Minimally Invasive Treatment of Benign Esophageal Tumors


Classification

Cell type

Epithelial

Squamous cell papilloma

Fibrovascular polyp

Adenoma

Inflammatory pseudotumor/polyp

Nonepithelial

Leiomyoma

Hemangioma

Fibroma

Neurofibroma

Schwannoma

Rhabdomyoma

Lipoma

Lymphangioma

Hamartoma

Heterotopic

Granular cell tumor

Chondroma

Osteochondroma

Osteochondroma

Giant cell

Amyloid

Eosinophilic granuloma




Table 14.2
Common classification systems of benign esophageal tumor































Methods of classification

Types

By cell of origin

Epithelial

Nonepithelial

Heterotopic

By layers of the esophageal wall

Mucosa

Submucosa

Muscularis propria

By radiographic and endoscopic appearance

Intramural-extramucosal

Intraluminal-mucosal

Extramural (cyst and duplication)




Clinical Manifestations


Benign esophageal tumors are usually asymptomatic and often are detected incidentally during radiologic or endoscopic examination for other conditions. In symptomatic patients, the most common presenting symptom is dysphagia which is more likely to be associated with an intraluminal location than with other locations [4]. Other symptoms associated with intraluminal masses are vomiting, bleeding, cough, substernal discomfort, and weight loss. A cervical pedunculated polypoid mass may cause regurgitation which result in aspiration pneumonitis and airway obstruction [4].

Intramural tumors are mostly asymptomatic and often found incidentally for other reasons. Dysphagia is the most frequent complaint in symptomatic patients, and its severity is likely to be associated with the size of tumor [6]. Other associated symptoms are substernal pain, weight loss, and hemorrhage.


Investigation


There are several investigative tools that help in making a definite diagnosis, including contrast esophagogram, chest computed tomography (CT), flexible endoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Contrast esophagography may help to characterize the surface of esophageal mucosa as well as the contour of the esophagus and the stomach so that the whole esophagus including the lesion can be seen. Moreover, it can be used to evaluate other pathologies including both structural and functional abnormalities that may be beneficial in preoperative evaluation [7]. CT of the chest identifies the radiographic features and the location of the lesion with its anatomic relationship to adjacent organs. Computed tomography may be most useful for large intraluminal or intramural lesions. Endoscopy may demonstrate the intraluminal or mucosal lesion and other possible lesions involving the mucosa. It can also be used for performing biopsy and any therapeutic procedure for the lesion. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is used as a diagnostic tool, providing the sonographic appearance of the lesion in relation to each layer of esophageal wall [8] as well as aiding fine-needle aspiration (FNA) when appropriate. Additionally, EUS can sometimes differentiate benign from malignant lesions. EUS findings that are suspicious for malignancy include a tumor diameter ≥4 cm, irregular tumor margins, a heterogenous internal echo pattern, and associated regional lymphadenopathy [8, 9].



Management


Periodical examinations can be performed in most asymptomatic patients with benign esophageal tumors. Generally, removal of these tumors is indicated when they cause symptoms or complications or when the malignancy is suspected. Removal of the tumors can be done through endoscopy in cases with small intraluminal or mucosal-based tumors. Otherwise, surgical intervention is indicated.


Preoperative Evaluation


When surgery is indicated, all patients diagnosed as having a benign esophageal tumor should be thoroughly evaluated with a history, physical examination, and proper investigation to avoid unnecessary or incorrect surgery and detect other potential or commonly associated pathologies such as hiatal hernia, diverticulum, gastroesophageal reflux (GERD), and achalasia [10, 11]. Lower esophageal lesions may require mobilization of the cardia and hiatus. Thus, performance of a simultaneous anti-reflux procedure should be discussed with these patients before surgery. Patients who have symptoms of reflux should be further investigated preoperatively with pH monitoring and manometry so that concomitant surgery to correct those associated conditions can be performed [11].


Minimally Invasive Approaches for Management of Benign Esophageal Tumors


Indications for tumor removal include the presence of symptoms, large tumor size, increasing tumor size, mucosal ulceration, prevention of potential complications, preemption of malignancy degeneration, or a need to confirm the histologic diagnosis [11, 12]. A variety of approaches for tumor removal are available.


Minimally Invasive Surgery


Minimally invasive surgery for benign esophageal tumor includes thoracoscopic or laparoscopic tumor enucleation and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection. Thoracoscopic enucleation of esophageal leiomyoma was first reported by Everitt in 1992 [13]. Since then, many case series of minimally invasive surgery for benign esophageal tumor have demonstrated its feasibility, good operative outcomes, low mortality, and minimal complication [3, 11, 12, 1417].


Endoscopic Surgery


Given the recent advances in endoscopic techniques, benign esophageal tumors can be removed endoscopically rather than requiring surgical resection. Endoscopic techniques include snare polypectomy, intralesional ethanol injection, band ligation, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) [12, 1821]. Tumors that are most appropriate for endoscopic resection are characterized as intraluminal in location, polypoid, less than 2 cm in diameter, or intramural originating no deeper than the muscularis mucosae [12].


Robotic Surgery


Robotic-assisted surgery has also been successfully used in the treatment of benign esophageal tumors. Reported procedures have included enucleation of esophageal leiomyomas [22, 23], esophageal resection for a large leiomyoma [24], and removal of a duplication cyst [25]. These authors propose that robotic-assisted surgery provides benefit through better visualization, greater range of motion with multiarticulated instruments, and more precise movements with tremor filtration and motion scaling compared to ordinary thoracoscopic surgery [22, 25, 26]. Given the high capital expenditure associated with robotic surgery without solid evidence of whether its outcome is better than other minimally invasive technique, such reports must be viewed cautiously. At present, this approach may be considered for appropriately selected cases in a robotic-capable center.


Management According to Tumor Type



Intramural-Extramucosal Tumors



Leiomyoma



Clinical Features

Leiomyoma is a benign tumor that is of smooth muscle in origin and usually arises from the muscularis propria or on occasion from muscularis mucosa [11]. It is the most common benign esophageal tumor, accounting for more than half of all benign tumors of the esophagus [27]. The tumors are mostly located in the lower two-thirds of the esophagus, and more than two-thirds of the tumors are found as an intramural-submucosal mass [5]. The peak age that the tumors are detected is between 30 and 50 years.

Most leiomyoma patients are asymptomatic, but when symptoms are present, they are mostly nonspecific and of long duration [12]. The most common presenting symptoms are dysphagia, retrosternal pain, and weight loss [27].

On the contrast-swallow study, leiomyoma may be seen as a rounded or lobulated, elevated filling defect with a sharp margin between the mass and the esophageal wall beneath the smooth mucosal surface. A CT scan of the chest is not specific for diagnosing leiomyoma, but it may be helpful for evaluation of large tumors that extend into the mediastinum to assess the interface between tumors and adjacent structures or tumors whose findings are atypical such as those exhibiting rapid growth, or ulcerated or inflamed mucosa. Endoscopy is indicated for evaluation of the mucosa. The lesion can appear on endoscopy as having normal overlying mucosa, moveable mass beneath the mucosa, and narrowing of the esophageal lumen without obstructing the passage of the scope. Cold forceps biopsy through the endoscope is contraindicated because it usually does not help in diagnosis, and risks complications such as bleeding, infection, and mucosal perforation at the time of enucleation. EUS is very helpful for diagnosis of leiomyoma, which is characterized as well circumscribed, homogeneous, and hypoechoic with a smooth outer border, usually arising from the fourth layer or muscularis propria [8]. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of the lesion can be done during performing EUS. Although, there are some reports mention about the effectiveness of EUS-FNA in helping to obtain more definite diagnosis of esophageal leiomyoma [28, 29], some authors proposed that it provided no significant benefit especially in differentiating benign leiomyoma from malignant leiomyosarcoma [8, 30]. Thus, the effectiveness of this technique is still uncertain.


Indications for Tumor Removal

Resection of the tumor is indicated in symptomatic cases. For asymptomatic patients, the indication for tumor removal includes tumor size ≥5 cm, an increase in tumor size, mucosal ulceration or suspicion of malignancy [12, 18].


Treatment

Endoscopic resection: Leiomyomas can be removed by various endoscopic methods as described above but only in selected cases and by capable endoscopists. Small (<2 cm) pedunculated leiomyomas originating from the muscularis mucosa can be resected using snare polypectomy [12]. Rubber band ligation through the scope at the neck of a small mass has also been reported [19]. Wider-based lesions may be removed by EMR or enucleation. EMR is performed by using a snare wire after injection of normal saline or other appropriate solution to lift the submucosal layer from the muscularis propria in order to cause protrusion of the tumor into the lumen [18]. For larger lesions, multiple sessions of ethanol injection into the mass through the scope may be an option with complete sloughing of the lesion without serious complication [31, 32], but this method is not common in the USA and other western countries and should be done by a skilled endoscopist. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was originally reported as a treatment option for early gastric cancer and other superficial gastrointestinal cancers in Japan and has also been reported as a treatment of esophageal leiomyoma originating from the muscularis propria [21]. However, with a concern of its efficacy and safety, more studies will be needed before being considered as a standard treatment.

Minimally invasive surgery: Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic approaches for both enucleation and esophageal resection are standard treatments for esophageal leiomyoma. For tumors smaller than 5 cm, enucleation via thoracoscopic or laparoscopic approach is recommended. In the cases of larger tumors, circumferential lesions, significant distortion of the esophageal musculature, high suspicion of malignancy, or extensive damage to the esophageal mucosa, segmental esophageal resection is suitable either via minimally invasive techniques or through a laparotomy or thoracotomy [11].

To perform enucleation, the selected side for the operation depends on the location of the tumor. Localizing the tumors is accomplished by visualization, palpation, or endoscopy. Enucleation is done by longitudinal incising and splitting the muscle fibers over the mass and then dissecting the mass from the attached muscle and submucosal tissue without disrupting the mucosa. The details of minimally invasive techniques will be discussed later in this chapter.


Granular Cell Tumor



Clinical Features

Granular cell tumor (GCT) is a rare submucosal tumor of the esophagus. It can be found in many different organs, most frequently in the tongue, skin, breast, and muscle and uncommonly at the gastrointestinal tract [33]. GCT has been assumed to originate from neural tissues since its ultrastructural and immunologic-staining appearances are similar to those of Schwann cell [33]. As an intramural tumor, the presenting symptoms of GCT are almost the same as for leiomyoma, and most of the patients are asymptomatic. The endoscopic findings of GCT may include a yellowish polypoid lesion beneath the thin mucosa. Endoscopic biopsy is frequently nondiagnostic, but a diagnosis may be accomplished with multiple biopsies taken from the same site [18]. GCT appears on EUS as a hyperechoic solid mass surrounded by a hypoechoic submucosa. There is a 1–3 % malignancy rate among all GCTs; there appears to be no potential for malignant transformation in instances in which the GCT histologically is benign [18].


Indications for Tumor Removal

Resection should be considered for lesions >1 cm in diameter or for those that are symptomatic.


Treatment

Endoscopic mucosal resection is appropriate for lesions that do not extend beyond the submucosal layer [18, 20]. Other treatments have been described including ethanol injection [34] and minimally invasive surgical enucleation [14].


Hemangioma



Clinical Features

Hemangiomas of the esophagus are benign vascular tumors that arise from the submucosal layer. They can be found throughout the esophagus [1]. Most patients are asymptomatic. Among patients who do have symptoms, dysphagia and bleeding are the most common complaints. Bleeding from rupture of the hemangioma can be massive and fatal. At endoscopy the lesions appear as bluish, polypoid, or sessile submucosal masses. On EUS, they usually occupy the 2nd or 3rd layer and have a sharp border. CT and MRI help in diagnosis and treatment planning, especially for large tumors. Given the concern for massive hemorrhage, biopsy is not recommended.


Indications for Tumor Removal

Intervention for esophageal hemangiomas should be considered regardless of whether patients have symptoms because of the high risk of bleeding [18].


Treatment

Many endoscopic methods have been proposed including sclerotherapy (similar to the treatment for varices), laser fulguration, and EMR [18, 35, 36]. Surgical treatment is another choice including enucleation and resection of the esophagus by minimally invasive or open techniques [37].


Lipoma



Clinical Features

Lipomas of the esophagus are usually found incidentally. Most lipomas of the thoracic esophagus are intramural, whereas those located in the cervical esophagus are mostly pedunculated. They usually appear soft and yellowish and are located beneath intact mucosa. EUS demonstrates the lesions to be homogenous, hyperechoic, and with sharp margins confined to the submucosal layer [11].


Indication for Tumor Removal

Resection should be performed in symptomatic patients or for larger pedunculated lesions in the cervical esophagus.


Treatment

Treatment options include endoscopic resection and ligation or stapling for pedunculated lesion. Otherwise, enucleation can be done by transcervical, transthoracic, VATS, or laparoscopic approaches. Transgastric laparoscopic resection via stapling of a long-stalked, pedunculated thoracic esophageal lipoma has been performed successfully, with tumor removal through the transgastric port [38].


Intraluminal-Mucosal Tumors



Fibrovascular Polyp



Clinical Features

Fibrovascular polyps are the most common benign intraluminal tumor. It is thought that the tumor is formed from an area of submucosal thickening, then gradually protrudes into esophageal lumen aided by esophageal peristalsis. Most of the lesions are located in the cervical esophagus, just distal to the cricopharyngeus muscle in the region of Laimer’s triangle. Clinical presentations include dysphagia, regurgitation, retrosternal pain, weight loss, and airway obstruction [11]. Large lesions with a long stalk that extend into the stomach may develop superficial ulceration which results in bleeding and anemia. Contrast esophagography usually shows a smooth, lobulated, elongated filling defect. The findings from CT and MRI can also demonstrate differing density or attenuation, depending on the relative amounts of fibrous and adipose tissue in the mass [39]. Endoscopy can identify the site of origin and size of the lesion. However, a small polyp may be missed since its origin is most often in the proximal esophagus and the lesion is typically covered with normal mucosa. EUS may be of use in large-stalk lesions to assess the feeding vessels that may put the patient at risk for bleeding after resection [18].


Indications for Tumor Removal

All large or elongated-stalk polyps should be removed because of the potential risks of respiratory complications including airway obstruction from regurgitation of the polyp and aspiration into the proximal airway.


Treatment

Most small polyps or thin stalk lesions can be removed via endoscopic methods such as snare polypectomy or EMR. Large polyps in the cervical esophagus may require left cervical esophagotomy for tumor removal [40]. The main goal of treatment is to remove the polyp base completely to prevent local recurrence.


Cysts and Duplications


Cysts and duplications of the esophagus are rare malformations that occur during embryonic development. These malformations are included in the spectrum of developmental aberrations of the embryonic foregut as esophageal duplications, bronchogenic cysts, gastric cysts, inclusion cysts, and neuroenteric cysts [41]. Many explanations have been offered for their pathogenesis, but no causative factors have yet been identified [42]. One theory is that these abnormalities may result from either incomplete recanalization or abnormal budding of the primitive foregut [43].

Esophageal cysts are classified as duplications if they meet the following criteria: (1) the cyst is intramural; (2) it is covered by two muscle layers; and (3) it is lined by squamous epithelium or other lining of embryonic esophagus (columnar, cuboid, pseudostratified, or ciliated) [41].

Bronchogenic cysts presumably originate from the developing lung buds that are incompletely separated from the primitive foregut [44]. They can be found as intramural esophageal cysts but are more commonly related to the lungs and bronchial tree. The present of cartilage in a cyst is the unique characteristic of bronchogenic cysts.

Gastric cysts are intramural esophageal cysts that are lined with gastric mucosa and contain one or more muscular layers in the cyst wall. It is believed that they originate from embryonic gastric cells that remain in the esophageal wall when the developing stomach is descending [41].

Inclusion cysts are intramural esophageal cysts of unknown etiology. The cells lining the cysts can be the same type as duplication cysts, but they are neither covered by muscle nor contain cartilage [41].

Neuroenteric cysts are believed to originate from a portion of the endoderm of the primitive foregut attaching to the notochord. During the separation between those two structures, an endodermal diverticulum may develop to become a cyst. Other names for these cysts are posterior mediastinal duplication cysts [41] or enteric cysts [44]. They are located in the posterior mediastinum, having well-formed muscular walls and lined with ciliated or any alimentary cell types. These cysts are commonly associated with vertebral abnormalities such as spina bifida occulta or anterior hemivertebrae [44].

Acquired esophageal cysts are believed to originate from obstruction of glands in the mucosal and submucosal layers of the esophagus. Other names for them are either retention cysts if they appear as a single lesion or esophagitis cystica in cases of multiple lesions. They are commonly found in the upper esophagus and usually are asymptomatic [41].


Clinical Features


Most patients with esophageal cysts and duplications are asymptomatic [45]. Symptoms are usually caused by compression of adjacent intrathoracic structures, with respiratory problems predominating, including coughing, wheezing, stridor, or shortness of breath, depending on the level of compression [42, 46, 47]. Other symptoms from esophageal compression are dysphagia and weight loss. The development of complications has been reported including infection, hemorrhage, erosion with perforation or fistulization adjacent structures, and malignant transformation of the cyst wall into adenocarcinoma or rhabdomyosarcoma [46]. Investigative imaging to confirm diagnosis can be done by using contrast esophagography, endoscopy, EUS, CT, and MRI. Esophagography and endoscopy reveal a smooth-walled indentation which is similar to other submucosal masses [11]. Cold forceps biopsy of the lesion is not recommended since it may complicate surgical resection of the cyst, while needle aspiration may help clarify the diagnosis while not interfering with subsequent treatment. CT and MRI can be used to locate the lesion and its relations to adjacent organ. EUS can differentiate cysts from other submucosal lesions and can delineate its extent and the composition of the cyst wall [48].

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Apr 1, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Minimally Invasive Treatment of Benign Esophageal Tumors

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access