Deep Venous Thrombosis



Deep Venous Thrombosis


Thomas W. Wakefield

William P. Fay

James B. Froehlich



EPIDEMIOLOGY AND USUAL CAUSES OF VENOUS THROMBOSIS

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) has been estimated to affect more than 250,000 patients per year (1,2). It has also been estimated that DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE) together are responsible for 300,000 to 600,000 hospitalizations and as many as 50,000 deaths per year; other estimates suggest an even higher yearly death rate (3). DVT is responsible for a 21% yearly rate of mortality in the elderly, and the cost of treatment for venous thromboembolism has been estimated to be between $1.0 billion and $2.5 billion per year. Thus venous thromboembolism remains a significant problem today. Usual risk factors associated with DVT include older age, malignancy, obesity, varicose veins, prior DVT, surgery, vascular injury, immobility, oral contraceptive use, heart failure, and various hypercoagulable states (Table 32.1).


PRESENTING SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS

Lower extremity DVT typically manifests with pain and swelling, particularly in the calf (Table 32.2). However, the abnormal findings associated with DVT are not specific for this diagnosis, and approximately half of all cases are asymptomatic. Therefore the diagnosis of DVT cannot be reliably established or excluded solely on the basis of the history and physical examination. Depending on the clinical setting, the examiner must maintain a high index of suspicion for DVT, and laboratory testing should be used liberally in the evaluation of patients in whom the diagnosis is suspected.


HELPFUL TESTS FOR DIAGNOSIS OF DEEP VENOUS THROMBOSIS AND PULMONARY EMBOLISM

Tests for the diagnosis of DVT involve indirect tests of historic interest and morecurrent tests that visualize thrombus. Venous duplex ultrasound imaging is now the standard for DVT diagnosis and has virtually replaced contrast phlebography.








TABLE 32.1. Risk factors for deep venous thrombosis

















































Age >40 yr


Malignancy


Obesity


Varicose veins


Prior deep venous thrombosis


Surgery


Vascular injury (e.g., catheter induced)


Immobility


Oral contraceptive use


Heart failure


Hypercoagulable stable



Antithrombin III deficiency



Protein C deficiency



Protein S deficiency



Factor V Leiden



Prothrombin 20210A



Dysfibrinogenemia



Homocystinemia



Factor VIII elevations










TABLE 32.2. Symptoms and signs of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis















Pain or tenderness (e.g., calf pain )


Edema


Skin discoloration


Increased skin temperature


Superficial venous dilatation


Palpable venous cord (superficial thrombophlebitis)


Duplex ultrasound imaging includes analysis of both image and flow. Acute thrombosis is diagnosed from noncompressibility of the vein, vein enlargement, and the lack of collateral veins. Chronic thrombosis is indicated by increased echogenicity of thrombi, a small and shrunken vein, and the preference of collateral vessels. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictor value for the diagnosis of acute DVT with color-flow duplex imaging in symptomatic patients are greater than 95% (4). Even for calf vein thrombi, the sensitivity in symptomatic patients is greater than 90%, although the sensitivity in the below-knee position may be much lower in asymptomatic patients being screened.

The excellent specificity of venous duplex imaging allows therapeutic decisions. Withholding anticoagulation on the basis of a negative scan is safe and reasonable. In a study of 431 negative duplex scans and 66 corresponding phlebograms, only three peroneal thrombi were found on phlebography, whereas more-proximal thrombi were not missed (5). Follow-up over an 8-month period revealed no PE and no recurrent DVT. Some clinicians have also combined clinical characteristics with duplex ultrasound imaging in an attempt to improve on the results of imaging (6).

Thus venous duplex imaging is now the “gold standard” for the diagnosis of DVT and has replaced contrast phlebography. It is safe, painless, and accurate; requires no contrast material; and can be performed during pregnancy. It is noninvasive and repeatable, it can follow the progression or resolution of DVT, and it detects other abnormalities, such as pseudoaneurysms, venous aneurysms, Baker cysts, superficial thrombophlebitis, and cellulitis. The incidence of positive studies in a busy vascular laboratory should be approximately 30%.

Magnetic resonance venography (MRV) has demonstrated promise as a diagnostic modality for both DVT and PE. The sensitivity and specificity are 100% and 96% both for DVT (7) and for PE (8). MRV with gadolinium has been found to define thrombus age. During acute DVT, an inflammatory response is found in the vein wall and perivenous tissue, and gadolinium extravasates into the inflammation (9). As the DVT organizes and matures, gadolinium enhancement fades as the vein shrinks. In many locations, the inaccessibility of the magnetic resonance imaging machines and the cost limit the use of MRV for DVT diagnosis.

The diagnosis of PE involves ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scanning or pulmonary angiography; newer techniques include spiral computed tomographic scanning and magnetic resonance imaging. The sensitivity of V/Q scanning is excellent, at 98%, but specificity is low, at 10% (10). However, by combining clinical risk factors with the V/Q scan, sensitivity and specificity greater than 95% have been reported. With a high-probability V/Q scan and two risk factors for PE, the sensitivity for PE diagnosis was 97%; with one risk factor, 84%; and with no risk factors, 82%. Similarly, with a normal V/Q scan, the chance of PE was 0, no matter what the risk factor status (11). These results suggest that a normal V/Q scan or a high-probability scan provide good diagnostic information. However, only approximately one third of V/Q scans are in one of these two categories, and so the majority of patients need further testing. Such further testing includes lower extremity venous duplex ultrasound imaging (venous duplex imaging is positive in approximately 10% of cases in these patients) and, more important, spiral CT scanning. Indications for pulmonary arteriography include acute massive PE, inferior vena cava (IVC) interruption, and the planning of pulmonary interventional therapy, such as thrombolysis or pulmonary embolectomy.


Spiral computed tomographic scanning, a relatively new technique for PE diagnosis, has excellent specificity but relatively low sensitivity (50% to 65%), despite promising initial results. However, as the technology has improved, the sensitivity and specificity have also improved, and now emboli at the subsegmental level can be identified (12). A recent study (PIOPED II) has now been completed. The sensitivity for isolated chest CT imaging was 83%, but increased to more than 90% when clinical analysis was added. Additionally, sensitivity improved when adding a leg study (either CT or ultrasound) to the chest CT scan (level 1 evidence) (13). Magnetic resonance imaging has demonstrated excellent promise for PE diagnosis and is currently being studied in PIOPED III.

The use of D-dimer assays has been investigated in the diagnosis of both DVT and PE, and sensitivity of 96% to 98% has been reported (14). However, specificity of only 40% to 50% has been found. It is likely that D-dimer testing will supplement other tests such as venous duplex ultrasound imaging and clinical assessment (15).


DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

The differential diagnosis of lower extremity DVT is extensive (Table 32.3). In most cases, the correct diagnosis can readily be established by careful history documentation, physical examination, and laboratory testing.








TABLE 32.3. Differential diagnosis of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis

























Cellulitis


Superficial thrombophlebitis


Lymphangitis


Arthritis, joint effusion, or hemarthrosis


Hematoma


Ruptured Baker cyst


Torn gastrocnemius muscle


Achilles tendonitis


Bone fracture


Acute arterial ischemia


Nonthrombotic venous obstruction



THERAPY


Standard Unfractionated Heparin and Oral Anticoagulation

Treatment for DVT and PE has historically involved anticoagulation with intravenous unfractionated heparin initially, followed by long-term oral anticoagulation. The initial treatment has been revolutionized by the introduction of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) preparations. For an excellent review of treatment modalities and duration of therapy, see The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy (16).

Adequate anticoagulation decreases the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism by 80%, from a range of 29% to 47% untreated, to a range of 5% to 7% treated (17). During adequate anticoagulant therapy—at least 5 days of heparin and 3 months of oral anticoagulation (International Normalized Ratio, 2.0 to 4.5), LMWH, or adjusted-dose subcutaneous unfractionated heparin—the risk of fatal PE is low: 0.4% and 0.3% during and after treatment for DVT and 1.5% and 0 during and after treatment for PE (18). Anticoagulation with standard heparin must be achieved rapidly, and it has been shown that if therapeutic levels are reached in the first 24 hours, the recurrence rate is lower than if therapeutic levels are not reached in the first 24 hours (level I evidence) (19). Continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin is better than intermittent subcutaneous standard heparin for thromboembolism recurrence (level I evidence).

After heparin is begun, what are guidelines for its use? Heparin administration for 5 days has been compared with that for 10 days, and no difference in recurrent thrombosis has been found (7.1% vs. 7.0%, level I evidence) (20). Oral anticoagulants are begun at maintenance dosing, rather than loading dosing, to decrease the chances of warfarin-induced skin necrosis. Studies (all level I evidence) have evaluated the length of optimal oral anticoagulant therapy. In comparisons of 6 weeks to 6 months of warfarin (Coumadin), the recurrence rate was 18.1%
versus 9.5% in favor of longer treatment at 2-year follow-up (21). Another study compared 4 weeks with 3 months of treatment in medical patients; the recurrence rate for 4 weeks was 7.8%, in comparison with 4.0% with 3 months of treatment (22). A third study suggested that oral anticoagulants should be used for longer rather than shorter periods, especially with continuing risk factors (23). The usual recommendation is for a 3- to 6-month period of oral anticoagulation after a first DVT. For example, with reversible or time-limited risk factors and a first thromboembolic event, treatment for 3 to 6 months is recommended, whereas for an idiopathic cause and a first event, treatment for at least 6 months is recommended (24). Natural history studies suggest that after a first DVT, the risk of recurrent thrombosis is 17.5% at 2 years, 25% at 5 years, and 30% at 8 years (25). However, the prognosis after DVT is variable. If DVT is triggered by an isolated event (e.g., trauma or surgery), the risk of recurrence after an adequate course of anticoagulant therapy is low. If DVT occurs in the setting of persistent risk factors, the risk of recurrence is high.

The optimal duration of warfarin therapy after DVT depends on clinical circumstances (Table 32.4). In general, patients with a first episode of venous thrombosis should receive warfarin for 3 to 6 months. Patients with a second episode of venous thromboembolism have a significantly lower rate of recurrence if they receive warfarin indefinitely (2.6% risk during 4 years of follow-up) as opposed to 6 months (20.7% risk of recurrence). However, this therapy exposes the patient to a higher risk of bleeding complications (26). Prospective clinical trials addressing the optimal duration of warfarin therapy in patients with a first episode of DVT and an irreversible risk factor considered to place the patient at high risk of recurrence (e.g., malignancy, identifiable thrombophilia such as factor V Leiden) are lacking. Each patient must be considered individually, the duration of therapy depending on the relative bleeding and thrombotic risks.








TABLE 32.4. Duration of anticoagulant therapy after deep venous thrombosis





























CLINICAL SETTING


DURATION OF WARFARIN THERAPY


First episode



Transient cause (e.g., surgery, trauma)


3 mo



Idiopathic


3-6 mo (or longer)



Persistent risk (e.g., malignancy, hypercoagulable state)


6-12 mo (or longer)


First recurrence


6-12 mo to indefinite


Second or later recurrence


1 yr to indefinite


High risk of recurrent thrombosis


Indefinite


Idiopathic DVT is an interesting problem. Most authorities believe that true idiopathic thrombosis requires more than 6 months of warfarin. A recent multicenter trial suggested that, after 6 months of therapy, low-dose warfarin at an INR of 1.5 to 2.0 should be used, based on a 64% risk reduction for recurrent DVT after the initial 6 months of standard warfarin therapy (level 1 evidence) (27). However, a second study in a similar group of patients found that full-dose warfarin at an INR 2.0 to 3.0 was superior to low-dose warfarin without a difference in bleeding (level 1 evidence) (28). Thus for idiopathic DVT, extended warfarin is indicated, the length still to be determined. Current guidelines suggest 6 to 12 months for idiopathic DVT (16).

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Aug 18, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Deep Venous Thrombosis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access