Predictors of One-Year Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis




Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is already an accepted option to treat elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who are inoperable or at high surgical risk. However, short- and long-term mortality after TAVI remains an important issue, raising the need to further improve the technology of TAVI as well as to identify patients who will not benefit from TAVI. A total of 1,391 patients treated with TAVI at 27 hospitals were included in the German Transcatheter Aortic Valve Interventions – Registry. One-year follow-up data were available for 1,318 patients (94.8%), with a mean follow-up period of 12.9 ± 4.5 months. One-year mortality was 19.9%. Survivors and nonsurvivors showed multiple differences in patient characteristics, indications for interventions, preintervention and interventional characteristics, and postintervention events. A higher logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score was associated with higher 1-year mortality (p <0.0001). Cox proportional-hazards analysis revealed the following independent predictors of mortality: among preintervention findings: previous mitral insufficiency ≥II° (p = 0.0005), low-gradient aortic stenosis (p = 0.0008), previous decompensation (p = 0.0061), previous myocardial infarction (p = 0.0138), renal failure (p = 0.0180), previous New York Heart Association class IV (p = 0.0254), and female gender (p = 0.0346); among procedural factors: intraprocedural conversion to surgery (p = 0.0009), peri-intervention stroke (p = 0.0003), and residual aortic insufficiency ≥II° (p = 0.0022); and among postprocedural events: postintervention myocardial infarction (p = 0.0009) and postintervention pulmonary embolism (p = 0.0025). In conclusion, 1-year mortality after TAVI was 19.9% in this series. Patient characteristics and procedural as well as postintervention factors associated with mortality were identified, which may allow better patient selection and better care for these critically ill patients.


Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has rapidly been integrated into the care of elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and is now performed in almost 1/3 of patients who undergo aortic valve replacement therapy in Germany.


The superiority of TAVI compared with conservative treatment has been shown for patients who are not candidates for surgery, and its equivalence to surgical valve replacement was shown in high-risk surgical patients who are candidates for surgery. This has led to a class I/B recommendation for TAVI in inoperable patients and a class IIa/B recommendation for high-risk surgical patients in the most recent guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology on valvular heart disease, under the premise that the indication to perform TAVI is made by the so-called heart team and that TAVI is performed at a center with on-site cardiac surgery. However, short-term as well as long-term mortality and morbidity after TAVI remain an important issue, raising the need to further improve the technology as well as to identify patients who will not benefit from TAVI and those who are at too great a risk for TAVI. Data are available from registries and from 2 randomized trials that analyzed predictors of mortality after TAVI. However, the data sets are too small or the analyses concentrated only on some important factors for prognosis, without using a more general and formal approach. To identify predictors of hospital, postdischarge, and total mortality from intervention through the end of the follow-up period, we analyzed data from the German Transcatheter Aortic Valve Interventions – Registry.


Methods


The German Transcatheter Aortic Valve Interventions – Registry is a multicenter prospective registry. Details have been described elsewhere. Since January 2009, all participating hospitals have committed to include all consecutive patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenoses treated with balloon valvuloplasty either alone or in combination with TAVI. The registry ceased recruitment in June 2010, after which all patients were included in the prospective Deutsches Aortenklappenregister (German Aortic Valve Replacement – Registry [GARY]).


All patients gave written informed consent before the procedure and also gave written informed consent for processing of their anonymized data.


The baseline operative risk of the patients was estimated using the logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score (EuroSCORE). The decision to treat a patient as well as the decision to perform balloon valvuloplasty alone or to perform TAVI were left to the discretion of the treating physician. However, we strongly suggested that these decisions should be made by a multidisciplinary team, typically consisting of an interventional cardiologist and a cardiac surgeon, the so-called heart team, as suggested in current recommendations.


In a first analysis of our registry, we analyzed all patients treated with TAVI from the start of our registry to December 2009. In that analysis, only procedural, hospital, and 30-day events were analyzed. We then performed follow-up by telephone according to a prespecified protocol from Institut für Herzinfarktforschung (Ludwigshafen, Germany) or the treating hospital to evaluate 1-year outcomes and to analyze factors associated with follow-up events.


Our registry was open to all available prostheses. However, only 2 prostheses were commercially available in Germany at that time: the Medtronic CoreValve (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota) and the Edwards SAPIEN (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California). Details of the valves used have been described elsewhere.


The degree of postprocedural aortic regurgitation was angiographically evaluated at the end of the TAVI procedure after final device deployment and removal of the catheter and guidewire. Qualitative angiographic assessment of the severity of aortic regurgitation was performed by visual estimation of the concentration of contrast medium in the left ventricle, using the method of Sellers et al. Preintervention mitral insufficiency was evaluated by echocardiography and was graded as absent (0), trace or mild (1/4), mild to moderate (2/4), moderate to severe (3/4), or severe (4/4).


Data were collected via the Internet by Institut für Herzinfarktforschung at the Heart Center Ludwigshafen. Absolute numbers and percentages as well as means and SDs or medians and interquartile ranges were computed to describe the patient population. Categorical values were compared using chi-square tests and continuous variables using 2-tailed Wilcoxon’s rank-sum tests. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate 30-day as well as follow-up survival rates. Multivariate analyses were used to determine risk factors for the occurrence of total mortality. We analyzed 3 different time periods: (1) from the procedure until the end of follow-up, (2) from the procedure until discharge, and (3) from discharge until the end of follow-up. We compared patients who died during follow-up with those who survived. Those parameters that showed differences with p values ≤0.10 were included in the multivariate model. The logistic EuroSCORE was not included in the model because the individual factors were already included. We provide instead the Kaplan-Meier curves for 3 categories of the logistic EuroSCORE, the grade of postintervention aortic regurgitation, and the grade of preintervention mitral insufficiency. Cox proportional-hazards analysis was used to determine risk factors for mortality for the time interval from the procedure until the end of follow-up, and logistic regression analyses were used for the time intervals from the procedure until discharge and from discharge until the end of follow-up. A p value <0.05 was considered significant. All p values are the results of 2-tailed tests. Analysis was performed using SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina).




Results


From January 2009 to June 2010, 1,391 patients (807 women [58%], 584 men [42%]) treated with TAVI at 27 hospitals were included. The mean follow-up duration was 12.9 ± 4.5 months. One-year follow-up data were available for 1,318 patients (94.8%). According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, 1-year mortality was 19.9% ( Figure 1 ).




Figure 1


Thirty-day and 1-year mortality.


As listed in Tables 1 to 4 , the 2 groups showed multiple differences in patient characteristics, indications for interventions, preintervention and interventional characteristics, and postintervention events. In particular, there was a gender difference in 1-year mortality, which was 23.6% in men and 17.3% in women (p <0.001; Figure 1 ). A higher logistic EuroSCORE was associated with lower 1-year survival, which was 85% in patients with scores <20%, 77% in those with scores of 20% to 40%, and 66% in those with scores >40% ( Figure 2 ). The postintervention degree of aortic insufficiency was also associated with 1-year survival, which was 82% in patients with no aortic insufficiency, 82% in those with grade I insufficiency, and 71% in patients with aortic insufficiency greater than grade I (p <0.001; Figure 3 ). This was also found for preintervention degree of mitral insufficiency, which was also associated with 1-year survival, at 90% in patients with no mitral insufficiency, 83% in those with grade I insufficiency, and 73% in patients with mitral insufficiency greater than grade I (p <0.001; Figure 4 ). The 1-year death rate in the percutaneous TAVI group was 33.3% (41 of 123) and 20.6% (246 of 1,195) in the operative TAVI group (p = 0.0011).



Table 1

Patient characteristics

































































































Variable Patients Who Died Patients Who Survived p Value
(n = 287) (n = 1,031)
Age (yrs) 81.5 ± 6.2 81.8 ± 6.1 0.44
Men 50.2% (144/287) 39.1% (403/1,031) <0.001
Body mass index (kg/m 2 ) 26 ± 8 27 ± 11 0.06
Previous coronary bypass surgery 19.5% (56/287) 17.7% (184/1,031) 0.51
Previous percutaneous coronary intervention 42.3% (120/284) 31.9% (328/1,028) 0.001
Previous valve surgery 14.1% (9/64) 17.1% (38/222) 0.56
Previous balloon valvuloplasty 16.1% (46/285) 10.4% (107/1,030) 0.007
Previous stroke 10.2% (29/285) 7.6% (78/1,030) 0.15
Diabetes mellitus 38.2% (109/285) 32.9% (339/1,029) 0.09
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 30.2% (99/285) 26.2% (270/1,030) 0.006
Peripheral arterial obstructive disease 31.9% (91/285) 17.7% (182/1,030) <0.001
Renal failure 72.1% (207/287) 57.3% (591/1,031) <0.001
Clinical presentation
NYHA class III 63.7% (181/284) 73.4% (752/1,025) 0.002
NYHA class IV 27.5% (78/284) 14.1% (145/1,025) <0.001
Frailty 24.8% (70/282) 15.9% (163/1,028) <0.001
Logistic EuroSCORE 25 ± 17 19 ± 12 <0.001

Data are expressed as mean ± SD or as percentage (number).

NYHA = New York Heart Association.

Glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/m 2 .



Table 2

Angiographic and hemodynamic findings























































































Variable Patients Who Died Patients Who Survived p Value
(n = 287) (n = 1,031)
No coronary heart disease 34.7% (99/285) 42.9% (441/1,029) 0.06
Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) 48 ± 16 55 ± 14 <0.001
Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤30% 20.2 % 9.3 % <0.001
Aortic valve area (cm 2 ) 0.66 ± 0.24 0.69 ± 0.44 0.34
Transvalvular mean gradient (mm Hg) 46.3 ± 21.8 50.6 ± 18.5 <0.001
Bicuspid aortic valve 2.1% (6/285) 3.1% (32/1,026) 0.37
Severely calcified valve 66.1% (189/286) 66.1% (677/1,024) 0.99
Aortic annular diameter (mm) 23 ± 3 23 ± 3 0.08
Low-output low-gradient stenosis 19.4% (55/283) 9.2% (93/1,014) <0.001
Concomitant aortic insufficiency grade ≥3/4 4.5% (13/286) 3.6% (37/1,027) 0.46
Concomitant mitral insufficiency grade ≥2/4 5.7% (16/285) 2.5% (26/1,027) 0.009
Peak systolic pulmonary pressure (mm Hg) 47 ± 17 45 ± 35 0.002
Pulmonary hypertension 68.8% (192/279) 65.5% (673/1,027) 0.30
Atrial fibrillation 31.3% (89/284) 23.1% (238/1,029) 0.004
Porcelain aorta 12.9% (37/286) 10.2% (104/1,022) 0.18

Data are expressed as mean ± SD or as percentage (number).

Diameter of the plane connecting the nadirs of all 3 aortic cusps.



Table 3

Type of intervention, type of valve used, and interventional characteristics


























































































































Variable Patients Who Died Patients Who Survived p Value
(n = 287) (n = 1,031)
Elective intervention 76.7% (220/287) 85.5% (882/1,031) <0.001
Intervention during resuscitation 1.0% (3/287) 0% (0/1,031) 0.001
Type of valve used
Medtronic CoreValve 78.3% (224/286) 82.6% (850/1,029) 0.10
26 mm 45.3% (102/225) 47.1% (402/853) 0.63
29 mm 54.7% (123/225) 52.9% (451/853) 0.63
Edwards SAPIEN 21.3% (61/286) 17.0% (175/1,029) 0.09
23 mm 44.3% (27/61) 46.3 (81/175) 0.78
26 mm 55.7 (34/61) 53.7 (94/175) 0.78
Type of access used
Transfemoral access 80.1% (230/287) 90.2% (930/1,031) <0.001
Subclavian access 5.6% (16/287) 1.8% (19/1,031) <0.001
Surgical access 14.3% (41/287) 8% (82/1,031) 0.001
Transapical 12.2% (35/287) 7.6% (78/1,031) 0.013
Transaortic 2.1% (6/287) 0.4% (4/1,031) 0.001
Procedural characteristics
Intervention time (minutes) 99 ± 60 87 ± 45 0.03
Fluoroscopy time (minutes) 15.26 ± 7.50 15.44 ± 7.37 0.41
Amount of contrast dye used (ml) 168 ± 75 163 ± 71 0.25
Interventional closure of puncture site 80.6% (183/227) 86.0% (799/929) 0.04
Surgical closure of puncture site 13.2% (30/227) 6.8% (63/929) 0.001
Concomitant percutaneous coronary intervention during the same procedure 6.3% (18/284) 3.7% (38/1,030) 0.05

Data are expressed as mean ± SD or as percentage (number).


Table 4

Procedural and clinical events































































































































Variable Patients Who Died Patients Who Survived p Value
(n = 287) (n = 1,031)
Technical success 92.0% (263/286) 98.8% (1,019/1,031) <0.001
Conversion to open-heart surgery 4.2% (12/286) 0.5% (5/1,031) <0.001
Unsuccessful termination of the procedure 3.8% (11/286) 0.7% (7/1,031) <0.001
Mean gradient after the procedure (mm Hg) 5.40 ± 5.98 5.99 ± 6.97 0.29
Residual aortic insufficiency (grade) 71.9% (200/278) 67.5% (694/1,028) 0.007
0 28.1 % (78/278) 32.5% (334/1,028) 0.007
1 50.0% (139/278) 53.9% (554/1,028)
2 19.34% (54/278) 12.5% (128/1,028)
3 1.8% (5/278) 1.1% (11/1,028)
4 0.7% (2/278) 0.1% (1/1,028)
Pacemaker implantation 33.8% (93/275) 34.5% (353/1,022) 0.82
Clinical course
Time at intensive care unit (days) 4.6 ± 4.3 2.9 ± 2.4 <0.001
Groin problems 29.2% (81/277) 19.6% (200/1,022) <0.001
Need for transfusion 6.5% (18/277) 1.7% (17/1,022) <0.001
Severe 9.0% (25/277) 2.1% (21/1,022) <0.001
Need for hemodynamic support (intra-aortic balloon pump/extracorporeal life support) 2.9% (8/279) 0% (0/1,016) <0.001
Pericardial tamponade 1.8% (5/279) 1.1% (11/1,018) 0.35
Aortic dissection 1.8% (5/279) 0.1% (1/1,018) <0.001
Coronary ischemia 1% (2/279) 0.2% (2/1,018) 0.20
Myocardial infarction 2.1% (6/280) 0.1% (1/1,023) <0.001
Stroke 7.6% (21/278) 1.6% (16/1,023) <0.001
Pulmonary embolism 5.1% (14/277) 0.7% (7/1,023) <0.001

Data are expressed as mean ± SD or as percentage (number).



Figure 2


Kaplan-Meier curves for survival depending on logistic EuroSCORE.



Figure 3


Kaplan-Meier curves for survival depending on residual aortic insufficiency (AI) after TAVI.



Figure 4


Kaplan-Meier curves for survival depending on the preprocedural amount of concomitant mitral insufficiency (MI).


Cox proportional-hazards analysis revealed the following predictors of 1-year mortality ( Table 5 ): previous mitral insufficiency ≥II° (p = 0.0005), low-gradient aortic stenosis (p = 0.0008), previous decompensation (p = 0.0061), previous myocardial infarction (p = 0.0138), renal failure (glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/m 2 ; p = 0.0180), previous New York Heart Association class IV (p = 0.0254), female gender (p = 0.0346), intraprocedural conversion to surgery (p = 0.0009), peri-intervention stroke (p = 0.0003), residual aortic insufficiency ≥II° (p = 0.0022), postintervention myocardial infarction (p = 0.0009), and postintervention pulmonary embolism (p = 0.0025). Independent factors associated with hospital and postdischarge mortality are also listed in Table 5 .



Table 5

Multivariate analyses of mortality




































































































































































Variable Wald’s Chi-Square Adjusted HR (95% CI) p Value
Overall mortality (procedure to end of follow-up)
Peri-intervention stroke 12.90 1.72 (1.28–2.31) 0.0003
Previous mitral insufficiency ≥II° 12.07 1.57 (1.22–2.02) 0.0005
Low-gradient aortic stenosis 11.28 1.83 (1.29–2.61) 0.0008
Intraprocedural conversion to surgery 11.06 4.13 (1.79–9.61) 0.0009
Postintervention myocardial infarction 10.94 5.48 (2.00–15.00) 0.0009
Residual aortic insufficiency ≥II° 9.41 1.63 (1.19–2.23) 0.0022
Postintervention pulmonary embolism 9.18 2.92 (1.46–5.86) 0.0025
Previous decompensation 7.51 1.48 (1.12–1.95) 0.0061
Previous myocardial infarction 6.06 1.48 (1.08–2.03) 0.0138
Renal failure (GFR <60 ml/min/m 2 ) 5.60 1.39 (1.06–1.82) 0.0180
Previous NYHA class IV 4.99 1.44 (1.05–1.99) 0.0254
Female gender 4.47 0.75 (0.57–0.98) 0.0346
Early (hospital) mortality Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)
Postintervention pulmonary embolism 19.47 13.43 (4.24–42.58) <0.0001
Intraprocedural conversion to surgery 14.07 14.08 (3.54–56.10) 0.0002
Pulmonary hypertension 13.44 0.36 (0.21–0.62) 0.0002
Peri-intervention stroke 11.93 2.46 (1.48–4.11) 0.0006
Residual aortic insufficiency ≥II° 9.09 2.43 (1.36–4.32) 0.0026
Postintervention myocardial infarction 6.93 16.40 (2.04–131.57) 0.0085
Low-gradient aortic stenosis 6.19 2.34 (1.20–4.57) 0.0128
Previous NYHA class IV 5.15 2.07 (1.10–3.88) 0.0233
Late mortality (discharge to 1 yr)
Female gender 9.47 0.56 (0.38–0.81) 0.0021
Previous mitral insufficiency ≥II° 8.56 1.70 (1.19–2.42) 0.0034
Previous balloon valvuloplasty 5.07 1.70 (1.07–2.71) 0.0243
Renal failure (GFR <60 ml/min/m 2 ) 4.60 1.49 (1.04–2.15) 0.0319
Previous American Society of Anesthesiologists class IV 4.34 1.76 (1.03–2.99) 0.0371
Previous decompensation 4.23 1.47 (1.02–2.12) 0.0398
Diabetes mellitus 3.94 1.44 (1.00–12.06) 0.0472
Previous myocardial infarction 3.91 1.56 (1.00–2.43) 0.0479

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 5, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Predictors of One-Year Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access