A Propensity-Matched Study of the Association of Diabetes Mellitus With Incident Heart Failure and Mortality Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults




Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a risk factor for incident heart failure (HF) in older adults. However, the extent to which this association is independent of other risk factors remains unclear. Of 5,464 community-dwelling adults ≥65 years old in the Cardiovascular Health Study without baseline HF, 862 had DM (fasting plasma glucose levels ≥126 mg/dl or treatment with insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents). Propensity scores for DM were estimated for each of the 5,464 participants and were used to assemble a cohort of 717 pairs of participants with and without DM who were balanced in 65 baseline characteristics. Incident HF occurred in 31% and 26% of matched participants with and without DM, respectively, during >13 years of follow-up (hazard ratio 1.45 for DM vs no DM, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14 to 1.86, p = 0.003). Of the 5,464 participants before matching unadjusted and multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios for incident HF associated with DM were 2.22 (95% CI 1.94 to 2.55, p <0.001) and 1.52 (95% CI 1.30 to 1.78, p <0.001), respectively. All-cause mortality occurred in 57% and 47% of matched participants with and without DM, respectively (hazard ratio 1.35, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.61, p = 0.001). Of matched participants DM-associated hazard ratios for incident peripheral arterial disease, incident acute myocardial infarction, and incident stroke were 2.50 (95% CI 1.45 to 4.32, p = 0.001), 1.37 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.93, p = 0.072), and 1.11 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.51, p = 0.527), respectively. In conclusion, the association of DM with incident HF and all-cause mortality in community-dwelling older adults without HF is independent of major baseline cardiovascular risk factors.


Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major risk factor for incident heart failure (HF). However, DM is also associated with many traditional cardiovascular risk factors. The extent to which the association of DM with incident HF is independent of other cardiovascular risk factors remains unclear. Although traditional multivariable risk adjustment models can account for baseline differences in the distribution of such risk factors, they cannot guarantee that they would be balanced. Propensity-score matching, in contrast, can be used for outcome-blinded assembly of study cohorts in which exposed and unexposed groups are balanced in all measured baseline characteristics. Therefore, we conducted a propensity-matched study of the association of DM with incident HF, mortality, and incident cardiovascular events.


Methods


The Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) is a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute–funded prospective study designed to assess traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors in community-dwelling older adults. The CHS recruited 5,888 Medicare-eligible community-dwelling adults ≥65 years of age from 4 United States communities in 2 phases. A mostly white initial cohort of 5,201 participants (1989 through 1990) was later supplemented by 687 African-Americans from 3 of those 4 communities (1992 through 1993). We used a de-identified public-use copy of the CHS dataset obtained from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, which contained information on 5,795 participants who consented to be included in that dataset. After excluding 63 participants without data on DM status and 268 participants with prevalent HF at baseline, the final sample for the present analysis was 5,464 participants.


Baseline DM was defined by a fasting plasma glucose level >126 mg/dl or treatment with insulin or hypoglycemic drugs and 16% of CHS participants (862 of 5,464) had DM. Data on sociodemographic, clinical, subclinical, and laboratory variables including serum insulin, triglyceride, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein levels were measured at baseline. If the value of a continuous variable was found to be missing, then predicted values based on age, gender, and race were imputed. The primary outcome for this study was incident HF, which was centrally adjudicated by the CHS events committee. Data on self-reports of physician diagnosis of HF were obtained during semiannual visits, which was then verified by review of medical records. Secondary outcomes included all-cause and cause-specific mortalities, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, and peripheral arterial disease.


Propensity scores, or the conditional probability of having DM, were estimated for each of the 5,464 participants using a nonparsimonious multivariable logistic regression model in which DM was the dependent variable and the 65 baseline characteristics were covariates. We then used propensity scores to match 717 participants (83% of 862) with DM to 717 of those without DM who had similar propensity scores. Absolute standardized differences before and after matching for all 65 covariates were estimated and presented as a Love plot ( Figure 1 ). An absolute standardized difference <10% indicates inconsequential imbalances, whereas 0% indicates no between-group imbalances on that covariate.




Figure 1


Absolute standardized differences comparing 65 baseline characteristics in the CHS between participants with and without diabetes mellitus before and after propensity-score matching. ACE = angiotensin-converting enzyme; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; EKG = electrocardiogram; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; LV = left ventricular; MMSE = Mini-mental Status Examination; NSAIDs = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.


For between-group comparisons for data before and after matching we used Pearson chi-square tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, McNemar tests, and paired-sample t tests, as appropriate. Kaplan–Meier and matched Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to estimate associations between DM and outcomes. Formal sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine the impact of a potential hidden confounder on the association between DM and incident HF in the matched cohort. Subgroup analyses were performed to determine the homogeneity of this association. Two-tailed statistical tests with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were employed with a p value <0.05 considered statistically significant. All data analysis was completed using SPSS 15 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Illinois).




Results


Our matched cohort had a mean age ± SD of 73 ± 6 years, 51% were women, and 21% were African-American ( Table 1 ). Before matching, participants with DM were more likely to have a history of coronary artery disease, hypertension, and stroke and higher mean serum insulin, triglyceride, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein levels. These and other imbalances were balanced in the matched cohort ( Figure 1 , Table 1 ).



Table 1

Baseline characteristics of patients by diabetes before and after propensity matching































































































































































































































































































































































































































































Before Matching After Matching
DM p Value DM p Value
No Yes No Yes
(n = 4,602) (n = 862) (n = 717) (n = 717)
Age (years) 73 ± 6 73 ± 5 0.936 73 ± 5 73 ± 6 0.646
Women 2,714 (59%) 434 (50%) <0.001 364 (51%) 367 (51%) 0.916
African-American 610 (13%) 204 (24%) <0.001 144 (20%) 159 (22%) 0.361
Body mass index (kg/m 2 ) 26 ± 4 28 ± 4 <0.001 28 ± 4 28 ± 4 0.409
Married 3,101 (67%) 541 (63%) 0.008 463 (65%) 462 (64%) 1.000
Current smoker 580 (13%) 85 (10%) 0.024 79 (11%) 73 (10%) 0.666
Smoking (pack-years) 17 ± 26 20 ± 30 0.006 19 ± 28 19 ± 28 0.581
Alcohol intake (units/week) 3 ± 7 2 ± 5 <0.001 2 ± 6 2 ± 5 0.800
General health, fair to poor 948 (21%) 329 (38%) <0.001 258 (36%) 247 (34%) 0.541
Medical history
Coronary artery disease 743 (16%) 209 (24%) <0.001 172 (24%) 165 (23%) 0.709
Acute myocardial infarction 332 (7%) 108 (13%) <0.001 87 (12%) 85 (12%) 0.935
Angina pectoris 617 (13%) 174 (20%) <0.001 148 (21%) 135 (19%) 0.426
Coronary artery bypass surgery 154 (3%) 51 (6%) <0.001 40 (6%) 38 (5%) 0.905
Hypertension 2,556 (56%) 623 (72%) <0.001 505 (70%) 506 (71%) 1.000
Chronic kidney disease 952 (21%) 190 (22%) 0.369 152 (21%) 152 (21%) 1.000
Stroke 154 (3%) 55 (6%) <0.001 34 (5%) 39 (5%) 0.620
Transient ischemic attack 107 (2%) 34 (4%) 0.006 27 (4%) 24 (3%) 0.775
Peripheral arterial disease 511 (11%) 169 (20%) <0.001 130 (18%) 134 (19%) 0.832
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 581 (13%) 95 (11%) 0.189 86 (12%) 80 (11%) 0.685
Cancer 669 (15%) 111 (13%) 0.201 93 (12%) 93 (13%) 1.000
Clinical examination
Pulse rate (beats/min) 67 ± 11 71 ± 12 <0.001 70 ± 11 70 ± 12 0.895
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 136 ± 21 141 ± 21 <0.001 140 ± 22 140 ± 21 0.990
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 71 ± 11 71 ± 12 0.631 71 ± 11 71 ± 12 0.558
Medications
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor 254 (6%) 95 (11%) <0.001 77 (11%) 74 (10%) 0.857
β Blocker 553 (12%) 142 (17%) <0.001 130 (18%) 117 (16%) 0.411
Calcium channel blocker 527 (12%) 158 (18%) <0.001 129 (18%) 126 (18%) 0.891
Statin 94 (2%) 27 (3%) 0.046 22 (3%) 19 (3%) 0.755
Loop diuretic 183 (4%) 76 (9%) <0.001 62 (9%) 53 (7%) 0.444
Thiazide diuretic 489 (11%) 130 (15%) <0.001 109 (15%) 103 (14%) 0.701
Nitrate 323 (7%) 91 (11%) <0.001 69 (10%) 73 (10%) 0.789
Digoxin 259 (6%) 101 (12%) <0.001 59 (8%) 65 (9%) 0.631
Laboratory values
Creatinine (mg/dl) 0.95 ± 0.32 1.00 ± 0.60 0.001 0.99 ± 0.34 0.99 ± 0.64 0.877
Potassium (mEq/L) 4.16 ± 0.37 4.16 ± 0.41 0.880 4.17 ± 0.40 4.16 ± 0.40 0.764
Cholesterol (mg/dl) 213 ± 38 206 ± 42 <0.001 205 ± 39 207 ± 42 0.398
Low-density lipoprotein (mg/dl) 131 ± 35 126 ± 38 <0.001 126 ± 34 127 ± 37 0.574
High-density lipoprotein (mg/dl) 56 ± 16 48 ± 13 <0.001 48 ± 12 48 ± 13 0.468
Triglyceride (mg/dl) 133 ± 67 172 ± 111 <0.001 163 ± 93 163 ± 93 0.915
Uric acid (mg/dl) 5.6 ± 1.5 5.8 ± 1.5 0.001 5.8 ± 1.5 5.8 ± 1.5 0.868
C-reactive protein (mg/L) 4.2 ± 7.0 6.8 ± 12.3 <0.001 6.1 ± 10.7 5.9 ± 8.2 0.671
Insulin (IU/ml) 14 ± 8 32 ± 56 <0.001 20 ± 15 20 ± 13 0.879
Interleukin-6 (pg/ml) 2.1 ± 1.8 2.6 ± 1.7 <0.001 2.4 ± 1.8 2.5 ± 1.6 0.560
Hemoglobin (g/dl) 14 ± 1 14 ± 1 <0.001 14 ± 1 14 ± 1 0.809
White blood cell count (10 3 /μl) 6.2 ± 2.0 6.8 ± 2.7 <0.001 7 ± 3 7 ± 2 0.547
Platelets (10 3 /μl) 252 ± 75 243 ± 75 0.001 247 ± 73 244 ± 75 0.410
Electrocardiographic findings
Left ventricular hypertrophy 192 (4%) 44 (5%) 0.217 38 (5%) 33 (5%) 0.625
Atrial fibrillation 91 (2%) 24 (3%) 0.130 17 (2%) 16 (2%) 1.000
Bundle branch block 357 (8%) 103 (12%) <0.001 84 (12%) 83 (12%) 1.000
Left ventricular systolic dysfunction 318 (7%) 93 (11%) <0.001 62 (9%) 71 (10%) 0.478

Values are presented as number (percentage) or mean ± SD.


Incident HF occurred in 31% and 26% of matched participants with and without DM, respectively, during >13 years of follow-up (hazard ratio 1.45, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.86, p = 0.003; ( Figure 2 , Table 2 ). A hidden binary covariate that is a near-perfect predictor of incident HF would need to increase the odds of DM by 23% to explain away this association. This association was homogenous across various subgroups of matched participants except that it was stronger in those without hypertension than in those with hypertension ( Figure 3 ). Associations of DM with incident HF before matching are listed in Table 2 .




Figure 2


Kaplan–Meier plots for (A) incident heart failure and (B) mortality from all causes by presence or absence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in a propensity-matched cohort of CHS participants. HR = hazard ratio.


Table 2

Association of baseline diabetes mellitus (DM) and incident heart failure in community-dwelling older adults without heart failure before and after propensity matching


































Percentage (events/total) Absolute Risk Difference (%) HR (95% CI) p Value
No DM DM
Unadjusted 19% (862/4,602) 32% (272/862) +13% 2.22 (1.94–2.55) <0.001
Multivariable adjusted 1.52 (1.30–1.78) <0.001
Propensity matched 26% (183/717) 31% (220/717) +5% 1.45 (1.14–1.86) 0.003

HR = hazard ratio.

Absolute risk differences were calculated by subtracting percent events in the no-diabetes group from that in the diabetes group.


Comparing diabetes to no diabetes.




Figure 3


Association of diabetes mellitus (DM) with incident heart failure in subgroups of propensity-matched CHS participants. Abbreviations as in Figure 2 .


All-cause mortality in the postmatch cohort occurred in 57% and 47% of participants with and without DM, respectively (hazard ratio 1.35, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.61, p = 0.001; Figure 2 , Table 3 ). Associations of DM with cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortalities are presented in Table 3 . Associations of DM with other incident cardiovascular outcomes are presented in Table 4 . Of those who developed incident HF only 25 patients (8%) had incident AMI before HF, which occurred in 1% (6 of 630) and 3% (19 of 632) of those with and without DM, respectively (p = 0.009).



Table 3

Association of baseline diabetes mellitus and all-cause and cause-specific mortalities in community-dwelling older adults without heart failure before and after propensity matching

































































































Percentage (events/total) Absolute Risk Difference (%) HR (95% CI) p Value
No DM DM
All-cause mortality
Unadjusted 41% (1,895/4,602) 59% (509/862) +18% 1.82 (1.65–2.01) <0.001
Multivariable adjusted 1.44 (1.29–1.62) <0.001
Propensity matched 47% (334/717) 57% (408/717) +10% 1.35 (1.13–1.61) 0.001
Cardiovascular mortality
Unadjusted 16% (724/4,602) 29% (248/862) +13% 2.31 (2.00–2.67) <0.001
Multivariable adjusted 1.65 (1.40–1.95) <0.001
Propensity matched 20% (142/717) 27% (192/717) +7% 1.53 (1.23–1.91) <0.001
Noncardiovascular mortality
Unadjusted 25% (1,165/4,602) 30% (260/862) +5% 1.52 (1.33–1.74) <0.001
Multivariable adjusted 1.32 (1.13–1.53) <0.001
Propensity matched 27% (190/717) 30% (215/717) +3% 1.30 (1.07–1.58) 0.008

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 16, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on A Propensity-Matched Study of the Association of Diabetes Mellitus With Incident Heart Failure and Mortality Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access