and Branched Endografts

div epub:type=”chapter” role=”doc-chapter”>



© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021
J. J. Hoballah, C. F. Bechara (eds.)Vascular Reconstructionshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1089-3_32


32. Fenestrated and Branched Endografts



Aleem K. Mirza1  , Gustavo S. Oderich1   and Bernardo C. Mendes1  


(1)
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Gonda Vascular Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

 



 

Aleem K. Mirza



 

Gustavo S. Oderich



 

Bernardo C. Mendes (Corresponding author)



Keywords
Abdominal aortic aneurysmThoracoabdominalFenestratedBranchedEndovascular


Fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair is evolving and achieving its maturity in treatment of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Excellent early- and long-term results have been reported by multiple institutions. These procedures are complex and require advanced endovascular imaging and technique. The objective of this chapter is to provide a summary of different stent graft designs and general technical principles of implantation.


Introduction


Fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR) has rapidly developed since the 1990s. The first fenestrated repair was performed in 1996 by Park, using a modified device with a single fenestration to incorporate an accessory renal artery for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) [1]. A year later, a research team in Perth, Australia, led by Tom Browne, Michael Lawrence-Browne, and David Hartley, also demonstrated target-vessel preservation in an animal model with a single fenestration. In 1998, Dr. John Anderson performed the first clinical fenestrated repair for a juxtarenal AAA in Adelaide, Australia, without placement of an aligning stent. Anderson later partnered with the research team from Perth, adding a balloon-expandable stent to the technique in order to fix the fenestration to the target-vessel orifice [2]. The technology rapidly spread through Australia, Asia, and Europe, before it was adopted and subsequently popularized in the United States by Roy Greenberg [3]. The technology was first applied to thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) by Michael Denton, with incorporation of the celiac axis (CA) and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) [1].


Many adjuncts and improvements have been added to the technique, including nitinol rings for reinforcement of the fenestrations, radiopaque markers to facilitate orientation of the main body and identification of the fenestrations, as well as diameter-reducing ties to allow for intracorporeal maneuvering of the device (Fig. 32.1). This led to the development of the Cook Zenith Fenestrated AAA Endovascular stent-graft (Cook Medical Inc., Bloomington, IN), which was commercially approved in the USA by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2012 [4]. Advances in the technology have continued, with the addition of preloaded catheters/wires, directional branches, inner branches, upper extremity access, and off-the-shelf devices. Application of this technology has also progressed, from juxtarenal AAA to TAAA, chronic post-dissection aneurysms, and more recently, to aortic arch pathologies [1].



../images/60971_2_En_32_Chapter/60971_2_En_32_Fig1_HTML.png

Fig. 32.1

Development of fenestrated endovascular aortic repair. (a) The Perth research team of Tom Browne, David Hartley, and Michael Lawrence-Brown based the initial fenestrated graft design on the Zenith Bifurcated Stent with a non-reinforced fenestration and radiopaque markers; struts crossed the fenestration, which was not intended to be stented. (b) Wolf Stelter in Germany suggested the concept of a separate tubular component with fenestrations and a distal bifurcated component. Roy Greenberg in the USA is credited with applying the technology to wide clinical use. Note that the fenestrations were not reinforced at this point, but the design evolved to avoid struts across the fenestrations. (c) The graft evolved to include a nitinol-reinforced ring and gold radiopaque markers, the use of covered stents to replace bare metal stents for alignment of fenestrations, and diameter-reducing ties. (By permission of Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. All rights reserved. Adapted from Roeder et al. [1]; with permission)


Stent-Graft Designs


It is important to note that some of the stent-grafts discussed in this section are still in clinical trials and are not commercially available.


Cook Zenith Fenestrated Stent-Graft


The Cook Zenith Fenestrated was approved by the FDA for use in the United States for aneurysms with short infrarenal necks, measuring >4 and < 15 mm. The components of the device include a proximal fenestrated main body, with a universal bifurcated distal device and contralateral limb extension. The device is constructed of woven polyester, sewn to self-expandable stainless steel Cook Z-stents. The fenestrated component is patient-specific, custom-made for each patient’s anatomy. Designs may include up to three fenestrations, of which two can be of the same type. Options include small fenestrations (6 × 6 mm or 6 × 8 mm) that are reinforced with nitinol, with no stent struts crossing through the fenestration. Large fenestrations (8–12 mm) are not nitinol-reinforced and may have struts crossing through the fenestration, making placement of alignment stents more difficult. Scallops are openings in the cephalad edge of the graft fabric, which measure 10 mm wide by 6–12 mm high (Fig. 32.2) [4].



../images/60971_2_En_32_Chapter/60971_2_En_32_Fig2_HTML.png

Fig. 32.2

Multiple device designs are in use or are currently under investigation, including off-the-shelf stent-grafts such as the Cook t-Branch, Cook p-Branch, WL Gore Thoracoabdominal Multibranch Endoprosthesis (TAMBE), and the Medtronic platform. Additionally, multiple different configurations can be obtained utilizing a patient-specific platform, with any combination of down-going branches and fenestrations, with or without tapering of the device. (By permission of Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. All rights reserved. Adapted from Roeder et al. [5]; with permission)


Cook p-Branch


The Cook p-Branch is an off-the-shelf stent-graft, constructed of polyester with a proximal stainless steel uncovered stent with barbs. Distal to this, it is reinforced with nitinol Z-stents. The modular system measures 26–36 mm in diameter, tapering distal to the renal fenestrations to 24 mm. The design includes a scallop for the CA, one fixed 8-mm strut-free fenestration for the SMA, and two pivot fenestrations for each renal artery, which have outer diameters of 15 mm and inner diameters of 6 mm. There are preloaded wires for both renal pivot fenestrations, and a diameter-reducing constraining wire to allow for intracorporeal manipulation and orientation. Two configurations are available; one option includes renal fenestrations at the same longitudinal level, and the other has the left renal fenestration 4 mm caudal to the right renal. The device is deployed through a 20 Fr delivery system [6].


Cook t-Branch


The Cook t-Branch is an off-the-shelf stent-graft intended for treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. It is constructed of woven polyester sutured to stainless steel Z-stents. Proximally, the diameter is 34 mm, tapering to 18 mm distally. The device length is 202 mm. At the mid portion of the graft, there are four external, caudally directed cuffs that are located 18 mm apart longitudinally. The CA and SMA cuffs are axially located at the 01:00 and 12:00 positions respectively. The two renal cuffs are located at the 10:00 and 03:00 positions. There are no preloaded wires or catheters, and the device is deployed through a 22 Fr system [7].


WL Gore Thoracoabdominal Branched Endoprosthesis (TAMBE)


The Gore TAMBE is an off-the-shelf, multicomponent system with a proximal multibranched component, a distal bifurcated piece, and iliac limb extensions. Several configurations are available for visceral vessel incorporation, originally designed with the option of antegrade or retrograde renal artery portals. An upcoming clinical trial will include the design with four antegrade portals, with proximal diameters of 31 or 37 mm, a length of 160 mm, and a distal diameter of 20 mm [8]. The delivery system requires a 22 Fr sheath. The device has pre-cannulated, removable guiding tubes through all portals, which will assist with preloading of guidewires.


Preoperative Planning


The most important aspect of preoperative planning is identification of a healthy proximal and distal sealing zone (Fig. 32.3). Preoperative CT angiography (CTA) should be evaluated with centerline of flow (CLF) imaging. This will provide the greatest amount of information on the extent of disease. Aortic dilatation can be readily identified, compared with adjacent segments, and evaluated for specific vessel involvement. Generally, a minimum of 2 cm of length is preferred for sealing zones, with a segment of parallel aortic walls. Segments with a reverse conic configuration, or those with significant calcium or thrombus, are not suitable necks and should be considered part of the pathology [9].


Supra-celiac sealing zones are preferred whenever feasible. Our practice is to treat pararenal aneurysms with at least three fenestrations and a CA scallop, whereas paravisceral and extent IV TAAAs are typically repaired with four fenestrations. The authors favor a sealing length of 2.5 cm for TAAAs, and if there are no paired intercostal arteries cephalad to this, the sealing zone is extended for 3–4 cm [9].


The method of target vessel incorporation is largely based on anatomy. Fenestrations are selected when the vessels originate from narrower aortic diameters (<30 mm). This is the method most often used for pararenal and extent IV TAAAs. Additionally, fenestrations are preferred for renal artery incorporation if possible, because of their excellent 5-year patency rates. Transversely oriented or up-going vessels—frequently seen in extent I TAAAs—are also well suited for fenestrations. Directional branches are utilized for more extensive aneurysms, in which the inner aortic diameter is >30 mm. They are advantageous particularly for caudally oriented vessels such as the CA and SMA, or when renal arteries are down-going. Directional branches are typically deployed 2 cm cephalad to their intended target, resulting in the need for higher sealing zones.


Repair is usually performed with access via one or both iliofemoral arteries. The CTA should be scrutinized for small-caliber iliac arteries, severe calcification, occlusion, or tortuosity. In these cases, iliofemoral conduits may be required. Upper extremity access is an important adjunct in complex cases that involve directional down-going branches, or when target vessels are caudally oriented. The CA frequently can demonstrate stenosis due to median arcuate ligament compression, and efficient cannulation in these cases is also facilitated by an upper extremity approach. Many operators prefer left-sided upper extremity access to avoid crossing the aortic arch. The authors’ practice has evolved away from selecting the left side whenever feasible, moving to the right side because of evidence of equivalent cerebroembolic complications. In addition, the right arm can be tucked at the patient’s side to simulate femoral access, decreasing operator radiation exposure and improving ergonomics and workflow. Aortic arch anatomy should always be assessed, including arch type and thrombus and calcium burden, as well as disease of the supra-aortic trunks. Type III and some type II arches are better suited for left-sided access to prevent undue strain and manipulation of the arch.



../images/60971_2_En_32_Chapter/60971_2_En_32_Fig3_HTML.png

Fig. 32.3

(a) Suboptimal necks for endovascular aortic repair and selection of parallel walled aorta for placement of endograft. (b) Selection of healthy landing zones. Note the minimum of 2.5–3 cm used by the authors, ideally in the supra-celiac segment, with a minimum of a double scallop for the celiac axis, with maximization of the neck and sealing zone if there are no intercostal artery pairs in the area. (c) Longer lengths are needed in tortuous segments, such as in the aortic arch, or in patients with familial history of aortic disease, ectasia, or thrombus-laden aorta. (By permission of Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. All rights reserved. Adapted from Oderich and Mendes [9]; with permission)

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 25, 2021 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on and Branched Endografts

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access