Larry M. Baddour, William K. Freeman, Rakesh M. Suri, Walter R. Wilson
Cardiovascular Infections
Historically, the focus of cardiovascular infections has been on infective endocarditis (IE) as the primary syndrome. In this chapter, infections that involve cardiovascular devices, including permanent pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, coronary stents, and ventricular assist devices, also are addressed, because infection is a frequent complication with some devices, often necessitating their removal. Moreover, the indications for devices continue to expand, involving an increasing number of patients, particularly among aging populations in many developed countries. These devices may be lifesaving and improve quality of life, but device removal generally is required for infection cure, and removal procedures are associated with notable morbidity and mortality. Certain aspects of antimicrobial therapy also are unique, inasmuch as IE often is caused by multi-drug–resistant organisms acquired in the health care setting. Consequently, fewer drugs are available for treating these infections, with an increased likelihood of drug-related toxicities. In addition, longer durations of therapy may be needed, which can enhance the rate of drug-induced adverse events.
Infective Endocarditis
Before the pandemic of human immunodeficiency virus infection, IE was the syndrome for which the expertise of infectious diseases physicians was almost universally requested. IE has the proclivity to cause complications both at the cardiac valve site and at extracardiac locations that can predispose affected patients to serious morbidity and mortality. It is for these reasons that management of IE requires a team approach, which generally includes specialists in infectious diseases, cardiovascular medicine, and cardiovascular surgery with particular expertise in IE. Thus every patient with IE should be managed in the inpatient setting of a medical center with experienced medical and surgical specialists to provide care, which often includes emergent diagnostic and surgical interventions.
Epidemiology
The global burden of disease due to IE is largely unknown. Much of the world’s population lives in developing countries, where many people do not have routine access to advanced medical care. In addition, in most of these countries, no infrastructure exists on either a local or countrywide level for disease reporting (see Chapter 2). Thus the clinical characterization of IE is a biased one that is shaped by the collective experiences at large teaching facilities in countries where patient access is available and disease reporting is done. However, even in many developed countries, including the United States, IE is not included among the diagnoses requiring mandatory reporting to public health agencies that would define a statewide or national disease incidence or burden.
IE is a heterogeneous syndrome that is heavily influenced by the epidemiology of the infection. For example, in developing countries where rheumatic fever is still endemic, younger adults with long-standing rheumatic heart disease commonly present with a subacute clinical course spanning several weeks that involves left-sided native valve infection due to viridans group streptococci. By contrast, in large, teaching, tertiary care centers in developed countries, patients with previous health care exposure frequently present with an acute illness that can be measured in days and is due to Staphylococcus aureus, with numerous anatomic sites of metastatic foci of infection and worse outcomes.
The incidence of IE is influenced by multiple host factors that modify the risk of infection. Such factors include the underlying anatomic (usually valvular) cardiac conditions that result in turbulent blood flow and endothelial cell disruption (see the Pathogenesis section). In addition, aging of the population in developed countries has resulted in a greater number of patients with myxomatous degeneration of the mitral valve with subsequent prolapse and insufficiency (see Chapter 63), while at the same time a dramatic fall in the incidence of rheumatic fever has reduced the overall risk of IE in younger persons. Advances in medicine also alter the incidence of IE. For example, reduced use of tunneled catheters with an increasing use of arteriovenous fistulas for chronic hemodialysis will reduce the risk of bloodstream infection. Improvement in oral health in developed countries also may affect the incidence of IE, but this remains to be determined.
Population-based studies1,2 have been used to estimate both the incidence of IE and its clinical characterization, but complete case ascertainment is difficult to secure. For example, in the United States, patients may receive medical care in locations that are not in their place of residence. Thus large medical centers that have unique expertise in endocarditis management may be unable to obtain complete case ascertainment in a population owing to changing referral patterns or second-party coverage. Data generated from a population-based investigation will have limited applicability (generalizability) if the cohort under study is not representative of other populations in demographic or clinical features,.
Incidence studies of IE are limited in number and in geographic coverage of populations.1,2 The incidence reported among surveys from Western Europe and Olmsted County, Minnesota, has been stable for many years, at fewer than 10 cases per 100,000 person-years, with the exception of one analysis3 from northwestern Italy that demonstrated a small but statistically significant increase in incidence. Historically, a sex predilection has been noted, with males more often affected by IE. This is due in part to a major contribution of injection drug use, which more frequently is reported among men, but even in cohorts with IE and a low frequency of reported injection drug use, males still predominate. This male predominance may be fading, as reported in a recent analysis2 in which the female incidence had increased, with a high level of health care exposure cited as a predisposing condition for the development of IE. Thus access to health care can influence the epidemiology of IE.
Health care exposure, including both nosocomial and nonnosocomial exposure, has been recognized only recently2,4 as a major contributor to the development of IE. Not only do indwelling central venous catheters and hemodialysis predispose to bloodstream infection, but infection with antimicrobial resistant pathogens is more likely to occur as a consequence of health care–related exposure. The virulence of some of these pathogens, in particular, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), is notable and is associated with increased mortality in patients with IE.
Injection drug users are a unique group at increased risk for IE. Thus the modified Duke criteria5 include injection drug use as a “minor” criterion to satisfy a case definition of IE. These patients, who tend to be young, male, and otherwise healthy, account for a large proportion of IE cases in inner city medical centers in developed countries.6 Their contact with the health care system often is limited to short stays in an emergency department. Some patients, however, harbor chronic bloodborne viral infections, including those due to hepatitis viruses and human immunodeficiency virus, often unrecognized until the affected person presents with manifestations of IE and undergoes subsequent screening for viral infections not directly related to heart valve infection. The predominant pathogen involving this group of patients with IE is S. aureus; less common is a panoply of other organisms, including aerobic gram-negative bacilli and anaerobic and aerobic oral flora, with polymicrobial infections also seen in a minority of patients. Patients tend to delay seeking medical care and present with systemic complications of infection. Because the right side of the heart, especially the tricuspid valve associated with heroin use,6 commonly is involved, patients often present with pulmonary complications, including septic pulmonary emboli, empyema, and lung abscesses. In a minority of patients, bilateral IE develops, with complications involving both the pulmonary and systemic circulations. Although outcomes of injection drug–using patients with right-sided IE generally are good, these patients are well recognized to be at risk for recurrent bouts of IE, particularly if they continue injecting illicit drugs and if prosthetic valve placement was required to treat the previous valve infection.
Pathogenesis
Investigations that examine pathogenic mechanisms will likely lead to the development of future novel therapies, many of them unrelated to the traditional activities of antimicrobial agents that will be used in the management and prevention of IE.
Two overarching aspects of endocarditis pathogenesis have been identified.7 Already noted is a primary predilection for development of IE due to an underlying valvular or nonvalvular cardiac structural abnormality that results in blood flow turbulence, endothelial disruption, and platelet and fibrin deposition. This lesion, termed nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE), serves as a nidus for subsequent adhesion by bacteria or fungi in the bloodstream. This pathway is thought to account for a majority of cases of IE, most often related to left-sided valvular stenosis or regurgitation. This picture of pathogenesis is mirrored, in many ways, by the animal model of endocarditis that has been used for decades to examine the pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention of IE. The microbiologic and histopathologic findings in infected animals are reflective of those seen in humans. A second notion is that infection may involve normal valves. Some reservations regarding this pathway of infection seem appropriate, because it is impossible to know if a valve is completely normal, including its endothelial surface, before onset of valve infection. In addition, animals do not develop experimental endocarditis after an intravascular challenge with a relatively large inoculum of virulent organisms, in particular S. aureus, in the absence of a previous disruption of the cardiac endothelial surface. Nevertheless, in vitro endothelial cell cultures studies have demonstrated uptake of organisms by endothelial cells.
The predominance of gram-positive cocci as causes of IE deserves additional comment. Advances in molecular biologic techniques have resulted in the ability to define virulence factors that are unique to these organisms.9 Infectivity studies that have compared “wild type” parent strains to molecularly “engineered” strains using an experimental IE model have been of critical importance in defining virulence factors among strains of staphylococci, streptococci, and enterococci. Some of these factors serve as “adhesins” and are largely responsible for initial bacterial attachment to an NBTE nidus or to endothelial cells. They also are responsible for the attachment to medical devices, including prosthetic valves and cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) leads. In this regard, biofilm formation occurs with some of these organisms and is important in both native tissue and prosthetic valve infections in the context of factors that are responsible for the propagation of IE after initial bacterial attachment.
The findings from these investigations are expected to affect future treatment and prevention of IE. Novel vaccines containing bacterial proteins that function as adhesins and are good immunogens are being examined, for example, and already have proved to be efficacious in the prevention of experimental IE. In this case, the protein (FimA)10 is expressed by several species of viridans group streptococci in the pathogenesis of IE. In addition, it is conceivable that work focusing on treatment and prevention of dental caries by viridans group streptococci could have some role in the management and prevention of IE.
Clinical Presentation
Predisposing Cardiac Conditions
Predisposing conditions to IE have evolved over the decades since early clinical series were reported. More recently, the International Collaboration on Endocarditis–Prospective Cohort Study (ICE-PCS)8 has detailed the clinical presentation in 2781 patients with definite IE. Native valve IE was predominant (72%), followed by prosthetic valve endocarditis (21%) and pacemaker or ICD IE (7%). Consistent with numerous earlier series, this international cohort study found that IE manifests with definite vegetations most commonly in the mitral valve position (41%), followed by the aortic valve position (38%), whereas the tricuspid (12%) and pulmonary (1%) valves were much less frequently involved.8
Preexisting valvular regurgitant lesions are far more prone to infection than stenotic lesions. It has been suggested that the incidence of IE is directly related to the impact of pressure on the closed valve, with shear stress disruption of the valvular endothelium in the vicinity of the egressing regurgitant jet. In the presence of the Venturi effect, circulating organisms are deposited within the high-velocity, lowered-pressure eddy zones of the regurgitant orifice of the receiving chamber, leading to the typical localization of vegetations on the upstream aspect of the infected valve.
Mitral regurgitation associated with degenerative mitral valve prolapse, particularly with advanced myxomatous leaflet thickening, is the most common predisposing condition for IE and is far more common than rheumatic mitral valve disease.8 Functional mitral regurgitation, associated with left ventricular (LV) remodeling causing mal-coaptation of intrinsically normal mitral leaflets in a low-pressure, low-cardiac-output state, also is quite uncommonly complicated by IE. The second most common native valve lesion predisposing to IE is aortic regurgitation. The risk of IE in patients with bicuspid aortic valve is low, with an incidence of approximately 2% during follow-up periods ranging from 9 to 20 years.11,12 Bicuspid aortic valve, however, is relatively common (16% to 43%) in case series of confirmed aortic valve IE,13,14 is associated with a high incidence of periannular complications of IE (50% to 64%), and is a strong independent predictor of perivalvular extension of infection.13 In patients older than 65 years of age, nonrheumatic aortic stenosis is seen as the aortic valve lesion in IE at a rate almost three times that of younger patients (28% and 10%, respectively).15
Congenital heart disease, other than bicuspid aortic valve disease, is a predisposing condition to IE in approximately 5% to 12% of cases1,8,16 Unrepaired ventricular septal defects are the most frequent congenital heart disease lesions associated with IE, followed by ventricular outflow tract obstructive lesions, such as with tetralogy of Fallot.17 Any highly turbulent shunt lesion can predispose affected patients to IE, as can the presence of prosthetic material employed for palliative shunts, conduits, or shunt closures, particularly if a residual shunt is present after surgical intervention. Low-velocity/low-turbulence shunt lesions, such as secundum atrial septal defect, are far less prone to endocardial disruption and are associated with a very low incidence of IE.17
A number of additional conditions contribute to the above anatomic cardiac lesions in the predisposition to risk of IE. These include a history of previous IE, the presence of chronic intravenous access, intravenous drug abuse, and indwelling endocavitary devices. Predisposing general medical conditions include diabetes mellitus, underlying malignancy, renal failure requiring hemodialysis, and chronic immunosuppressive therapy.8,16 A history of an invasive or dental procedure can be identified in approximately 25% of patients within 60 days of clinical presentation with IE.8 A history of cardiac disease may be present in approximately 50% to 65% of patients.18 Superimposed and of mounting concern is the increasing frequency of health care–associated IE. In a recent report from the ICE-PCS investigators,19 19% of the cases in a study cohort of 1622 patients with IE were considered to be nosocomial (defined as related to hospitalization for more than 2 days before presentation with IE). An additional 16% of cases were related to non-nosocomial health care (e.g., outpatient hemodialysis, intravenous chemotherapy, wound care, or residence in a long-term care facility) received within 30 days of onset of symptoms of IE.
Physical Examination
Potential findings on physical examination are delineated in Table 64-2. These data are approximated from both older and more recently reported clinical series.8,16,19,22–24 A definite murmur is audible in at least 80% of patients on presentation, particularly with left-sided IE. In the large International Collaboration on Endocarditis–Prospective Cohort Study (ICE-PCS), the murmur was new in almost 50% of the patients.8 The same cohort study found that worsening of a preexisting murmur occurred in 20% of cases. The presence of a new heart murmur also is noted more frequently in patients with IE complicated by heart failure,22 and an S3 gallop and pulmonary rales would further substantiate this diagnosis. Murmurs are detected in less than half of patients with IE complicating an implanted cardiac device20 and are uncommonly heard in patients with right-sided IE. Heart murmurs associated with acute IE complicated by extensive left-sided valvular destruction with acute, severe regurgitation may also be deceptively unimpressive owing to the nature of the decompensated hemodynamics in these unstable patients. Precipitous heart failure, pulmonary edema, and cardiogenic shock are most often associated with severe acute aortic regurgitation associated with IE, less so by severe acute mitral regurgitation. Severe tricuspid regurgitation, even as an acute complication of IE, is far better tolerated.
TABLE 64-2
Physical Findings in Infective Endocarditis
SIGN | PATIENTS AFFECTED (%) |
Fever |