Impact of Statin Use on Development of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus in Asian Population




There have been several reports showing that the statin use is associated with new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of chronic statin use on development of new-onset DM in a series of Asian population. The patients were retrospectively enrolled using the electronic database of Korea University Guro Hospital from January 2004 to February 2010. A total of 10,994 patients without a history of diabetes were analyzed. Baseline lipid profiles, fasting glucose, Hemoglobin (Hb) A1c, and glucose tolerance tests were measured in all patients before statin treatment. Included patients had HbA1c ≤5.7% and fasting glucose level ≤100 (mg/dl). The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the use of statins (the statin group, n = 2,324 patients and the nonstatin group, n = 8,670 patients). To adjust baseline potential confounders, a propensity score–matched analysis was performed using logistic regression model. After propensity score matching, 2 propensity-matched groups (1,699 pairs, n = 3,398, C statistic = 0.859) were generated and analyzed. After propensity score matching, baseline characteristics of both groups were balanced except that the statin group was older and had higher rate of coronary artery disease compared with the nonstatin group. During a 3-year follow-up, the statin group had higher incidence of new-onset DM compared with the nonstatin group (hazard ratio 1.99, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.92, p <0.001), but the statin group showed lower incidence of major adverse cerebral-cardiovascular events compared with the nonstatin group (hazard ratio 0.40, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.85, p <0.001). In the present study, although the use of statins was associated with higher rate of new-onset DM, it markedly improved 3-year cardiovascular outcomes in Asian population.


The statins are widely used for cardiovascular disease prevention and which are clearly supported by clinical evidence. However, there have been several debates, and there have been several reports showing that the statin use is associated with a slightly higher incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM). However, there are limited data regarding the impact of chronic statin use on the development of new-onset DM in Asian population, especially in patients without DM. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of chronic statin use on the development of new-onset DM in patients without DM and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in a series of Asian population.


Methods


A total of 65,686 consecutive patients who visited cardiovascular center of Korea University Guro Hospital (KUGH) from January 2004 to February 2010 were retrospectively enrolled using the electronic database of KUGH. All patients did lipid profiles, fasting glucose, Hemoglobin (Hb) A1c level, and glucose tolerance tests before statin treatment. Inclusion criteria included both HbA1c ≤5.7% and fasting glucose level ≤100 (mg/dl). Finally, a total of 10,994 patients without DM and IGT were analyzed. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of KUGH.


New-onset DM was defined as fasting blood glucose ≥126 (mg/dl), HbA1c ≥6.5%, or the current use of hypoglycemic agents depending on the physician’s discretion. Major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCEs) were defined as the composite of total death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular accidents. New-onset DM–related MACCE was defined as both new-onset DM and MACCE occurring at the same follow-up period. The primary study end point was the cumulative incidence of new-onset DM during 3-year clinical follow-up.


For continuous variables, differences between 2 groups were evaluated by unpaired t test or Mann–Whitney rank test. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. For discrete variables, differences were expressed as counts and percentages and analyzed with chi-square or Fisher’s exact test between the groups as appropriate. To adjust for potential confounders, propensity score–matched analysis was performed using the logistic regression model. We tested all available variables that could be of potential relevance: age, men, cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, and cerebrovascular accidents), comedication treatment (angiotensin II receptor blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, β blockers, diuretics, and warfarin), and laboratory findings (total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride). The logistic model by which the propensity scores were estimated showed good predictive value (C statistic = 0.859). Patients in the statin group were then one-to-one matched to those in the nonstatin group according to propensity scores with the nearest available pair matching method. Subjects were matched with a caliper width equal to 0.05. The procedure yielded 1,699 well-matched pairs. A 2-tailed p value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Various 3-year clinical outcomes were estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method, and differences between groups were compared with the log-rank test. All the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois).




Results


In the present study, a total of 10,994 patients were finally enrolled. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the use of statins (the statin group, n = 2,324 and the nonstatin group, n = 8,670). After propensity score matching (PSM), baseline characteristics of 2 propensity-matched groups (1,699 pairs, n = 3,398, C statistic = 0.859) were balanced except that the statin group were older and had a higher rate of coronary artery disease compared with the nonstatin group. The mean treatment days were 1,456 ± 791 days in the statin group (after PSM, 1,402 ± 782 days; Table 1 ).



Table 1

Baseline clinical characteristics and medication treatments



















































































































































































































































































































Variables,
N (%) or mean ± SD
Overall Patients Matched Patients
Statin Use
(n = 2324)
No Use
(n = 8670)
p Value Statin Use
(n = 1699)
No Use
(n = 1699)
P Value
Gender (men) 1318 (56.7 %) 4033 (46.5 %) < 0.001 883 (51.9 %) 879 (51.7 %) 0.891
Age, (years) 60.6 ± 10.8 51.1 ± 14.9 < 0.001 59.8 ± 10.8 60.7 ± 12.4 0.027
Body mass index, kg/m 2 24.4 ± 3.0 24.3 ± 3.4 0.091 24.5 ± 3.1 24.4 ± 3.6 0.576
Hypertension 1273 (54.7 %) 3149 (36.3 %) < 0.001 888 (52.2 %) 904 (53.2 %) 0.582
Dyslipidemia 597 (25.6 %) 1125 (12.9 %) < 0.001 388 (22.8 %) 408 (24 %) 0.418
Coronary artery disease 693 (29.8 %) 386 (4.4 %) < 0.001 253 (14.8 %) 178 (10.4 %) < 0.001
Myocardial infarction 208 (8.9 %) 40 (0.4 %) < 0.001 44 (2.5 %) 31 (1.8 %) 0.129
Coronary revascularizations 436 (18.7 %) 63 (0.7 %) < 0.001 73 (4.2 %) 53 (3.1 %) 0.069
Coronary spasm 101 (4.3 %) 280 (3.2 %) 0.009 79 (4.6 %) 92 (5.4 %) 0.308
Cerebrovascular accidents 438 (18.8 %) 670 (7.7 %) < 0.001 311 (18.3 %) 329 (19.3 %) 0.430
Heart failure 93 (4.0 %) 259 (2.9 %) 0.014 68 (4.0 %) 69 (4.0 %) 0.931
Angina pectoris 634 (27.2 %) 1877 (21.6 %) < 0.001 425 (25 %) 412 (24.2 %) 0.605
Chest pain 131 (5.6 %) 729 (8.4 %) < 0.001 96 (5.6 %) 84 (4.9 %) 0.358
Arrhythmia 178 (7.6 %) 520 (5.9 %) 0.004 122 (7.1 %) 122 (7.1 %) ns
Atrial fibrillation 119 (5.1 %) 267 (3.0 %) < 0.001 82 (4.8 %) 81 (4.7 %) 0.936
Cardiac arrhythmia 95 (4.0 %) 340 (3.9 %) 0.715 64 (3.7 %) 61 (3.5 %) 0.785
Fasting glucose, mg/dl 94.1 ± 8.1 93.1 ± 8.0 < 0.001 94.2 ± 7.8 94.2 ± 7.9 0.900
Hemoglobin A1c, (%) 5.5 ± 0.2 5.4 ± 0.2 < 0.001 5.5 ± 0.2 5.5 ± 0.2 0.464
Insulin, (ng/ml) 7.5 ± 4.9 7.1 ± 5.3 0.072 7.6 ± 5.0 7.6 ± 5.4 0.945
Total cholesterol, (mg/dL) 179 ± 45 178 ± 33 0.100 181 ± 44 182 ± 34 0.664
Triglyceride, (mg/dL) 135 ± 93 122 ± 88 < 0.001 135 ± 97 136 ± 118 0.866
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, (mg/dL) 50 ± 13 53 ± 13 < 0.001 52 ± 13 51 ± 14 0.508
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, (mg/dL) 113 ± 41 110 ± 29 0.008 114 ± 41 114 ± 30 0.733
Medication treatment
Beta blockers 641 (27.5 %) 807 (9.3 %) < 0.001 356 (20.9 %) 350 (20.6 %) 0.800
Calcium channel blockers 1160 (49.9 %) 1816 (20.9 %) < 0.001 794 (46.7 %) 814 (47.9 %) 0.492
Angiotensin receptor blockers 756 (32.5 %) 1218 (14.0 %) < 0.001 516 (30.3 %) 511 (30.0 %) 0.852
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors 335 (14.4 %) 279 (3.2 %) < 0.001 137 (8.0 %) 145 (8.5 %) 0.619
Diuretics 534 (22.9 %) 1039 (11.9 %) < 0.001 383 (22.5 %) 385 (22.6 %) 0.935
Nitrates 974 (41.9 %) 798 (9.2 %) < 0.001 490 (28.8 %) 450 (26.4 %) 0.125
Type of Statins
Atorvastatin 811 (34.8 %) 605 (35.6 %)
Fluvavastatin 133 (5.7 %) 106 (6.2 %)
Pitavastatin 241 (10.3 %) 161 (9.4 %)
Pravastatin 252 (10.8 %) 196 (11.5 %)
Rosuvastatin 344 (14.8 %) 220 (12.9 %)
Simvastatin 543 (23.3 %) 411 (24.1 %)
Fibrates 29 (1.2 %) 98 (1.1 %) 0.638 25 (1.4 %) 34 (2.0 %) 0.237

Data are presented as N (%) or mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.


After PSM, during the 3-year follow-up period, the incidence of new-onset DM was higher in the statin group compared to that in the nonstatin group (4.7% vs 2.4%, p value <0.001). However, the rates of total death and MACCE were lower in the statin group compared with those in the nonstatin group ( Tables 2 and 3 ).



Table 2

Cumulative clinical outcomes up to 3 years































































Variable, N (%) Overall Patients Matched Patients
Statin Use
(n = 2324)
No Use
(n = 8670)
P Value Statin Use
(n = 1699)
No Use
(n = 1699)
P Value
New-onset diabetes 116 (4.9 %) 111 (1.2 %) < 0.001 80 (4.7 %) 41 (2.4 %) < 0.001
Mortality 18 (0.7 %) 48 (0.5 %) 0.221 8 (0.4 %) 23 (1.3 %) 0.007
Cardiac death 10 (0.4 %) 11 (0.1 %) 0.006 3 (0.1 %) 7 (0.4 %) 0.205
Myocardial infarction 14 (1.0 %) 8 (0.1 %) < 0.001 4 (0.4 %) 6 (0.6 %) 0.755
Cerebrovascular accidents 11 (0.4 %) 26 (0.2 %) 0.200 6 (0.3 %) 15 (0.8 %) 0.049
MACCE 34 (1.4 %) 64 (0.7 %) 0.001 15 (0.8 %) 31 (1.8 %) 0.018

MACCE = major adverse cardiac and cerebral events.


Table 3

Risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus (new-onset DM) and major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) by statin use












































Description Patients. No. New-onset DM MACCE
HR (95% CI) P Value HR (95% CI) P Value
Unadjusted HR 10 994 4.05 (3.10-5.27) < 0.001 1.99 (1.31-3.03) 0.001
Adjusted HR (95% CI)
Multivariate 10 994 2.70 (1.99-3.67) < 0.001 0.70 (0.42-1.18) 0.191
Propensity score 10 994 2.71 (1.94-3.79) < 0.001 0.50 (0.29-0.87) 0.015
Propensity score matched 3 398 1.99 (1.36-2.92) < 0.001 0.47 (0.25-0.89) 0.020

The HR along with its corresponding 95% CI and p values are based on Cox proportional hazard analysis.


In the present study, we compared the incidence of new-onset DM–related MACCEs between the 2 groups during the 3-year follow-up period. In the statin group, new-onset DM–related MACCEs occurred in 3 cases (0.18%), accounting for 20% of the total MACCE (hazard ratio (HR) 4.42, 95% CI 1.16 to 16.7, p = 0.029). In the nonstatin group, new-onset DM–related MACCE occurred in 1 case (0.06%), accounting for 3.2% of the total MACCE (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.10 to 6.95, p = 0.882). The incidence of MACCE between the statin group and the nonstatin group was similar, suggesting the risk of MACCE occurred from chronic statin use is not different from that of patients without statin ( Figure 1 ).




Figure 1


Cumulative incidence of new-onset DM, MACCEs, and new-onset DM–related MACCE up to 3 years. Figures are the cumulative incidences of new-onset DM (Right) , the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (MACCE, Mid ), and the incidences of MACCE even or after new-onset DM (Left) after PSM. The incidence of MACCE between the statin group and the nonstatin group was similar, suggesting the risk of MACCE occurred from chronic statin use was not different with that of patients without statin.


After PSM, multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that elderly, male gender, and drug intake (diuretics, overall statins, and subtype statins) were the independent risk factors for new-onset DM. However, when we analyze the impact of individual statin on the incidence of new-onset DM, the use of simvastatin was not a significant risk factor for new-onset DM ( Table 4 ).



Table 4

A predictor of new-onset diabetes mellitus after propensity score–matched analysis




























































































































Description Patients, N (%)
(n = 3,398)
New-onset DM, N (%)
(n = 121)
HR (95% CI) P Value
Gender (men) 1762 (51.8 %) 1.76 (1.19-2.59) 0.004
Age, [mean ± SD] 60.2 ± 11.6 1.01 (1.00-1.03) 0.025
Hypertension 1792 (52.7 %) 1.38 (0.94-2.02) 0.097
Cardiovascular disease 431 (12.6 %) 0.96 (0.56-1.65) 0.891
Coronary spasm 171 (5.0 %) 1.64 (0.80-3.35) 0.169
Dyslipidemia 796 (23.4 %) 1.00 (0.63-1.58) 0.973
Angiotensin receptor blockers 1027 (30.2 %) 1.34 (0.87-2.05) 0.173
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors 282 (8.2 %) 0.80 (0.38-1.67) 0.559
Calcium channel blockers 1608 (47.3 %) 0.72 (0.49-1.05) 0.090
Beta blockers 706 (20.7 %) 1.30 (0.85-2.01) 0.218
Diuretics 768 (22.6 %) 1.61 (1.03-2.52) 0.035
Nitrates 940 (27.6 %) 1.07 (0.70-1.64) 0.735
Statins (overall) 1699 (50.0 %) 80/1699 (4.7 %) 2.06 (1.40-3.04) < 0.001
Atorvastatin 605 (35.6 %) 28/605 (4.6 %) 2.09 (1.27-3.44) 0.003
Simvastatin 411 (24.1 %) 10/411 (2.4 %) 0.99 (0.49-2.02) 0.998
Rosuvastatin 220 (12.9 %) 10/220 (4.5 %) 2.13 (1.04-4.38) 0.038
Pravastatin 196 (11.5 %) 13/196 (6.6 %) 2.88 (1.50-5.55) 0.001
Pitavastatin 161 (9.4 %) 13/161 (8.0 %) 3.46 (1.79-6.68) < 0.001
Fluvastatin 106 (6.2 %) 6/106 (5.6 %) 2.53 (1.03-6.21) 0.041

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 27, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Impact of Statin Use on Development of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus in Asian Population

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access