Comparison of Bivalirudin Versus Bivalirudin Plus Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitor Versus Heparin Plus Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitor in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Having Percutaneous Intervention for Narrowed Saphenous Vein Aorto-Coronary Grafts (the ACUITY Trial Investigators)




Clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes randomized in the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) were examined. The ACUITY trial assessed the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin alone versus bivalirudin plus a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor versus heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor in 13,819 patients with moderate- and high-risk acute coronary syndromes, 7,789 of whom underwent PCI. A total of 329 patients (4.2%) underwent PCI of SVGs in ACUITY. The primary end points at 30 days were composite ischemia or major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, or unplanned target vessel revascularization), major bleeding (unrelated to coronary artery bypass grafting), and net adverse clinical events (composite ischemia or major bleeding). The rates of ischemic, bleeding, and net clinical end points were similar with bivalirudin monotherapy, bivalirudin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, and heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. Net adverse clinical outcome rates at 30 days were 22%, 26%, and 22% (p = 0.67), respectively, for the 3 groups. Major adverse cardiac event rates at 1 year were 37%, 37%, and 43% (p = 0.95), respectively. Minor bleeding unrelated to coronary artery bypass grafting at 30 days was significantly lower with bivalirudin alone compared with heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (26% vs 38%, p = 0.05). In conclusion, bivalirudin is an effective anticoagulant in PCI of SVGs in acute coronary syndromes, with similar rates of major adverse cardiac events and net adverse cardiac events and lower minor bleeding complications in comparison with heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor or bivalirudin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor.


Percutaneous coronary intervention of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) is considered a high-risk subset, and scarce information exists regarding contemporary antithrombotic regimen in SVG intervention. The Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial was a prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter trial of 13,819 patients with unstable angina and non–ST elevation myocardial infarctions who an underwent early invasive management strategy. In this trial, the pharmacologic management strategy was randomized among bivalirudin alone, bivalirudin plus a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor, or heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. A total of 329 patients in the trial underwent percutaneous coronary intervention of SVGs, and we sought to examine their clinical outcomes in this analysis.


Methods


The design of the ACUITY trial has been described in detail previously. Briefly, inclusion criteria for the study were age >18 years with symptoms of unstable angina or non–ST elevation myocardial infarction. Major exclusion criteria included acute ST elevation myocardial infarction or shock; bleeding diathesis or major bleeding episode within 2 weeks; thrombocytopenia; calculated creatinine clearance <30 ml/minute; recent administration of abciximab, warfarin, fondaparinux, fibrinolytic agents, bivalirudin, or ≥2 doses of low–molecular mass heparin; and allergy to study drugs or iodinated contrast that could not be adequately premedicated. The study was approved by the institutional review board or ethics committee at each participating center, and all patients gave written informed consent.


Patients were assigned to 1 of 3 antithrombin regimens: heparin (either unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin) plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, bivalirudin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, or bivalirudin alone. In the 2 groups in which patients were assigned to a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor–based regimen, they were randomized once again in a 2 × 2 factorial design to upstream GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor initiation in all patients immediately after randomization versus deferred GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor initiation for selective use in the catheterization laboratory starting immediately before percutaneous intervention. The provisional use of a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor was permitted before angiography in patients randomized to the deferred use of a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor or bivalirudin monotherapy for severe breakthrough ischemia and during percutaneous intervention in bivalirudin monotherapy patients for prespecified procedural complications.


Angiography was performed by protocol <72 hours after randomization, after which the decision was declared and recorded for primary treatment, either with percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, or medical management. All antithrombin agents were routinely discontinued per protocol at the completion of angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention. Aspirin (300 to 325 mg orally or 250 to 500 mg intravenously) was administered daily during hospitalization. The initial dosing and timing of clopidogrel were left to investigator discretion per local standards, although a loading dose of ≥300 mg was required no later than 2 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention in all patients. Clopidogrel 75 mg/day was recommended for 1 year in all patients after percutaneous coronary intervention, and aspirin 75 to 325 mg/day was recommended indefinitely.


The end points of the trial have been described previously. Briefly, 3 primary end points were composite ischemia or major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), major bleeding not related to coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and net adverse clinical events (NACEs). Major bleeding was defined as intracranial or intraocular bleeding, hemorrhage at the access site requiring intervention, hematoma with a diameter of 5 cm, a reduction of hemoglobin level ≥4 g/dl without a source or ≥3 g/dl with a source, reoperation for bleeding, or transfusion of a blood product. Types of minor bleeding included ecchymoses, epistaxis, gastrointestinal bleeding, genitourinary bleeding, bleeding at the puncture site, and hemopericardial and pulmonary bleeding.


Of 7,789 percutaneous coronary interventions in ACUITY, 329 patients (4%) underwent percutaneous intervention of SVGs and constituted the focus of this analysis. Although patients who underwent SVG intervention represented a prespecified subgroup for analysis, the ACUITY trial was not powered for formal noninferiority or superiority analysis of this or any subgroup. Statistical comparisons were conducted for the purpose of hypothesis generation. All analyses used the intention-to-treat population. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests. Continuous variables were compared using the nonparametric Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test. Medians and interquartile ranges are presented for continuous variables. The power analysis and sample size determination method for the ACUITY trial has been described previously.




Results


Of a total of 329 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention of SVGs in the ACUITY trial, 114 (34%) were randomized to bivalirudin alone, 114 (34%) to bivalirudin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, and 101 (31%) to heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (control). Diagnoses of non–ST elevation myocardial infarctions on presentation (increased creatine kinase-MB isozyme or troponin) were documented in 168 patients (54%); 169 (61%) had high-risk Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) scores, and 98 (36%) had intermediate-risk score. Baseline characteristics were similar among all 3 randomized groups and are listed in Table 1 . The rates of clopidogrel preloading were similar in all 3 arms and similar to the original ACUITY study: 66% in the heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor arm, 69% in the bivalirudin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor arm, and 75% in the bivalirudin alone arm (p = 0.32).



Table 1

Baseline characteristics

























































































































Variable Heparin Plus GP IIb/IIIa Inhibitor Bivalirudin Plus GP IIb/IIIa Inhibitor Bivalirudin (n = 114) p Value
(n = 101) (n = 114)
Mean age (years) 70 68 68 0.81
Men 79% 83% 78% 0.69
Diabetes mellitus 48% 41% 40% 0.45
Insulin requiring 15% 13% 13% 0.92
Hypertension 88% 81% 83% 0.38
Current smokers 18% 17% 12% 0.46
Previous myocardial infarction 53% 55% 60% 0.59
Previous percutaneous coronary intervention 70% 66% 60% 0.30
Baseline ST-segment deviation ≥1 mm 31% 29% 31% 0.95
Elevated cardiac biomarker or ST-segment deviation ≥1 mm 59% 66% 70% 0.23
Elevated cardiac biomarker (creatine kinase-MB or troponin) 51% 53% 59% 0.47
TIMI risk score
0–2 5% 2% 5% 0.53
3–4 30% 39% 36% 0.44
5–7 65% 59% 59% 0.63
Thrombus 20% 17% 23% 0.54
Previous aspirin treatment 100% 98% 97% 0.28
Previous thienopyridine exposure 66% 70% 75% 0.33


Angiography was performed in all patients within a median time of 10.3 hours after admission. The study drug was administered at a median of 4 hours before percutaneous coronary intervention, with no differences among the 3 groups. In the group randomized to heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, 59 of 101 patients (58%) were treated with unfractionated heparin, while the remaining 42 (42%) received low–molecular weight heparin enoxaparin. Of the patients receiving unfractionated heparin (in conjunction with a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor), the median maximum activated clotting time during percutaneous coronary intervention was 239 seconds (interquartile range 211 to 291). Eptifibatide was the most common GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor used during percutaneous coronary intervention (97%), with the remainder (3%) divided between tirofiban and abciximab (started upstream). Of the patients receiving GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, 53% were randomized to early upstream use, and 46% received deferred use at the time of the procedure. Provisional GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used in 19 patients (17%) receiving bivalirudin monotherapy, including 5 (4%) for protocol-specified procedural thrombotic complications.


More than 1 lesion per SVG was treated consistently in all groups ( Tables 1 and 2 ). Drug-eluting stents were implanted in 76% of patients (almost equally divided between paclitaxel-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents), whereas 29% of patients received bare-metal stents. Adjunctive devices such as thrombectomy were used in 9% of patients, and distal protection devices were used in 20% of patients. The device distribution was well matched among the 3 groups. Angiographic and procedural variables did not differ among the groups ( Table 2 ).



Table 2

Angiographic and procedural characteristics































































































































































































































Variable Heparin Plus GP IIb/IIIa Inhibitor Bivalirudin Plus GP IIb/IIIa Inhibitor Bivalirudin (n = 114) p Value
(n = 101) (n = 114)
Target SVG location
SVG to LAD 26% 23% 33% 0.24
SVG to LCX 41% 45% 44% 0.71
SVG to RCA 37% 39% 33% 0.81
Number of lesions treated 2.51 ± 1.19 2.61 ± 1.40 2.69 ± 1.46 0.64
Baseline TIMI flow
0/1 13% 17% 16% 0.74
2 26% 25% 27% 0.90
3 61% 59% 59% 0.93
Baseline blush grade
0/1 23% 30% 26% 0.60
2 16% 16% 15% 0.99
3 61% 55% 59% 0.70
Percutaneous intervention strategy
BMS 27% 30% 30% 0.85
DES 75% 77% 78% 0.80
BMS and DES 10% 12% 12% 0.93
Thrombectomy use 9.0% 5.3% 12.4% 0.17
Atherectomy use 1% 0.9% 0.0% 0.58
Cutting balloon use 5.0% 6.2% 4.4% 0.83
Distal protection use 17.0% 23.9% 18.6% 0.41
Final TIMI flow
0/1 3% 3% 4% 0.94
2 5% 5% 13% 0.02
3 92% 93% 84% 0.07
Final blush grade
0/1 6% 4% 7% 0.76
2 12% 15% 17% 0.69
3 82% 81% 76% 0.63
Complications
Spasm 3% 0% 4% 0.14
Abrupt closure 4% 2% 3% 0.59
No reflow 1% 2% 2% 0.88
Perforation 0% 1% 0% 0.38
Distal embolization 0% 2% 3% 0.35

BMS = bare-metal stent; DES = drug-eluting stent; LAD = left anterior descending coronary artery; LCX = left circumflex coronary artery; RCA = right coronary artery.


The proportion of patients with final post–percutaneous coronary intervention TIMI grade 2 flow was greater and TIMI grade 3 flow rates trended lower in the bivalirudin alone arm. There were no significant differences in the rates of angiographic complications at end of the procedure between the 3 treatment groups ( Table 2 ). There were no reported occurrences of catheter-related thrombus in any of the 3 groups. By blinded core laboratory analysis, the baseline and postprocedural rates of myocardial blush were not significantly different in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with bivalirudin either with or without a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor compared with heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor.


The rates of ischemic, bleeding, and net clinical end points were similar among the 3 groups at 30 days and 1 year ( Tables 3 and 4 ). NACE rates were similar with bivalirudin monotherapy as with either bivalirudin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor or heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor among the 3 groups at 30 days: 22 of 114 (25%), 26 of 114 (30%), and 22 of 101 (22%) (p = 0.67), respectively, for the 3 groups. MACE rates at 1 year were also similar with the 3 groups: 41 of 114 (37%), 40 of 114 (37%), and 37 of 101 (43%) (p = 0.95), respectively. Minor bleeding unrelated to cardiac bypass graft surgery was significantly lower with bivalirudin alone compared with heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (26% vs 38%, p = 0.05).



Table 3

Clinical outcomes at 30 days






























































































































Outcome Heparin Plus GP IIb/IIIa Inhibitor Bivalirudin Plus GP IIb/IIIa Inhibitor p Value Bivalirudin Alone (n = 114) p Value
(n = 101) (n = 114)
Major adverse cardiac event 19% 20% 0.84 19% 0.91
Death from any cause 1% 4% 0.22 2% 0.62
Death/myocardial infarction 18% 17% 0.80 17% 0.8
Myocardial infarction 17% 13% 0.45 17% 0.94
Q wave 5% 2% 0.20 1% 0.07
Non–Q wave 12% 12% 0.91 16% 0.42
Unplanned revascularization for ischemia TVR 4% 7% 0.33 5% 0.89
Percutaneous coronary intervention 4% 6% 0.47 5% 0.89
Coronary artery bypass surgery 0% 1% 0.34 0% 0.32
Net adverse clinical event 22% 26% 0.46 22% 0.44
Major bleeding (non-CABG-related) 7% 11% 0.34 6% 0.8
Minor bleeding (non-CABG-related) 38% 37% 0.99 26% 0.05
Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major bleeding 1% 5% 0.13 1% 0.10
Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction minor bleeding 8% 11% 0.51 9% 0.83
Thrombocytopenia 11% 8% 0.49 7% 0.32
Stent thrombosis 2% 1% 0.49 2% 0.89

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 22, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Comparison of Bivalirudin Versus Bivalirudin Plus Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitor Versus Heparin Plus Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitor in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Having Percutaneous Intervention for Narrowed Saphenous Vein Aorto-Coronary Grafts (the ACUITY Trial Investigators)

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access