Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Effect of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors on Cancer Risk




The renin–angiotensin system is an important mediator of tumor progression and metastasis. A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reported an increased risk of cancer with angiotensin receptor blockers. It is unknown whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may have a similar effect. Our primary objective was to determine the effect of ACE inhibitors on cancer occurrence and cancer death. Our secondary objective was to determine the effect of ACE inhibitors on occurrence of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers given previous concerns of increased risk. Systematic searches of SCOPUS (covering MEDLINE, EMBASE, and other databases) and the Food and Drug Administration official web site were conducted for all randomized controlled trials of ACE inhibitors. Trials with ≥1 year of follow-up and enrolling a minimum of 100 patients were included. Fourteen trials reported cancer data in 61,774 patients. This included 10 trials of 59,004 patients providing information on cancer occurrence, 7 trials of 37,515 patients for cancer death, and 5 trials including 23,291 patients for GI cancer. ACE inhibitor therapy did not have an effect on occurrence of cancer (I 2 0%, risk ratio [RR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95 to 1.07, p = 0.78), cancer death (I 2 0%, RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.13, p = 0.95), or GI cancer (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.35, p = 0.43). In conclusion, ACE inhibitors did not significantly increase or decrease occurrence of cancer or cancer death. There was also no significant difference in risk of GI cancer.


The renin–angiotensin system is a complex pathway critical to cardiovascular homeostasis. Drugs that antagonize this system, primarily angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), are widely used for treatment of many cardiovascular conditions and for risk reduction. In recent years, it has become increasingly recognized that the renin–angiotensin system also plays an important role in cancer biology. For example, type 1 and type 2 angiotensin receptors are important regulators of cellular proliferation, angiogenesis, and inflammation. Although the exact role these receptors play in development of human cancer remains to be clarified, a recent meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials has reported that drugs directly blocking type 1 angiotensin receptors (i.e., ARBs) were associated with a modestly increased risk of cancer diagnosis. This publication inevitably led to the question of whether a closely allied class of drugs, ACE inhibitors, has a similar effect on cancer incidence. Therefore, we decided to perform a systematic meta-analysis of all randomized trials testing ACE inhibitors that reported cancer data. Our primary objective was to examine the effect of ACE inhibitors on cancer occurrence and cancer death. Because some previous clinical trials have reported an excess in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers with ACE inhibitors, our secondary objective was to determine effect of ACE inhibitors on occurrence of GI cancers.


Methods


We retrieved all randomized controlled trials reporting on ACE inhibitor therapy and human cancers published before December 2009. Electronic searches of SCOPUS (which includes MEDLINE, EMBASE, and several other databases from a wide range of disciplines) were supplemented with searches of the Food and Drug Administration web site. The search terms and other search strategies are described in detail in Appendix A (available online). Searches were limited to randomized controlled trials in human subjects reported in English. Links of every search result were examined thoroughly for any cancer information.


All search results were assessed for study duration and sample size. Because cancers usually have a long latency period and are relatively uncommon adverse events, randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion only if they had ≥1 year of follow-up and enrolled a minimum of 100 patients. These cut-off values of study duration and enrollment size were based on previous studies examining cancer outcomes. Only randomized controlled trials that were double blinded or had a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point design were included to decrease the possibility of confounding factors. Trials using active control or placebo control were included. However, trials comparing an ACE inhibitor to an ARB were excluded because ARBs have recently been reported to be associated with an increased cancer risk. Trials were also excluded if ACE inhibitors were used in all study arms.


The literature search using SCOPUS yielded 3,979 results ( Figure 1 ). Ninety-nine trials that met the inclusion criterion were then examined in detail for any cancer data ( Appendix B , available online; Figure 1 ). Searches of Food and Drug Administration web site revealed cancer information from one trial. A total of 14 trials reported cancer information. Ten of these 14 trials reported new cancer occurrence, 7 reported cancer death, and 4 reported GI cancers.




Figure 1


Flowchart of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor trials included in the meta-analysis (see Appendix A for search terms used in different databases, available online).


Two investigators (J.C. and S.D.) independently extracted the data from the trials, which are presented in Tables 1, 2, and 3 .



Table 1

Randomized controlled trials of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors with cancer data

































































































































































































































































































































































Study Publication Year Condition studied Mean Follow-Up (years) Total Number of Patients Study Drug (number of patients) Control (number of patients) Mean Age (years) Men Black Current Smoker History of Cancer at Baseline
Study Drug Control Study Drug Control Study Drug Control Study Drug Control Study Drug Control
Trials with new cancer data and gastrointestinal cancer data
STOP-HTN-2 2001 hypertension 5.3 6,614 lisinopril or enalapril upto 20 mg/day (n = 2,205) β blocker, diuretic, or calcium channel blocker (n = 4,409) 76.1 76 33.7% 33.0% 9.4% 8.8% 9.4% 9.0%
HOPE 2000 high cardiovascular risk 5.0 9,297 ramipril upto 10 mg/day (n = 4,645) placebo (n = 4,652) 66.0 66.0 72.5% 74.2% 13.9% 14.5%
Maschio et al 1996 chronic renal insufficiency 3.0 583 benazepril 10 mg/day (n = 300) placebo (n = 283) 51.0 51.0 73.0% 71.0% 0 § 0 §
SOLVD-P 7 1992 asymptomatic systolic heart failure 3.1 4,228 enalapril upto 10 mg 2 times/day (n = 2,111) placebo (n = 2,117) 59.1 59.1 88.5% 89.0% 9.2% 9.7% 22.8% 24.1% 0 § 0 §
SOLVD-T 6 1991 symptomatic systolic heart failure 3.5 2,569 enalapril upto 10 mg 2 times/day (n = 1,285) placebo (n = 1,284) 60.7 61.0 80.9% 79.8% 16.2% 14.5% 22.8% 21.4% 0 § 0 §
Trials with new cancer data and cancer death data
PHARAO 2008 prehypertension 3.0 1,008 ramipril upto 5 mg/day (n = 505) placebo (n = 503) 62.2 62.3 49.7% 47.1% 12.1% 16.7%
ALLHAT 2002 cardiovascular disease 4.9 33,357 lisinopril upto 40 mg/day (n = 9,054) chlorthalidone upto 25 mg/day or amlodipine upto 10 mg/day (n = 24,303) 66.9 66.9 53.8% 52.9% 35.5% 35.3% 21.9% 21.9%
FACET 1998 noninsulin-dependent diabetes 3.0 380 fosinopril 20 mg/day (n = 189) amlodipine 10 mg/day (n = 191) 62.8 63.3 63.5% 55.5% 4.8% 6.8%
Trials with new cancer data only
PHYLLIS 2004 carotid atherosclerosis 2.6 508 fosinopril 20 mg/day (n = 255) HCTZ 25 mg/day ± pravastatin (n = 253) 58.5 58.3 40.0% 40.5% 12.3% 20.1%
SCAT 2000 coronary artery disease 4.0 460 enalapril upto 10 mg 2 times/day (n = 229) placebo (n = 231) 60.0 62.0 89.0% 89.0% 15.0% 15.0% 0 § 0 §
Trials with cancer death data only
QUINS 2007 scleroderma 3.0 210 quinapril upto 80 mg/day (n = 104) placebo (n = 106) 54.0 55.0 16.0% 13.0% 5.0% # 2.0% #
APRES 2000 coronary artery disease 2.8 159 ramipril upto 10 mg/day (n = 80) placebo (n = 79) 61.4 60.6 88.0% 90.0% 83.0% 88.0%
SAVE 1992 asymptomatic systolic heart failure postmyocardial infarction 3.5 2,231 captopril upto 50 mg 3 times/day (n = 1,115) placebo (n = 1,116) 59.3 59.5 83.0% 82.0% 53.0% 53.0%
MMHF 1992 systolic heart failure 2.7 170 captopril upto 25 mg 2 times/day (n = 83) placebo (n = 87) 62.4 ⁎⁎ 62.4 ⁎⁎ 75.0% ⁎⁎ 75.0% ⁎⁎ 0 § 0 §

APRES = Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibition Post Revascularization Study; HCTZ = hydrochlorothiazide; QUINS = Quinapril in Scleroderma.

See Appendix C for individual trial gastrointestinal cancer data (available online).


Beta blocker = atenolol upto 50 mg/day, metoprolol upto 100 mg/day, or pindolol upto 5 mg/day; diuretic = hydrochlorothiazide upto 25 mg/day or amiloride upto 2.5 mg/day; calcium channel blocker = felodipine upto 5 mg/day or isradipine upto 5 mg/day.


Includes previous and current smoking.


§ Patients with cancer history excluded from study.


Defined as coronary artery, peripheral vascular, or cerebrovascular disease.


# Percentage of nonwhite participants.


⁎⁎ Percentages of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and control groups combined; data not available according to study groups.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 16, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Effect of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors on Cancer Risk

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access