15 Contrast Echocardiography
Overview
Despite improvements in ultrasound imaging techniques, including harmonic imaging, an estimated 5% to 10% of resting echocardiograms and 20% to 30% of stress echocardiograms are suboptimal. To overcome these limitations and improve echocardiographic image quality, ultrasound contrast agents have been developed that, unlike the agitated saline contrast used to detect intracardiac and intrapulmonary shunts, freely cross the pulmonary circulation and readily opacify the left heart after an intravenous injection (Fig. 15-1).1,2 These contrast agents consist of microbubbles (2–5 μm, smaller than red blood cells), containing an inert gas within a biodegradable shell (albumin/lipid/polymer/surfactant-based) (Table 15-1). These agents are not radioactive and are non-nephrotoxic, and they pass unimpeded through the microcirculation without causing hemodynamic effects.2 Specific imaging techniques, including harmonic imaging, have been developed to enhance the acoustic signal from microbubbles, while eliminating surrounding tissue signal.3 In this fashion, a sharp delineation between the blood pool and endocardial border is obtained, thus enabling the acquisition of transthoracic echocardiographic images of improved quality, with greater definition of intracardiac structures and better delineation of the left ventricular (LV) endocardial border. Extensive research also has been performed studying the use of these contrast agents to assess myocardial perfusion in many settings, with multicenter phase II and III clinical trials recently completed.4
Indications
Intravenous microbubble ultrasound contrast agents are indicated for left ventricular opacification and improvement of LV endocardial border delineation in patients with suboptimal acoustic windows (see Fig. 15-1), with several agents approved for this indication.5,6 Ultrasound contrast agents have been proven to be safe and effective in numerous clinical studies (Box 15-1), are relatively simple and easy to use, and can be used with all currently available echocardiographic systems. Use of these agents during transthoracic echocardiography has been shown in clinical studies to
Improve the qualitative assessment of global LV systolic function1,7
Improve the accuracy of quantification of LV volumes and LV ejection fraction (Fig. 15-2)8,9
Improve the accuracy and interobserver agreement for the assessment of regional wall motion (Fig. 15-3)10
Increase the diagnostic accuracy of exercise and dobutamine stress echocardiography (Fig. 15-4), reduce the interobserver variability, improve interpreter confidence, and enhance the reproducibility of stress echocardiographic studies11,12
Improve the echocardiographic detection rates of myocardial rupture, pseudoaneurysms, intracardiac thrombi (Figs. 15-5 and 15-6), aortic dissection (Fig. 15-7), apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (Fig. 15-8), and LV noncompaction (Fig. 15-9)13–15
Enhance left-sided Doppler velocity signals in the assessment of intracardiac pressures and transvalvular gradients16
Safety Issues
Based on post-marketing data, the estimated risk of an anaphylactoid reaction with microbubble contrast administration is 1:10,000, and the risk of an associated severe fatal allergic reaction is 1:500,000.17 Although the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) attached a “black box” warning to the monograph of perflutren-based microbubble ultrasound contrast agents, this was subsequently revised in May 2008.17 Initial concerns were raised over four cases of cardiac arrest within 30 minutes of contrast administration. All four cases were patients with documented heart disease and serious comorbidities, where a direct cause-and-effect relationship could not be established. Retrospective studies have since demonstrated that the overall risks of ultrasound contrast agents are very low, and fatal event rates are similar to those of non–contrast-enhanced echocardiography, suggesting that the adverse fatal events were unlikely to be directly related to the administration of these agents.18,19 Prospective registries to monitor and determine the safety of these agents have been initiated. The current contraindications to ultrasound contrast use are listed in Box 15-2. It is also recommended that patients with potentially unstable cardiac or pulmonary conditions (Box 15-3) be monitored both during and for at least 30 minutes after microbubble contrast administration.
Practical Tips for Contrast Left Ventricular Opacification
Contrast Administration
Assess for contraindications (see Box 15-2)
Obtain consent (verbal or written, depending on laboratory policy).
Many contrast agents need venting prior to withdrawal from the vial.
Slow bolus (undiluted contrast agent), e.g., 0.5 mL of Optison, or 0.2 mL of Definity, followed by a slow 1- to 2-mL saline flush (over 3–5 sec)
Diluted slow bolus/infusion (e.g., 3 mL of Optison, or 1.3 mL of Definity diluted to 10 to 20 mL, given as slow boluses of 1 to 3 mL, followed by a slow 1- to 2-mL saline flush)
For contrast boluses, stop when contrast enters the right ventricle, and follow with slow saline flush to minimize LV cavity attenuation (see Fig. 15-2).
Elevating the arm with the IV provides an extra “bolus” of contrast by increasing venous return.
Repeat administration as needed (usually maximum 1 vial of contrast per patient study).
Echocardiographic System Settings
Select echocardiography machine presets for LV opacification (vendor-specific)—adjust as needed.
Set mechanical index (MI) 0.2–0.4 (MI 0.1–0.2 if using real-time perfusion imaging techniques for LV opacification).
Transmit focus in the far-field (just above the mitral annulus).
In apical views, decrease depth to encompass the ventricles and one third of the atria.
Adjust the gains, time gain compensation, and compression—at low MI, gain will have to be increased (should be set to barely visualize the myocardium).
For contrast-specific imaging presets, myocardium is relatively dark, to highlight the border between cavity (bright contrast) and endocardium (darker).
Imaging and Scanning Tips
Focus on the “cavities” rather than the myocardium or valves, because the cavities are highlighted during contrast imaging, while the normal two-dimensional structures (the myocardium and valves) are less prominent.
One can transiently return to standard two-dimensional imaging (using a higher MI) to realign the imaging plane, and then immediately switch back to contrast-specific imaging mode. It may be necessary to administer more contrast agent, due to transient microbubble destruction at higher MI.