Renovascular Disease




© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014
Samir K. Shah and Daniel G. Clair (eds.)Cleveland Clinic Manual of Vascular Surgery10.1007/978-1-4939-1631-3_6


6. Renovascular Disease



Lee Kirksey 


(1)
Department of Vascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Mail Code H32, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA

 



 

Lee Kirksey




Epidemiology


Renal artery disease includes a group of disorders affecting renal blood flow. Causes of impaired renal blood flow include atherosclerosis, fibromuscular dysplasia, dissection, and trauma. Atherosclerosis is the most common cause of renal artery stenosis (RAS). RAS may be responsible for poorly controlled hypertension and impaired renal excretory function (azotemia). Population-based studies report a prevalence of approximately 7 % in individuals greater than age 65 [1]. In selected populations suffering from peripheral vascular disease, carotid stenosis, and aortoiliac disease the prevalence of RAS may be as high as 40–50 % [2, 3].


Historical Evolution


In 1937, Goldblatt caused hypertension, azotemia, and renal atrophy in a canine model with iatrogenic unilateral RAS [4]. Nephrectomy soon became the treatment of choice for renovascular hypertension until a 1956 review of 575 patients revealed a disappointing cure rate of 25 % [5]. Freeman performed transaortic renal endarterectomy in 1954 [6], but a review of results using this technique documented cure in less than half of patients.


Pathophysiology and Clinical Presentation


RAS may manifest clinically as hypertension or renal insufficiency. In general, hypertension directly caused by RAS is associated with refractory, poorly controlled hypertension. Refractory hypertension is defined as at least three classes of maximally dosed antihypertensives—one of which is a diuretic agent.

The degree of azotemia associated with RAS varies from absent to severe owing to associated comorbidities such as diabetes, which may contribute to impaired renal function.

In the early period following the development of hemodynamically significant RAS, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAA) system is responsible for the body’s physiologic response to RAS. Renin produced by the juxtaglomerular cells converts angiotensinogen to angiotensin I. Angiotensin I is converted to angiotensin II (ATII) by angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE). ATII is a potent local and systemic vasoconstrictor. ATII acts on the adrenal gland to promote aldosterone production. Aldosterone is an important mediator of renal tubular sodium absorption and volume expansion. This compensatory effect on volume expansion explains the unexpected worsening in renal function when a patient with bilateral RAS is started on an ACEI or ARB agent. Over time, RAS-mediated volume expansion contributes less to hypertension; it appears that systemic arterial medial wall hyperplasia remodeling is responsible for maintenance of hypertension.


Goals for Procedural Intervention


Although commonly believed that the sole reason for intervening upon RAS is to improve perfusion and halt or improve renal dysfunction, the goals of intervention deserve special attention. Although improvement of renal function or cessation of decline (and thus avoidance of renal replacement) is a laudable clinical benefit, the global focus should be a collective reduction of cardiovascular events (MI, heart failure, and stroke). Selection of the ideal population that benefits from renal revascularization has, and continues to be, the ongoing clinical challenge.



  • In carefully selected populations and high volume centers, hypertensive cure rates have been reported to be above 80 % with open dedicated renal revascularization (dedicated suggesting surgery done for isolated RAS and not in combination with aortoiliac [AOI] or aneurysmal pathology).


  • For aneurysmal pathology, many centers report morbidity and mortality approaching that for AOI pathology alone.


  • For isolated RAS, endovascular therapy is now the most common approach. Contemporary outcomes suggest that 30 % of patients have renal function/hypertensive improvement, 30 % remain the same, and 30 % decline. Postprocedural decline in renal function following catheter-based intervention is attributed to unidentified atheroembolization. It is anticipated that the use of distal embolic protection devices (EPD) may reduce this risk. If EPD is used, one should probably choose a mounted balloon device, which appears beneficial over filters that have pore sizes ranging from 70 to 167 μm.


  • Several diagnostic tools help in the selection of ideal candidates and increase the success of renal hypertension intervention. Lateralizing renal vein renin levels in the patient with unilateral RAS has an approximately 70 % specificity and sensitivity. A renal resistive index (RRI) <0.8 suggests the absence of renal parenchymal fibrotic changes, an indication of favorable hypertensive response to intervention. The use of these two modalities notwithstanding, our approach to selecting the patient most likely to benefit remains based upon clinical features:

Jan 26, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Renovascular Disease

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access