Heart Transplants: Bicaval Versus Biatrial Techniques



Heart Transplants: Bicaval Versus Biatrial Techniques


Brian Lima

Gonzalo V. Gonzalez-Stawinski



Indications/Contraindications


Indications

Cardiac transplantation remains the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage heart failure, limited primarily by the finite number of available donor organs. Despite the exponential increase in potential recipients, the annual number of heart transplantations has plateaued at approximately 2,500 performed in the United States and 3,500 worldwide. Judicious allocation of such a scarce resource mandates a comprehensive, multidisciplinary evaluation of any prospective transplantation candidate. Part of the evaluation process includes exhaustive screening for underlying end-organ pathology using a variety of diagnostic studies and laboratory tests (Table 35.1). Once the evaluation process has been completed, appropriate candidates are chosen by majority vote from a duly appointed selection committee.

Patients generally have compromised systolic cardiac function with NYHA class III or IV symptoms refractory to optimal medical and/or surgical management, and an estimated 1-year survival of <50%. Objective measures include low ejection fraction (<20%) and diminished peak exercise oxygen consumption (VO2 <14 mL/kg/min or <55% predicted). Primary (90%) etiologies include either ischemic versus nonischemic, dilated cardiomyopathy. Other, less common, etiologic categories include valvular, hypertensive, peripartum, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathies along with congenital heart disease.


Contraindications

While certain exclusionary criteria are center specific, there are a number of widely accepted, absolute contraindications to cardiac transplantation (Table 35.2). Among these are fixed, severe pulmonary hypertension; irreversible end-organ dysfunction; and recent malignancy. Certain relative contraindications vary from center to center (Table 35.2).
These pertain to age, size, comorbidities, and psychosocial issues. Once placed on the wait list, each patient must be thoroughly reassessed at regular 3- to 6-month intervals to ensure that no exclusionary criteria have emerged in the interim. These could include the onset of a significant infection, or worsening pulmonary vascular resistance.








TABLE 35.1 Screening Studies for Prospective Heart Transplantation Candidates






















































History and physical examination
Complete blood count with differential
Blood chemistry panel
Liver function tests
Renal function panel
Coagulation studies
Urinalysis
Chest radiograph
Pulmonary function test
Blood typing and antibody screening
Stool guaiac
Mammography and Pap smear (female aged >40 years)
Prostate-specific antigen (male aged >50 years)
Carotid duplex (if dictated by age, history, examination)
Bone densitometry
Complete dental evaluation
Electrocardiogram
Echocardiography
Left and right heart catheterization
Peak exercise oxygen consumption (VO2) testing
Hepatitis serologies
HIV serology
Cytomegalovirus IgG and IgM titers
Other titers when indicated
Psychological evaluation and assessment by social worker for determination of patient compliance, familial support, and financial resources/medical insurance coverage
Ig, immunoglobulin.

When assessing donor suitability for cardiac transplantation, there is also considerable variability in what some centers may deem as disqualifying features. Some of these donor criteria commonly include the following:



  • Age >55 years


  • Pre-existing cardiac disease (e.g., coronary artery disease, valvular pathology)









    TABLE 35.2 Contraindications to Heart Transplantation






































    Absolute Contraindications
    Fixed, severe pulmonary hypertension (PVR > 5 Wood units; TPG > 15 mm Hg)
    Irreversible renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance < 50 mg/mL/min)
    Irreversible hepatic dysfunction (e.g., bilirubin > 3.0 mg/dL)
    Active or recent malignancy (<5-year disease-free survival)
    HIV infection or AIDS
    Relative Contraindications
    Age > 65 years
    Obesity (body mass index > 35 kg/m2)
    Cardiac cachexia (body mass index < 20 kg/m2)
    Diabetes mellitus with end-organ damage (neuropathy, nephropathy, retinopathy)
    Active infection
    Limited psychosocial support
    History of noncompliance
    Systemic process that may recur in transplanted heart (e.g., amyloidosis)
    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    Peripheral vascular disease
    PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance; TPG, transpulmonary gradient.


  • Prolonged cardiac arrest or severe hypotension


  • Chest trauma with cardiac injury


  • Extracerebral malignancy


  • Septicemia


  • Positive HIV or hepatitis serologies


  • Requirement for high-dose inotropic support


  • Left ventricular hypertrophy (wall thickness >1.5 cm)

Marginal donors may be accepted at the discretion of implanting centers for patients deteriorating on the wait list. These are typically scenarios where the risk associated with waiting for the next best donor offer outweighs that associated with implanting a less-than-ideal cardiac allograft. Some centers also employ an alternative list transplant program where marginal hearts are matched with patients ineligible for a standard heart transplant listing.


Preoperative Planning

Various forms of mechanical circulatory support have evolved to meet the growing number of patients with advanced heart failure. Implantable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), in particular, have emerged as a durable means to bridge patients to cardiac transplantation who might otherwise not survive the wait for an available donor heart. As such, an ever-increasing proportion of heart transplantations are performed in the setting of a previously implanted LVAD. These present uniquely challenging reoperative cases for the surgeon performing the transplantation; the hazards of sternal re-entry and difficulty of mediastinal adhesiolysis are especially pronounced. To facilitate subsequent LVAD explantation and heart transplantation, certain operative measures can be taken at the time of LVAD implantation. These include positioning of the outflow graft lateral to the right atrium, a safe distance away from the overlying sternum. Limited dissection between the aorta and pulmonary artery (PA), with lower placement of the outflow graft on the ascending aorta, can simplify the aortic anastomosis at the time of transplantation. An additional protective measure is the placement of a GORE-TEX (W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.; Newark, DE, USA) or CorMatrix (CorMatrix; Roswell, GA, USA) patch to bridge the pericardial edges and shield cardiac structures during subsequent sternal re-entry. Patients with LVAD and other reoperative patients awaiting transplantation should undergo chest computed topography scan to assess the proximity of mediastinal structures to the posterior sternum. This information may help gauge whether a peripheral cannulation strategy might be necessary. In that setting, the authors prefer side-graft axillary artery and percutaneous femoral venous cannulation to afford rapid institution of cardiopulmonary bypass during re-entry.

A critical facet to successful heart transplantation is careful coordination of timing between the implanting and procuring teams to minimize the cold ischemic time of the cardiac allograft. The goal is to keep that interval <4 hours. Ideally, the recipient cardiectomy is completed upon arrival of the donor heart. This necessitates effective and frequent communication between the two teams, taking specific time variables into consideration:



  • Travel time/distance for procurement team


  • Time for patient transport to operating room, anesthetic induction, and placement of monitoring lines


  • Time needed by abdominal organ harvest teams prior to donor aortic cross-clamping


  • Time needed for recipient operation (e.g., redo sternotomy with LVAD explantation)


Surgery

It is vitally important that appropriate broad-spectrum antibiotics and immunosuppressive agents are administered immediately prior to, or promptly after, anesthetic induction. Many centers have adopted a preoperative checklist or “time-out” before making
skin incision, to confirm that these medications have been infused. Similarly, it is essential to verify that blood products are immediately available for transfusion, especially in reoperative cases. Standard monitoring lines include Swan–Ganz PA catheter and arterial line. To facilitate subsequent transvenous endomyocardial biopsies for rejection surveillance, it is preferable to avoid central venous access in the right internal jugular vein. The right subclavian vein may also be unavailable for access if right axillary artery cannulation is anticipated by the surgeon performing the implantation. Bladder temperature is routinely monitored via a Foley catheter temperature probe.


Positioning

Patients are placed in the supine position with both arms tucked and well padded at the patient’s side. The chest and bilateral groins are prepped and draped in standard, sterile fashion, enabling access to bilateral axillary and femoral vessels. External defibrillator pads are placed for all cases.

Jun 15, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIAC SURGERY | Comments Off on Heart Transplants: Bicaval Versus Biatrial Techniques

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access