The 2010 meeting of the editorial board of The American Journal of Cardiology (AJC) was held on March 14, 2010, in Atlanta, Georgia, at the time of the Annual Scientific Sessions of the American College of Cardiology. The meeting’s purpose was to review the AJC’s publication results for 2009, to recognize, in particular, those AJC board members who had reviewed the most manuscripts in 2009, and to receive criticisms and suggestions from board members on how to improve the journal. The meeting went as follows:
- 1
Introduction of new editorial board members: these are listed in Table 1
Table 1
Jack P. Chen
Jean-Pierre Després
Allen L. Dollar
S. David Gertz
Greg L. Kaluza
Ellen C. Keeley
Lynda E. Rosenfeld
- 2
AJC board members reviewing the most manuscripts in 2009: their names are listed in Table 2 .
Table 2
Name
No. Reviewed
Toby R. Engel
10
Antonio Abbate
9
Ami E. Iskandrian
9
Gregory Y. H. Lip
9
Myrvin H. Ellestad
8
Stephen P. Glasser
8
Monty M. Bodenheimer
8
Carl J. Lavie
8
- 3
Numbers of manuscripts submitted, withdrawn, accepted, and refused in 2009: 2,878 manuscripts were received in 2009 (excluding readers’ comments); 728 (25%) were accepted, 2,136 (75%) were refused, and 14 (<1%) were withdrawn. The number of manuscripts received in 2009 represented a 1% decrease from the number received in 2008.
- 4
Numbers of manuscripts submitted and published or accepted (excluding readers’ comments) in the AJC for 1983 to 2009, the period of the present editorship ( Table 3 ): the major reason the acceptance rate was in the mid-20s was that most of the manuscripts published were shortened considerably, allowing space for more reports.
Table 3
Year
No. of Manuscripts Submitted
No. of Manuscripts Published or Accepted
Percentage Accepted
1983
1,234
643
52%
1984
1,605
747
46%
1985
1,707
645
38%
1986
1,574
616
39%
1987
1,525
695
46%
1988
1,496
636
42%
1989
1,740
699
40%
1990
1,717
662
38%
1991
1,615
680
42%
1992
1,873
664
35%
1993
1,997
619
31%
1994
1,783
604
34%
1995
1,844
668
36%
1996
1,930
701
36%
1997
1,898
768
40%
1998
1,992
631
31%
1999
2,170
703
32%
2000
2,226
630
28%
2001
2,068
682
33%
2002
2,171
683
31%
2003
2,190
783
36%
2004
2,109
842
39%
2005
2,661
984
37%
2006
3,061
653
21%
2007
3,184
710
22%
2008
2,888
709
25%
2009
2,864
728
25% Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree