Frequency of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation




Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is significantly related to adverse clinical outcomes in patients at high risk of cardiovascular events. In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), data on LVH, that is, prevalence and determinants, are inconsistent mainly because of different definitions and heterogeneity of study populations. We determined echocardiographic-based LVH prevalence and clinical factors independently associated with its development in a prospective cohort of patients with non-valvular (NV) AF. From the “Atrial Fibrillation Registry for Ankle-brachial Index Prevalence Assessment: Collaborative Italian Study” (ARAPACIS) population, 1,184 patients with NVAF (mean age 72 ± 11 years; 56% men) with complete data to define LVH were selected. ARAPACIS is a multicenter, observational, prospective, longitudinal on-going study designed to estimate prevalence of peripheral artery disease in patients with NVAF. We found a high prevalence of LVH (52%) in patients with NVAF. Compared to those without LVH, patients with AF with LVH were older and had a higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and previous myocardial infarction (MI). A higher prevalence of ankle-brachial index ≤0.90 was seen in patients with LVH (22 vs 17%, p = 0.0392). Patients with LVH were at significantly higher thromboembolic risk, with CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc ≥2 seen in 93% of LVH and in 73% of patients without LVH (p <0.05). Women with LVH had a higher prevalence of concentric hypertrophy than men (46% vs 29%, p = 0.0003). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that female gender (odds ratio [OR] 2.80, p <0.0001), age (OR 1.03 per year, p <0.001), hypertension (OR 2.30, p <0.001), diabetes (OR 1.62, p = 0.004), and previous MI (OR 1.96, p = 0.001) were independently associated with LVH. In conclusion, patients with NVAF have a high prevalence of LVH, which is related to female gender, older age, hypertension, and previous MI. These patients are at high thromboembolic risk and deserve a holistic approach to cardiovascular prevention.


Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent supraventricular tachyarrhythmia associated with high risk of death and stroke. Hypertension is the most frequent cardiovascular risk factor in AF and recognized as a predictor of new onset AF. One of the hypertension-related target organ damage is left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Data on gender differences in development of LVH have been reported in hypertensive patients with or without concomitant heart failure. Notwithstanding different definitions and threshold criteria, LVH prevalence ranges widely in the general population. Nonetheless, LVH is an independent risk factor for major cardiovascular events and all cause death. Also, left ventricular remodeling has been identified as an independent risk factor for stroke and mortality in patients with AF. The aim of our study was to determine LVH prevalence, using well-defined echocardiographic criteria based on left ventricular mass (LVM) indexed by body surface area (BSA) in a cohort of patients with non-valvular (NV) AF. Second, we aimed to identify the clinical factors independently associated with LVH in our patients with NVAF. Third, we conducted a gender-stratified analysis to investigate relevant gender differences in LVH in patients with NVAF.


Methods


We performed a cross-sectional analysis on the “Atrial Fibrillation Registry for Ankle-brachial Index Prevalence Assessment: Collaborative Italian Study” (ARAPACIS), a multicenter, observational, prospective on-going study designed to estimate prevalence of ankle-brachial index (ABI) ≤0.90 in patients with NVAF and its influence on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events incidence over a 3-year follow-up.


Details on standard study procedures have been previously reported. In addition, a standard transthoracic echocardiography was performed where feasible. Even if a central analysis of echocardiographic images was not performed, an experienced cardiologist in echocardiography performed a blinded evaluation of measurements for consistency and reliability.


Patients were consecutively recruited, both as inpatients or outpatients, if they were aged ≥18 years and had NVAF diagnosis recorded in the preceding 12 months. Enrollment was performed in 136 facilities belonging to the Italian Internal Medicine Society network from October 2010 and continued until 30 October 2012. All patients signed a written informed consent. The study was conducted in accordance with the EU Note for Guidance on Good Clinical Practice CPMP/ECH/135/95 and the Declaration of Helsinki.


LVM estimation was calculated according to American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) and European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) joint recommendations. LVM values have been indexed by BSA, calculated with the Dubois and Dubois formula (BSA = 0.007184 × weight [Kg] 0.425 × height [cm] 0.725 ). Thus, we defined the presence of LVH for an LVM indexed by BSA (LVMI-BSA) >95 g/m 2 for women and an LVMI-BSA >115 g/m 2 for men.


The definition of LV remodeling was assessed calculating the relative wall thickness (RWT). In accordance to ASE/EAE recommendations, RWT ≥0.42 defined a concentric remodeling, otherwise an RWT <0.42 defined an eccentric remodeling. All patients were then categorized into 4 categories of cardiac remodeling: (1) no remodeling, that is, patients without LVH and with an RWT <0.42; (2) concentric remodeling, that is, patients without LVH and with an RWT ≥0.42; (3) eccentric hypertrophy, that is, patients with LVH and an RWT <0.42; and (4) concentric hypertrophy, that is, patients with LVH and an RWT ≥0.42.


According to Shapiro–Wilk normality test, variables with a normal distribution were tested for differences by the Student t test and reported as mean ± standard deviation. Variables with nonhomogeneous variances were tested by the Mann–Whitney U test and reported as median and interquartile range. Categorical variables, expressed as counts and percentages, were analyzed by a chi-square test. A gender-stratified analysis was also conducted. Finally, a multivariate regression analysis was performed to establish LVH determinants in patients with NVAF. To reduce interobserver variability, the regression analysis was corrected for enrolling centers. The probability values were 2 sided; a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were carried out with SPSS version 20 (IBM, NY, USA).




Results


Among a total of 2,027 patients enrolled in ARAPACIS, echocardiographic data were available for 1,184 subjects (59%). After data revision, 1,087 patients (72 ± 11 years; 56% men) were eligible for analysis ( Figure 1 ). Clinical and demographic variables in nonincluded patients were similar to those analyzed ( Table 1 ).




Figure 1


Flow diagram of NVAF patient selection.


Table 1

Clinical and demographic characteristics according to the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy


































































































































































Variable Excluded Patients
N= 940
Left Ventricular Hypertrophy P value
Yes vs. No
Yes
N=576
No
N=511
Age (years.), mean±SD 74±9 75±9 70±12 <0.0001
Age Classes <0.0001
<65 years 263 (28%) 123 (21%) 191 (37%)
65-74 years 209 (22%) 141 (25%) 142 (28%)
≥75 years 468 (50%) 312 (54%) 178 (35%)
Women 439 (47%) 353 (56%) 158 (31%) <0.0001
Body Mass Index (Kg/m 2 ), mean±SD 28±5 28±5 28±5 0.4876
Type of Atrial Fibrillation 0.0866
Paroxysmal 425 (45%) 233 (41%) 221 (43%)
Persistent 120 (13%) 82 (14%) 90 (18%)
Permanent 395 (42%) 261 (45%) 200 (39%)
Hypertension 785 (84%) 515 (89%) 374 (73%) <0.0001
Diabetes Mellitus 237 (25%) 152 (26%) 77 (15%) <0.0001
Smoker 138 (15%) 77 (13%) 100 (20%) 0.0057
Hypercholesterolemia § 353 (38%) 231 (40%) 205 (40%) 0.9964
Metabolic Syndrome 282 (31%) 164 (30%) 141 (29%) 0.6767
Previous Transient Ischemic Attack/Stroke 116 (12%) 67 (12%) 52 (10%) 0.4429
Previous Myocardial Infarction 159 (17%) 105 (18%) 49 (9.6%) <0.0001
Previous Peripheral Artery Disease 13 (1.4%) 9 (1.4%) 10 (1.9%) 0.5624
Heart Failure 189 (20%) 102 (18%) 87 (17%) 0.7668
Ankle-Brachial Index ≤0.90 212 (23%) 128 (22%) 88 (17%) 0.0391
CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc, median [IQR] 3 [2-4] 4 [3-5] 2 [1-4] <0.0001
CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc Classes <0.0001
Score 0 25 (2.7%) 8 (1.4%) 46 (9.0%)
Score 1 108 (11.5%) 35 (6.1%) 94 (18.4%)
Score≥2 807 (85.8%) 533 (92.5%) 371 (72.6%)

IQR = Interquartile Range; SD = Standard Deviation.

Student t test.


Chi-square test.


Blood Pressure>140/90 mm Hg or treated with anti-hypertensive drugs.


§ Total Cholesterol≥ 240 mg/dl or treated with lipid lowering drugs.


Data referred to 1,084 patients.


Mann Whitney U test.



Previous cardiovascular disease was recorded for about 1/4 of patients. Among classic cardiovascular risk factors, hypertension was the most prevalent (82%). The mean LVMI-BSA was 112 ± 31 g/m 2 . Values of LVMI-BSA were greater in permanent NVAF compared to those with persistent AF (p = 0.0107) or paroxysmal AF (p = 0.0023). LVMI-BSA progressively increased with higher CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc risk classes (p <0.0001; Figure 2 ).




Figure 2


LVMI-BSA values distribution according to CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score.


LVH was recorded in 52% of patients. Clinical and demographic characteristics in the groups are reported in Table 1 . Patients with LVH were older, had a higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and previous myocardial infarction (MI) compared to those without. ABI ≤0.90 was prevalent in patients with LVH. CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc ≥2 class was recorded more frequently in patients with LVH.


Table 2 summarizes echocardiographic characteristics of the 2 groups. Patients with LVH had poorer ventricular function compared to those without LVH. In 59% of patients with LVH, there was a concentric hypertrophy pattern.



Table 2

Echocardiographic characteristics according to the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy










































































Variable Left Ventricular Hypertrophy P
Yes
N=576
No
N=511
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (%), mean±SD 54±10 57±8 <0.0001
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction <50% 133 (23%) 62 (12%) <0.0001
Left Ventricular Mass Indexed by Body Surface Area (g/m 2 ), mean±SD 132±27 89±15 <0.0001
Relative Wall Thickness (>0.42) 338 (59%) 215 (42%) <0.0001
Left Ventricular Internal End-Diastolic Dimension (mm), mean±SD 53±6 48±5 <0.0001
Interventricular Septum Thickness (mm), mean±SD 12±2 10±2 <0.0001
Posterior Wall Thickness (mm), mean±SD 11±2 9±1 <0.0001
Left Atrial Diameter (mm), mean±SD 45±8 44±9 0.2488
Cardiac Remodeling <0.0001
None Remodeling 0 (0) 296 (58%)
Concentric Remodeling 0 (0) 215 (42%)
Eccentric Hypertrophy 238 (41%) 0 (0)
Concentric Hypertrophy 338 (59%) 0 (0)

SD = Standard Deviation.

Student t test.


Chi-square test.


Data referred to 912 patients.



Pharmacologic treatments distribution in the 2 groups are reported in Table 3 . Patients with LVH were more likely treated with oral anticoagulants (OAC) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors than those without LVH.


Nov 28, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Frequency of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access