Surgical Approaches for Heart Failure



Surgical Approaches for Heart Failure


Nicholas G. Smedira

Katherine J. Hoercher

Randall C. Starling



Heart failure surgery has been called “high-risk” conventional or nontransplant surgery. These procedures represent the evolution of well-known operations such as coronary bypass grafting, valve interventions, and left ventricular (LV) reconstruction now applied to patients with severe LV dysfunction. Perceived as incurring a substantial early risk, many patients in the past were not offered a surgical alternative other than transplantation. An increasing body of evidence has demonstrated that surgical procedures and devices to arrest or reverse remodeling are safely performed in the failing heart, improve LV function, and may play a key role in providing lasting benefit for patients with heart failure. Surgery for advanced heart failure has become a common treatment of choice for many patients. A key ingredient to the success of any surgery for heart failure is the combination of state-of-the-art pharmacologic therapy. When used together, medical and surgical therapies offer marked improvement in both quantity and quality of life for the many patients suffering from end-stage heart failure.

At the time the first edition was being written, we were assessing the use of conventional surgical therapies and beginning to explore multiple new surgical options to address the problem of heart failure with the belief that symptoms would be reduced and survival improved with an acceptably low operative mortality. Many studies have confirmed the low operative risks and two eagerly awaited randomized trials—Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) and Acorn CorCap—provide insight into the utility of surgical therapy for advanced heart failure. This chapter reviews the current status of surgical treatments for heart failure, focusing on results that have been published since the last edition and highlighting changes in our understanding of how surgery impacts survival and quality of life.


Risk Assessment

The risk of all cardiac surgery has declined over the past decade. Perioperative risks have diminished owing to improvements in intraoperative myocardial protection, increased surgeon experience, and more consistent postoperative care strategies. For example, hospital death after reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is now less than 2%. This is clinically indistinguishable from the 1% mortality of patients undergoing primary CABG (Fig. 91.1). This must be interpreted with caution, however; we have found that older age, smoking, renal dysfunction, and poor LV dysfunction decreased the likelihood of undergoing reoperation (1). All these factors have been shown to increase the morbidity and mortality associated with reoperation and may have biased the decision against surgery in favor of medical therapy or percutaneous intervention (1).

Many small series have described operative mortalities of less than 2% in patients with severe heart failure and reduced LV function. The Cleveland Clinic experience from the early 1990s demonstrated reduced ejection fraction (EF) was associated with a marked increase in mortality in patients undergoing primary or reoperative CABG. This risk factor was eliminated by 2002 (Figs. 91.2 and 91.3) (1). This statistic is further underscored by a recent study of contemporary outcomes of nontransplant surgical strategies for managing ischemic cardiomyopathy. From January 1997 to July 2003, 1,108 patients at the Cleveland Clinic with ischemic cardiomyopathy and an EF of less than 35% underwent CABG alone (n = 760), CABG plus mitral valve (MV) repair (n = 191), or LV reconstruction (n = 167). All three strategies demonstrated a hospital mortality of less than 5% and an excellent 5-year survival (Fig. 91.4). Rather than a low EF, we found the presence of comorbidities, especially renal dysfunction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and vascular disease, to be more powerful predictors of early death. Other studies have repeatedly shown that parameters of LV function reflecting a reduced EF have little impact on early surgical mortality. Although there remains an incremental risk during bypass surgery produced by abnormal LV function, with modern myocardial protection that increment is small and represents a relatively small proportion of the total risk for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. A review of 14,075 Cleveland Clinic patients undergoing primary
isolated bypass surgery from 1990 to 1999 showed in-hospital mortality rates when preoperative LV function was normal (n = 7,203) of 1.5%, mild impairment (n = 3,378) of 0.8%, moderate impairment (n = 2,132) of 2.5%, and severe impairment (n = 1,362) of 3.2%.






FIGURE 91.1. Operative mortality for all primary and reoperative CABG at The Cleveland Clinic Foundation.






FIGURE 91.2. The Cleveland Clinic experience from the early 1990s demonstrated that LV dysfunction was associated with a marked increase in hospital mortality in patients undergoing primary or reoperative CABG. By 2002, this risk factor was eliminated.






FIGURE 91.3. The Cleveland Clinic experience from the early 1990s demonstrated that LV dysfunction was associated with a marked increase in hospital mortality in patients undergoing primary or reoperative CABG. By 2002, this risk factor was eliminated.






FIGURE 91.4. At The Cleveland Clinic, 1,108 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and LVEF of less than 35% underwent CABG alone (n = 760), CABG plus MV repair (n = 191), or LV reconstruction (n = 167). All three strategies demonstrated a hospital mortality of less than 5% and an excellent 5-year survival.

The Cleveland Clinic Risk Score was developed in 1988 and is still in use today. It determines preoperative risk factors for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery (2). Compared with the 1980s, patients undergoing surgery in this decade are at much higher estimated risk as a result of an older population, higher number of reoperations, emergency operations, the incidence of LV dysfunction, and the presence of comorbidities, such as diabetes and renal dysfunction. Yet despite this, these patients have a significantly lower incidence of morbidity and hospital mortality (Fig. 91.5) (2,3).

We now have solid data to demonstrate that surgical risk has been substantially reduced for even the patients at highest risk, but therein lies the quandary. Given that the vast majority of patients will survive the operation, the much more difficult question is this: Do these procedures improve symptoms and prolong survival? The remainder of this chapter addresses these concerns.






FIGURE 91.5. Compared with the 1980s, patients undergoing CABG in this decade are at much higher risk. Yet despite this, these patients have a significantly lower incidence of morbidity and hospital mortality.








TABLE 91.1 CABG with Severe LV Dysfunction















































































































































































































































































Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 4, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Surgical Approaches for Heart Failure

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access
First author Points Years Ejection fraction Perioperative mortality (%) Late mortality (y)
Vlietstra 10 1966–1972 <0.25 60% (2)
Manley 183 1968–1971 Mean 0.22 16.0 43% (5)
Yatteau 24 1968–1972 <0.25 42 50% (2)
Oldham 11 1969–1972 ≤0.25 55
Zubiate 140 1969–1975 <0.20 22 41.6% (6)
Faulkner 46 1969–1975 Mean 0.21 4.0 17% (2)
Mitchel 9 <0.20 0.0 11% (1)
Fox 7 1971–1974 <0.20 0.0 14%
Jones 41 1973–1977 <0.20 2.5 10% (1)
Alderman 82 1975–1979 ≤0.25 8.0 37% (5)
Mochtar 62 1975–1983 Mean 0.25 4.8 30% (5)
Zubiate 93 1976–1981 <0.20 5.0 50% (5)
Hochberg 51 1976–1982 0.20–0.24 12.0 42% (3)
Hochberg 41 1976–1982 <0.20 37.0 85% (3)
Sanchez 23 1982–1989 Mean 0.28 9.0 24% (2)
Kron et al. 39 1983–1988 <0.20 2.6 17% (3)
Blakeman 20 1984–1988 Mean 0.18 15.0 30% (1)
Wong 22 1986–1989 Mean 0.25 9.0 23% (3)
Christakis 487 1982–1990 <0.20 9.8
Hammermeister 251 1987–1990 <0.20 9.2
Louie 22 1984–1990 Mean 0.23 13.6 28% (3)
Milano et al. 118 1981–1991 <0.25 11.0 42% (5)
Shapira et al. 74 1986–1991 <0.30 13.5% (5)
Anderson et al. 203 1983–1992 Mean 0.34 6.0 41% (5)
Hausmann et al. 265 1986–1992 Mean 0.24 7.6 13% (3)
Kaul et al. 210 1987–1992 ≤0.20 10.0 27% (5)
Mickleborough et al. 79 1982–1993 <0.20 3.8 32% (5)
Langenburg et al. 96 1983–1993 ≤0.25 8.3
Elefteraides et al. 135 1986–1994 ≤0.30 5.2 29% (4.5)
Iskandrian et al. 269 1991–1994 ≤0.35 7.1
Kawachi et al. 50 1982–1995 ≤0.30 8.0 26% (5)
Moshkovitz et al. 75 1991–1994 ≤0.35 2.7 27% (4)
Trachiotis et al. 156 1981–1995 <0.25 3.8 35% (5)
Baumgartner et al. 61 1990–1996 <0.25 8.0
Cimochowski et al. 111 1992–1996 <0.35 1.8
Argenziano et al. 454 no CHF 1993–1996 ≤0.35 3.5 no CHF
   (CABG Patch) 443 CHF 7.7 CHF
DeCarlo et al. 80 1994–1996 ≤0.30 6.3