Percutaneous Arterial Angioplasty with and without Stenting for Atherosclerotic Aortic and Iliac Artery Occlusive Disease



Percutaneous Arterial Angioplasty with and without Stenting for Atherosclerotic Aortic and Iliac Artery Occlusive Disease



Douglas B. Hood


The comparative ease and success of endovascular management of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) has greatly reduced the need for its open surgical repair. Factors such as reduced patient morbidity, discomfort, and length of convalescence have resulted not only in increased acceptance by patients but often in patients’ insistence on this mode of therapy. Potential cost savings is another factor favoring endovascular treatments, although the expense of the necessary endovascular devices and implants and the not uncommon need for repeat interventions to treat recurrent disease can negate this potential advantage.



Indications


Endovascular treatment of AIOD should be considered for patients with disabling claudication or critical limb ischemia who have lesions with favorable expected results. The Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) classification scheme, which stratifies patients into four groups according to the anatomic pattern of occlusive lesions, is useful to select patients for these interventions (Box 1). Patients with type A lesions (focal stenosis of the common or external iliac arteries) have the best results, and endovascular therapy is the treatment of choice for this group. Open surgical reconstruction is recommended for patients with the most severe pattern of disease (type D lesions). Comorbidities, patient’s preference, and the operator’s experience should be considered when choosing endovascular or open techniques for managing patients with types B and C lesions, with the majority of these patients currently treated with endovascular intervention.



Treatment guidelines also recommend that patients with critical limb ischemia and combined aortoiliac and infrainguinal occlusive disease should have the AIOD addressed first. Infrainguinal intervention should then be performed in patients with persistent ischemia after inflow revascularization. If it is unclear whether or not a particular lesion is hemodynamically significant, a pressure gradient across the lesion should be performed before and after the administration of a vasodilator. A peak systolic gradient of 5 to 10 mm Hg before or 10 to 15 mm Hg after vasodilatation is considered significant.



Technique


Endovascular interventions for common and proximal external iliac artery lesions are most easily performed through an ipsilateral retrograde femoral approach. If necessary or desirable, however, many interventions can be performed through a contralateral femoral puncture, with over-the-top contralateral access across the aortic bifurcation (Figure 1). Upper extremity vascular access is also technically feasible, but it is not preferred. Guidewire and catheter manipulations are more difficult over the longer working distance from the arm, and the larger-diameter sheath required for many interventional devices increases the likelihood of puncture site complications in the smaller arm vessels. Aortic lesions near its bifurcation should be considered complex lesions involving the distal aorta and both common iliac arteries. Safe and effective intervention in this situation typically requires the use of two balloons or stents, one in each iliac artery and projecting partway into the aorta so that they kiss in the distal aorta. Aortic lesions distant from the bifurcation or other critical branches are otherwise treated similarly to that described for iliac stenoses.



Successful navigation of guidewires and catheters across the target lesion from the access site can require considerable skill and experience. Failure to achieve successful traversal is one reason for initial technical failure of the procedure. Navigation across a complete occlusion, with reentry into the true lumen of the vessel beyond the lesion, can be especially challenging. This maneuver is most often accomplished using angled hydrophilic guidewires and/or catheters (Figure 2). If reentry cannot be achieved from the chosen point of vascular access (e.g., ipsilateral common femoral), an attempt may be made from a new access site (e.g., contralateral common femoral or brachial). For more challenging cases, reentry devices such as the Outback (Cordis Corp., Bridgewater, NJ) or Pioneer (Medtronic, Fridley, MN) catheters can be used.


Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Aug 25, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Percutaneous Arterial Angioplasty with and without Stenting for Atherosclerotic Aortic and Iliac Artery Occlusive Disease

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access