performed. Stenting on SB was deployed in case of prolonged ischemia due to SB complication, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade flow 0 or 1, dissection in the SB, and >70% residual stenosis.
An intriguing solution seems to be a “biodegradable bifurcation PCI.” In our own experience, we use biovascular resorbable scaffold (BVS) on MV with final KBI using DCB on SB. To the best of our knowledge, our group was the first to report this new provocative strategy for bifurcation lesions treatment. Here, we would like to suggest this new safe and feasible way to treatment of these challenging settings based on literature review and our own experience.
The technical rationale once absorbed BVS is to attempt the restore of “neo-carina” and native coronaries anatomy with improvement of hemodynamic factors and blood flow on SB contrary to DES that permanent obstruct the flow because of metallic struts obstruction. Moreover, the advantages of DCB respect DES implantation on SB is that eternal metal prosthesis can be avoided and, in case of failure of SB angioplasty, DCB can be used multiple times for recurrent restenosis. Again, in cases of a coronary vessel non–flow-limiting dissection, DCB angioplasty may be leave without stent deployment.
In conclusion, there is not clear and univocal results about the effective bifurcation PCI treatment and better technique and further trials are needed. In this light, everolimus-eluting stent on MV with DCB on SB seems an intriguing and safe treatment performing, but “biodegradable bifurcation PCI” with BVS on MV and final KBI with DCB on SB may represent “the kiss of true love” as an interesting and nontraumatic solution with native anatomical vessels restoration in contraposition to 2-stent technique that could symbolize “Judas kiss” due to higher SB angioplasty failure.
References
- 1. Burzotta F., and Trani C.: In bifurcation PCI, as in everyday life, the consequences of kissing may not always be the same. EuroIntervention 2016; 11: pp. e1209-e1213
- 2. Ferenc M., Ayoub M., Büttner H.J., Gick M., Comberg T., Rothe J., Valina C.M., Hochholzer W., and Neumann F.J.: Long-term outcomes of routine versus provisional T-stenting for de novo coronary bifurcation lesions: five-year results of the Bifurcations Bad Krozingen I study. EuroIntervention 2015; 11: pp. 856-859
- 3. Niemelä M., Kervinen K., Erglis A., Holm N.R., Maeng M., Christiansen E.H., Kumsars I., Jegere S., Dombrovskis A., Gunnes P., Stavnes S., Steigen T.K., Trovik T., Eskola M., Vikman S., Romppanen H., Mäkikallio T., Hansen K.N., Thayssen P., Aberge L., Jensen L.O., Hervold A., Airaksinen J., Pietilä M., Frobert O., Kellerth T., Ravkilde J., Aarøe J., Jensen J.S., Helqvist S., Sjögren I., James S., Miettinen H., Lassen J.F., and Thuesen L.: Randomized comparison of final kissing balloon dilatation versus no final kissing balloon dilatation in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with main vessel stenting: the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study III. Circulation 2011; 123: pp. 79-86
- 4. Maeng M., Holm N.R., Erglis A., Kumsars I., Niemelä M., Kervinen K., Jensen J.S., Galløe A., Steigen T.K., Wiseth R., Narbute I., Gunnes P., Mannsverk J., Meyerdierks O., Rotevatn S., Nikus K., Vikman S., Ravkilde J., James S., Aarøe J., Ylitalo A., Helqvist S., Sjögren I., Thayssen P., Virtanen K., Puhakka M., Airaksinen J., Christiansen E.H., Lassen J.F., and Thuesen L.: Long-term results after simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: Nordic Bifurcation Study 5-year follow-up results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: pp. 30-34
- 5. Burzotta F., Trani C., Todaro D., Mariani L., Talarico G.P., Tommasino A., Giammarinaro M., Niccoli G., Porto I., Leone A.M., Mongiardo R., Mazzari M.A., Schiavoni G., and Crea F.: Prospective randomized comparison of sirolimus- or everolimus-eluting stent to treat bifurcated lesions by provisional approach. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4: pp. 327-335
- 6. Takahashi H., Otake H., Shinke T., Murasato Y., Kinoshita Y., Yamawaki M., Takeda Y., Fujii K., Yamada S.I., Shimada Y., Yamashita T., Yumoto K., and Hirata K.I.: Impact of final kissing balloon inflation on vessel healing following drug-eluting stent implantation: insight from the optical coherence tomography sub-study of the J-REVERSE trial. J Cardiol 2016; undefined:
- 7. Murasato Y., Kinoshita Y., Yamawaki M., Shinke T., Otake H., Takeda Y., Fujii K., Yamada S., Shimada Y., Yamashita T., Yumoto K., and Fujino Y.: Efficacy of kissing balloon inflation after provisional stenting in bifurcation lesions guided by intravascularultrasound: short and midterm results of the J-REVERSE registry. EuroIntervention 2016; 12: pp. e1237-e1248
- 8. Yamawaki M., Murasato Y., Kinoshita Y., Fujii K., Fujino Y., Shinke T., Takeda Y., Yamada S., Shimada Y., Tsukahara R., Muramatsu T., and Suzuki T.: Mechanism of residual lumen stenosis at the side branch ostium after final kissing balloon inflation: a volumetric intracoronary ultrasound study of coronary bifurcation lesions. J Interv Cardiol 2016; 29: pp. 188-196
- 9. Gao X.F., Zhang Y.J., Tian N.L., Wu W., Li M.H., Bourantas C.V., Jiang X.M., Wang Z.M., Li B., Mao W.X., Zhang J.J., and Chen S.L.: Stenting strategy for coronary artery bifurcation with drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of nine randomised trials and systematic review. EuroIntervention 2014; 10: pp. 561-569
- 10. Finet G., Derimay F., Motreff P., Guerin P., Pilet P., Ohayon J., Darremont O., and Rioufol G.: Comparative analysis of sequential proximal optimizing technique versus kissing balloon inflation technique in provisional bifurcation stenting: fractal coronary bifurcation bench test. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 24: pp. 1308-1317
- 11. Worthley S., Hendriks R., Worthley M., Whelan A., Walters D.L., Whitbourn R., and Meredith I.: Paclitaxel-eluting balloon and everolimus-eluting stent for provisional stenting of coronary bifurcations: 12-month results of the multicenter BIOLUX-I study. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2015; 16: pp. 413-417
- 12. Piraino D., Carella M., Buccheri D., and Andolina G.: Bifurcation lesions: bioresorbable vascular scaffold and drug coated balloon, an efficacy association. Lessons from Optimal Coherence Tomography. Int J Cardiol 2016; 212: pp. 92-93
- 13. Nakazawa G., Yazdani S.K., Finn A.V., Vorpahl M., Kolodgie F.D., and Virmani R.: Pathological findings at bifurcation lesions: the impact of flow distribution on atherosclerosis and arterial healing after stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 20: pp. 1679-1687
- 14. Kraak R.P., Grundeken M.J., Onuma Y., Tu S., Wykrzykowska J.J., Chevalier B., Ormiston J., and Serruys P.W.: The future of BRS in bifurcations. EuroIntervention 2015; 11 Suppl V: pp. V188-V192
- 15. Cortese B., Silva Orrego P., Agostoni P., Buccheri D., Piraino D., Andolina G., and Seregni R.G.: Effect of drug-coated balloons in native coronary artery disease left with a dissection. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8: pp. 2003-2009