Early outcomes of off-label transcatheter tricuspid valve repair/replacement in the STS/ACC TVT registry

ABSTRACT

Background

Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) have expanded with the recent FDA approval of both replacement transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) and edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) devices. However, the volume and outcomes of commercial, off-label TTVR and T-TEER procedures are unknown. Herein, we describe institutional volume and patient characteristics for commercial, off-label TTVR and T-TEER procedures in the STS/ACC transcatheter valve therapies (TVT) registry, and assess 30-day and 1-year outcomes, including quality of life.

Methods

Patients undergoing isolated TTVR or T-TEER for tricuspid regurgitation (TR) without stenosis were identified. The primary outcomes were residual TR severity and change in KCCQ-OS at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, vascular/bleeding complications, heart failure readmission, tricuspid reintervention, and 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimated mortality.

Results

A total of 995 tricuspid procedures were performed at 142 sites from January, 2021 to December, 2023, including 238 TTVR (primarily valve-in-valve or valve-in-ring) and 757 T-TEER. 72% of sites performed 5 or fewer procedures, while 4 high-volume centers performed 49, 81, 94, and 120 procedures, respectively. Among TTVR patients (median age 60), 97% had ≤ moderate residual TR at 30 days; 61% had substantial improvement and 14% had moderate improvement in KCCQ-OS. 30-day and 1-year estimated mortality were 3.9% and 19% respectively. Among T-TEER patients (median age 78), 74% had ≤ moderate residual TR; 54% had substantial improvement and 17% moderate improvement in KCCQ-OS. 30-day and 1-year estimated mortality were 3.0% and 18%, respectively.

Conclusions

Off-label use of transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions was highly variable across institutions, with the majority of institutions performing <5 procedures, while others performed >100. Both T-TEER and TTVR reduced residual TR to ≤ moderate in the majority of cases and were associated with substantial improvements in quality of life.

Abbreviations

ACC, American college of cardiology; EF, ejection fraction; IQR, interquartile range; KCCQ-OS, Kansas City cardiomyopathy questionnaire overall summary score; STs, society of thoracic surgeons; TR, tricuspid valve regurgitation; T-TEER, tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair; TTVI, transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions; TTVR, transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement; TVR, surgical tricuspid valve replacement; TVr, surgical tricuspid valve repair; TVT, transcatheter valve therapies.

Background

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) represents a heterogeneous pathology of heightened interest in recent years as the cardiovascular community has an increased understanding of its significant hemodynamic and clinical implications. The optimal and tailored treatment of TR, whether medical, surgical or transcatheter remains a topic of intense investigation in the modern era. Numerous investigational transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) devices have been introduced, including native valve replacement prostheses (TTVR), tricuspid annulus reduction/stabilization devices, direct leaflet edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER), and caval valve implantation devices. Early trial and registry data demonstrated these techniques to be feasible and effective options for patients with native valve TR or failing tricuspid bioprostheses.

Until the recent FDA approval of both a TTVR and T-TEER device to treat severe TR, , the use of transcatheter devices to treat TR in the United States outside of a clinical trial has been off label, typically using approved mitral edge-to-edge repair devices and aortic valve devices. The objectives of this analysis are to (1) characterize institutional volume of TTVI, (2) describe the demographics, comorbidities, and procedural details of patients undergoing off-label transcatheter treatment for severe TR, and (3) assess 30-day and 1-year clinical and quality of life outcomes of this population.

Methods

Data source: STS/ACC TVT registry

All data were obtained from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) transcatheter valve therapies (TVT) registry, which introduced a dedicated tricuspid data collection form in January 2021. The registry contains patient characteristics, echocardiographic data, procedural details, 30-day and 1-year outcomes, including health status as measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (KCCQ-OS) for off-label commercially performed TTVI. TTVIs performed as part of an investigational device exception clinical trial are not included in the registry. The registry undergoes annual data quality and completeness checks via the National Cardiovascular Data Registry and Duke Clinical Research Institute, including a random 10% third-party data audit. The TVT registry is approved by the central IRB Advarra and analyses are approved by the Institutional Review Board of Duke University (IRB#: Pro00040634) with patient consent waived.

Patient population

All patients undergoing TTVI from January 2021 through December 2023 were identified in the TVT registry. In order to investigate outcomes of off-label devices used for TTVI, this analysis was limited to interventions prior to 2024, when the FDA approved both TTVR and T-TEER devices. As the analysis was focused on patients undergoing TTVR and T-TEER for TR, patients who had isolated tricuspid stenosis, <moderate TR, and isolated transcatheter annular reduction procedures were excluded. Also, patients undergoing concomitant nontricuspid transcatheter valve procedure were excluded to avoid confounding from nontricuspid interventions. No patients enrolled in concurrent clinical trials were included in this analysis. All descriptive data and outcomes are presented stratified by TTVR and T-TEER subpopulations.

Outcomes

The primary outcomes were residual TR severity and change in KCCQ-OS at 30 days. TR was graded by sites per the 4-grade American Society of Echocardiography grading system (none/trivial, mild, moderate, severe). Change in KCCQ-OS from preprocedure to 30-days was assessed as an established categorical change, , including significantly improved (>20 points), moderately improved (10-20 points), mildly improved (5-10 points), no change (5 point decrease to 5 point increase) and worse (greater than 5 point decrease). Additional 30-day outcomes included mortality, conversion to open heart surgery, device embolization, new permanent pacemaker (PPM), major vascular complications, major, life threatening or disabling bleeding event, heart failure readmission, and tricuspid valve reintervention. Mortality over 1 year after TTVI was also assessed.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was primarily descriptive with categorical variables presented as number and frequency and continuous variables presented as mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range. 1-year time-to-event mortality was presented with the Kaplan–Meier approach. KCCQ-OS analysis was limited to sites with at least 50% completeness for 30-day KCCQ-OS data (Supplemental Table 1). An inverse probability weighting model was developed to estimate the probability of having a missing KCCQ-OS outcome, adjusting for baseline KCCQ-OS and other baseline characteristics listed in Supplemental Table 1. Given the differential anatomic requirements and expected reductions in TR between TTVR and T-TEER, all analyses are stratified by procedure type, and comparisons of outcomes were intentionally not undertaken. In order to assess how echocardiographic results of T-TEER (reduction in TR) are associated with improvement in quality of life, categorical changes in KCCQ-OS and residual TR were compared. The Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test was used to assess for potential association between residual TR and changes in KCCQ-OS. All statistics were performed in SAS version 9.4 (Cary, NC, USA) at the Duke Clinical Research Institute.

Results

Commercial, off-label transcatheter tricuspid procedure volume

There were a total of 142 institutions that performed at least one commercial, off-label TTVI during the study period. The majority (71.8%) of institutions performed 5 or fewer TTVI ( Figure 1 ), and 50 (35.2%) institutions only performed 1 procedure. Higher volume institutions included 12 institutions performing 11-20 TTVI and 5 institutions performing 21 to 40 TTVI. There were 4 very-high volume institutions performing 49, 81, 94, and 120 TTVI procedures during the study period.

Figure 1

Histogram of institutional TTVI volume.

Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR)

There were 238 TTVR procedures ( Figure 2 ), of which the majority were valve-in-valve procedures (69.7%, N = 166). Median age was 60 years (IQR 41-74), and 64.7% ( N = 105) were female ( Table 1 ). TTVR patients presented with a very high comorbidity burden, including 59.7% ( N = 142) with atrial fibrillation, 38.7% ( N = 70) with a heart failure hospitalization in the past year, and 14.3% ( N = 34) with prior stroke. 11.8% ( N = 29) had prior surgical aortic valve replacement, and 29.8% ( N = 71) prior surgical mitral valve repair/replacement. Baseline health status was poor; 37.6% ( N = 65) had poor to fair KCCQ-OS score (25-49.9) and 34.1% ( N = 59) had very poor KCCQ-OS (<25). Baseline echocardiogram and hemodynamic status is summarized in Table 2 , and procedural details are summarized in Table 3 .

Figure 2

Study flow diagram.

Table 1

Patient characteristics and prior cardiac surgery/interventions.

Variable Replacement (TTVR)
( N = 238)
Repair (T-TEER)
( N = 757)
Patient characteristics
Age 60 [41-74] 78 [70-83]
Female gender 154 (64.7) 427 (56.4)
BMI 26 [23-31] 25 [22-29]
Atrial fibrillation 142 (59.7) 607 (80.2)
Atrial flutter 50 (21.0) 111 (14.5)
Prior myocardial infarction 16 (6.7) 100 (13.2)
HF hospitalization in past year 70 (38.7) 317 (53.8)
Chronic lung disease (moderate-severe) 19 (8.0) 59 (7.8)
Ever smoker 122 (51.3) 356 (47.0)
Home oxygen 17 (7.2) 51 (6.8)
ESRD on dialysis 11 (4.6) 84 (11.1)
Liver disease 51 (21.4) 106 (14.0)
Prior stroke 34 (14.3) 87 (11.5)
Diabetes 50 (21.0) 237 (31.3)
Peripheral arterial disease 21 (8.8) 75 (9.9)
NYHA class
  • I/II

  • III

  • IV


64 (26.9)
122 (53.3)
43 (18.8)

149 (19.7)
473 (65.9)
96 (13.4)
KCCQ-OS
  • Excellent (75-100)

  • Fair to good (50-74.9)

  • Poor to fair (25-49.9)

  • Very poor (<25)


20 (11.6)
29 (16.8)
65 (37.6)
59 (34.1)

70 (11.7)
149 (25.0)
202 (33.8)
176 (29.5)
Six minute walk test (feet) 550 [250-1,025] 712 [450-933]
Prior cardiac surgeries/procedures
Prior CABG 24 (10.1) 150 (19.8)
Prior surgical aortic valve Repair/Replacement 29 (11.8) 73 (9.6)
Prior transcatheter aortic valve Replacement 8 (3.4) 49 (6.5)
Prior surgical mitral valve Repair/Replacement 71 (29.8) 122 (16.1)
Prior transcatheter mitral valve Repair/Replacement 11 (4.8) 88 (11.9)
Prior surgical tricuspid valve repair 50 (21.0) 14 (1.9)
Prior surgical tricuspid valve Replacement 160 (67.2) 0 (0)
Prior PCI 21 (8.8) 137 (18.1)
Prior PPM 107 (45.0) 202 (26.7)

Table 2

Baseline echocardiogram and hemodynamic status.

Variable Replacement (TTVR)
( N = 238)
Repair (T-TEER)
( N = 757)
Tricuspid disease etiology
  • Primary

  • Secondary

  • Pacemaker induced

  • Other


68 (28.9)
61 (26.0)
14 (6.0)
92 (39.1)

198 (28.2)
392 (55.8)
40 (5.7)
73 (10.4)
Tricuspid regurgitation severity
  • Moderate

  • Severe


60 (25.3)
177 (74.7)

37 (4.9)
716 (95.1)
Tricuspid annular size (cm) 3.0 [2.8-3.3] 4.2 [2.0-4.5]
Mitral stenosis (any) 15 (10.0) 40 (7.2)
Mitral regurgitation
  • Moderate

  • Severe


27 (17.3)
9 (3.8)

179 (30.9)
43 (5.7)
Aortic stenosis (any) 13 (5.7) 92 (12.3)
Aortic insufficiency
  • Moderate

  • Severe


17 (7.3)
0 (0)

62 (8.3)
3 (0.4)
LVEF 58 [53-62] 55 [48-60]
Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 27, 2026 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Early outcomes of off-label transcatheter tricuspid valve repair/replacement in the STS/ACC TVT registry

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access