Hemodynamic support during high-risk PCI: a single-center comparison of in-hospital events between intraaortic balloon pump, Tandem Heart and Impella device




Objective


The goal of this study was to examine the hospital outcomes of high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) performed with hemodynamic support by intraaortic balloon pump (IABP), Tandem Heart (TH) or Impella (IMP).




Methods


In our single-center retrospective study, we identified 75 patients who underwent high-risk PCI with hemodynamic support from March 2007 to January 2010. The number of patients per group was as follows: IABP=48, TH=12 and IMP=15. The primary endpoint was major in-hospital adverse cardiac events (MACE), consisting of reinfarction, repeat revascularization and death. The secondary endpoint was in-hospital vascular complications defined as need for transfusion, vascular repair or CVA.




Methods


In our single-center retrospective study, we identified 75 patients who underwent high-risk PCI with hemodynamic support from March 2007 to January 2010. The number of patients per group was as follows: IABP=48, TH=12 and IMP=15. The primary endpoint was major in-hospital adverse cardiac events (MACE), consisting of reinfarction, repeat revascularization and death. The secondary endpoint was in-hospital vascular complications defined as need for transfusion, vascular repair or CVA.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 16, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Hemodynamic support during high-risk PCI: a single-center comparison of in-hospital events between intraaortic balloon pump, Tandem Heart and Impella device

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access