Change of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors strategies in percutaneous coronary interventions and the rate of ischemic and bleeding complications




Background


Routine use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) reduces ischemic events during PCI, but this benefit appears to be negated by excessive bleeding complication and thrombocytopenia and did not translate into mortality benefit in any randomized clinical trial (RCT). In 2009, we altered our protocol of GPI use. Via our continuous quality improvement program, we evaluated the effect of this intervention on clinical events.




Methods


Commencing February 2009, the following strategies were employed: (a) Prior to GPI administration, patients were assessed for bleeding propensity. (b) Eptifibatide was the only GPI used. (c) Bolus only or bolus and abbreviated (<8 h) drip GPI were preferred over the traditional 18-h administration. Both major ischemic and bleeding events as well as adjunctive therapy were recorded.




Methods


Commencing February 2009, the following strategies were employed: (a) Prior to GPI administration, patients were assessed for bleeding propensity. (b) Eptifibatide was the only GPI used. (c) Bolus only or bolus and abbreviated (<8 h) drip GPI were preferred over the traditional 18-h administration. Both major ischemic and bleeding events as well as adjunctive therapy were recorded.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 16, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Change of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors strategies in percutaneous coronary interventions and the rate of ischemic and bleeding complications

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access