Percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) has become the treatment of choice for patients with renal artery FMD that is limited to the main renal artery (Figures 1 to 4). The majority of these patients have medial fibroplasia. Before the advent of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, open surgical revascularization was the primary therapeutic modality for these patients. Overall, the technical success rates of the open surgical approach ranged from 89% to 97%; arterial hypertension was cured in approximately 33% to 63% of patients and improved in 24% to 57%. Several factors such as prolonged duration of hypertension, concomitant atherosclerotic disease, and complex branch-vessel repair can all adversely affect the outcomes of surgical revascularization. Although stents have been used extensively to treat atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis, the use of these devices for FMD has been reserved as a bailout procedure in cases in which there are suboptimal results with balloon angioplasty or in which renal artery dissection occurs.
Complications are rare after PTRA but include renal artery perforation, dissection, or segmental kidney infarction. Special attention must be taken to not overdilate the lesion, which is a risk factor for rupture of the artery. Cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) for managing renal artery FMD lesions that are resistant to conventional angioplasty should not be considered as safe as previously thought. Small series and single case studies have reported vessel rupture while attempting to treat FMD. Because salvage of the renal artery rupture with the use of stent graft depends not only on their immediate availability but also on the renal artery anatomy, some authors have suggested that patients with FMD lesions resistant to conventional angioplasty should be given the option of open surgery, and cutting balloon angioplasty should be considered a second-line treatment for this group of patients.
Restenosis rates after PTRA for FMD range from 7% to 27%. Clinical factors associated with restenosis following initial PTRA include increased body mass index and duration and degree of hypertension. Oertle and colleagues have shown that about one third of patients who were treated with PTRA for FMD and who return during follow-up with recurrent arterial hypertension have no angiographically demonstrable restenosis, whereas 15% of patients without recurrent arterial hypertension have angiographically demonstrable restenosis.