21 Matthew J. Chung1,2 and Sunil V. Rao1,2,3 1 Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA 2 Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA 3 Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA Antiplatelet therapy remains a cornerstone in the management of patients with coronary artery disease. Beginning with aspirin monotherapy, antiplatelet therapy has evolved to include the administration of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in addition to aspirin. This dual antiplatelet therapy provides greater platelet inhibition, which leads to a reduction in recurrent ischemic events, albeit at the cost of increased bleeding complications [1, 2, 3]. The thienopyridines (e.g., ticlopidine, clopidogrel, and prasugrel) irreversibly inhibit the P2Y12 receptor. While all of these agents lead to a reduction in recurrent ischemic events, they each have their associated shortcomings. Ticlopidine suffers from association with hypercholesterolemia and, more seriously, hematological effects, including neutropenia, aplastic anemia, and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura [4]. Clopidogrel is plagued by its delayed onset of action, interindividual pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability, and drug–drug interactions [5]. Furthermore, the platelet inhibition induced by clopidogrel is irreversible and increases the risk of major bleeding [1] as well as leads to potential prolonged hospitalization if clopidogrel is administered before the decision is made to pursue coronary artery bypass surgery. Prasugrel has less interindividual variability and faster onset of action and provides more potent platelet inhibition; however, it also suffers from an increase in major bleeding and causes irreversible platelet inhibition [3]. Ticagrelor, a noncompetitive and reversible inhibitor of the P2Y12 receptor, reduces mortality, but there are concerns about increased fatal intracranial bleeding and risks of patient noncompliance given the fast offset of the drug [6, 7]. Elinogrel, a novel, small-molecule, direct-acting, competitive, reversible, intravenous (IV) and oral quinazolinedione P2Y12 receptor inhibitor (Portola Pharmaceuticals, San Francisco, CA, USA), has pharmacological properties that may address some of the limitations of current antiplatelet therapies. Elinogrel is synthesized from ethyl-5-chlorothiophen-2-ylsulfonylcarbamate and 3-(4-aminophenyl)-6-fluoro-7-(methylamino)quinazoline-2,4(1H,3H)-dione [8]. Notably, it exists in both oral and IV preparations without interactions at the level of the P2Y12 receptor, allowing for ease of transition from IV to oral formulations without interruption in platelet inhibition. Prior studies have shown a drug interaction between the intravenously administered cangrelor and the orally administered thienopyridines (e.g., clopidogrel and prasugrel) [9], which leads to an inability of thienopyridine-induced platelet inhibition because the P2Y12 receptor is already bound by cangrelor. Since both the oral and IV forms of elinogrel do not have these interactions at the level of the P2Y12 receptor, sustained platelet inhibition is feasible even when transitioning from IV to oral dosing. In addition, elinogrel has a direct-acting mechanism of action without the need to be metabolized into an active form. Thus, in contrast to clopidogrel and prasugrel, which are both prodrugs, elinogrel avoids potential drug–drug interactions that result from reliance on the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system. The elimination half-life of elinogrel is 11–12 h, time to peak 20 min, and offset 24 h. Clearance is mainly via hepatic demethylation and renal excretion. Twice daily dosing is required to maintain stable plasma concentrations. Table 21.1 summarizes the three phase I clinical studies investigating the tolerability and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of elinogrel. Table 21.1 Phase I clinical studies of elinogrel.
Elinogrel
Introduction
Shortcomings of current therapy
Pharmacological principles of elinogrel
Phase I clinical studies
Trial
Patient population
Intervention
Conclusions
Lieu et al. [10]
N = 40. Healthy volunteers. Five groups of eight subjects (six active, two placebo)
Doses of IV elinogrel ranging from 1 mg to 40 mg given over 20 min
Maximum platelet inhibition was achieved at 20 min after stimuli ADP 10 µmol/L. A dose of 20 mg achieved 81% platelet inhibition. Single IV doses of elinogrel ≥10 mg achieved high levels of platelet inhibition, which was fully reversible within 8 h. Plasma concentrations were dose related and correlated well with the level of platelet inhibition
Dose-escalation study with single oral doses of elinogrel (10, 30 ± aspirin, 100, 200, 400, and 800 mg) given
Dose-escalation study showed tolerance in all patients with no adverse events. LTA showed full inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation in a dose-dependent manner and PCA revealed that elinogrel inhibited thrombus and destabilized thrombus starting at 30 mg. The addition of aspirin had a synergistic effect in the inhibition of collagen-induced platelet aggregation. A single dose of elinogrel 100 mg had the same effect as elinogrel 30 mg plus aspirin
Conley et al. [11]
N = 24. Healthy volunteers. Each arm of the study had 12 subjects
Arm 1: oral elinogrel 100 mg twice daily
LTA showed that clopidogrel induced higher platelet inhibition compared with elinogrel after 5 µmol/L (66 vs. 55%) and 20 µmol/L (52 vs. 33%) ADP stimuli. PCA showed that elinogrel was found to have more potent inhibition of thrombosis than clopidogrel (83 vs. 75%)
Arm 2: clopidogrel 75 mg + aspirin 325 mg daily
Gurbel et al. [7, 13]
N = 45. Patients older than 18 years of age who had undergone previous coronary artery stenting and were treated with chronic daily 75 mg clopidogrel and 81 mg aspirin
Screened for HPR to ADP. Twenty subjects with HPR identified. Between 12 h and 16 h after the last dose of clopidogrel, a single oral dose of elinogrel 60 mg was given. All subjects continued maintenance aspirin and clopidogrel
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree
Get Clinical Tree app for offline access