Prevalence of Calcification of the Mitral Valve Annulus in Patients Undergoing Surgical Repair of Mitral Valve Prolapse




Factors correlating to mitral annulus calcification (MAC) include risk factors predisposing to atherosclerosis. In patients with mitral valve (MV) prolapse (MVP), other anatomic or mechanical factors have been supposed to facilitate MAC. The aims of this study were, in patients with MVP undergoing MV repair, (1) to describe the prevalence and characteristics of MAC, (2) to correlate MAC with clinical risk factors, coronary involvement, and aortic valve disease, and (3) to describe prevalence, site, and extension of MAC in fibroelastic deficiency (FED) versus Barlow’s disease (BD) and correlate MAC to surgical outcomes (repair vs replacement). In 410 consecutive patients with MVP suitable for surgical MV repair, detailed clinical and echocardiographic data were collected to characterize MAC in BD and FED. MAC was found in 99 patients (24%). Age, female gender, coronary artery disease, and cardiovascular risk factors were correlated with MAC. MAC was equally distributed in FED and BD groups despite patients with FED being older with more cardiovascular risk factors. The most common localization of MAC was annular involvement adjacent to P2 (75%), P1 (31%), and P3 (35%). The presence of MAC affected surgical outcomes in both groups (8% patients with MAC underwent replacement after a first attempt of repair vs 3% without MAC). MAC is a common finding in patients undergoing MV repair, and several clinical characteristics correlate with MAC either in FED or BD. In conclusion, despite very high percentage of repairability, MAC influences surgical outcomes and very detailed echo evaluation is advocated.


Mitral annulus calcification (MAC) is one of the more frequent abnormalities of the heart. Factors predisposing to MAC include age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, chronic renal insufficiency, prolapsing mitral valve (MV), and other congenital and acquired diseases. The frequent occurrence of factors predisposing to atherosclerosis in patients with MAC supports a common etiologic basis for both MAC and atherosclerosis. In patients with MV prolapse (MVP), several anatomic or mechanical factors have been supposed to facilitate MAC. Specifically, an extensive calcification of the MV annulus is encountered either in elderly subjects with a fibroelastic deficiency (FED) of the MV or in younger adults with Barlow’s disease (BD). MV repair has become preferential to replacement in MVP. However, the operation in patients with MAC remains a challenge for the surgeon, because, both in patients with FED and patients with BD, an annuloplasty ring should be inserted to stabilize the annulus and the suture line with obvious technical implications in MAC cases. The aims of this study are threefold: (1) to describe in detail the prevalence and anatomic characteristics (echocardiography) of MAC in a large consecutive series of patients undergoing MV repair for degenerative MVP, (2) to correlate MAC with clinical risk factors, coronary involvement, and coexisting aortic valve disease, and (3) to describe prevalence, site, and extension of MAC in patients with FED or BD and correlate echocardiographic findings to surgical outcomes (repair vs replacement).


Methods


This is a retrospective analysis including 410 consecutive patients with MVP who underwent MV surgery in our hospital from January 2008 to June 2012. All patients have an established diagnosis of severe mitral regurgitation (MR) due to degenerative MVP evaluated by 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and were suitable for surgical MV repair. Exclusion criteria were (1) association of MV stenosis, (2) previous or active endocarditis, and (3) history of coronary artery disease (CAD), previous myocardial ischemia or infarction, bypass graft surgery, or coronary stent implantation. The local ethics committee approved the study. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.


Detailed baseline demographic and clinical data were collected. Current smoking was defined as self-report of ≥1 cigarettes in the past 30 days. Hyperglycemia requiring previous or ongoing pharmacologic therapy was considered as diabetes. High blood pressure was described as either systolic or diastolic elevation of blood pressure (>140/90 mm Hg) or ongoing antihypertensive treatment. Hypercholesterolemia was defined as total cholesterol level of >200 mg/dl or a value <200 mg/dl in association with hypolipidemic therapy. The presence of CAD was evaluated by preoperative coronary angiography. The surgical approach for MV repair varied according to MV morphology and to the surgeon’s choice. However, the procedure was completed with annular ring implantation in all patients. The surgical repair was considered successful in the absence of significant residual MR (more than mild), stenosis (mean diastolic MV gradient >6 mm Hg), and/or systolic anterior motion of the anterior leaflet evaluated by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. MV replacement was performed only in case of unsuccessful repair.


A complete presurgical TTE was performed in all patients using a Philips iE33 or a GE Vivid 7 ultrasound system equipped with S5 or M4S probes, respectively (Philips Medical Systems, Andover, Massachusetts, or GE Healthcare, Horten, Norway). All images were digitally acquired and stored for off-line analysis and included standard 2-dimensional, color, and pulse- and continuous-wave Doppler acquisitions. MR was defined as severe when the effective regurgitant orifice area was ≥0.4 cm 2 estimated by proximal isovelocity surface area and/or in presence of vena contracta width >7 mm or of chordal rupture associated with flail leaflets. MVP diagnosis was based on 2- and 3-dimensional TTE. To assess MV anatomy, we used Carpentier’s widely recognized nomenclature that divides the posterior leaflet into 3 scallops: lateral (P1), middle (P2), and medial (P3), and the anterior leaflet into 3 segments: lateral (A1), middle (A2), and medial (A3). The anterolateral and posteromedial commissures were also evaluated. All segments were classified as normal, prolapsing (3 mm beyond the annulus plane), or flail. The presence of ruptured chordae was annotated. MAC was defined as an intense echo-producing structure with stone shadow, usually localized at the posterior mitral annulus, sometimes involving the whole annulus, the base of ≥1 MV scallops, chordae, and ventricular endocardium ( Figure 1 ). To assign the localization of each calcification involving the annulus, the leaflets, or the commissures, we used the conventional Carpentier’s nomenclature as described previously.




Figure 1


Examples of patients with MVP without and with calcification in short-axis (A and C) and 4-chamber (B and D) views, respectively. LA = left atrium; LV = left ventricle.


Patients were divided into 2 subgroups based on the 2 main phenotypes of degenerative MVP, which are BD and FED. BD is characterized by severe myxomatous degeneration of the leaflets with excess thickened tissue, billowing and/or prolapse of multiple segments of the valve, elongated and thickened, fused, or calcified chordae, and highly dilated annulus. Conversely, the diagnosis of FED is established in case of normal or even thinner leaflets because of impaired production of connective tissue that affects also the chordae tendineae, no billowing, a single prolapsing segment (usually P2) frequently associated with chordal rupture, and slight annular dilation. In the intermediate forms in which the sole prolapsed area presented some degree of myxomatous involvement, the size of the mitral annulus was also taken into consideration. All images were independently evaluated by 2 experienced cardiologists blinded to clinical data. Conflict was resolved by involving a third expert in the decision.


Continuous variables are presented as mean ± SD and categorical variables as frequency and relevant percentage. The data distribution normality of continuous variables was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Continuous variables were compared using the unpaired Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test, and for categorical variables, the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used, as appropriate, both for comparison between patients with and without MAC and between BD and FED groups. Differences were considered statistically significant at p <0.05. Significant variables in univariate analysis were included in a multivariate logistic regression analysis with stepwise method for the identification of independent variables predicting MAC. Goodness of fit was assessed using the Hosmer and Lemeshow test, in which a p value of <0.05 indicated a lack of fit of the model. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS, version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois).




Results


This study included 410 patients with severe MR due to MVP undergoing MV repair in our institution from January 2008 to June 2012. The mean age of this cohort was 62 ± 13 year and 274 patients (67%) were male ( Table 1 ). Female patients were significantly older than male patients (64 ± 12 vs 61 ± 12 years, p = 0.020). Prevalence of MAC was 24% and was higher in female patients (35% in women vs 19% in men, p <0.001). The most common site of MAC was annular involvement adjacent to P2 (75.8%), P1 (31.3%), and P3 (35.4%; Figure 2 ). Involvement of anterior annulus or leaflets was very uncommon. In 17 of 99 patients (17%) the calcium involved the chordae tendineae and in 18 (18%) the posterior-basal left ventricular endocardium. Surgical inspection confirmed echocardiographic findings in all patients with MAC. Hypertension, dyslipidemia, and positive smoking history were significantly more frequent in patients with MAC. Slightly greater prevalence of CAD was found in patients with MAC compared with patients without MAC, with higher rates of severe CAD. Percentage of aortic valve calcification was higher in patients with MAC. Concomitant coronary bypass grafting was performed in 19 patients (19%) with MAC and 42 (14%) without MAC (p = 0.166). The logistic regression analysis revealed that independent predictors of MAC were age (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05 to 1.10, p <0.001), smoking (OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.44 to 6.52, p = 0.004), female gender (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.32 to 3.57, p = 0.002), and dyslipidemia (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.06 to 3.26, p = 0.029). The model displayed satisfactory goodness of fit (p = 0.27).



Table 1

Baseline clinical and transthoracic echocardiographic characteristics of the study population and comparison between patients with and without mitral annulus calcification










































































































































Variable Overall (n = 410) Mitral Annular Calcium p Value
Yes (n = 99) No (n = 311)
Age (yrs) 62 ± 13 68 ± 10 60 ± 13 <0.001
Men 274 (67) 51 (51) 223 (72) <0.001
Body surface area (m 2 ) 1.81 ± 0.19 1.75 ± 0.18 1.82 ± 0.18 <0.001
Hypertension 224 (55) 67 (68) 157 (51) 0.003
Diabetes mellitus 22 (5) 8 (8) 14 (4) 0.169
Dyslipidemia 265 (65) 75 (76) 190 (61) 0.008
Smoker 43 (11) 16 (16) 27 (9) 0.031
Coronary artery disease 87 (21) 32 (32) 55 (18) 0.002
No. of coronary arteries involved 0.011
0 323 (79) 67 (68) 256 (82)
1 50 (12) 18 (18) 32 (10)
2 20 (5) 6 (6) 14 (5)
3 17 (4) 8 (8) 9 (3)
End-diastolic volume index (ml/m 2 ) 76 ± 19 73 ± 16 77 ± 20 0.025
End-systolic volume index (ml/m 2 ) 27 ± 9 27 ± 9 27 ± 10 0.421
Ejection fraction (%) 65 ± 7 64 ± 8 65 ± 7 0.386
Aortic valve calcification 18 (4) 13 (13) 5 (2) <0.001
Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (mm Hg) 38 ± 12 40 ± 12 37 ± 12 0.013
Annulus anteroposterior diameter (mm) 36 ± 5 35 ± 5 36 ± 5 0.023
Annulus mediolateral diameter (mm) 40 ± 5 39 ± 5 41 ± 5 0.041
Eccentricity 0.10 ± 0.07 0.11 ± 0.07 0.10 ± 0.07 0.306

Data are presented as mean ± SD or n (%).



Figure 2


Surgical view of MV showing different distribution of calcifications in mitral annulus ( bold number and percentage indicated by arrows ) and leaflets (percentage in the middle of each scallop ) in patients with MAC. A1, A2, and A3: segments of the anterior leaflets. P1, P2, and P3: scallops of the posterior leaflet. ALC = anterolateral commissure; PMC = posteromedial commissure.


The presence and extent of calcium on MV apparatus influences repair feasibility. Indeed, MV replacement was achieved in 8 patients (8%) with MAC and 9 (3%) without MAC (p = 0.038). No intra- and/or peri-operative death was observed. The presence of MAC was always confirmed by surgical inspection. Concerning morphologic classification, 317 patients (77%) had BD and 93 (23%) had FED. Slightly, but not significantly, higher percentage of MAC was present in the FED group. Patients with FED were older, with greater prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and CAD. Patients with BD were characterized by greater anteroposterior and mediolateral diameters. The prevalence of MV and aortic valve calcification was similar in BD and in FED groups ( Table 2 ). Figure 3 describes the localization of the calcifications adjacent to MV scallops in BD and FED. MV replacement was performed in 10 patients (4%) with BD and 7 (8%) with FED (p = 0.076). Patients with and without MAC grouped by BD and FED are compared in Table 3 for clinical characteristics and echocardiographic findings. The localization of MVP involved the posterior leaflet in 279 patients (68%), the anterior leaflet in 50 (12%), and both MV leaflets in 81 (20%). Ruptured chordae was diagnosed in 268 patients (65%). Figure 4 is a flowchart showing surgical outcomes (repair vs replacement) according to BD and FED classification and presence or absence of MAC.



Table 2

Baseline clinical and transthoracic echocardiographic characteristics of the study population and comparison between patients with Barlow’s disease (BD) and fibroelastic deficiency (FED)














































































































































Variable Overall (n = 410) BD (n = 317) FED (n = 93) p Value
Age (yrs) 62 ± 13 60 ± 13 68 ± 9 <0.001
Men 274 (67) 205 (65) 69 (74) 0.086
Body surface area (m 2 ) 1.81 ± 0.19 1.80 ± 0.18 1.83 ± 0.19 0.143
Hypertension 224 (55) 161 (51) 63 (68) 0.004
Diabetes mellitus 22 (5) 13 (4) 9 (10) 0.036
Dyslipidemia 265 (65) 206 (65) 59 (63) 0.784
Smoker 43 (11) 36 (11) 7 (7) 0.289
Coronary artery disease 87 (21) 55 (17) 32 (34) <0.001
No. of coronary arteries involved 0.002
0 323 (79) 262 (83) 61 (66)
1 50 (12) 33 (10) 17 (18)
2 20 (5) 10 (3) 10 (31)
3 17 (4) 12 (4) 5 (16)
End-diastolic volume index (ml/m 2 ) 76 ± 19 79 ± 19 68 ± 15 <0.001
End-systolic volume index (ml/m 2 ) 27 ± 9 28 ± 10 25 ± 8 0.016
Ejection fraction (%) 65 ± 7 65 ± 7 63 ± 8 0.034
Aortic valve calcification 18 (4) 12 (4) 6 (6) 0.260
Mitral annular calcium 99 (24) 72 (23) 27 (29) 0.211
Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (mm Hg) 38 ± 12 37 ± 12 38 ± 11 0.283
Annulus anteroposterior diameter (mm) 36 ± 5 37 ± 5 34 ± 5 <0.001
Annulus mediolateral diameter (mm) 40 ± 5 41 ± 5 38 ± 5 <0.001
Eccentricity 0.10 ± 0.07 0.10 ± 0.07 0.11 ± 0.06 0.513

Data are presented as mean ± SD or n (%).



Figure 3


Surgical view of MV showing different distribution of calcifications in mitral annulus ( bold number and percentage indicated by arrows ) and leaflets (percentage in the middle of each scallop ) between patients with BD (left) and FED (right) . A1, A2, and A3: segments of the anterior leaflets. P1, P2, and P3: scallops of the posterior leaflet. ALC = anterolateral commissure; PMC = posteromedial commissure.


Table 3

Comparison of clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of the study population between patients with and without mitral annulus calcification (MAC) grouped by etiology of mitral valve prolapse























































































































































































Variable BD (n = 317) p Value FED (n = 93) p Value
MAC (n = 72) No MAC (n = 245) MAC (n = 27) No MAC (n = 66)
Age (yrs) 67 ± 10 58 ± 13 <0.001 72 ± 9 67 ± 9 0.010
Men 34 (47) 171 (70) 0.001 17 (63) 52 (79) 0.113
Body surface area (m 2 ) 1.74 ± 0.18 1.81 ± 0.18 0.001 1.78 ± 0.18 1.86 ± 0.19 0.072
Hypertension 45 (63) 116 (47) 0.024 22 (81) 41 (62) 0.070
Diabetes mellitus 4 (6) 9 (4) 0.479 4 (15) 5 (8) 0.284
Dyslipidemia 53 (74) 153 (63) 0.081 22 (81) 37 (56) 0.021
Smoker 13 (18) 23 (9) 0.042 3 (11) 4 (6) 0.410
Coronary artery disease 19 (26) 36 (15) 0.021 13 (48) 19 (29) 0.074
No. of coronary arteries involved 0.023 0.135
0 53 (74) 209 (85) 14 (52) 47 (71)
1 13 (18) 20 (8) 5 (18.5) 12 (18)
2 1 (1) 9 (4) 5 (18.5) 5 (8)
3 5 (7) 7 (3) 3 (11) 2 (3)
End-diastolic volume index (ml/m 2 ) 75 ± 16 80 ± 20 0.017 68 ± 14 68 ± 15 0.790
End-systolic volume index (ml/m 2 ) 27 ± 9 28 ± 10 0.508 25 ± 9 25 ± 8 0.738
Ejection fraction (%) 64 ± 7 65 ± 7 0.242 63 ± 9 63 ± 8 0.995
Aortic valve calcification 9 (12) 3 (1) <0.001 4 (15) 2 (3) 0.057
Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (mm Hg) 39 ± 12 37 ± 12 0.040 40 ± 13 37 ± 9 0.181
Annulus anteroposterior diameter (mm) 35 ± 5 37 ± 5 0.010 35 ± 5 34 ± 5 0.708
Annulus mediolateral diameter (mm) 40 ± 5 41 ± 5 0.042 38 ± 5 38 ± 5 0.802
Eccentricity 0.11 ± 0.07 0.10 ± 0.07 0.142 0.10 ± 0.06 0.10 ± 0.06 0.584

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 1, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Prevalence of Calcification of the Mitral Valve Annulus in Patients Undergoing Surgical Repair of Mitral Valve Prolapse

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access