Impact of Obesity and Nonobesity on Grading the Severity of Aortic Valve Stenosis




We tested the hypothesis that the disproportionate increase of body surface area in obesity may lead to the overestimation of aortic stenosis (AS) severity when the aortic valve area (AVA) is indexed (AVAI) for body surface area in 1,524 patients enrolled in the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in AS study. Obesity was defined as a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m 2 . Peak aortic jet velocity, mean aortic gradient, AVA, and energy loss (EL) did not differ, although AVAI and EL indexed (ELI) for body surface area were significantly smaller in the obese group (n = 321) compared with the nonobese (n = 1,203) group (both p <0.05). Severe AS by AVAI (<0.6 cm 2 /m 2 ) but nonsevere by AVA (>1.0 cm 2 ; AVAI/AVA discordance) was found in 15% of the patients, whereas severe AS by ELI (<0.6 cm 2 /m 2 ) but nonsevere by EL (>1.0 cm 2 ; ELI/EL discordance) was found in 9% of the patients. Obesity was associated with a 2.4-fold higher prevalence of AVAI/AVA discordance and a 1.6-fold higher prevalence of ELI/EL discordance. Discordant grading was also associated with male gender, larger body size, higher mean aortic gradient, and stroke volume (all p <0.05). During a median follow-up of 4.3 years, 419 patients were referred for aortic valve replacement and 177 patients died or were hospitalized because of heart failure. In the Cox regression analyses, AVAI/AVA discordance was associated with a 28% higher rate of aortic valve replacement (p <0.05) but did not predict the rate of combined death and hospitalization for heart failure. In conclusion, using AVAI and ELI for the grading of stenosis in patients with obesity may lead to overestimation of true AS severity.


In aortic stenosis (AS), therapeutic decisions are based on the status of symptoms and hemodynamic severity and left ventricular function estimated by echocardiography. Accurate assessment of AS severity is of major importance for diagnosis, management, and prognosis of the disease. Current guidelines recommend a variety of Doppler echocardiographic measures for assessing AS severity, including peak aortic jet velocity, mean aortic gradient, aortic valve area (AVA), and AVA indexed (AVAI) for body surface area. In milder degrees of AS, adjusting for pressure recovery in calculation of valve area gives a more accurate estimate of the disease severity and prognosis. The indexation of valve area for body surface area is recommended to avoid overestimation of AS, particularly in subjects with small body size. We hypothesized that the disproportionate increase of body surface area in obesity may lead to the overestimation of AS severity when the indexed valve area is used in patients with obesity.


Methods


A total of 1,873 patients aged 45 to 85 years with asymptomatic AS (peak aortic valve velocity ≥2.5 and ≤4.0 m/s) were recruited in the Simvastatin Ezetimibe in AS study, a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study on the effect of combined simvastatin and ezetimibe or placebo on AS progression and associated cardiovascular events during a median of 4.3 years. The primary study end point was combined aortic valve replacement (AVR), hospitalization for heart failure due to progression of AS, cardiovascular death, coronary revascularization, nonhemorrhagic stroke, myocardial infarction, and hospitalization for unstable angina pectoris. Total mortality was a tertiary study end point. All end points were adjudicated by an independent committee. For the present analysis, 1,561 patients with complete baseline echocardiographic data allowing assessment of AVA, AVAI, energy loss (EL), and EL index (ELI) were eligible. Thirteen patients with body mass index <18.5 kg/m 2 , 15 patients with AVA <1.0 cm 2 but AVAI >0.6 cm 2 /m 2 , and 9 patients with EL <1.0 cm 2 and ELI >0.6 cm 2 /m 2 were excluded for statistical reasons because of the low numbers, leaving 1,524 patients for the present prespecified analysis.


Echocardiography was done in 173 study centers following a standardized protocol. Blinded, off-line analysis was done at the Core Laboratory at the Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. Quantitative assessment of the left ventricle and the aortic valve was performed following the joint European Association of Echocardiography and American Society of Echocardiography guidelines. Stroke volume was calculated from Teichholz-derived left ventricular volumes. The AVA was calculated by the continuity equation with Doppler time velocity integrals and indexed for body size (AVAI). EL was calculated as (AVA × Aa)/(Aa − AVA) and indexed for body size (ELI), where Aa is the aortic area at the sinotubuluar junction. Severe AS was defined as AVA or EL <1.0 cm 2 and AVAI or ELI <0.6 cm 2 /m 2 , respectively. We defined the AVAI/AVA discordance as severe AS by AVAI but nonsevere by AVA and ELI/EL discordance as severe AS by ELI but nonsevere by EL.


All data management and analyses were performed by IBM SPSS 21.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York). The study population was divided into obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 ) and nonobese groups. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± SD and categorical variables as percentages. Comparisons between the groups were done with t and chi-square tests as appropriate. Covariates of AVAI/AVA and ELI/EL discordance were identified in logistic regression analyses. End point incidences were calculated by Kaplan-Maier analysis. The association of AVAI/AVA and ELI/EL discordances with incident AVR and combined death from any cause and hospitalization for heart failure due to progression of AS was tested in Cox regression analyses. Two-tailed p <0.05 was considered significant in all analyses.




Results


Patients with obesity (n = 321) had higher fasting serum glucose and more dyslipidemia and included more patients with hypertension than the patients without obesity ( Table 1 ). AS severity did not differ between the obese and nonobese groups when assessed by peak aortic jet velocity, mean aortic gradient, AVA, or EL. In contrast, AVAI and ELI were significantly smaller in the obese group ( Table 2 ).



Table 1

Baseline characteristics of nonobese and obese groups of patients



































































































Variables Nonobese (n = 1,203) Obese (n = 321) p Value
Women 35 48 <0.001
Age (yrs) 67.4 ± 9.9 67.3 ± 8.7 0.951
Height (m) 1.71 ± 0.09 1.68 ± 0.10 <0.001
Weight (kg) 74.8 ± 11.1 94.6 ± 12.9
BMI (kg/m 2 ) 25.4 ± 2.5 33.3 ± 3.4
Body surface area (m 2 ) 1.87 ± 0.18 2.04 ± 0.19 <0.001
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 144 ± 20 147 ± 19 0.003
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 82 ± 10 84 ± 11 <0.001
Hypertension 84 96 <0.001
Serum creatinine (μmol/L) 94 ± 15 93 ± 17 0.012
Glucose (mmol/L) 5.2 ± 0.7 5.7 ± 1.1 <0.001
Total cholesterol (mmol/L) (mg/dl) 5.8 ± 1.0224.3 ± 38.7 5.6 ± 1.0216.6 ± 38.7 0.016
HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) 1.5 ± 0.4 1.3 ± 0.4 <0.001
(mg/dl) 58.0 ± 15.5 50.3 ± 15.5
LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) 3.6 ± 0.9 3.5 ± 0.9 0.008
(mg/dl) 139.2 ± 34.8 135.4 ± 34.8
Triglycerides (mmol/L) 1.4 ± 0.7 1.7 ± 0.8 <0.001
(mg/dl) 54.1 ± 27.1 65.7 ± 30.1

Data are presented as n (%) and mean ± SD.

BMI = body mass index; HDL = high-density lipids; LDL = low-density lipids.


Table 2

Baseline echocardiographic findings in nonobese and obese groups of patients

























































































Variables Nonobese (n = 1,203) Obese (n = 321) p Value
LV end-diastolic diameter (cm) 5.0 ± 0.6 5.2 ± 0.6 <0.001
LV end-systolic diameter (cm) 3.2 ± 0.6 3.3 ± 0.6 <0.001
LV ejection fraction 66 ± 8 65 ± 8 0.010
Endocardial fractional shortening 37 ± 6 36 ± 6 0.013
LV mass (g) 191 ± 63 220 ± 78 <0.001
Stroke volume (ml) 80 ± 22 84 ± 23 0.008
Cardiac output (L/min) 5.2 ± 1.5 5.6 ± 1.7 <0.001
Sinotubular junction diameter (cm) 2.8 ± 0.4 2.8 ± 0.4 0.587
Sinus of valsalva diameter (cm) 3.6 ± 0.5 3.6 ± 0.5 0.993
Peak aortic velocity (m/s) 3.1 ± 0.5 3.1 ± 0.6 0.133
Mean aortic gradient (mm Hg) 23 ± 9 23 ± 9 0.135
AVA (cm 2 ) 1.28 ± 0.46 1.28 ± 0.44 0.962
AVAI (cm 2 /m 2 ) 0.68 ± 0.24 0.62 ± 0.21 <0.001
Pressure recovery (mm Hg) 5.8 ± 2.2 6.2 ± 2.5 0.011
EL (cm 2 ) 1.72 ± 0.93 1.74 ± 0.90 0.666
ELI (cm 2 /m 2 ) 0.92 ± 0.48 0.85 ± 0.43 0.025

AVA = aortic valve area; AVAI = aortic valve area index; EL = energy loss; ELI = energy loss index; LV = left ventricular.


The AVAI/AVA discordance was found in 15% of the patients, and ELI/EL discordance was found in 9% of the patients in the total study population, and both were significantly more common among patients with obesity (23% and 13% vs 13% and 9%, respectively, both p <0.05; Table 3 ; Figure 1 ). In multivariate analyses, obesity was associated with 2.4-fold higher prevalence of AVAI/AVA discordance and 1.6-fold higher prevalence of ELI/EL discordance ( Table 4 ).



Table 3

Clinic and echocardiographic characteristics of groups of patients with and without aortic valve area index (AVAI)/aortic valve area (AVA) and energy loss index (ELI)/energy loss (EL) discordances























































AVAI/AVA Discordance ELI/EL Discordance
Yes (n = 225) No (n = 1,299) Yes (n = 144) No (n = 1,380)
Male gender 84 59 79 61
Body surface area (m 2 ) 2.04 ± 0.16 1.88 ± 0.19 2.01 ± 0.14 1.89 ± 0.19
Obesity 32 19 29 20
Aortic sinus diameter (cm) 3.7 ± 0.5 3.6 ± 0.5 3.8 ± 0.5 3.6 ± 0.5
Left ventricular mass (g) 214 ± 70 193 ± 67 220 ± 69 194 ± 67
Stroke volume (ml) 85 ± 21 80 ± 23 84 ± 22 81 ± 23
Mean aortic gradient (mm Hg) 25 ± 8 22 ± 9 26 ± 8 22 ± 9

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 1, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Impact of Obesity and Nonobesity on Grading the Severity of Aortic Valve Stenosis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access