Relation of Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure and Long-Term Outcomes in Ambulatory Patients With Chronic Mild to Moderate Heart Failure




We studied the impact of baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) on outcomes in patients with mild to moderate chronic systolic and diastolic heart failure (HF) in the Digitalis Investigation Group trial using a propensity-matched design. Of 7,788 patients, 7,785 had baseline SBP data and 3,538 had SBP ≤120 mm Hg. Propensity scores for SBP ≤120 mm Hg, calculated for each of the 7,785 patients, were used to assemble a matched cohort of 3,738 patients with SBP ≤120 and >120 mm Hg who were well-balanced in 32 baseline characteristics. All-cause mortality occurred in 35% and 32% of matched patients with SBPs ≤120 and >120 mm Hg respectively, during 5 years of follow-up (hazard ratio [HR] when SBP ≤120 was compared to >120 mm Hg 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99 to 1.23, p = 0.088). HRs for cardiovascular and HF mortalities associated with SBP ≤120 mm Hg were 1.15 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.30, p = 0.031) and 1.30 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.57, p = 0.006). Cardiovascular hospitalization occurred in 53% and 49% of matched patients with SBPs ≤120 and >120 mm Hg, respectively (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.24, p = 0.008). HRs for all-cause and HF hospitalizations associated with SBP ≤120 mm Hg were 1.10 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.194, p = 0.017) and 1.21 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.36, p = 0.002). In conclusion, in patients with mild to moderate long-term systolic and diastolic HF, baseline SBP ≤120 mm Hg was associated with increased cardiovascular and HF mortalities and all-cause, cardiovascular, and HF hospitalizations that was independent of other baseline characteristics.


Hypertension is a known risk factor for incident heart failure (HF). However, several studies have demonstrated that in patients with acute decompensated HF, a low systolic blood pressure (SBP) is associated with poor outcomes. We recently demonstrated similar associations between low SBP and poor outcomes in a propensity-matched cohort of patients with advanced chronic systolic HF. However, the role of baseline SBP in outcomes in patients with mild to moderate chronic systolic and diastolic HF is relatively less known and has not been investigated using propensity-matched design. The purpose of the present study was to examine the association between baseline SBP and outcomes in a propensity-matched cohort of patients with mild to moderate chronic systolic and diastolic HF.


Methods


A public-use copy of the Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG) dataset was used for the present analysis. The DIG was a multicenter randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of digoxin in patients with HF. Briefly, 7,788 patients with advanced chronic systolic HF were enrolled from 302 different sites across the United States and Canada from February 1991 through August 1993. At baseline patients had a mean duration of 17 months of HF and had a mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 29%. Most patients had New York Heart Association class I to III symptoms and >80% of patients were receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and diuretics.


Data on baseline SBP were available from 7,785 patients and were documented by study investigators. Of these, 3,538 (45%) had SBP ≤120 mm Hg (median 110, interquartile range 8), and 4,247 (54%) had SBP >120 mm Hg (median 140, interquartile range 20). We chose an SBP of 120 mm Hg as our cutoff because it is often considered the upper limit of normal range. Taking into account the significant imbalances in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups ( Table 1 ), we used propensity scores to assemble a matched cohort who were well-balanced baseline characteristics. We began by estimating propensity scores for SBP ≤120 mm Hg for each of the 7,785 patients using a nonparsimonious multivariable logistic regression model and then assembled a cohort of 1,869 pairs (n = 3,838) of propensity-matched patients with SBPs ≤120 and >120 mm Hg who were well-balanced in 32 baseline characteristics. Absolute standardized differences were estimated to evaluate the prematch imbalance and postmatch balance and presented as a Love plot. An absolute standardized difference of 0% indicates no residual bias and differences <10% are considered inconsequential.



Table 1

Baseline characteristics of patients with heart failure by systolic blood pressure before and after propensity-score matching























































































































































































































































































































































































Prematch SBP (mm Hg) Postmatch SBP (mm Hg)
>120 (n = 4,247) ≤120 (n = 3,538) p Value >120 (n = 1,869) ≤120 (n = 1,869) p Value
Age (years) 65 ± 10 62 ± 11 <0.001 64 ± 10 64 ± 11 0.511
Women 1,163 (27%) 762 (22%) <0.001 438 (23%) 444 (24%) 0.847
Nonwhite 657 (16%) 470 (13%) 0.006 254 (14%) 242 (13%) 0.595
Body mass index (kg/m 2 ) 28 ± 6 27 ± 5 <0.001 27 ± 5 27 ± 6 0.410
Duration of heart failure (months) 30 ± 37 29 ± 35 0.434 30 ± 37 30 ± 36 0.565
Primary cause of heart failure <0.001 0.223
Ischemic 2,811 (66%) 2,548 (72%) 1,330 (71%) 1,330 (71%)
Hypertensive 622 (15%) 182 (5%) 150 (8%) 133 (7%)
Idiopathic 545 (13%) 565 (16%) 261 (14%) 293 (15%)
Others 269 (6%) 243 (7%) 128 (7%) 113 (6%)
Previous myocardial infarction 2,546 (60%) 2,361 (67%) <0.001 1,237 (66%) 1,217 (65%) 0.507
Current angina pectoris 1,170 (28%) 944 (27%) 0.392 520 (28%) 524 (28%) 0.913
Hypertension 1,159 (59%) 2,514 (33%) <0.001 792 (42%) 794 (43%) 0.972
Diabetes mellitus 1,366 (32%) 852 (24%) <0.001 519 (28%) 524 (28%) 0.883
Chronic kidney disease 2,017 (48%) 1,508 (43%) <0.001 854 (46%) 840 (45%) 0.646
Medications
Pretrial digoxin use 1,780 (42%) 1,584 (45%) 0.011 811 (43%) 831 (45%) 0.529
Trial use of digoxin 2,131 (50%) 1,757 (50%) 0.650 938 (50%) 919 (50%) 0.554
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors 3,929 (93%) 3,343 (95%) <0.001 1,740 (93%) 1,745 (93%) 0.793
Nitroglycerin and hydralazine 80 (2%) 31 (1%) <0.001 20 (1%) 23 (1%) 0.761
Diuretics 3,311 (78%) 2,762 (78%) 0.911 1,464 (78%) 1,438 (77%) 0.338
Potassium-sparing diuretics 284 (7%) 312 (9%) <0.001 146 (8%) 156 (8%) 0.581
Potassium supplement 1,185 (28%) 1,013 (29%) 0.476 545 (29%) 529 (28%) 0.595
Symptoms and signs of heart failure
Dyspnea at rest 922 (22%) 782 (22%) 0.676 395 (21%) 381 (20%) 0.602
Dyspnea on exertion 3,155 (74%) 2,705 (77%) 0.027 1,422 (76%) 1,410 (75%) 0.673
Jugular venous distension 519 (12%) 501 (14%) 0.012 251 (13%) 227 (12%) 0.249
Third heart sound 864 (20%) 981 (28%) <0.001 455 (24%) 435 (23%) 0.471
Pulmonary rales 657 (16%) 644 (18%) <0.001 314 (17%) 289 (16%) 0.272
Lower extremity edema 961 (23%) 672 (19%) <0.001 393 (21%) 375 (20%) 0.489
Number of symptom/signs 5.4 ± 2.0 5.5 ± 2.0 0.021 5.5 ± 2.0 5.5 ± 2.0 0.251
New York Heart Association class <0.001 0.269
I 650 (15%) 453 (13%) 254 (14%) 267 (14%)
II 2,404 (57%) 1,838 (52%) 1,026 (55%) 1,038 (56%)
III 1,127 (27%) 1,159 (33%) 557 (30%) 538 (29%)
IV 66 (2%) 88 (3%) 32 (2%) 26 (1%)
Heart rate (beats/min) 78 ± 12 79 ± 13 0.393 78 ± 12 78 ± 13 0.819
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 80 ± 11 69 ± 9 <0.001 74 ± 9 74 ± 8 0.578
Chest x-ray findings
Pulmonary congestion 550 (13%) 559 (16%) <0.001 276 (15%) 256 (14%) 0.365
Cardiothoracic ratio >0.5 2,541 (60%) 2,148 (61%) 0.429 1,115 (60%) 1,086 (58%) 0.349
Serum creatinine (mg/dL) 1.29 ± 0.38 1.27 ± 0.36 0.004 1.29 ± 0.38 1.27 ± 0.36 0.208
Serum potassium (mEq/L) 4.33 ± 0.44 4.34 ± 0.44 0.078 4.35 ± 0.44 4.35 ± 0.45 0.923
Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) 35 ± 13 29 ± 11 <0.001 31 ± 11 31 ± 12 0.834
Left ventricular ejection fraction >45% 725 (17%) 263 (7%) <0.001 177 (10%) 211 (11%) 0.068


The primary outcome for the present analysis was all-cause mortality during 5 years of follow-up. The secondary outcomes included various cause-specific mortalities and hospitalizations. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to determine associations between SBP ≤120 mm Hg and outcomes during 5 years of follow-up. Subgroup analyses were conducted to determine the homogeneity of association between SBP ≤120 mm Hg and all-cause mortality. Formal sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine the impact of an unmeasured confounder. All statistical tests were 2-tailed with a p value <0.05 considered statistically significant. All data analyses were performed using SPSS 18 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Illinois).




Results


Matched patients had a mean age of 64 ± 10 years with 23% women and 14% nonwhites. Matched patients with SBP ≤120 mm Hg had a median SBP of 114 mm Hg (interquartile range 10) and those with SBP >120 mm Hg had a median SBP of 134 mm Hg (interquartile range 10). More than 90% of matched patients with SBP ≤120 mm Hg had their SBP from 110 to 120 mm Hg. Before matching, patients with SBP ≤120 mm Hg were younger (by a mean age of 3 years) and had a lower prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease ( Table 1 ). They were also more likely to be men, have a higher prevalence of ischemic cardiomyopathy, a greater symptom burden, and a lower mean LVEF. These and other prematch imbalances in baseline covariates were balanced after matching ( Table 1 ). Postmatch standardized differences for all measured covariates were <10% (most were <5%), suggesting substantial covariate balance across groups ( Figure 1 ).




Figure 1


Love plot for pre- and postmatch absolute standardized differences for baseline covariates for patients with systolic blood pressures ≤120 and >120 mm Hg. ACE = angiotensin-converting enzyme; NYHA = New York Heart Association.


All-cause mortality occurred in 35% and 32% of matched patients with SBPs ≤120 and >120 mm Hg, respectively, during 5 years of follow-up (SBP ≤120 compared to >120 mm Hg, hazard ratio [HR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99 to 1.23, p = 0.088; Figure 2 and Table 2 ). This association was homogenous across various subgroups of patients except that it was observed only in those receiving diuretics ( Figure 3 ). In the absence of a hidden bias, a sign-score test for matched data with censoring provided evidence (p = 0.0147) that patients with SBP ≤120 mm Hg clearly had higher mortality than those with SBP >120 mm Hg. A hidden covariate that is a near-perfect predictor of mortality could explain away this association if it also increased the odds of having SBP ≤120 mm Hg by only 3.13%. Associations of SBP ≤120 mm Hg with other cause-specific mortalities before and after matching are presented in Table 2 .




Figure 2


Kaplan–Meier plots for all-cause mortality (top) and cardiovascular hospitalization (bottom) by systolic blood pressure.


Table 2

Baseline systolic blood pressure and mortality





























































































































Events, n (%) SBP (mm Hg) Absolute Risk Increase HR (95% CI) p Value
>120 ≤120
Before match
Subjects 4,247 3,538
All causes 1,289 (30%) 1,316 (37%) 7% 1.31 (1.21–1.41) <0.001
Cardiovascular 987 (23%) 1,064 (30%) 7% 1.38 (1.27–1.51) <0.001
Heart failure 396 (9%) 511 (14%) 5% 1.66 (1.45–1.89) <0.001
Other cardiovascular 591 (14%) 553 (16%) 2% 1.20 (1.06–1.34) 0.003
Noncardiovascular 232 (6%) 178 (5%) −1% 0.99 (0.81–1.20) 0.894
Unknown 70 (2%) 74 (2%) 0% 1.36 (0.98–1.88) 0.068
After match
Subjects 1,869 1,869
All causes 606 (32%) 650 (35%) 3% 1.10 (0.99–1.23) 0.088
Cardiovascular 459 (25%) 514 (28%) 3% 1.15 (1.01–1.30) 0.031
Heart failure 194 (10%) 246 (13%) 3% 1.30 (1.08–1.57) 0.006
Other cardiovascular 265 (14%) 268 (14%) 0% 1.04 (0.87–1.23) 0.682
Noncardiovascular 110 (6%) 99 (5%) −1% 0.93 (0.71–1.22) 0.581
Unknown 37 (2%) 37 (2%) 0% 1.03 (0.65–1.62) 0.907

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 22, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Relation of Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure and Long-Term Outcomes in Ambulatory Patients With Chronic Mild to Moderate Heart Failure

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access