Pericardial Disease: Diagnosis and Hemodynamics

43 Pericardial Disease


Diagnosis and Hemodynamics



Pericardial pathology can present as an outpatient disease, in a setting requiring invasive diagnostic testing and surgery, or anywhere in between (see Chapter 42). This chapter focuses on the more significant presentations that result in hemodynamic compromise. In these cases, the common underlying physiologic abnormality, regardless of the specific pericardial pathology, is impaired diastolic filling of the heart. Significant constrictive pericarditis presents with evidence of right-sided heart failure, whereas pericardial tamponade presents with distinctive systemic hypotension. Diagnosis of these conditions is not always simple, since combinations of the disease processes can exist (effusive-constrictive pericarditis) and milder forms may require acute fluid loading to bring out characteristic hemodynamic findings (occult constrictive pericarditis). In addition, localized and transient forms of constrictive pericarditis have been described. The differential diagnosis between constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy, addressed primarily in Chapter 20, can also be a challenge, because myocardial involvement may accompany the pericardial component and all three can indeed be present in the same patient. The hemodynamics can be further complicated if the patient has another disease altering the hemodynamics, such as pulmonary hypertension, an associated dilated cardiomyopathy, or significant valvular heart disease. Attention to details is mandatory in an attempt to sort out the presence of pericardial disease under these circumstances.



Etiology and Pathogenesis



Normal Physiology


The pericardium can be conceptualized as a balloon with the heart pushed into it like a fist. The visceral pericardium adheres to the heart itself and is separated from the parietal pericardium by a space, the pericardial cavity. This space normally holds a small collection of fluid. The fluid within the pericardial space is in dynamic equilibrium with the blood serum. The normal amount of pericardial fluid is less than 50 mL and is transudative with a low protein content. Because there are many smaller sinuses and recesses in the pericardial space (around the atria, the superior vena cava, the great vessels, the pulmonary veins [PVs], and the inferior vena cava), a minimum of about 250 mL of fluid forms the normal pericardial reserve volume before tamponade physiology becomes evident. As noted below, the volume of pericardial fluid required for tamponade physiology depends upon the rate at which it accumulates; the faster the fluid accumulates, the less is required to achieve pericardial tamponade.


The pericardium provides a thin tissue barrier between the heart and the surrounding structures and exerts constant pressure on the heart, affecting thin structures (the atria and the right ventricle) more than the thicker-walled left ventricle. Resting diastolic pressures within the heart are directly affected by this pericardial constraint (for instance, pericardial removal results in greater dilatation of the right ventricle than of the left ventricle).


Normal intrapericardial pressures range from −6 to −3 mm Hg, directly reflecting intrapleural pressures. The pressure differential between the pericardium and the cardiac chambers (transmural pressure) is about 3 mm Hg. The pericardium is much stiffer than cardiac muscle, and once the pericardial reserve volume is exceeded, the pressure-volume curve of the normal pericardium rises steeply. The pericardium has little effect on ventricular systole; however, interactions between the right- and left-sided cardiac chambers are enhanced by the pericardium, because atrial and ventricular septal movements are independent of pericardial constraint.


Intracardiac pressures are a reflection of the contraction and relaxation of individual cardiac structures and the changes imparted to them by the pleural and pericardial pressures (Fig. 43-1). Changes in pleural or pericardial pressure affect the intracardiac diastolic pressure. With inspiration, the intrapleural pressures drop and the abdominal cavity pressure increases. Blood flow to the right side of the heart increases, whereas blood return to the left side of the heart decreases slightly. The fall in the intrapleural pressures also causes an increase in the transmural aortic root pressure, slightly increasing impedance to left ventricular (LV) ejection. The reverse occurs during expiration. In the normal setting, the respiratory changes are reflected in the intrapericardial and intracardiac pressures, with inspiration lowering the measured right atrial (RA) pressures and the systolic right ventricular (RV) pressure more than the left-sided heart pressures.



The slight reduction in LV filling and the slightly increased impedance to LV ejection with inspiration produce a modest decline in the LV stroke volume and slightly lower systolic aortic pulse pressures with inspiration. Marked swings in the intrapleural pressures from very negative during inspiration to very positive during expiration (as occur in asthma or severe chronic obstructive lung disease) exaggerate these changes in LV filling and may produce a paradoxical pulse (>10 mm Hg decline in the aortic systolic pressure) purely from the pleural pressure swings. Such a paradoxical pulse related to marked swings in the intrapleural pressure must be differentiated from a similar phenomenon due to pericardial tamponade.


The normal atrial and ventricular waveforms are shown in Figure 43-2. With atrial contraction, the atrial pressures rise (a wave). With the onset of ventricular contraction, the atrioventricular (AV) valves bulge toward the atria and a small c wave results (the c wave is evident on hemodynamic tracings but usually is not visible to the examiner observing the jugular venous pulsations). As ventricular contraction continues, the AV annulus is pulled into the ventricular cavity and the atria begin diastole, enlarging the atria and decreasing the atrial pressure (represented by the x descent). Passive filling of the atria during ventricular systole produces a slow rise in the atrial pressure (the v wave) until the AV valves reopen at the peak of the v wave; the pressure then falls rapidly as the ventricles begin active relaxation. Passive filling of the ventricles then follows until atrial contraction recurs, and the cycle repeats. Ventricular diastole can be conceptually divided into an initial active phase (a brief period when the ventricle fills about halfway) and a later passive filling phase. The nadir, or lowest, diastolic pressure during ventricular diastole occurs during the early active relaxation phase (suction effect).




Hemodynamics of Pericardial Constriction and Pericardial Tamponade


Constrictive pericarditis and pericardial tamponade alter the normal intracardiac pressures in several ways. Some of the hemodynamic abnormalities, such as ventricular interdependence, are seen in both processes, whereas others, such as the magnitude of the y descent, are unique to each (see Fig. 43-2).



Pericardial Constriction



Pressure Measurements


Constrictive pericarditis was recognized at autopsy in the 19th century and described as a “chronic fibrous callous thickening of the wall of the pericardial sac that is so contracted that the normal diastolic filling of the heart is prevented” (Fig. 43-3). The variable severity of the constrictive process results in a spectrum of hemodynamic change. Table 43-1 outlines the major features of the subacute (elastic) and the more chronic (rigid shell) forms of pericardial constriction.



Table 43-1 Comparison of Features Characteristic of Subacute (Elastic) and Chronic (Rigid Shell) Constrictive Pericarditis



































Subacute (Elastic) Chronic (Rigid Shell)
Paradoxical pulse usually present. Signs of ventricular interdependence prominent Paradoxical pulse usually minimal or absent
Ventricular interdependence less prominent
Prominent x and y descents (“M” or “W” waveform in the JVP) Prominent y descent; x descent sometimes minimal
Dip and plateau pattern less obvious Conspicuous dip and plateau pattern
Early diastolic nadir may not approach zero. Early diastolic nadir approaches zero
Calcification of pericardium rare Calcification of pericardium more likely
Pericardial effusion may be present. Pericardial effusion absent
Constriction primarily due to visceral pericardium Constriction due to fusion of visceral and parietal pericardium and with epicardium of the heart
ECG “P” waves usually normal ECG “P” waves wide, notched, and low amplitude
Atrial fibrillation or flutter uncommon Atrial fibrillation or flutter common

ECG, electrocardiogram; JVP, jugular venous pressure.


With permission from Hancock EW. Differential diagnosis of restrictive cardiomyopathy and constrictive pericarditis. Heart. 2001;86:343–349.


The difference between the subacute and the more chronic forms of constrictive pericarditis probably relates to whether only the visceral pericardium is fused to the epicardium of the heart (subacute) or both the visceral and the parietal pericardial layers are fused together (chronic). In both instances, the diastolic pressures in the atria are elevated due to the restriction of ventricular diastolic inflow. In constriction, the elevated atrial pressures and the normal early LV filling result in a rapid decrease in atrial pressure after the AV valves open and are responsible for the rapid y descent seen (see Fig. 43-2). However, the constraint imposed by the pericardium as the ventricle fills results in the sudden halting of this rapid early filling and an abrupt rise in pressure producing the “square root sign” or “dip and plateau” in the pressure tracings. The x descent is generally minimally affected; thus, the atrial y descent is greater than the x descent in constrictive pericardial disease. RV and pulmonary pressures are usually normal or only mildly elevated, with the result that the RV end-diastolic pressure (EDP) tends to be greater than one third the RV systolic pressure. At the end of ventricular diastole, both the right and left ventricles are confined by the pericardium, and there is equalization of the RV and LV EDPs.


The normal respiratory changes in cardiac flow are altered in constriction. The normal inspiratory fall in the RA pressures may not occur or may even rise (Kussmaul’s sign). Also reflecting the loss of normal RV filling, the inferior vena cava diameter may not collapse with inspiration as expected. The precise mechanisms responsible for these losses of respiratory effects on cardiac flow are the subject of some debate. It is possible that the rigid pericardium in constrictive pericarditis acts to disassociate the usually related intrathoracic and intracardiac pressures described earlier. In constriction, the right side of the heart is forced to fill to more than its capacity, and the right heart pressures rise rather than fall with inspiration. In addition, there is an inspiratory drop in the diaphragm that may pull the pericardium downward and actually further reduce the overall cardiac volumes. Kussmaul’s sign is not specific for pericardial constriction since it also can be seen in acute or chronic RV failure, RV infarction, RV volume overload, and restrictive cardiomyopathy. In most of these conditions, the constrictive physiology is due more to RV volume overload (reaching the limit of RV capacity) than to constriction from the pericardium.


Because the atrial and ventricular septa are unaffected by the pericardial process, changes in atrial and ventricular filling on the right side of the heart can affect left-sided filling (ventricular interdependence). Demonstration of ventricular interdependence is generally accepted as a fundamental requirement for diagnosing constrictive pericarditis. In constriction, as the negative intrapleural pressure draws blood through the RV with inspiration, the increase in RV filling into the confined right ventricle results in a rise in the RV systolic pressure while the normal fall in the LV systolic pressure occurs. This phenomenon is illustrated in Figure 43-2. An additional finding is that the width and area of the RV pressure tracing also increase with inspiration. Since LV filling falls with inspiration, the systolic areas of the RV and LV pressure-time tracing can be determined and the ratio of the RV systolic area to the LV systolic area determined during each respiratory phase. If constriction is present, the ratio of the RV systolic area to the LV systolic area is expected to be greater than 1.1. This ratio remains constant in restrictive disease and increases in constrictive pericarditis as the RV systolic pressure and area rise while the LV systolic pressure and area fall (discordance). In a review from the Mayo Clinic of this index, the average ratio in a group of 59 patients with constriction was 1.4 as compared with 0.92 for a group of 41 without constriction. The sensitivity of a systolic area index greater than 1.1 was 97% with a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 95%. In addition, reduced LV filling results in a lower pulmonary capillary wedge pressure to LV diastolic gradient in inspiration and a greater gradient in expiration (see Fig. 43-3).


Jun 12, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Pericardial Disease: Diagnosis and Hemodynamics

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access