7 Paul A. Gurbel1,2, Martin Gesheff1, Kevin P. Bliden1, and Udaya S. Tantry1 1Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA 2Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Laboratory evaluation of platelet function by a simple and reliable in vitro method is crucial to understand the critical role of platelets during hemostasis and thrombotic complications of cardiovascular disease. This process is very challenging, since platelets can be easily activated during blood drawing and samples must be processed in a timely manner to avoid spontaneous platelet activation. An in vitro quantitative determination of platelet aggregation by the light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) and the important role of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) during platelet aggregation were first described by Born in 1962 [1]. Despite some important limitations, LTA (turbidimetric assay, optical aggregometry, or conventional aggregometry) with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is still considered as the “gold standard assay” for platelet function measurement. In the landmark study by Born, it was reported that PRP was stirred at a rate of 1000 rotations per minute using a small polyethylene-covered iron rod, and the extent of decrease in optical density following platelet aggregation was proportional to the concentration of the ADP added. It was further demonstrated that the addition of adenosine monophosphate at similar concentrations reversed the platelet aggregation induced by ADP [1]. This study laid the foundation for the development of in vitro methods of platelet function testing (PFT), which were widely used during the assessment of bleeding disorders. It was further used in experiments to identify important targets to inhibit platelet function and to develop antiplatelet agents directed against these targets. Currently, these antiplatelet agents such as aspirin, P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, and glycoprotein (GP)IIb/IIIa inhibitors constitute a major pharmacological therapy in the treatment of high-risk coronary artery disease patients. Before collecting blood samples for platelet aggregation to assess antiplatelet drug response, it is crucial to document all comedications. An effort should be made to minimize interference from agents that are known to influence platelet function. Moreover, information on exercise, smoking status, and dietary habits (caffeine, chocolate, fruits such as grapes and grape fruit) should also be taken into account. Due to diurnal variation, it is preferred to collect fasting blood samples at a standard time during the morning hours. Sodium citrate (3.2% or 3.8%) at a ratio of 1 (anticoagulant):9 (blood) by volume is widely used. If the blood sample cannot be processed for more than 1–2 h, buffered anticogulant can be used to maintain the pH at 7.2–7.4. The principle behind using sodium citrate is to bring the extracellular ionized calcium concentration from 0.94–1.33 mM, which is present in normal blood sample, to 40–50 μM. At this concentration, there will be very low level of platelet activation, and the low ionized calcium concentration is sufficient for the binding of fibrinogen to GPIIb/IIIa receptor and subsequent platelet aggregation. It was also suggested that at this low citrate concentration, there is an increased aggregation response to some commonly used weak agonists, such as ADP and epinephrine, and also, the antiplatelet response to GPIIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor may be over exaggerated. Other ideal anticoagulants that do not influence Ca2+ concentrations are hirudin and D
Light Transmission Aggregometry
Technique
Sample collection
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel