Which Treatment is Best for Functional Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation?


Parameter

Range of values

1. Mitral regurgitation severity

Mild

Moderate (ERO < 20 mm2)

Severe (ERO 20–40 mm2)

Very severe (ERO > 40 mm2)

2. Mitral leaflet tethering

None

Mild (tethering distance < 10 mm)

Severe (tethering distance ≥ 10 mm)

3. Left ventricle viability

Fully viable

Mostly viable (>5 LV segments viable)

Mostly non-viable (≤5 LV segments viable)

4. Left ventricle size

Mildly dilated

Moderately dilated

Severely dilated (LVEDD > 65 mm)

5. Left ventricle function

Mildly impaired

Moderately impaired

Severely impaired (LVEF < 30 %)


ERO effective regurgitation orifice area, LV left ventricle, LVEDD left ventricular end diastolic diameter, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction




Table 16.2
AHA/ACC grading of functional ischemic mitral regugitation severity










































Grade

Definition

Valve anatomy

Valve hemodynamics

Associated cardiac findings

Symptoms

A. At risk of MR

Normal valve leaflets, chords, and annulus in a patient with coronary disease or cardiomyopathy

No MR jet or small central jet area <20 % LA on Doppler,

Small vena contracta <0.30 cm

Normal or mildly dilated LV size with fixed (infarction) or inducible (ischemia) regional wall motion abnormalities

Primary myocardial disease with LV dilation and systolic dysfunction

Symptoms due to coronary ischemia or HF may be present that respond to revascularization and appropriate medical therapy

B. Progressive MR

Regional wall motion abnormalities with mild tethering of mitral leaflet.

Annular dilation with mild loss of central coaptation of the mitral leaflets

ERO < 0.20 cm2

Regurgitant volume <30 mL

Regurgitant fraction <50 %

Regional wall motion abnormalities with reduced LV systolic function.

LV dilation and systolic dysfunction due to primary myocardial disease

Symptoms due to coronary ischemia or HF may be present that respond to revascularization and appropriate medical therapy

C. Asymptomatic severe MR

Regional wall motion abnormalities and/or LV dilation with severe tethering of mitral leaflet.

Annular dilation with severe loss of central coaptation of the mitral leaflets

ERO >0.20 cm2

Regurgitant volume >30 mL

Regurgitant fraction >50 %

Regional wall motion abnormalities with reduced LV systolic function

LV dilation and systolic dysfunction due to primary myocardial disease

Symptoms due to coronary ischemia or HF may be present that respond to revascularization and appropriate medical therapy

D. Symptomatic severe MR

Regional wall motion abnormalities and/or LV dilation with severe tethering of mitral leaflet.

Annular dilation with severe loss of central coaptation of the mitral leaflets

ERO >0.20 cm2

Regurgitant volume >30 mL

Regurgitant fraction >50 %

Regional wall motion abnormalities with reduced LV systolic function.

LV dilation and systolic dysfunction due to primary myocardial disease

HF symptoms due to MR persist even after revascular-ization and optimization of medical therapy.

Decreased exercise tolerance.

Exertional dyspnea


From Nishimura et al. [4]. With permission from Elsevier



Table 16.3
Recommended interventions according to the severity of ischemic mitral regurgitation and other parameters (when there is an indication for coronary artery revascularisation)



















MR severity grade

Other parameters

Interventions

A. At risk of MR
 
Coronary revascularisation

B. Progressive MR

LV all viable

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 1, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Which Treatment is Best for Functional Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation?

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access