The paper entitled ‘‘Recommendations for Cardiac Chamber Quantification by Echocardiography in Adults: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging’’ by Lang et al, published in the January 2015 issue of JASE (J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015;28:1-39), has the following corrections:
In Supplemental Table 5, in the “Parameter” column, the second instance of “Apical two-chamber view” should be replaced with “Apical four-chamber view”.
A revised Supplemental Table 6 appears below:
Supplemental Table 6
Normal LV strain values from meta-analysis and individual recent publications using specific vendors’ equipment and software
| Vendor | Software | n | Mean | SD | LLN | Reference from list below |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Varying | Meta-analysis | 2597 | −19.7% | NA | 1 | |
| GE | EchoPAC BT 12 | 247 | −21.5% | 2.0% | −18% | 2 |
| EchoPAC BT 12 | 207 | −21.2% | 1.6% | −18% | 3 | |
| EchoPAC BT 12 | 131 | −21.2% | 2.4% | −17% | 4 | |
| EchoPAC 110.1.3 | 333 | −21.3% | 2.1% | −17% | 5 | |
| Philips | QLAB 7.1 | 330 | −18.9% | 2.5% | −14% | 5 |
| Toshiba | Ultra Extend | 337 | −19.9% | 2.4% | −15% | 5 |
| Siemens | VVI 1.0 | 116 | −19.8% | 4.6% | −11% | 6 |
| VVI 1.0 | 82 | −17.3% | 2.3% | −13% | 7 | |
| Esaote | Mylab 50 | 30 | −19.5% | 3.1% | −13% | 8 |
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree
