Highlights
-
•
EMR-based randomization can enable rapid enrollment in pragmatic clinical trials.
-
•
EMR embedded trials can proceed without significant clinical workflow interruptions.
-
•
Prelude Ideal (lower cost) did not meet non-inferiority versus Glidesheath Slender.
-
•
Prelude Ideal had higher rates of spasm, valve leakage, and requirement for incision.
-
•
EMR-based trials can guide data-driven optimization of hospital operations.
ABSTRACT
Background
Decisions involving the purchase of procedural equipment at the health system level require balancing efficacy, safety, physician preference, and cost. The application of efficient and low-cost pragmatic study designs has the potential to rapidly generate data to inform health system operations.
Methods
The aim of the pragmatic Radial Access Insertion Sheath Evaluation via the electronic medical record (RAISE-EMR) study is to determine physician preference between 2 commercially available radial artery introducer sheaths, one of which has a higher acquisition cost, to guide inventory selection in the hospital system’s catheterization laboratories. Patients undergoing coronary angiography using 6-French radial artery access were prospectively identified and randomized through the health system’s EMR. Among 1696 eligible unique patients, 554 patients (32.7%) were randomized over 37 days across 3 hospitals. Randomization took place through the EMR after the attending interventional cardiologist signed a mandated pre-procedure note. The study was deemed non-human subject research and approved by the New York University (NYU) Langone Health Quality Improvement Oversight Committee. The primary endpoint, a physician satisfaction score, will be ascertained by a mandated semi-quantitative survey within the electronic procedure note. All data, including co-variables and clinical outcomes, will be ascertained using structured data within the EMR.
Conclusions
The Radial Access Insertion Sheath Evaluation via the EMR study is designed to determine physician preference of 2 commercially available radial artery introducer sheaths and potentially reduce supply costs using an entirely EMR-based randomized study design. Pragmatic study designs leveraging structured data within an EMR can be used to rapidly provide data to inform operational decision-making and have implications for the future of evidence generation.
Trial Registration
ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT07218406).
Healthcare systems are faced with the challenge of balancing costs with state-of-the-art care. Supply costs in procedural areas like the cardiac catheterization laboratory account for a significant proportion of health system spending. Reducing supply costs often involves a qualitative assessment by end-users (ie, physicians) of a new or replacement device followed by a formal or informal analysis of acquisition costs. However, healthcare system supply chain leadership is often limited by a lack of structured feedback on device preference, which may lead to decisions that are unpopular with physicians.
Randomized controlled trials (RCT) are considered the gold standard for comparisons of 2 treatment strategies. However, RCTs can be costly and time-consuming and are rarely used to inform healthcare system operations. Furthermore, RCTs, particularly in the setting of a high-volume and time-efficient cardiac catheterization laboratory, only enroll a small fraction of the eligible study population due to the resources required to identify eligible patients, enroll and randomize study participants, and communicate with participant’s clinical care team on what is needed during and after the cardiac catheterization procedure to fulfill study protocol procedures. Pragmatic trials aim to maintain the rigorous RCT methodology to generate data in a real-world clinical practice setting at lower costs. In addition, a goal of pragmatic trials is to enroll a cohort that is more representative of the clinical population.
Quality improvement studies and value-based analyses within healthcare systems would be best served by pragmatic study designs that allow evaluation of a large representative cohort at low-cost. The widespread implementation of electronic medical records (EMR) and structured reporting provides an ideal opportunity to implement pragmatic study designs across healthcare systems. By embedding randomization into the EMR and using structured data collection, the goals of rapid enrollment, greater representativeness, and lower cost can potentially be achieved. There are several radial artery introducer sheaths commercially available with slightly different designs and available at variable costs. To inform purchasing across the health system, a decision was made to evaluate the Prelude Ideal radial artery introducer sheath (Prelude Ideal, Merit Medical, South Jordan, UT, USA) given the substantially lower cost when compared with the currently used radial artery introducer sheath (Glidesheath Slender, Terumo Interventional Systems, Somerset, NJ, USA).
Study aims
The aims of the of the Radial Access Insertion Sheath Evaluation via the EMR (RAISE-EMR) study are to: (1) Develop and test randomization functionality within the New York University (NYU) Langone Health electric medical record system, Epic (Epic Systems Corporation, Verona, WI); and (2) Conduct a randomized evaluation of physician preference of 2 different commercially available radial artery introducer sheaths (Prelude Ideal versus Glidesheath Slender) for invasive coronary angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to support a value-based decision analysis. Acquisition cost for the Prelude Ideal is lower than for the Glidesheath Slender; therefore, the operational goals of this quality improvement study were to determine physician preference between 2 sheaths and potentially reduce supply costs.
Methods
Organizational structure and study design
RAISE-EMR is a randomized evaluation of physician preference a commercially available radial artery introducer sheath at 3 physically separate sites within NYU Langone Health: NYU Manhattan, NYU Brooklyn, and NYU Long Island (Mineola, NY). Unique patients planned to undergo a catheterization procedure were identified for possible randomization if there was at least 1 planned 6-French radial artery access site. As observed in standard clinical workflow, the clinical team was aware, and the patient was not aware of which radial artery introducer sheath was used at the time of physician evaluation.
The study was deemed non-human subject research and approved by the NYU Langone Health Quality Improvement Oversight Committee as a quality improvement project. This project was undertaken as a Quality Improvement Initiative at NYU Langone Health, and as such was not formally supervised by the Institutional Review Board per institutional policies. This study was funded by NYU Langone Health as an investigator-initiated study, and the study investigators collaborated with NYU Langone Heart’s Data Hub under NYU Langone Health’s Medical Center of Information Technology. This quality improvement study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02135939).
Study devices
The sheath introducers chosen for evaluation in this study are the 2 commercially available sheath introducers clinically used by physicians for invasive coronary angiography and/or PCI via radial artery access at NYU Langone Health. The Prelude Ideal (Merit Medical, South Jordan, UT, USA) and Glidesheath Slender (Terumo Interventional Systems, Somerset, NJ, USA) are both thin-walled sheath introducers. The 6-French Prelude Ideal sheath (11 cm length) has an outer diameter of 2.44 mm, inner diameter of 2.24 mm, dilator body of 2.20 mm, and a dilator length of 17 cm, while the 6-French Glidesheath Slender (10 cm length) also has an outer diameter of 2.44 mm, inner diameter of 2.22 mm, dilator body of 2.14 mm, and a dilator length of 15.7 cm. , At NYU Long Island, the 6-French Prelude Wave sheath (11 cm length) was used, which has an outer diameter of 2.48 mm, inner diameter of 2.23 mm, dilator body of 2.22 mm, and a dilator length of 17 cm.
Timeline
The study began at all 3 cardiac catheterization laboratories at NYU Langone Health on October 20, 2025. Although the expected sample size was reached on November 6, 2025, enrollment continued until the end of the institution’s next EMR change cycle on November 25, 2025.
Eligibility criteria and patient identification
All unique patients planned to undergo a catheterization procedure via at least 1 planned 6-French radial artery access approach were identified. As part of the standard clinical workflow, all attending interventional cardiologists provide a mandated pre-procedure attestation note in Epic before the nursing team can move the respective patient into the cardiac catheterization laboratory for their procedure. This attestation note is a uniform template across the NYU Langone Health enterprise ( Figure 1 ). Within this template, intended access site is selected from an Epic SmartList, thereby capturing eligible patients.
Attending interventional cardiologist’s mandated pre-procedure attestation note template.
The only patient procedures not identified for randomization were those who were already enrolled and randomized in this quality improvement study previously (ie, unique patients were included), and those for whom the mandated pre-procedure attestation was exempt (ie, emergency procedures).
Enrollment and randomization
Epic-randomization was achieved through the utilization of the Epic OurPractice Advisory (OPA) framework. With the selection of “at least one 6-French radial” in the Epic SmartList shown in the mandated pre-procedure attestation ( Figure 1 ), a background data element was discretely filed. Upon signing the associated note, the OPA framework evaluated for the presence of that planned access selection. When clicking “Enact” in the OPA pop-up to confirm physician participation for the identified patient procedure in the quality improvement study ( Figure 2 ), Epic performed a coin flip randomization function and result in a value of 0 or 1. A value of 0 and 1 was then assigned by the OPA to a discrete encounter SmartData Element to hold and represent the assigned randomized sheath for the case. The randomization function has the ability to randomize values in a range of 0 to n-1 values, based on the assigned value of n in the function (in this case, n = 2). The assignment of the introducer sheath was noted on the catheterization laboratory status board for each patient ( Figure 3 ), which informed the nursing staff which introducer sheath would be used in that particular procedure.
Pop-up window to confirm physician participation in the quality improvement study.
Status of study participation as a hover icon on the Epic Status Board. for each case.
Study communication
To ensure consistent communication with the nursing team for any patient randomized in this quality improvement study, when a member of the nursing team marked “Wheels in” per standard clinical workflow, an OPA pop-up appeared with the sheath the patient was assigned to by randomization ( Figure 4 ). The nursing team member was instructed to (1) open the assigned sheath type for the procedure; (2) inform the attending, fellow-in-training, or physician assistant who was obtaining access of the sheath assignment; and (3) then mark “Completed.” If the person marking “wheels in” was not a member of the clinical care team, acknowledgment could be deferred. If initial acknowledgment was deferred, nurses would see the OPA reappear on the next chart open by a nursing team member.
Our Practice Advisory pop-up window to be completed a member of the nursing team after patient is moved into the procedure room.
Data elements
The NYU Langone cardiac catheterization laboratory maintains a data variable dictionary of all standard variables and outcomes of interest for quality improvement purposes. This data variable dictionary was created in conjunction with NYU Langone Heart’s Data Hub so that variables of interest may be automatically collected from Epic in a consistently defined manner. All data elements were exported by NYU Langone Heart’s Data Hub from the EMR using this data variable dictionary for analysis at the end of the study period.
Co-variables
Demographics are identified from structured elements in Epic, including age (none missing), sex (none missing), and self-identified race (6.0% missing).
Medical comorbidities are captured using structured elements from the Epic Cupid procedure report and Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED) codes as follows:
-
1.
Presence of obesity is defined as a body mass index (BMI) of ≥30 kg/m 2, with weight documented in the procedure encounter and height documented within 1 year prior to the procedure. In the absence of a documented BMI (0.4% missing), obesity is defined by the documentation of Class III obesity in the procedure report.
-
2.
Prior coronary revascularization is defined as prior PCI or prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery documented in the procedure report.
-
3.
Prior myocardial infarction is defined as documented in the procedure report or presence of related SNOMED codes (see appendix).
-
4.
Presence of cerebrovascular disease is defined as prior hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke, prior transient ischemic attack, or carotid stenosis documented in the procedure report or presence related SNOMED codes (see appendix).
-
5.
Presence of peripheral artery disease is defined as prior peripheral artery revascularization, ankle-brachial index of <0.9, claudication with non-palpable peripheral pulses, peripheral artery stenosis >50%, known abdominal aortic aneurysm, renal artery stenosis, or subclavian artery stenosis documented in the procedure report.
-
6.
History of congestive heart failure is defined as documented left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% in the procedure report or, if not reported in the report, on the most recent transthoracic echocardiogram within 1 year prior to the procedure. In the absence of a documented LVEF (45.7% missing), congestive heart failure is defined as history of heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction documented in the procedure report or presence of related SNOMED codes (see appendix).
-
7.
Presence of diabetes mellitus is defined as documentation in the procedure report or presence of related SNOMED codes (see appendix), documented outpatient prescription of insulin within the past year, or the most recent Hemoglobin A1c within 3 years prior to the procedure as ≥6.5% (37.5% missing). Insulin treatment is defined as documentation in the procedure report or outpatient prescription of insulin in the EMR within the 1 year prior to the procedure.
-
8.
Presence of hypertension is defined as presence of related SNOMED codes (see appendix).
-
9.
Presence of dyslipidemia is defined as presence of related SNOMED codes (see appendix) or outpatient prescription of a lipid lowering medication (atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, pitavastatin, rosuvastatin, simvastatin, ezetimibe, colestipol, cholestyramine, colsevelam, evolocumab, alirocumab, niacin, bempedoic acid, fenofibrate, gemofibrozil, fenofibric acid, omega-3 acid ethyl esters, or icosapent ethyl) in the EMR within the one year prior to the procedure.
-
10.
Presence of atrial arrhythmias is defined as documentation in the procedure report or presence of related SNOMED codes (see appendix).
-
11.
Kidney disease is defined as the most recent glomerular filtration rate (GFR) within 90 days prior to the procedure of <60 mL/min/1.73m 2. In the absence of a documented GFR (10.1% missing), kidney disease is defined as documentation in the procedure report or presence of related SNOMED codes (see appendix). Among patients with kidney disease, the presence of end-stage renal disease is defined as the most recent GFR within 90 days prior to the procedure as <15 mL/min/1.73m 2 or documentation of treatment with dialysis in the procedure report or presence of related SNOMED codes (see appendix). In cases where there is a discrepancy between the procedure report and SNOMED code, the most recent GFR prior to the procedure was trusted.
-
12.
Chronic lung disease is defined as documentation in the procedure report or the presence of related SNOMED codes (see appendix).
-
13.
Tobacco use is defined as documentation in structured elements in Epic, the procedure report, or presence of related SNOMED codes.
-
14.
Type of procedure is defined as documented in the procedure report.
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree