Primary percutaneous coronary intervention within the first hour: Insights from early-treated patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Highlights

  • Performing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) ≤60 minutes of randomization resulted in a significant reduction in the 30-day composite outcome of all-cause death, shock, heart failure, and reinfarction compared to later treatment.

  • The incidence of cardiogenic shock at 30 days was substantially reduced by 62% in patients who received PPCI ≤60-minute, highlighting a key mechanism of benefit.

  • Patients treated ≤60-minutes had a significantly lower proportion of Q waves on their hospital discharge ECG and a lower QRS score, suggesting greater myocardial salvage.

  • The time difference between the early and later-treated groups translated into an approximately 70-minute reduction in total ischemic time (symptom-onset-to-PPCI) for the <60-minute cohort.

ABSTRACT

Background

Whereas reperfusion benefit in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is time-dependent, outcome data from very early primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) are limited. The STREAM-1 and-2 trials provided a unique opportunity to assess this issue. We evaluated electrocardiographic (ECG), angiographic, and clinical outcomes of early presenting STEMI patients undergoing PPCI, focusing on those treated <60 minutes of randomization.

Methods

We analyzed STEMI patients from STREAM-1 ( n = 1,892) and STREAM-2 ( n = 604) trials presenting <3 hours of symptom onset who underwent PPCI. Endpoints included ECG (ST segment resolution, Q waves), angiographic (TIMI flow grade), 30-day composite of all-cause death, shock, heart failure, reinfarction, safety outcomes, and 1-year mortality.

Results

Patients undergoing PPCI <60 minutes of randomization (29.2%) were younger, more frequently male, and had shorter total ischemic times than those undergoing PPCI >60 minutes. ST resolution and TIMI flow outcomes were similar, but significantly fewer patients in the rapid PPCI group had Q waves on discharge ECG (58.2 vs. 71.9%, P <.001). The 30-day composite outcome was lower in the <60 minutes group (10.1 vs 14.8%, risk ratio [RR] 0.68 [95% confidence interval 0.47-0.98], P =.04), associated with a significant 62% reduction in cardiogenic shock ( P =.0008), and also had lower 1-year mortality (4.0 vs 7.2%; RR 0.56 [0.31-1.01], P (logrank) =.047). After inverse probability weighted adjustment, the 30-day composite outcome and cardiogenic shock were RR 0.74 (0.50-1.08), P =.116 and RR 0.45 (0.22-0.91), P =.027, respectively, and the 1-year mortality was RR 0.70 (0.39-1.26), P =.235. Safety endpoints were similar in both groups.

Conclusions

Substantial opportunity exists to improve outcomes for early-presenting STEMI patients undergoing PPCI. Establishing a first medical contact-to-PPCI time of <60 minutes provides incremental benefit.

Clinical trial registration

URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00623623 , https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02777580 . Unique identifiers: NCT02777580, NCT00623623 .

ACC

American College of Cardiology

AHA

American Heart Association

CAPTIM

Comparison of Angioplasty and Prehospital Thrombolysis In acute Myocardial infarction (trial)

CathPCI

Catheterization Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Registry)

DANAMI-2

Danish Acute Myocardial Infarction-2 (trial)

ESC

European Society of Cardiology

FTT

Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists’ (study)

IPW

Inverse Probability Weighting

KAMIR-NIH

Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health (registry)

NCDR

national cardiovascular data registry

NRMI

national registry of myocardial infarction

PCAT-2

Primary Coronary Angioplasty vs Thrombolysis (study)

PPCI

primary percutaneous coronary intervention

STREAM

STrategic reperfusion early after myocardial infarction (trial)

TIMI

thrombolysis in myocardial infarction

Background

The concept of the golden hour as the ideal time window within which to achieve reperfusion was elaborated by Boersma et al. based on an alternative analysis of 50,245 patients in the Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists’ (FTT) study. , Benefit, as expressed by the proportionate reduction in mortality of 6.5 per 100 patients treated, was related to the time prior to commencing reperfusion and was greatest in the small proportion (9.5%) of patients treated with the first hour of symptom onset. Thereafter, the benefit declined rapidly with each passing hour by about 3.3 lives per 100 patients. In the Primary Coronary Angioplasty vs Thrombolysis (PCAT-2) study, which compared 30-day outcomes of 6,763 ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients (from 22 randomized clinical trials between 1990 and 2002) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) versus patients receiving in-hospital fibrinolysis, only about 11% of patients presented within the first hour of symptom onset.

Because PPCI is recommended as the preferred reperfusion strategy-provided it can be performed within 90, and ideally <60 minutes of arrival at a PCI-capable hospital —we specifically excluded patients in the STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM)-1 and STREAM-2 studies (reported in 2013 and 2023, respectively) who could potentially undergo PPCI within 60 minutes from the time of randomization in order to compare PPCI to a pharmacoinvasive strategy. ,,, The STREAM-1 and-2 protocols also specified patients should be enrolled within 3 hours of symptom onset. , We also collected ancillary angiographic and electrocardiographic (ECG) data, which provided a unique opportunity in a more contemporary era to assess the impact of treatment delays on the efficacy of PPCI in early-presenting STEMI patients where the potential for myocardial salvage is greatest.

Our objective was to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the ECG, angiographic and clinical outcomes of early-presenting STEMI patients undergoing PPCI, with particular emphasis on those treated within the first hour.

Methods

Study population

The STREAM-1 and STREAM-2 findings have been previously reported. , The trials were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki principles. The protocols were approved by national regulatory authorities and local ethics committees at each of the participating centers, and patients gave informed consent.

In the current report, we examined all STEMI patients undergoing PPCI: they received standard of care, including antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies according to guideline-based local practice in both studies. Patients with STEMI in STREAM-1 of any age ( n = 1,892) presenting within 3 hours of symptoms, were randomly assigned to receive either conventional full-dose tenecteplase (with rescue intervention, if needed) and scheduled coronary angiography 6 to 24 hours after randomization (pharmacoinvasive strategy), or to PPCI. In STREAM-2 ( n = 604), older patients with STEMI ≥60 years presenting within 3 hours of symptoms were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive half-dose tenecteplase (with rescue intervention, if needed) and scheduled coronary angiography 6 to 24 hours after randomization (pharmacoinvasive strategy) or to PPCI. In both studies, patients were randomized either prehospital in ambulances ( n = 832) or in community hospitals ( n = 285). In STREAM-2, a higher proportion of patients were randomized at community hospitals (52.4 vs 19.2%) in STREAM-1.

In the current study, only those patients assigned to PPCI in both STREAM-1 and STREAM-2 studies were included, provided time from randomization-to-sheath insertion (employed as a proxy for first medical contact-to-device time in both STREAM trials) was available (97%). Notwithstanding the studies’ intent to exclude patients who were able to undergo PPCI within 1 hour ( Figure 1 ), 29% underwent PPCI within 1 hour of randomization (277 patients in STREAM-1 and 49 patients in STREAM-2).

Figure 1

Consort diagram. PPCI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention; STREAM, STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction; S1, STREAM-1; S2, STREAM-2.

ECG and angiographic analysis

Both trials also underwent similar core laboratory ECG measurements of reperfusion and the endpoints of interest were: the proportion of patients with worst lead ≥50% ST segment elevation resolution, as well as resolution of sum ST deviations (binary ≥50%) and residual ST deviation (continuous millimeters) following angiography. Baseline ECG, postreperfusion, and discharge measurements were interpreted at a core laboratory blinded to 30-day clinical outcomes. The presence of Q waves was defined using the Selvester QRS screening criteria : a Q wave of ≥30 ms in lead aVF (inferior); ≥40 ms in leads I and aVL (lateral); or ≥40 ms in ≥2 leads V4, V5 or V6 (apical); or any Q wave ≥20 ms or QS complex in leads V2 and V3 (anterior). Q wave equivalents were defined as follows: R wave ≥40 ms in V1 (posterior), or R wave ≤0.1 mV and ≤10 ms in V2 (anterior). ST segment deviation was measured at the J point with magnified calipers. The total ST deviation was calculated by adding the sum of ST-elevations and ST depressions. Worst lead ST-elevation resolution was also reported and dichotomized as >50% or <50% based on guideline recommendations for reperfusion assessment. Selvester 54-criteria/32-point QRS scoring system, a validated ECG estimate of infarct size, was measured at hospital discharge. The Cardio Calipers version 3.3 program (Iconico Inc., New York, NY) performed electronic measurements. When there was uncertainty regarding an ECG measurement, a consensus process between readers was used for final ECG reporting.

Angiographic findings of interest were thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade of the culprit vessel at first and last coronary angiography, as reported by the site investigators.

Clinical outcomes

The primary clinical endpoint for both trials was the composite of all-cause death, shock, heart failure, or reinfarction at 30 days; safety criteria were total stroke, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and major (nonintracranial) bleeding. For this analysis, we also explored the composite of all-cause death, shock, or heart failure and the composite of shock or heart failure. All-cause death at 1-year was also examined.

Statistical analysis

Patient baseline characteristics, ECG and angiographic measurements were reported according to time from randomization-to-sheath insertion and categorized by whether this was <60 minutes (early PPCI) versus greater or ≥60 minutes. Categorical variables were summarized as numbers (percentages), whereas continuous variables were presented as medians with 25th and 75th percentiles. Comparisons of baseline variables between trials and within trials were conducted using Chi-square tests for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous variables.

Clinical efficacy and safety outcomes at 30 days and mortality at 1-year are reported as observed rates. Mortality within 1 year is displayed using Kaplan–Meier curves according to early PPCI with logrank test. The relative association of early PPCI with the clinical efficacy outcomes are summarized as a relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), calculated from a Poisson regression model with robust variance. In the pooled cohort, the studies (STREAM-1 and-2) were included as covariates. Unadjusted and adjusted estimates are reported, with the latter adjusted for the simplified TIMI Risk Score and radial artery access. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to account for selection bias and imbalance of baseline characteristics between early PPCI and late PPCI groups. To establish the weights, a logistic regression model for early vs late PPCI was first developed by including relevant patient characteristics available at randomization (ie, age, sex, history of diabetes, hypertension, prior MI and study). Subsequently, the inverse of predicted probabilities was used as a weight in the Poisson regression model for the clinical outcomes (ie, clinical efficacy endpoints at 30 days and 1-year mortality). Assessment of heterogeneity in early/late PPCI on clinical outcomes between trials was also undertaken.

The relationship of early PPCI to cardiogenic shock and Q waves at hospital discharge was also assessed using time from randomization-to-sheath insertion as a continuous variable. To investigate the relationship visually, predicted events rates with 95% confidence interval (CI) limits were plotted according to time to sheath insertion (44 patients with times greater than 180 minutes were truncated to 180 minutes) using the restricted cubic splines with 4 knots in a logistic regression model.

There was no imputation for missing data. All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS (version Base 9.4; Cary, NC). P -values for two-sided tests are provided for descriptive purposes.

Results

In Table 1 , the baseline characteristics of patients assigned to PPCI in the STREAM-1 and-2 trials are shown and further categorized by whether the times from randomization to PPCI were less than or ≥60 minutes. A similar overall proportion of patients (overall 29.2%; STREAM-1, 30.1% and STREAM-2, 24.9%) underwent PPCI within 60 minutes. Notably, only 6.4% of patients who underwent PPCI within 60 minutes were randomized in community hospitals, whereas 33.4% of those randomized ≥60 minutes were in community hospitals. This early-treated cohort was younger and more frequently male. As expected, given the STREAM-2 protocol, patients in this cohort were older and had higher TIMI risk scores than those in STREAM-1. The STREAM-1 patients randomized <60 minutes also had a significantly shorter time from symptom-onset-to-randomization (75 minutes) as compared to the other 3 groups, in whom times ranged from 91 to 98 minutes. The total ischemic times in both trials-as represented by symptom-onset-to-PPCI-were approximately 2 hours (123 and 132 minutes) for those randomized within 60 minutes, and about 80 minutes longer, ie, 200 minutes, for the later cohort. Treatment delays from randomization to PPCI (as represented by sheath insertion) were similarly short (48 minutes) in both trials for the <60 minutes cohort versus approximately 95 to 98 minutes for those undergoing PPCI ≥60 minutes after randomization.

Table 1

Patient characteristics according to study and time from randomization to PPCI

STREAM-1 STREAM-2
<60 min ≥60 min P- value <60 min ≥60 min P- value
n 277 643 49 148
Age–year 56 (49, 65) 60 (52, 70) .001 66 (63, 71) 70 (66, 77) .005
Female sex–no. (%) 44 (15.9) 154 (24.0) .006 15 (30.6) 47 (31.8) .881
Weight-kg 80 (72, 90) 80 (70, 88) .046 79 (72, 87) 77 (70, 88) .448
Killip class–no./total no. (%) .177 .067
I 245/253 (96.8) 578/615 (94.0) 49/49 (100.0) 132/147 (89.8)
II/III 8/253 (3.2) 34/615 (5.5) 0/49 (0.0) 14/147 (9.5)
IV 0/253 (0.0) 3/615 (0.5) 0/49 (0.0) 1/147 (0.7)
Heart rate (beats/min) 73 (60, 84) 75 (64, 85) .139 72 (60, 86) 74 (64, 87) .516
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 138 (120, 155) 139 (120, 150) .784 129 (115, 146) 137 (120, 155) .123
Infarct location–no./total no. (%)
Anterior 134/277 (48.4) 287/641 (44.8) .315 23/49 (46.9) 66/148 (44.6) .775
Inferior 138/277 (49.8) 343/641 (53.5) .304 27/49 (55.1) 82/147 (55.8) .934
Other 5/277 (1.8) 11/641 (1.7) .925 1/49 (2.0) 10/148 (6.8) .213
Cardiovascular history
– no./total no. (%)
Previous heart failure 2/277 (0.7) 13/640 (2.0) .151 0/49 (0.0) 2/144 (1.4) .407
Previous PCI 30/276 (10.9) 51/640 (8.0) .156 2/49 (4.1) 16/145 (11.0) .147
Previous myocardial infarction 31/276 (11.2) 64/643 (10.0) .560 5/49 (10.2) 20/144 (13.9) .507
Hypertension 116/270 (43.0) 285/634 (45.0) .582 25/49 (51.0) 107/145 (73.8) .003
Diabetes 30/273 (11.0) 87/638 (13.6) .274 7/48 (14.6) 32/144 (22.2) .255
TIMI risk score 2 (1, 3) 2 (1, 4) .024 3 (2, 4) 4 (3, 5) <.001
Median time delays (Q1-Q2)–min
Symptom-onset-to-randomization 75 (54, 110) 98 (71, 140) <.001 91 (55, 126) 95 (62, 133) .310
Symptom-onset-to-sheath insertion 123 (100, 156) 200 (162, 250) <.001 132 (101, 170) 205 (163, 254) <.001
Randomization-to-sheath insertion 48 (39, 54) 97 (74, 123) <.001 48 (41, 54) 99 (76, 132) <.001
Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 27, 2026 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Primary percutaneous coronary intervention within the first hour: Insights from early-treated patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access