ECMO for Refractory Cardiac Arrest



Fig. 10.1
Monza’s flow chart for ECMO support in refractory CA



We must emphasize that this flow chart only represents a recommendation, since it is the attending physician’s responsibility to decide whether to initiate ECLS, even in the presence of prolonged no- or low-flow time, based on clinical or anamnestic factors, e.g., the appearance of vital signs, or a good CPR performed by well-trained personnel or with an automated chest compression device.

The first point to assess in our flow chart is the presence of comorbidities precluding ECMO positioning as reported below (Fig. 10.1).

We decided to use a no-flow time of 6 min and a low-flow time of 45 min on the basis of the literature and from our preliminary results [30]. To reduce the no-flow time, we promoted telephone-guided CPR performed by bystanders. To reduce the low-flow time, our ECMO team was alerted for all CA patients when ongoing CPR lasted more than 15 min. In OHCA, the ambulance crew was prompted to leave the scene and begin transport after no more than 15 min of ACLS maneuvers in the absence of an ROSC, to reduce the no-flow time to a minimum.

Finally, an ETCO2 below 10 mmHg measured after 20 min of CPR contraindicated ECMO.



10.4 Conclusion


Sudden CA is a complex event with high mortality rate. We strongly believe that optimal state-of-the-art conventional treatment should constitute the basis for every CA patient. ECLS represents a valuable additional therapeutic option both in achieving ROSC and in post-resuscitation care in highly selected CA patients not responding to the conventional approach.


References



1.

Safar P, Bircher N (1988) History and phases and stages of cardiopulmonary cerebral resuscitation. In: Safar P, Bircher N (eds) Cardiopulmonary cerebral resuscitation, 3rd edn. WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia


2.

Peberdy MA, Kaye W, Ornato JP et al for the NRCPR Investigators (2003) Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of adults in the hospital: a report of 14720 cardiac arrests from the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Resuscitation 58:297–308


3.

Massetti M, Tasle M, Le Page O et al (2005) Back from irreversibility: extracorporeal life support for prolonged cadiac arrest. Ann Thorac Surg 79:178–184PubMedCrossRef


4.

Girotra S, Nallamothu BK, Spertus JA et al (2012) Trends in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 367:1912–1920PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef


5.

Tunstall-Pedoe H, Bailey L, Chamberlain DA et al (1992) Survey of 3765 cardiopulmonary resuscitation in British hospitals (the BREUS study): methods and overall results. BMJ 304:1347–1351PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef


6.

Sasson C, Roger MAM, Dahl J et al (2010) Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 3:63–81PubMedCrossRef


7.

Simpson PM, Goodger MS, Bendall JC et al (2010) Delayed versus immediate defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Resuscitation 81:925–931PubMedCrossRef


8.

Wik L, Kramer-Johansen J, Myklebust H et al (2005) Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 293:299–304PubMedCrossRef


9.

Stub D, Bernard S, Duffy S, Kaye DM (2011) Post cardiac arrest syndrome. A review of therapeutic strategies. Circulation 123:1428–1435PubMedCrossRef


10.

Bernard SA, Gray TW, Buist MD, Jones BM, Silvester W, Gutteridge G, Smith K (2002) Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia. N Engl J Med 346:557–563PubMedCrossRef


11.

Delhaye C, Mahmoudi M, Waksman R (2012) Hypothermia therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:197–210PubMedCrossRef

Mar 27, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on ECMO for Refractory Cardiac Arrest

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access