Paul D. Thompson Until the early 1950s, standard treatment of myocardial infarction (MI) was several weeks of hospitalization followed by months of restricted physical activity. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation was developed to reverse the physical deconditioning produced by this restriction of physical activity. Exercise training was central to this process and was one of the few interventions that reduced exertional angina pectoris in the era before beta-adrenergic blocking agents and coronary artery revascularization procedures.1 Shorter hospitalizations, along with effective medications and procedures to treat myocardial ischemia, have changed cardiac rehabilitation programs. Exercise training is still important, but education and counseling to improve psychological well-being, reduce cigarette smoking, and increase adherence to medications and diet are now key components of the rehabilitation effort.2 U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines reflect these changes and stipulate that “cardiac rehabilitation programs must be comprehensive and…include a medical evaluation, a program to modify cardiac risk factors…prescribed exercise, education, and counseling.” Consequently, cardiac rehabilitation programs are now often referred to as “cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs.”2 The American Heart Association (AHA) and American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) recommend comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation programs (class I indication) for patients who have undergone percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), who have suffered an acute cardiac syndrome, or who have stable angina pectoris or peripheral vascular disease.3 This recommendation received the highest level of evidence (level A) for all conditions except angina (level B).3 The CMS also considers comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation “reasonable and necessary” for patients after valve surgery and heart or heart and lung transplantation.4 They proposed using referral to cardiac rehabilitation as a core performance measure for the management of patients with coronary disease and after cardiac surgery starting in January 2014, with an impact on hospital reimbursement in 2015.5 Consequently, interest in cardiac rehabilitation will probably increase in the near future. Exercise training is central to most cardiac rehabilitation/risk reduction programs because it increases exercise capacity and reduces exercise-induced cardiac ischemia and angina, but even programs without an exercise component may reduce recurrent cardiac events. A meta-analysis of 63 randomized secondary prevention trials that included 21,295 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) noted a 15% reduction in mortality, but the reductions in mortality and recurrent MI were similar for programs that involved exercise only, exercise and risk factor education and counseling, and risk factor education and counseling alone6 (Table 47-1). Because risk factor reduction is discussed elsewhere in detail (see also Chapters 42, 44, and 45), this chapter specifically addresses exercise training in the rehabilitation process. TABLE 47-2 Terms to Describe Exercise From Thompson PD: Exercise prescription and proscription for patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 112:2354, 2005. Exercise performance may be normal for age and sex in individuals with cardiac disease. Alternatively, diseases that limit maximal SV, impair the HR response, or cause myocardial ischemia that produces limiting symptoms or a diminished increase in SV may impair exercise capacity. Medications that limit the HR response to exercise (such as beta-adrenergic blocking agents) or restrictions in physical activity that produce a detraining effect may also contribute to reduced exercise tolerance in cardiac patients. The primary effect of either aerobic or strength training is increased exercise capacity. With strength training, the primary adaptation is to increase muscular strength and endurance in the exercise-trained muscle. The principal effect of aerobic exercise training is increased . This increase in maximal exercise capacity means that any submaximal work rate requires a lower percentage of , thereby reducing the HR and SBP response and Mo2 requirements. Endurance exercise training also increases the absolute VT and VT as a percentage of . Multiple adaptations contribute to improvement in exercise tolerance after training, including increases in SV and widening of the A-V O2 Δ. The magnitude of the increase in exercise with endurance exercise training depends on multiple factors, including the age of the subject, the intensity and duration of the training regimen, genetic factors, underlying disease states, and whether testing and training use similar exercises. In general, young subjects trained intensively have greater improvement in exercise tolerance. Increases in average 11% to 36% in cardiac rehabilitation patients,7 although the response varies with the severity of the underlying disease. Individuals with markedly reduced ventricular function, for example, may achieve much of their increase in exercise capacity by widening the A-V O2
Exercise-Based, Comprehensive Cardiac Rehabilitation
Historical Perspective
Effect of Cardiac Disease on Exercise Performance
Effect of Exercise Training on Exercise Performance
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree
Exercise-Based, Comprehensive Cardiac Rehabilitation
47