Highlights
-
•
ASCVD-free adults with LDL-C < 70 vs 70 to 99 mg/dL had similar long-term ASCVD risk.
-
•
Adults with LDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dL had higher long-term ASCVD risk.
-
•
Adults with non-HDL-C ≥ 160 mg/dL or apoB ≥ 90 mg/dL also had higher ASCVD risk.
-
•
Achieving normal lipoprotein levels is important for primary prevention of ASCVD.
ABSTRACT
Background
Elevated atherogenic lipoproteins increase risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), though long-term risk for adults without ASCVD who have low-normal levels has not been well described.
Methods
This study used pooled data from 16,384 individuals in 3 population-based prospective cohorts. At baseline all participants were without ASCVD and were not taking lipid-lowering therapy. We evaluated ASCVD events by baseline LDL-C, non-HDL-C and apoB, including low-normal values. ASCVD risk was assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards.
Results
The study cohort had a mean age of 52 (SD 18) years with 56.5% women, 64.7% of White race and 35.3% of Black race. Over a median follow-up of 18.8 years, unadjusted ASCVD event incidence was similar for adults with baseline LDL-C < 70 mg/dL and 70 to 99 mg/dL, and higher with LDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dL; trends were similar for non-HDL-C and apoB categories. Compared to having baseline LDL-C 70 to 99 mg/dL, LDL-C < 70 mg/dL was associated with similar ASCVD risk (adjusted HR 1.16 [95% Confidence Interval, 95% CI 0.90-1.50]) and LDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dL was associated with higher risk (adjusted HR 1.31 [95% CI 1.14-1.50]) after multivariable adjustment; adults with non-HDL-C ≥ 160 mg/dL or apoB ≥ 90 mg/dL also had higher risk after multivariable adjustment.
Conclusions
Among adults without ASCVD not taking lipid-lowering therapy at baseline, ASCVD risk for adults with low-normal and high-normal LDL-C, non-HDL-C and apoB was similar, and their risk remained less than in adults with elevated lipoproteins. These findings emphasize the importance of achieving normal atherogenic lipoprotein levels for primary prevention of ASCVD from early adulthood through middle age.
Background
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is the leading cause of mortality in the United States and worldwide. , Elevated low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a primary cause of atherosclerosis, and strategies to lower LDL-C are therefore fundamental to preventing ASCVD. ,,, Based on guidelines and standard reporting of laboratory results, a serum LDL-C < 100 mg/dL is generally considered in the normal range and desirable for the general adult population without clinical ASCVD, ,,, though only a minority of U.S. adults achieve this. ,, However, there has been considerable debate about what range of LDL-C should be targeted for primary prevention, particularly since randomized clinical trials of lipid-lowering therapies have demonstrated cardiovascular events can be reduced with lower LDL-C goals for adults with established ASCVD. ,,, Furthermore, high prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis has been demonstrated in otherwise healthy middle-aged adults with LDL-C < 100 mg/dL. , Other measures of atherogenic lipoproteins including non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and serum apolipoprotein B (apoB) may also be more suitable for recommending desirable cholesterol goals in a primary prevention population. ,,,,,
Despite current understanding of blood cholesterol and development of ASCVD, long-term prospective studies evaluating the association of lower LDL-C, non-HDL-C and apoB levels for primary prevention of ASCVD in adults not taking lipid-lowering therapy are lacking. Since this group represents the majority of the U.S. population, assessing whether lower atherogenic lipoproteins levels predict future ASCVD risk can help guide primary prevention recommendations for lifestyle and lipid-lowering interventions in young to middle-aged adults. To address this gap in evidence, we evaluated a large primary prevention cohort using pooled data from 3 large U.S. prospective cohort studies with >15 years of follow-up to determine the association of low-normal cholesterol levels with incident ASCVD events in adults not initially on lipid-lowering therapy.
Methods
Data source
This investigation used data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC), Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) and Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) studies. Each prospective cohort study consisted mostly of healthy adults without cardiovascular disease recruited from the general population, and collected similar key variables including blood cholesterol and ASCVD events occurring during long-term follow-up. All participants provided informed consent for study participation at each study visit. Institutional review boards at all participating sites have previously approved the 3 studies.
Study design and population
The current observational analysis used pooled, deidentified individual-level data from the 3 cohorts. The baseline visit was determined based on the time of the first blood cholesterol measurement in each cohort: Visit 4 in ARIC (1996-1998), Visit 1 in MESA (2000-2002) and Visit 1 in CARDIA (1985). The end of follow-up was defined as December 31, 2016 for ARIC, December 31, 2023 for MESA and December 31, 2011 for CARDIA.
The study population included all adults free of ASCVD at baseline. The age ranges at the baseline exam in each cohort were 45-65 years in ARIC, 45-84 years in MESA and 18-30 years in CARDIA. Adults with existing ASCVD ( n = 1,292), missing values for lipids measurements ( n = 2,213) and lack of available follow-up times ( n = 6) were excluded. Since lipid-lowering therapies are prescribed based on individual clinical characteristics and at varying time points, adults taking lipid-lowering therapy at baseline ( n = 1,148) were also excluded to avoid biases in observed associations between lipid measures and long-term events; data on lipid-lowering therapy after the baseline visit were not available. Pooled data were previously constituted to include only White and Black adults. Data for Hispanics ( n = 1,496) and Chinese ( n = 803) adults in MESA, and non-White or non-Black adults in ARIC ( n = 69) were therefore not available for analysis. The final study cohort included 16,384 participants without ASCVD and not on lipid-lowering therapy at their baseline visit.
Lipid measurements
In the pooled dataset, lipid measurements were only uniformly available at the baseline visit. Measurements of total cholesterol (TC) and triglycerides (TG) in ARIC were based on enzymatic assays and HDL-C was measured using dextran-magnesium precipitation. ApoB in ARIC was determined using World Health Organization/International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (WHO/IFCC) standardized reference materials. In MESA, fasting blood draws were collected and stored at −70 °C, and lipids were measured using eDTA plasma at a central laboratory within 2 weeks of collection. Cholesterol oxidase methods were used to measure TC and TG were measured using TG GB on a Roche COBAS FARA centrifugal analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA). HDL-C in MESA was measured using cholesterol oxidase methods after precipitation of non-HDL-C with magnesium/dextran (Roche Diagnostics). ApoB in MESA was measured with the Tina-quant apoB ver.2 immunoassay on a Roche Modular P analyzer (Roche Diagnostics). In CARDIA, TC and HDL-C were measuring using fasting blood draws that were separated into plasma and frozen at −70 °C prior to central laboratory analysis. ApoB in CARDIA was measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. For all analyses, the Martin-Hopkins equation was used to calculate LDL-C based on non-HDL-C and TG. ,
Exposures, covariates and study outcomes
The main exposures for this study were blood cholesterol measures with participants stratified into categories of baseline serum levels. Low-normal serum levels of LDL-C, non-HDL-C and apoB were defined as <70 mg/dL, <100 mg/dL and <80 mg/dL, respectively. Participants with high-normal levels (70-99 mg/dL for LDL-C, 100-129 mg/dL for non-HDL-C, and 80-89 mg/dL for apoB) were used as the reference group. Participants with elevated levels of LDL-C (≥100 mg/dL, non-HDL-C (≥130 mg/dL) and apoB (≥90 mg/dL) were also evaluated and compared to the reference group. These categories were chosen a priori based on cutoffs proposed in previous guidelines, ,,, even though population-level percentiles can vary among the different measures. ,,,
Covariates included demographics (age, sex, race) and other cardiovascular risk factors which were obtained from medical history, physical examination and laboratory data at the baseline visit. These included body mass index, smoking status (never, former or current), systolic blood pressure and diabetes mellitus. In ARIC, 2 blood pressure measurements were taken and the mean of both measurements was used for analyses. In MESA and CARDIA, 3 blood pressure measurements were taken and the mean of the second and third was used for analyses. Diabetes mellitus was defined as a fasting serum glucose ≥126 mg/dL, a nonfasting glucose ≥200 mg/dL, a self-reported physician diagnosis of diabetes, or use of a hypoglycemic medication.
The primary outcome of this study was incident acute ASCVD events, defined as a composite of definite or probable myocardial infarction, stroke or coronary death. Individual ASCVD events were defined similarly across the 3 cohorts and were determined from annual telephone calls, medical records, hospital discharge summaries and ICD codes, and/or death certificates, as has been previously described. ,,,,, In ARIC, study investigators performed continuous monitoring for all cardiovascular disease-related hospitalizations and deaths among cohort participants, and directly adjudicated all ASCVD events including coronary deaths. Monitoring in ARIC was performed using annual interviews or telephone calls with participants or next of kin, review and abstraction of hospital medical records, and questionnaires completed by physicians, medical examiners, and/or coroners for participants who died. In MESA, outcomes data were collected based on telephone calls at 9-12 month intervals, patient information at MESA visits, and medical records including hospitalization records collected in follow up. Two physicians were blinded to participant data and independently adjudicated all ASCVD events. For suspected coronary deaths, a committee of MESA physicians reviewed information from death certificates and available medical records, and obtained additional information from interviews with next of kin and physician questionnaires for out of hospital deaths. In CARDIA, participants were contacted annually by telephone and medical records were requested for those who were hospitalized or received an outpatient revascularization procedure. Two physician members on the CARDIA endpoints surveillance and adjudication committee independently adjudicated all events, and the full committee made final decisions for events with disagreement. For deaths, death certificates, hospital records, autopsy reports, and physician questionnaires were reviewed. When insufficient information was available to determine the cause of death, interviews were also conducted with family members, friends and/or other individuals who were present when the participant died.
Statistical analysis
Baseline characteristics of study participants were described with stratification by serum atherogenic lipoproteins at baseline (eg, <70 mg/dL, 70-99 mg/dL, 100-129 mg/dL, and ≥130 mg/dL for LDL-C). Kaplan–Meier estimates of cumulative event-free survival were used to assess long-term incidence of ASCVD events, and log-rank tests were used for comparisons. In prospective analyses Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the independent association of baseline blood cholesterol measures with incident ASCVD events. LDL-C, non-HDL-C and apoB were evaluated separately with stratification into 4 groups, with the high-normal group used as the reference. Three adjusted models were used. Model 1 was adjusted for baseline age, sex and race. Model 2 was additionally adjusted for baseline body mass index, hypertension, systolic blood pressure, smoking and diabetes, and Model 3 adjusted for all variables in Model 2 in addition to TG.
In secondary analyses, adjusted analyses were performed with stratification by baseline age of <55 and ≥55 years, since most adults over 55 years of age are recommended for statins based on current guidelines. Analyses were also performed based on sex and study cohort. Adjusted analyses were also performed by including a separate group with very low baseline blood cholesterol (LDL-C < 55 mg/dL, non-HDL-C < 85 mg/dL or apoB <60 mg/dL). In a smaller subgroup of participants with baseline high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) available ( n = 11,474), associations were determined by hsCRP level (<2 or ≥2 mg/dL). Lastly, given that cutoffs for LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and apoB represent different percentiles across the population, we performed analyses using lipoprotein quartiles to ensure an equal number of participants in each group across all measures.
Results
The mean age of the pooled study cohort was 51.5 (SD 18.2) years, 56.5% were women, 64.7% White and 35.3% Black. Median (25th-75th percentile) values were 117 mg/dL (97-140 mg/dL) for LDL-C, 139 mg/dL (114-165 mg/dL) for non-HDL-C and 96 mg/dL (80-113 mg/dL) for apoB. The population with low-normal LDL-C had the lowest mean age and the highest frequency of Black participants and active tobacco use ( Table 1 ); baseline findings were similar for adults with low-normal non-HDL-C and apoB (Supplementary Tables I and II).
Table 1
Baseline characteristics of participants based on LDL cholesterol.
| LDL-C | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <70 mg/dL | 70-99 mg/dL | 100-129 mg/dL | ≥130 mg/dL | |
| n = 879 | n = 3,825 | n = 5,912 | n = 5,768 | |
| Age, y | 42.9 (20.1) | 45.9 (19.6) | 52.1 (18.0) | 55.8 (15.6) |
| Female sex, n (%) | 509 (57.9) | 2,154 (56.3) | 3,262 (55.2) | 3,331 (57.7) |
| Race, n (%) | ||||
| White | 435 (49.5) | 2,336 (61.1) | 3,868 (65.4) | 3,939 (68.3) |
| Black | 443 (50.4) | 1,484 (38.8) | 2,034 (34.4) | 1,819 (31.5) |
| BMI, kg/m 2 | 25.1 (5.6) | 26.1 (5.7) | 27.6 (5.8) | 28.6 (5.6) |
| Smoking status | ||||
| Never smoker | 387 (44.0) | 1,883 (49.2) | 2,786 (47.1) | 2,695 (46.7) |
| Former smoker | 220 (25.0) | 1,093 (28.6) | 2,063 (34.9) | 2,033 (35.2) |
| Current smoker | 265 (30.1) | 824 (21.5) | 1,027 (17.4) | 1,009 (17.5) |
| Systolic BP, mmHg | 117 (18) | 119 (18) | 122 (19) | 125 (19) |
| Diabetes, n (%) | 65 (7.4) | 261 (6.8) | 516 (8.7) | 537 (9.3) |
| Antihypertensive medications, n (%) | 159 (18.1) | 724 (18.9) | 1,392 (23.6) | 1,491 (25.9) |
| LDL-C, mg/dL | 58 (11) | 87 (8) | 115 (8) | 154 (22) |
| Non-HDL-C, mg/dL | 73 (13) | 105 (13) | 136 (14) | 181 (26) |
| ApoB, mg/dL | 59 (13) | 77 (12) | 95 (13) | 121 (20) |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | 78 (80) | 93 (74) | 113 (76) | 138 (83) |
| HDL-C, mg/dL | 60 (19) | 56 (17) | 52 (15) | 49 (13) |
| 10-Year Estimated ASCVD Risk | ||||
| <5% | 611 (70.7) | 2,406 (63.5) | 2,779 (47.5) | 1,984 (34.7) |
| 5%-7.4% | 56 (6.5) | 311 (8.2) | 625 (10.7) | 686 (12.0) |
| 7.5%-19.9% | 152 (17.6) | 760 (20.0) | 1,745 (29.8) | 2,117 (37.0) |
| ≥20% | 45 (5.2) | 315 (8.3) | 705 (12.0) | 931 (16.3) |
Cohort included participants in ARIC, MESA and CARDIA who were without ASCVD and not on lipid-lowering therapy at baseline. 10-year ASCVD risk was estimated using the AHA/ACC pooled cohort equations. Mean (standard deviation) values are shown for continuous variables.
ApoB = apolipoprotein B, ASCVD = atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, BMI = body mass index, BP = blood pressure, HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, non-HDL-C = non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
During a median (25th-75th percentile) follow-up of 18.8 (14.0-31.7) years, there were a total of 1,916 incident ASCVD events among 16,384 participants (74/879 for LDL < 70 mg/dL, 324/3,825 for LDL 70-99 mg/dL, 672/5,912 for LDL 100-129 mg/dL, and 846/5,768 for LDL ≥ 130 mg/dL). In long-term follow-up, unadjusted ASCVD-free survival was highest in adults with low-normal lipoprotein levels and lowest in those with high lipoproteins levels ( Figures 1-3 ).
Survival free of ASCVD events based on LDL cholesterol. ASCVD-free survival is shown from 16,384 adults without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and not on lipid-lowering therapy at baseline in ARIC, MESA, and CARDIA. ASCVD events included myocardial infarction, stroke and coronary death. ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Survival free of ASCVD events based on Non-HDL cholesterol. ASCVD-free survival is shown from 16,384 adults without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and not on lipid-lowering therapy at baseline in ARIC, MESA, and CARDIA. ASCVD events included myocardial infarction, stroke and coronary death. ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, Non-HDL-C, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Survival free of ASCVD events based on apolipoprotein B. ASCVD events included myocardial infarction, stroke and coronary death. ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, ApoB, apolipoprotein B. ASCVD-free survival is shown from 16,384 adults without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and not on lipid-lowering therapy at baseline in ARIC, MESA, and CARDIA.
In fully adjusted multivariable analyses, adults with LDL-C < 70 mg/dL had similar risk of long-term ASCVD events compared to those with LDL-C 70 to 99 mg/dL (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.90-1.50; P =.26). Adults with low-normal non-HDL-C and apoB also had similar risk of ASCVD events compared to those with high-normal levels, whereas adults with LDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dL, non-HDL-C ≥ 160 mg/dL and apoB ≥90 mg/dL had higher long-term risk of ASCVD events ( Table 2 ).
Table 2
Adjusted risks of ASCVD events based on serum cholesterol levels.
| Model 1 | P value | Model 2 | P value | Model 3 | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LDL-C | ||||||
| <70 | 1.12 [0.87-1.44] | .87 | 1.10 [0.85-1.42] | .47 | 1.16 [0.90-1.50] | .26 |
| 70-99 | Ref | – | Ref | – | Ref | – |
| 100-129 | 1.15 [1.01-1.32] | .04 | 1.14 [0.99-1.30] | .06 | 1.10 [0.96-1.26] | .17 |
| ≥130 | 1.44 [1.26-1.63] | <.001 | 1.42 [1.25-1.62] | <.001 | 1.31 [1.14-1.50] | <.001 |
| Non-HDL-C | ||||||
| <100 | 0.99 [0.82-1.19] | .90 | 0.99 [0.82-1.20] | .93 | 1.05 [0.87-1.27] | .62 |
| 100-129 | Ref | – | Ref | – | Ref | – |
| 130-159 | 1.17 [1.03-1.32] | .02 | 1.12 [0.99-1.28] | .08 | 1.06 [0.93-1.21] | .36 |
| ≥160 | 1.55 [1.37-1.75] | <.001 | 1.46 [1.29-1.66] | <.001 | 1.28 [1.12-1.47] | <.001 |
| ApoB | ||||||
| <80 | 1.09 [0.92-1.28] | .33 | 1.11 [0.94-1.31] | .22 | 1.14 [0.96-1.35] | .20 |
| 80-89 | Ref | – | Ref | – | Ref | – |
| 90-119 | 1.28 [1.11-1.48] | .001 | 1.26 [1.09-1.46] | .002 | 1.20 [1.03-1.39] | .017 |
| ≥120 | 1.69 [1.45-1.98] | <.001 | 1.66 [1.41-1.96] | <.001 | 1.49 [1.26-1.76] | <.001 |
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree